000152: WHICH IS THE BEST TECHNIQUE FOR ENDOMETRIAL SAMPLING? ASPIRATION (PIPELLE) VERSUS DILATATION AND CURETTAGE (D&C)

Fuat Demirkıran, Evrim Yavuz, Tugan Beşe, T. Bexe, Macit Arvas, C. Şanioǧlu, C. Ijanioglu, D. Kösebay
In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer · 2005 · vol. 15 , pp. 94 · doi:10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200509001-00148 · W3080820089
OA: closed CC0
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-20 ⓘ

This study compares aspiration (Pipelle) and dilatation and curettage (D&C) techniques to determine the best method for endometrial sampling in the context of endometriosis or adenomyosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-11-02T06:26:32.194460+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK