Dance as Embodied Pedagogy in Higher Education Physical Education: A Mixed-Methods Curriculum Pedagogical Programme

Dance as Embodied Pedagogy in Higher Education Physical Education: A Mixed-Methods Curriculum Pedagogical Programme | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Dance as Embodied Pedagogy in Higher Education Physical Education: A Mixed-Methods Curriculum Pedagogical Programme Ujang Maulana Yusup, Juju Masunah, Rita Milyartini This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-9001347/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Dance is frequently positioned in higher education physical education as an expressive or recreational activity, with limited attention to its pedagogical function in shaping meaningful learning experiences. This study examined how dance can operate as an embodied pedagogical approach within university physical education, particularly in a distance-learning context. A mixed-methods pedagogical programme was conducted with undergraduate students who participated in a six-week structured dance programme. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated to explore changes in student engagement, embodied awareness, and perceived learning outcomes. Findings indicated increased participation, deeper bodily awareness, and strengthened connections between movement, reflection, and self-regulation. Students described dance as fostering attentiveness to movement quality, relational interaction, and sustained motivation to engage in physical activity. The convergence of numerical trends and experiential accounts suggests that dance functioned not merely as physical exercise but as a mode of embodied learning aligned with curricular learning objectives. These findings contribute to sport pedagogy scholarship by positioning dance as a pedagogically purposeful practice capable of enhancing engagement and learning in higher education physical education, including flexible and distance delivery formats. The study contributes to physical education pedagogy by demonstrating how dance can operate as an embodied pedagogical model aligning movement practice with curriculum-based learning outcomes in higher education. Dance Pedagogy Embodied Learning Physical Education Higher Education Student Engagement Figures Figure 1 Introduction Dance occupies a complex and often marginal position within higher education physical education (PE). Although commonly included within university curricula, it is frequently approached as an expressive, recreational, or culturally enriching activity rather than as a pedagogical practice capable of supporting structured learning and demonstrable educational outcomes. Within contemporary sport pedagogy, however, increasing attention has shifted toward teaching approaches that emphasise meaningful movement experiences, relational engagement, and embodied participation beyond traditional emphases on fitness performance or sport-specific skill development. From this pedagogical standpoint, dance represents a form of learning through movement that integrates bodily awareness, rhythmic coordination, and reflective engagement. A substantial body of research has demonstrated that participation in structured dance activities contributes positively to physical capacity, functional mobility, and psychosocial well-being (Hwang & Braun, 2015 ; Silva et al., 2022 ; Kshtriya et al., 2015 ; Rehfeld et al., 2018 ). Nevertheless, much of this scholarship has been framed primarily through health and therapeutic perspectives, privileging physiological outcomes and behavioural benefits. Comparatively limited attention has been directed toward understanding dance as a pedagogical process within physical education itself specifically, how learning experiences are organised through movement, how students interpret embodied tasks, and how participation translates into recognised curricular learning achievements. As a consequence, dance continues to be legitimised largely through health-related outcomes rather than through theoretically grounded pedagogical rationales within PE. Recent developments in sport pedagogy have increasingly drawn upon theories of embodied learning to challenge enduring separations between cognition and movement (Shusterman, 2012; Fuchs & Koch, 2014 ). Embodied learning perspectives conceptualise knowledge as emerging through sensory perception, proprioceptive engagement, and affective experience. Within physical education contexts, this orientation reframes movement as a site of perception, reflection, and meaning-making rather than solely as observable performance. Dance-based activities, which demand sustained attention to posture, timing, breathing, and interpersonal coordination, provide structured opportunities through which learners may cultivate embodied awareness. Mehling et al.’s (2012) multidimensional model of body awareness further supports this perspective by identifying processes of noticing, interpreting, and responding to bodily sensations as legitimate forms of learning engagement. At the same time, higher education systems increasingly operate within outcome-based curriculum frameworks that require clear demonstration of student learning achievement. Principles of constructive alignment (Biggs & Tang, 2011 ) emphasise coherence between intended learning outcomes, teaching practices, and assessment strategies. Yet embodied pedagogies remain insufficiently theorised within such alignment processes. Physical education programmes often prioritise technical proficiency, tactical knowledge, or quantifiable fitness indicators, leaving limited conceptual space for outcomes related to somatic awareness, affect regulation, or sustained engagement in movement participation. Consequently, embodied practices such as dance risk being marginalised despite their potential relevance to broader educational goals, including reflective capacity, self-regulation, and lifelong engagement in physical activity. These challenges become particularly visible within distance-learning higher education environments. Distance education models frequently prioritise cognitive content delivery and digitally mediated interaction (Garrison, 2011 ; Moore & Kearsley, 2012 ), potentially constraining opportunities for guided bodily practice and experiential learning. Students balancing employment responsibilities, caregiving roles, and geographical dispersion may encounter barriers to sustained participation in conventional physical education activities. At the same time, such contexts invite reconsideration of how PE curricula might support accessible and meaningful movement experiences that extend beyond campus-based sport structures. In the Indonesian higher education context, ongoing outcome-oriented reforms further emphasise the need for university courses to demonstrate measurable competencies while responding to diverse learner backgrounds. Within this landscape, culturally grounded dance practices represent a potentially significant yet underexplored pedagogical resource. Rather than positioning dance solely as cultural preservation or health promotion, there is a growing need to examine how dance may operate pedagogically within physical education to support engagement, embodied awareness, and demonstrable learning outcomes across flexible learning environments. Despite growing recognition of embodied learning within physical education, limited research has examined how such approaches can be operationalised within outcome-based higher education curricula. Existing dance scholarship has predominantly foregrounded health, participation, or expressive dimensions, offering comparatively limited insight into the pedagogical processes through which learning is intentionally structured, enacted, and experienced within physical education settings. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates how dance may function as an embodied pedagogical model capable of fostering student engagement, reflective bodily awareness, and curriculum-aligned learning outcomes in higher education physical education, particularly within distance-learning environments. By addressing how embodied learning can be operationalised within structured curriculum environments, this study responds to ongoing calls within sport pedagogy to move beyond skill acquisition models toward meaningful and educative movement experiences in higher education physical education. Methods Research Design This study adopted a quasi-experimental mixed-methods sequential explanatory design integrating quantitative pre-post assessment with qualitative inquiry (Fetters et al., 2013 ). The study was implemented within an existing higher education physical education course, situating the research within authentic curriculum practice rather than a laboratory-controlled experimental environment. Consistent with implementation-oriented educational research (Glasgow et al., 2003 ; Curran et al., 2012 ), the design prioritised ecological validity and pedagogical feasibility. The absence of a control group reflected the study’s emphasis on examining learning processes within real educational settings, where withholding structured learning opportunities aligned with intended outcomes would conflict with principles of constructive alignment in higher education (Biggs & Tang, 2011 ). The mixed-methods approach enabled simultaneous examination of measurable change and students’ lived embodied learning experiences, allowing interpretation of outcomes alongside underlying pedagogical processes (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2018 ; Guetterman et al., 2015 ). Participants Participants were 50 female undergraduate students enrolled in the PGPAUD programme at Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia. The mean age was 38.5 ± 11.2 years (range 20–60), reflecting the demographic characteristics of adult distance learners, with 70% engaged in full-time employment. Baseline physical activity levels were classified as low (44%), moderate (40%), and high (16%). Inclusion criteria required active course enrolment, readiness for light-to-moderate physical activity verified through the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), willingness to participate in all learning sessions and assessments, and provision of written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included recent major joint surgery, uncontrolled chronic illness contraindicating participation, pregnancy, or inability to provide consent. Attendance averaged 16.4 of 18 sessions (91.1%), with 96% completing at least 75% of scheduled sessions. Power analysis indicated a minimum sample of 34 participants to detect medium effects (Cohen, 1988 ); recruitment of 50 participants accounted for potential attrition (Lipsey et al., 2012 ). Table 1 Participant Characteristics (N = 50) Characteristic Value Age (years) 38.5 ± 11.2 (range: 20–60) Sex Female: 50 (100%) Body Mass Index (kg/m²) 24.8 ± 3.6 BMI Categories Normal weight (18.5–24.9): 28 (56%) Overweight (25.0-29.9): 18 (36%) Obese (≥ 30.0): 4 (8%) Employment Status Full-time employed: 35 (70%) Part-time employed: 10 (20%) Unemployed/Homemaker: 5 (10%) Baseline Physical Activity Level Low (< 600 MET-min/week): 22 (44%) Moderate (600–1499 MET-min/week): 20 (40%) High (≥ 1500 MET-min/week): 8 (16%) Pedagogical programme Completion Completed ≥ 75% sessions: 48 (96%) Dropout: 2 (4%) Session Attendance 16.4 ± 1.8 / 18 sessions (91.1%) Table 2 Pedagogical Progression of the Dance-Based Pedagogical programme Week Pedagogical Focus Learning Tasks Embodied Emphasis Student Engagement Structure 1–2 Foundational body awareness and movement orientation Basic steps, weight transfer, postural alignment Whole-body coordination and proprioceptive awareness Guided instruction, individual exploration, brief reflective journaling 3–4 Lower-extremity mobility and rhythmic coordination Lunges, pliés, leg swings (Jaipong-inspired sequences) Hip and knee mobility integrated with rhythmic timing Small-group practice, peer feedback, structured reflection 5–6 Upper-extremity integration and full-body synthesis Arm waves, shoulder isolations, rotational sequences (Saman-inspired), integrated choreography Shoulder and spinal mobility within coordinated full-body movement Collaborative choreography practice, peer synchronisation, collective reflection Pedagogical Design of the Dance-Based Curriculum The programme was conceptualised as a pedagogical enactment embedded within curriculum practice rather than as a therapeutic or exercise pedagogical programme. Dance activities were designed to support structured learning experiences through movement engagement, reflective participation, and collaborative interaction aligned with course learning objectives. The programme comprised 18 sessions delivered across six weeks (three sessions weekly, 60 minutes per session). Indonesian dance forms incorporating Jaipong and Saman movement elements were pedagogically adapted for higher education physical education contexts. Learning sessions emphasised progressive movement understanding rather than therapeutic outcomes. Each session followed a structured instructional sequence: Preparatory engagement (10 minutes) Dynamic mobility activities introduced foundational movement patterns while directing attention toward posture, coordination, and spatial orientation. Guided movement exploration (25 minutes) Students engaged in progressively sequenced dance phrases emphasising weight transfer, multi-planar mobility, rhythmic coordination, and synchronised group movement. Discovery-oriented and task-based learning strategies supported exploration and adaptation rather than imitation (Smith et al., 2023). Integrated strength and stability (15 minutes) Body-weight strengthening tasks were embedded within choreographic sequences to reinforce postural control and sustained movement capability (Turner et al., 2022). Reflection and consolidation (10 minutes) Sessions concluded with cool-down activities followed by structured reflection. Students documented bodily sensations, perceived learning progress, emotional responses, and movement challenges within reflective journals. Peer discussion facilitated shared interpretation and social interaction. Instruction was delivered by certified dance educators trained in adaptive physical activity pedagogy. Implementation fidelity was monitored through attendance documentation, instructor logs, and structured observation of engagement patterns (Bellg et al., 2004). The programme operated as a complex curricular practice shaped through instructor facilitation, peer interaction, and cultural relevance (Craig et al., 2008). Outcome Measures Outcome measures were selected to capture multidimensional learning processes associated with embodied pedagogical engagement, including functional capability, bodily awareness, and psychosocial participation. Rather than assessing isolated physiological change, measurements were intended to reflect how movement-based learning experiences were enacted and experienced within the pedagogical programme. Assessments were conducted at baseline and 48–72 hours following programme completion under consistent testing conditions (Hopkins, 2000). Joint mobility and functional performance were assessed using standardised field-based procedures with established reliability (Gajdosik & Bohannon, 1987; Jones et al., 1999; Mayorga-Vega et al., 2014). Measures included active range of motion across major joints, flexibility (Sit-and-Reach), lower-extremity strength (Chair Stand), balance (Single-Leg Stand, Functional Reach, Berg Balance Scale), and cardiorespiratory endurance (6-Minute Walk Test). Psychosocial dimensions were assessed using validated instruments including SF-12v2 and SF-36 subscales (Ware et al., 1996), Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale, Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, Body Awareness Questionnaire (Mehling et al., 2012), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Sullivan et al., 1995). Baseline assessment indicated moderate limitations in lower-extremity mobility and balance relative to normative references, alongside below-average flexibility for adult populations. Quantitative Analysis Data were analysed using IBM SPSS 28.0. After examination of distributional assumptions (Razali & Wah, 2011), pre-post differences were analysed using paired-sample t-tests or non-parametric equivalents (α = .05). Effect sizes (Cohen’s d) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to estimate magnitude of change (Cohen, 1988; Sullivan & Feinn, 2012), enabling transparent interpretation within a single-group educational design. Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis Following quantitative analysis, purposive sampling identified 15 participants representing varied response profiles (Patton, 2015). Data sources included semi-structured interviews, session-based reflective journals, and structured observational notes. Reflexive thematic analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s (2021) procedures involving iterative coding, theme development, review, and refinement. Trustworthiness was enhanced through triangulation, member checking, reflexive journaling, and peer debriefing (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Tracy, 2010). Four interconnected domains were identified: enhanced somatic awareness, improved joint comfort, mind–body integration, and sustained engagement motivation. Mixed-Methods Integration Integration employed joint display analysis (Fetters et al., 2013; Guetterman et al., 2015). Quantitative trends in mobility, functional performance, and psychosocial indicators were interpreted alongside qualitative accounts describing embodied awareness, emotional regulation, and motivational engagement. Patterns of convergence and expansion supported interpretation of measurable outcomes within students’ lived learning experiences. High completion (96%) and attendance (91.1%) rates aligned with qualitative reports of enjoyment and social connection, indicating strong pedagogical acceptability. Table 3. Integrated Mixed-Methods Interpretation of Learning Outcomes Learning Domain Quantitative Trend Student Experience Pedagogical Interpretation Lower-body mobility Significant learning developments in hip and knee mobility Students reported reduced stiffness and greater ease in daily movement (e.g., stair use) Structured rhythmic movement facilitated embodied awareness of lower-limb coordination and functional confidence Upper-body integration Largest gains observed in shoulder mobility Participants described improved overhead reach and reduced upper-body tension Choreographic sequencing supported coordinated arm–torso integration and movement fluidity Functional performance Marked learning developments in flexibility, balance, and lower-limb endurance Students noted progressive ease in physical tasks and reduced post-activity fatigue Progressive task complexity enhanced movement competence and perceived capability Psychosocial engagement Learning developments in vitality, self-efficacy, and mental well-being indicators Participants described stress reduction, emotional regulation, and intrinsic enjoyment Dance functioned as embodied pedagogy fostering affective regulation and sustained engagement Participation and adherence High completion and attendance rates Students emphasized social connection and cultural resonance Collaborative learning structure strengthened motivation and collective accountability Ethical Considerations Ethical approval was granted by the institutional research ethics committee (Approval No. UT-IRB-2024-087). All participants provided written informed consent prior to data collection. Data were stored in encrypted systems with restricted access. The study complied with national research ethics standards and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. Results Results are presented in relation to pedagogical learning domains emerging from participation in the dance-based curriculum rather than as isolated performance outcomes. Quantitative changes are therefore interpreted alongside their relevance to embodied learning processes, movement coordination, and students’ developing engagement with curriculum-based physical education practice. Mobility and Functional Performance Participation in the dance-based curriculum was associated with statistically significant learning developments across all joint mobility measures, with consistently large effect sizes overall (d = 0.80–1.36). Upper-body movement capacities demonstrated the most pronounced gains, particularly in shoulder mobility, while lower-limb and axial regions also showed substantial learning development. The observed reduction in knee hyperextension indicates enhanced movement regulation and postural control rather than mechanical restriction. Functional performance improved across flexibility, lower-limb strength, balance, and walking endurance domains (d = 0.70–1.06). Measures related to balance demonstrated notable enhancement, suggesting improved postural stability and coordinated movement control developed through repeated engagement in structured dance tasks. Although aerobic conditioning was not an explicit pedagogical objective, moderate learning developments in walking endurance were also observed. Detailed pre-post values and effect sizes are presented in Table 4 . Table 4 Pre-Post Changes in Mobility and Functional Performance (N = 50) Domain Measure Pre (Mean ± SD) Post (Mean ± SD) Effect Size (d) Magnitude Upper-body mobility Shoulder Abduction 148.2 ± 11.8 162.4 ± 9.6 1.36 Large Shoulder Flexion 156.8 ± 12.4 168.2 ± 10.8 1.04 Large Lower-body mobility Knee Flexion 128.4 ± 8.6 136.8 ± 7.4 1.02 Large Hip Flexion 108.6 ± 9.2 116.4 ± 8.6 0.88 Large Axial mobility Lumbar Flexion 68.4 ± 8.9 76.8 ± 7.4 1.00 Large Flexibility Sit-and-Reach (cm) 18.6 ± 6.4 24.8 ± 5.8 1.06 Large Strength Chair Stand (reps) 14.2 ± 3.8 17.6 ± 3.4 0.94 Large Balance Single-Leg Stand (sec) 18.4 ± 8.6 26.8 ± 9.2 0.96 Large Endurance 6-Minute Walk (m) 452.6 ± 68.4 498.4 ± 64.2 0.70 Moderate Note: All changes significant at p < 0.001. Psychosocial and Embodied Outcomes Significant learning developments were observed across psychosocial indicators (d = 0.60–1.12). The largest effect was found in body awareness, aligning with the pedagogical programme’s emphasis on somatic attention and reflective movement practice. Substantial gains were also identified in exercise self-efficacy and physical activity enjoyment, indicating strengthened confidence and intrinsic engagement. Mental well-being demonstrated moderate learning development, accompanied by strong gains in vitality. Reductions in maladaptive pain-related cognition suggest adaptive shifts in bodily interpretation. Full descriptive statistics and effect sizes are reported in Table 5 . Table 5 Psychosocial and Embodied Outcomes (n = 30) Construct Measure Pre Post Effect Size (d) Magnitude Physical well-being SF-12 Physical 46.8 ± 7.2 52.4 ± 6.8 0.80 Large Mental well-being SF-12 Mental 48.4 ± 8.6 53.2 ± 7.8 0.60 Moderate Vitality SF-36 Vitality 