Improving the diagnostics and treatment of patients with endometriosis : an algorithmic approach

dissertation OA: green CC0

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic condition in which tissue resembling the uterine lining grows outside the uterus, often causing debilitating symptoms such as severe pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and infertility. Its aetiology remains uncertain, and in the absence of a cure, management focuses on alleviating symptoms. Definitive diagnosis still relies on laparoscopic surgery and biopsy, an invasive and resource-intensive procedure that contributes to average diagnostic delays of 8-11 years. Such delays can exacerbate disease progression, compromise fertility, and impose significant physical, psychological, and economic burdens. These challenges highlight the urgent need for non-invasive, data-driven approaches to accelerate diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. Using endometriosis as a motivating example, this thesis first applies a six-phase thematic analysis (with an added preparatory step for translation and cleaning) to free-text survey responses from UK and Brazilian cohorts. It then develops a proof-of-concept diagnostic pipeline that integrates insights from these data with causal inference methods, producing probability estimates and symptom-level explanations that are transparent to clinicians. The long-term aim is to contribute to earlier, safer, and more interpretable decision support for endometriosis and related conditions. A modular Bayesian framework was designed to represent risk factors, conditions, and symptoms within a causal structure. The framework combines marginal probability propagation with counterfactual sufficiency and disablement scoring, adapted from Richens et al., to provide clinically meaningful explanations. It is parameterised with prevalence values derived from survey data and evaluated through clinician-designed vignette testing and parameter perturbation experiments, assessing plausibility, stability, and robustness under uncertainty. This work delivers a prototype pipeline linking patient-reported survey data to a causal diagnostic engine. It introduces population-specific profiles to make prevalence assumptions explicit, employs dual conditional probability tables and background terms to handle uncertainty, and offers transparent explanation scores aligned with clinical reasoning. While focused on endometriosis, the design principles are general, offering a transferable blueprint for causal, auditable decision support in medicine.
Full text 2,820 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Improving the diagnostics and treatment of patients with endometriosis : an algorithmic approach View/ Open Date 03/07/2026Author Supervisor Funder Grant ID 2589749 EP/T518062/1 Keywords Metadata Show full item recordAbstract Endometriosis is a chronic condition in which tissue resembling the uterine lining grows outside the uterus, often causing debilitating symptoms such as severe pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, and infertility. Its aetiology remains uncertain, and in the absence of a cure, management focuses on alleviating symptoms. Definitive diagnosis still relies on laparoscopic surgery and biopsy, an invasive and resource-intensive procedure that contributes to average diagnostic delays of 8-11 years. Such delays can exacerbate disease progression, compromise fertility, and impose significant physical, psychological, and economic burdens. These challenges highlight the urgent need for non-invasive, data-driven approaches to accelerate diagnosis and improve patient outcomes. Using endometriosis as a motivating example, this thesis first applies a six-phase thematic analysis (with an added preparatory step for translation and cleaning) to free-text survey responses from UK and Brazilian cohorts. It then develops a proof-of-concept diagnostic pipeline that integrates insights from these data with causal inference methods, producing probability estimates and symptom-level explanations that are transparent to clinicians. The long-term aim is to contribute to earlier, safer, and more interpretable decision support for endometriosis and related conditions. A modular Bayesian framework was designed to represent risk factors, conditions, and symptoms within a causal structure. The framework combines marginal probability propagation with counterfactual sufficiency and disablement scoring, adapted from Richens et al., to provide clinically meaningful explanations. It is parameterised with prevalence values derived from survey data and evaluated through clinician-designed vignette testing and parameter perturbation experiments, assessing plausibility, stability, and robustness under uncertainty. This work delivers a prototype pipeline linking patient-reported survey data to a causal diagnostic engine. It introduces population-specific profiles to make prevalence assumptions explicit, employs dual conditional probability tables and background terms to handle uncertainty, and offers transparent explanation scores aligned with clinical reasoning. While focused on endometriosis, the design principles are general, offering a transferable blueprint for causal, auditable decision support in medicine. Type Thesis, PhD Doctor of Philosophy Collections Items in the St Andrews Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisdysmenorrheadyspareuniainfertility

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:02:05.074954+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK