Transparency and Open Science Practices in Research on Emerging Adulthood

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This paper discusses reducing research degrees of freedom, increasing statistical power, and overcoming challenges to adopting open science practices in emerging adulthood research to promote transparency and reproducibility.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The replication crisis has become a major focus throughout the sciences, spurring discussions among researchers about the limits of the mainstream work produced in their fields. In response, there have been strong efforts towards developing solutions to address these limits, efforts that are broadly referred to as the open science movement. In this chapter, we highlight three core issues related to open science that are particularly important for producing and consuming research on emerging adulthood: 1) The importance of understanding and reducing research degrees of freedom across the research cycle; 2) the under-appreciated role of statistical power in quantitative studies, particularly when testing interaction effects; and 3) some of the unique challenges facing emerging adulthood researchers in adopting open science practices. Across the discussion, we provide concrete steps that researchers can take to promote the open science principles of transparency, credibility, reproducibility, and accessibility.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00