56.8 ± 12.6 68.4 ± 11.2 0.96 Large Body awareness BAQ 76.8 ± 16.4 94.2 ± 14.8 1.12 Large Self-efficacy Exercise Confidence 62.4 ± 12.8 74.8 ± 11.4 1.04 Large Enjoyment PA Enjoyment 86.4 ± 18.6 104.6 ± 16.2 1.06 Large Pain cognition Catastrophizing 18.6 ± 8.4 12.4 ± 6.8 0.84 Large Note: All changes significant at p < 0.001. Program Engagement Program adherence was high (96% completion; 91% attendance), with no adverse events recorded across 900 participant-sessions. The two withdrawals were attributable to scheduling constraints rather than dissatisfaction. This retention pattern aligns with qualitative accounts emphasizing enjoyment and social connection. Mixed-Methods Integration Qualitative analysis converged around four experiential domains: enhanced somatic awareness, improved joint comfort, mind-body integration, and sustained motivation. These themes closely aligned with quantitative trends. Enhanced somatic awareness corresponded with the largest psychometric gains in body awareness. Universal reports of reduced stiffness and improved functional ease paralleled mobility learning developments. Moderate quantitative gains in mental well-being were expanded through narratives of stress regulation and embodied presence. High adherence was strongly supported by accounts of intrinsic enjoyment and collaborative engagement. Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings is summarised in Table 6 . Table 6 Mixed-Methods Integration Matrix Learning Domain Quantitative Trend Qualitative Insight Integration Pattern Somatic awareness Largest effect (d = 1.12) Widespread reports of enhanced proprioceptive sensitivity Convergence Joint comfort Large mobility gains Universal reports of reduced stiffness and easier daily movement Convergence + expansion Functional performance Large balance and strength gains Progressive task ease and reduced fatigue Convergence Mind–body integration Moderate mental health gains Present-moment focus and breath–movement awareness Expansion Motivation & adherence 96% completion Universal enjoyment and strong social connection Convergence Discussion Summary of Findings This study examined how dance functioned pedagogically within higher education physical education, demonstrating how embodied learning processes may be intentionally structured through curriculum design. Quantitative findings indicated significant learning developments in joint mobility and functional performance (d = 0.70–1.36), alongside moderate-to-large psychosocial gains (d = 0.60–1.12). The largest psychometric effect was observed in body awareness, while high levels of attendance (91%) and completion (96%) reflected sustained student engagement within the learning programme. Qualitative findings complemented these outcomes, with participants describing enhanced somatic awareness, reduced stiffness in everyday activities, increased confidence in movement participation, and continued enjoyment of physical activity. Collectively, these findings indicate that structured dance participation operated not only as physical practice but as a pedagogical environment through which movement competence, perception, and motivation developed concurrently. Rather than positioning dance as an alternative to conventional exercise approaches, the findings illustrate how culturally grounded movement practices may function within physical education as intentionally organised and assessable learning experiences aligned with curricular objectives. Contribution to Sport Pedagogy This study contributes to ongoing discussions within sport pedagogy regarding embodied approaches to learning (Shilling, 2021 ; Klemola et al., 2023 ). While prior research has established that dance can improve health-related outcomes, fewer studies have examined how dance functions pedagogically within formal physical education settings. The findings suggest that embodied pedagogies may support learning across multiple domains simultaneously: physical capacity, perceptual awareness, and motivational engagement. Importantly, these outcomes were measurable and aligned with clearly articulated learning objectives, indicating that embodied learning can be systematically integrated into curriculum design rather than treated as supplementary activity. The study therefore extends existing literature by illustrating how embodied practice can be structured, assessed, and interpreted within sport pedagogy frameworks, particularly in adult and distance-learning populations. The findings further indicate that dance-based learning operated through identifiable pedagogical mechanisms, including progressive task sequencing, reflective bodily awareness, and collaborative synchronisation among participants. These mechanisms supported the integration of physical engagement with reflective learning processes, suggesting that embodied pedagogy functions not merely through activity participation but through intentional instructional design. In this sense, dance may be understood as a transferable pedagogical model capable of structuring meaningful learning experiences within higher education physical education. Implications for Physical Education Curriculum The results have practical implications for curriculum design in higher education physical education. First, movement-based learning can be intentionally structured to support both functional performance and reflective awareness. The integration of choreographic progression, guided reflection, and peer interaction appears to have supported both physical development and intrinsic motivation. Second, culturally relevant movement practices may enhance engagement. Participants frequently referenced cultural resonance and collective participation as meaningful aspects of the experience. This suggests that curriculum designers should consider contextual adaptation rather than standardized exercise prescriptions. The incorporation of culturally familiar dance practices may also have contributed to students’ sense of belonging and participation, indicating that embodied pedagogies are shaped not only by instructional structure but also by cultural resonance within learning environments. Third, the high retention rate indicates that embodied pedagogies may support sustained participation, an ongoing challenge in adult and distance education contexts (Bozkurt et al., 2022 ). While the present study does not establish long-term behavioural change, it suggests that intrinsic engagement may be fostered when movement is framed as expressive and socially meaningful rather than obligation-driven. Implications for Teacher Education For teacher education programs, the findings highlight the importance of pedagogical structure rather than simply activity selection. The effectiveness of the pedagogical programme appeared to depend on: Progressive sequencing of movement tasks Explicit learning goals Opportunities for reflection Social interaction and collaborative movement This reinforces the view that embodied pedagogy requires instructional intentionality. Dance in physical education should not be reduced to performance replication or entertainment; rather, it can be designed as a learning environment that cultivates movement literacy, body awareness, and relational engagement. Teacher education programs may therefore benefit from preparing future educators to design, scaffold, and assess embodied learning experiences using both quantitative and qualitative tools. Limitations Several limitations warrant consideration. First, the quasi-experimental design without a control group limits causal inference. However, the purpose of the present study was not to establish causal superiority over alternative instructional approaches but to examine how