Veering Philosophy Towards Its Public Role

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-24 · read from full text

The provided “paper” text contains only a boilerplate description about licensing, copyright, and a template for publication fields, without any study aims, methods, results, or scientific findings. No population, experimental design, dataset, or conclusions are described, so there is no substantive biomedical content to summarize. The excerpt also does not include any explicit limitation statements from the authors beyond the general availability of a newer version. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The public role of philosophy is, in itself, both a deeply philosophical and a highly public matter. In this paper, the author argues for a stronger engagement of philosophy in social life, acknowledging that there is no straightforward or immediate solution to achieving this goal. The proposed approach focuses on exploring the internal tensions within philosophical thinking and writing, offering suggestions for adjustments to facilitate greater engagement. The main tensions analysed in the paper include: neutrality versus engagement, abstractness versus life-world relevance, finality versus openness, independence versus interdisciplinarity, jargon versus triviality, and philosophy for specialists versus philosophy for an engaged public. The paper concludes with a call for a more active role of philosophy in public life. This can be achieved by rethinking the value and importance of philosophical thinking. In this context, engaging in reflection on the public role of philosophy - its challenges, limitations and potential - is an important step toward veering philosophy toward a more engaged and socially relevant role.
Full text 621 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
There is a newer version available for this {{ publicationType }}. View latest version {{ publication.field_name }} {{ publication.subfield_name }} Copyright: © {{ publicationYear }} {{ publication.presentation_authors[0].full_name + (publication.presentation_authors.length > 1 ? ' et al' : '') }}. This is an open access publication distributed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Check the {{ publicationType | capitalize }} Source for copyright and license information. Listen on

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00