Positive mental health among children 11 years and under in Western countries: a scoping review to inform Canada’s public health surveillance

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-06 · read from full text

This scoping review examined how positive mental health (PMH) is conceptualized and measured among children under age 12, using peer-reviewed and grey literature searched up to January 31, 2023 and October 3, 2023, respectively. It screened 636 documents and included 39 peer-reviewed papers plus 65 grey literature sources, finding that many studies referenced at least one theory and that PMH concepts most often included hedonic well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, and social-emotional learning/positive development, with extracted risk and protective factors and both self- and other-rated measures. The authors conclude the existing Canadian PMH conceptual framework could be used for children with small modifications, but that additional work is needed before findings can support national surveillance, and they note this gap in age-appropriate PMH measurement. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background The Public Health Agency of Canada developed the Positive Mental Health Surveillance Indicator Framework (PMHSIF), which is used to monitor positive mental health (PMH) and its determinants in Canada. While adult and youth versions of the PMHSIF were released, additional research is needed to identify relevant and age-appropriate concepts of PMH among children. Methods A scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted to examine how PMH is conceptualized and measured among children (< 12 years). Online academic databases were searched up until January 31, 2023. Grey literature sources were conducted up until October 3, 2023. Data on study characteristics were extracted and some were tallied and explained. Measures of PMH were categorized as self- or other-rated. Results A total of 636 documents were identified through the search strategies. Of these, 65 documents from the grey literature and 39 peer-reviewed papers were included in this review. Many of the articles (74%) mentioned at least one theory in the introduction/background. The PMH concepts that emerged included: hedonic well-being (n=77), psychological well-being (n=41), social well-being (n=30), and social emotional learning and/or positive development (n=19). Various risk and protective factors were extracted. Conclusion The findings support the use of the existing Canadian PMH conceptual framework for children, albeit with small modifications to ensure that child-relevant pieces are reflected. Additional work is needed before these results can be used for national surveillance. This review addresses a gap in the literature, encourages routine reporting of child PMH across Canada, and better informs public health policy.
Full text 3,568 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background The Public Health Agency of Canada developed the Positive Mental Health Surveillance Indicator Framework (PMHSIF), which is used to monitor positive mental health (PMH) and its determinants in Canada. While adult and youth versions of the PMHSIF were released, additional research is needed to identify relevant and age-appropriate concepts of PMH among children.

Methods

A scoping review of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted to examine how PMH is conceptualized and measured among children (< 12 years). Online academic databases were searched up until January 31, 2023. Grey literature sources were conducted up until October 3, 2023. Data on study characteristics were extracted and some were tallied and explained. Measures of PMH were categorized as self- or other-rated.

Results

A total of 636 documents were identified through the search strategies. Of these, 65 documents from the grey literature and 39 peer-reviewed papers were included in this review. Many of the articles (74%) mentioned at least one theory in the introduction/background. The PMH concepts that emerged included: hedonic well-being (n=77), psychological well-being (n=41), social well-being (n=30), and social emotional learning and/or positive development (n=19). Various risk and protective factors were extracted.

Conclusion

The findings support the use of the existing Canadian PMH conceptual framework for children, albeit with small modifications to ensure that child-relevant pieces are reflected. Additional work is needed before these results can be used for national surveillance. This review addresses a gap in the literature, encourages routine reporting of child PMH across Canada, and better informs public health policy. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement Not applicable. Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: This is a scoping review of publicly available sources. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Availability of data and materials All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. Abbreviations - OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - PHAC - Public Health Agency of Canada - PMH - Positive mental health - PMHSIF - Positive Mental Health Surveillance Indicator Framework - WHO - World Health Organization

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00