embodied learning processes may emerge within authentic curriculum implementation contexts. The design therefore prioritised pedagogical realism over experimental control.While learning developments were statistically significant, alternative explanations such as maturation effects cannot be fully excluded. Second, the sample consisted exclusively of female university students within one institutional context, which restricts generalisability. Cultural specificity may have contributed positively to engagement, and results may differ in other contexts. Third, psychosocial measures were collected in a subsample (n = 30), and longer-term follow-up was not conducted. The sustainability of observed changes remains unknown. Finally, although quantitative measures demonstrated reliability, mobility and functional performance were assessed over a relatively short pedagogical programme period. These limitations suggest caution in interpreting the findings as definitive evidence of superiority over other pedagogical approaches. Future Research Future studies may extend this work in several directions. Controlled comparative designs could examine differences between dance-based pedagogy and other movement approaches. Longitudinal research would help determine whether embodied learning experiences influence sustained physical activity participation. Further qualitative work may explore how cultural adaptation shapes engagement across diverse contexts. Research involving mixed-gender or multi-institutional samples would strengthen generalisability. Finally, future investigations might examine how embodied pedagogies interact with digital or hybrid learning environments, particularly in distance higher education settings. In this regard, dance-based embodied pedagogy offers not simply an alternative activity but a conceptual reorientation of how learning through movement may be designed, experienced, and evaluated within contemporary physical education. Conclusion This study demonstrates how dance may operate as a pedagogically purposeful approach within higher education physical education, illustrating the capacity of embodied learning to be intentionally structured through curriculum design. Participation in the programme was associated with consistent learning developments in mobility and functional performance (d = 0.70–1.36), alongside substantial gains in body awareness (d = 1.12) and psychosocial engagement. High completion rates (96%) and widespread reports of enjoyment indicate that movement-based learning was experienced by students as both measurable and educationally meaningful. Collectively, these findings suggest that embodied learning outcomes can be deliberately designed, implemented, and evaluated within formal curriculum frameworks rather than positioned as supplementary wellness or recreational activities. The study contributes to ongoing discussions in sport pedagogy by demonstrating how dance-based pedagogical practices may support student engagement and capability development through structured movement experiences. Engagement in dance enabled students to develop physical competence, somatic awareness, and social connection within an organised instructional environment. The convergence of quantitative learning developments with qualitative accounts of increased comfort, confidence, and attentional presence highlights the pedagogical potential of integrating movement practices that connect physical development with reflective learning processes. Within higher education particularly distance-learning contexts where reduced opportunities for embodied participation remain a persistent challenge dance-based physical education represents a viable curricular strategy. Aligning embodied practice with assessable learning outcomes allows institutions to support holistic student development while maintaining academic accountability. Future research may further examine how embodied pedagogies can be adapted across diverse cultural and institutional settings to strengthen physical education curriculum design and inform teacher education practices. Taken together, these findings suggest that dance-based embodied practice may serve as a viable pedagogical model for rethinking learning design and student engagement in contemporary higher education physical education. Rather than functioning as supplementary activity, embodied pedagogies enable the integration of physical, reflective, and relational dimensions of learning within curriculum structures. References Afonso, J., Rocha, L., Ramirez-Campillo, R., & Sarmento, H. (2023). The effectiveness of pre-exercise routines to enhance jumping performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(4), 825–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01774-0 Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2022). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968276 American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11410403 Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208932 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company. Barbado, D., Sánchez-Molina, D., Maroto-Izquierdo, S., & López-García, J. J. (2023). Core stability assessment and training methods in older adults: A systematic review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 31(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2021-0388 Barene, S., Krustrup, P., Jackman, S. R., Brekke, O. L., & Holtermann, A. (2014). Do soccer and Zumba exercise improve fitness and indicators of health among female hospital employees? A 12-week RCT. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 24(6), 990–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12138 Bellg, A. J., Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., Ogedegbe, G., Orwig, D., Ernst, D., & Czajkowski, S. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology, 23(5), 443–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443 Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411 Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press. Bohannon, R. W. (2006). Reference values for the timed up and go test: A descriptive meta-analysis. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 29(2), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1519/00139143-200608000-00004 Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(4), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z Bozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Coëtlogon, P., … Paskevicius, M. (2022). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 Casey, A., & MacPhail, A. (2022). Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1990249 Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2025). From expression to profession: Investigating how dance education in China enhances student development across health, career, and cultural dimensions. Educational Studies, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251363200 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Craig, C. L., Marshall, A. L., Sjöström, M., Bauman, A. E., Booth, M. L., Ainsworth, B. E., Pratt, M., Ekelund, U., Yngve, A., Sallis, J. F., & Oja, P. (2003). International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35(8), 1381–1395. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex pedagogical programmes: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337, a1655. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655 Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(4), 1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00150-4 Curran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., & Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Medical Care, 50(3), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812 Daly, C., Pachler, N., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2023). Exploring the pedagogical potential of video-based learning designs. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.509347 Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01 Downs, S., Marquez, J., & Chiarelli, P. (2013). The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 59(2), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9 Duncan, P. W., Weiner, D. K., Chandler, J., & Studenski, S. (1990). Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. Journal of Gerontology, 45(6), M192–M197. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.6.M192 Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2020). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226337722.001.0001 Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117 Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Franchignoni, F., Vercelli, S., Giordano, A., Sartorio, F., Bravini, E., & Ferriero, G. (2014). Minimal clinically important difference of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 44(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2014.4893 Freitas, S. R., Andrade, R. J., Larcoupaille, L., Mil-Homens, P., & Nordez, A. (2018). Muscle and joint responses during and after static stretching performed at different intensities. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 118(6), 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3874-3 Fuchs, T., & Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508 Gajdosik, R. L., & Bohannon, R. W. (1987). Clinical measurement of range of motion: Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Physical Therapy, 67(12), 1867–1872. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.12.1867 Gallagher, S., & Lindgren, R. (2020). Enactive metaphors: Learning through full-body engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9327-1 Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2020). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons. Girden, E. R. (1992). ANOVA: Repeated measures (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). SAGE Publications. Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261 Guetterman, T. C., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865 Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729948 Hawe, P., Shiell, A., & Riley, T. (2004). Complex pedagogical programmes: How "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ, 328(7455), 1561–1563. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561 Hecksteden, A., Kraushaar, J., Schrettl, J., & Meyer, T. (2018). Individual anaerobic threshold is unchanged after high-intensity interval training. Frontiers in Physiology, 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00033 Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine, 30(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 Hwang, P. W., & Braun, K. L. (2015). The effectiveness of dance pedagogical programmes to improve older adults' health: A systematic literature review. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 21(5), 64–70. Indonesian National Research Ethics Committee. (2017). Ethical review guidelines for human research. Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224 Jones, C. J., Rikli, R. E., & Beam, W. C. (1999). A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028 Kandasamy, G., Alqahtani, M. S., Bhuvaneswari, A. S., Verma, A. K., Alshahrani, M. Y., Alqahtani, Y. A., Faqihi, A. A., Samman, A. A., Alasiri, A. M., Alshahrani, S. A., Jali, M. V., & Acharya, S. (2024). Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among undergraduate students. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1403267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1403267 Karpati, F. J., Giacosa, C., Foster, N. E., Penhune, V. B., & Hyde, K. L. (2020). Dance and music share gray matter structural correlates. Brain Research, 1657, 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.11.029 Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Kelley, K., & Preacher, K. J. (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028086 Kleinman, E., Cohen, Z. D., DeRubeis, R. J., & DeRubeis, R. (2024). Effects of a body-based mindfulness program on alexithymia, dispositional mindfulness, and distress symptoms: A pilot clinical trial. Mindfulness, 15(12), 3056–3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02493-3 Klemola, U., Heikinaro-Johansson, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (2023). Physical education student teachers and embodied knowledge. Sport, Education and Society, 18(6), 717–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.608941 Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 Kshtriya, S., Barnstaple, K., Rabinovich, D. B., & DeSouza, J. F. (2015). Dance and aging: A critical review of findings in neuroscience. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 37(2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10465-015-9196-7 Laucis, N. C., Hays, R. D., & Bhattacharyya, T. (2014). Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: A brief guide. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 96(19), 1628–1634. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01077 Lima, C. K., Barbosa, I. R., Souza, R. A., Lima, M. S., & Silva, E. M. (2024). Co-occurrence of obesogenic behaviors and their implications for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study with university students. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1538. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19031-6 Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. Lipsey, M. W., Puzak, R. S., & Kelley, A. (2012). Design analysis: A comprehensive resource for planning and evaluating research. SAGE Publications. Liu, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). The effect of VR technology-assisted college dance education on college students' physical and mental health and their comprehensive qualities. SAGE Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251321392 Mattle, M., Chocano-Bedoya, P. O., Fischbacher, M., Meyer, U., Abderhalden, L. A., Lang, W., Mansky, R., Kressig, R. W., Steurer, J., Orav, E. J., Egli, A., & Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A. (2020). Association of dance-based mind-motor activities with falls and physical function among healthy older adults. JAMA Network Open, 3(9), e2017688. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17688 Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2020). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? American Psychologist, 70(6), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400 Mayorga-Vega, D., Merino-Marban, R., & Viciana, J. (2014). Criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach tests for estimating hamstring and lumbar extensibility: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 13(1), 1–14. McAuley, E., & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28(2), 85–88. Mehling, W. E., Gopisetty, V., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Hecht, F. M., & Stewart, A. (2009). Body awareness: Construct and self-report measures. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005614 Ministry of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Panduan pengembangan kurikulum program studi di perguruan tinggi [Guidelines for curriculum development in higher education study programs. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi. Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barlow, J., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., Moore, L., O'Cathain, A., Tinati, T., Wight, D., & Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex pedagogical programmes: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 350, h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258 Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth. Moon, J. A. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development (2nd ed.). Routledge. Niemann, C., Godde, B., Staudinger, U. M., & Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2020). Exercise-induced changes in basal ganglia volume and cognition in older adults. Neuroscience, 281, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.033 Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 Nguyen, T. M., & Habók, A. (2021). Vietnamese teachers' perspectives on outcome-based education. Educational Studies, 47(5), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1717930 Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Peters, D. H., Adam, T., Alonge, O., Agyepong, I. A., & Tran, N. (2013). Implementation research: What it is and how to do it. BMJ, 347, f6753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6753 Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2015). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). F.A. Davis Company. Rahman, A., Susanto, H., & Hartono, R. (2024). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka belajar dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia berbasis kearifan lokal [Implementation of Merdeka Belajar curriculum in Indonesian language learning based on local wisdom]. EL-Tsaqafah: Jurnal Jurusan PBA, 23(2), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v23i2.11712 Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33. Rehfeld, K., Lüders, A., Hökelmann, A., Lessmann, V., Kaufmann, J., Brigadski, T., Müller, P., & Müller, N. G. (2018). Dance training is superior to repetitive physical exercise in inducing brain plasticity in the elderly. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0196636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196636 Rodrigues, J., Prussak, K. A., & Graber, K. C. (2021). Reconceptualizing dance as physical activity. Quest, 63(3), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483680 Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Samsa, G., Edelman, D., Rothman, M. L., Williams, G. R., Lipscomb, J., & Matchar, D. (1999). Determining clinically important differences in health status measures. PharmacoEconomics, 15(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003 Schoenfeld, B. J., Ogborn, D., & Krieger, J. W. (2016). Dose-response relationships between resistance training volume and muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review and nonlinear meta-regression modelling. Sports Medicine, 46(11), 1635–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0559-2 Schwender, T. M., Spengler, S., Oedl, C., & Mess, F. (2018). Effects of dance pedagogical programmes on aspects of the participants' self: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01130 Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin. Shapiro, L., & Stolz, S. A. (2022). Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, 17(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518822149 Shilling, C. (2021). Body pedagogics: Embodiment, cognition and cultural transmission. Sociology, 55(6), 1148–1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211028743 Silva, A. P., Marques, D. L., Vieira, J. M., Silva, M. N., Teixeira, P. J., & Palmeira, A. L. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of dance programs on physical performance: Appropriate health promotion for healthy older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912335 Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications. Smith, L., Wang, C., & Martinez, J. (2023). Contemporary dance pedagogy: Principles and practice in movement education. Journal of Dance Education, 23(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2022.2156789 Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1 Sullivan, M. J., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524 Susanto, H., & Hartono, R. (2022). The development of teaching materials based outcome-based education curriculum to encourage teacher skill. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 22(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v22i3.53785 Tarr, B., Launay, J., & Dunbar, R. I. (2014). Music and social bonding: "Self-other" merging and neurohormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1096. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01096 Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight "big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121 Turner, K., Davis, J., & Anderson, L. (2022). Resistance exercise and functional capacity in older adults: A meta-analysis. Journal of Aging and Health, 34(4), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211067890 UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501 Varea, V., & González-Calvo, G. (2021). Touchless classes and absent bodies: Teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, Education and Society, 26(8), 831–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814 Wang, Y., Chen, L., & Zhang, M. (2025). An experimental study on the impact of sports dance exercise on college students' mental health. International Education Forum, 7(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.54005/ief.v7i2.12764 Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 Westbrook, C., Creswell, J. D., Lam, S., Dutton, M. A., Carmody, J., & Baer, R. A. (2024). A systematic review of brief respiratory, embodiment, cognitive, and mindfulness pedagogical programmes to reduce state anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1412928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412928 Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Wijaya, H., Susanto, R., & Pratama, A. (2024). Implementation of early childhood education kits in higher education student learning: Ex-post facto study of Open University students. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 18(1), 82–100. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.181.06 Woods, K., Bishop, P., & Jones, E. (2007). Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury. Sports Medicine, 37(12), 1089–1099. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200737120-00006 Wyon, M. A., Harris, J., Adams, J., & Cloak, R. (2020). The impact of dance-specific neuromuscular conditioning and injury prevention training on motor control, stability, balance, function and injury in professional ballet dancers: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566851 Additional Declarations The authors declare no competing interests. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-9001347","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":598786035,"identity":"5ea1b788-5e56-489f-b70e-05d9d7565043","order_by":0,"name":"Ujang Maulana Yusup","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1722-6239","institution":"Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Ujang","middleName":"Maulana","lastName":"Yusup","suffix":""},{"id":598786190,"identity":"dddc2c9a-d5f9-4dec-b528-3447553eb1f6","order_by":1,"name":"Juju Masunah","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6024-3547","institution":"Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Juju","middleName":"","lastName":"Masunah","suffix":""},{"id":598786191,"identity":"011da7ec-a50f-4009-be58-de823c9ce7de","order_by":2,"name":"Rita Milyartini","email":"","orcid":"https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2212-9695","institution":"Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"Rita","middleName":"","lastName":"Milyartini","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2026-03-01 12:15:37","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":{"humanSubjects":true,"vertebrateSubjects":false,"conflictsOfInterestStatement":false,"humanSubjectEthicalGuidelines":true,"humanSubjectConsent":true,"humanSubjectClinicalTrial":false,"humanSubjectCaseReport":false,"vertebrateSubjectEthicalGuidelines":false},"doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9001347/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9001347/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":103842373,"identity":"a0814aed-520a-40db-86db-d16daa36c922","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-03 15:03:48","extension":"png","order_by":1,"title":"Figure 1","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"figure","size":627576,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eRadial network diagram illustrating qualitative theme prevalence rates and hierarchical relationships from mixed-methods analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","description":"","filename":"1.png","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9001347/v1/15953433dc1b013e8e7dc203.png"},{"id":104779271,"identity":"a81fc6c7-00a6-41fa-92e1-533bca0a2d28","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2026-03-17 07:37:56","extension":"pdf","order_by":0,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":1646034,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"manuscript.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-9001347/v1/74237c24-5688-4908-88c5-7ffb06a204e5.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"The authors declare no competing interests.","formattedTitle":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDance as Embodied Pedagogy in Higher Education Physical Education: A Mixed-Methods Curriculum Pedagogical Programme\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e","fulltext":[{"header":"Introduction","content":"\u003cp\u003eDance occupies a complex and often marginal position within higher education physical education (PE). Although commonly included within university curricula, it is frequently approached as an expressive, recreational, or culturally enriching activity rather than as a pedagogical practice capable of supporting structured learning and demonstrable educational outcomes. Within contemporary sport pedagogy, however, increasing attention has shifted toward teaching approaches that emphasise meaningful movement experiences, relational engagement, and embodied participation beyond traditional emphases on fitness performance or sport-specific skill development. From this pedagogical standpoint, dance represents a form of learning through movement that integrates bodily awareness, rhythmic coordination, and reflective engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA substantial body of research has demonstrated that participation in structured dance activities contributes positively to physical capacity, functional mobility, and psychosocial well-being (Hwang \u0026amp; Braun, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR46\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Silva et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR89\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e; Kshtriya et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR57\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e; Rehfeld et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR80\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e). Nevertheless, much of this scholarship has been framed primarily through health and therapeutic perspectives, privileging physiological outcomes and behavioural benefits. Comparatively limited attention has been directed toward understanding dance as a pedagogical process within physical education itself specifically, how learning experiences are organised through movement, how students interpret embodied tasks, and how participation translates into recognised curricular learning achievements. As a consequence, dance continues to be legitimised largely through health-related outcomes rather than through theoretically grounded pedagogical rationales within PE.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRecent developments in sport pedagogy have increasingly drawn upon theories of embodied learning to challenge enduring separations between cognition and movement (Shusterman, 2012; Fuchs \u0026amp; Koch, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR34\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2014\u003c/span\u003e). Embodied learning perspectives conceptualise knowledge as emerging through sensory perception, proprioceptive engagement, and affective experience. Within physical education contexts, this orientation reframes movement as a site of perception, reflection, and meaning-making rather than solely as observable performance. Dance-based activities, which demand sustained attention to posture, timing, breathing, and interpersonal coordination, provide structured opportunities through which learners may cultivate embodied awareness. Mehling et al.\u0026rsquo;s (2012) multidimensional model of body awareness further supports this perspective by identifying processes of noticing, interpreting, and responding to bodily sensations as legitimate forms of learning engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAt the same time, higher education systems increasingly operate within outcome-based curriculum frameworks that require clear demonstration of student learning achievement. Principles of constructive alignment (Biggs \u0026amp; Tang, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e) emphasise coherence between intended learning outcomes, teaching practices, and assessment strategies. Yet embodied pedagogies remain insufficiently theorised within such alignment processes. Physical education programmes often prioritise technical proficiency, tactical knowledge, or quantifiable fitness indicators, leaving limited conceptual space for outcomes related to somatic awareness, affect regulation, or sustained engagement in movement participation. Consequently, embodied practices such as dance risk being marginalised despite their potential relevance to broader educational goals, including reflective capacity, self-regulation, and lifelong engagement in physical activity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese challenges become particularly visible within distance-learning higher education environments. Distance education models frequently prioritise cognitive content delivery and digitally mediated interaction (Garrison, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR37\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e; Moore \u0026amp; Kearsley, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR70\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e), potentially constraining opportunities for guided bodily practice and experiential learning. Students balancing employment responsibilities, caregiving roles, and geographical dispersion may encounter barriers to sustained participation in conventional physical education activities. At the same time, such contexts invite reconsideration of how PE curricula might support accessible and meaningful movement experiences that extend beyond campus-based sport structures.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIn the Indonesian higher education context, ongoing outcome-oriented reforms further emphasise the need for university courses to demonstrate measurable competencies while responding to diverse learner backgrounds. Within this landscape, culturally grounded dance practices represent a potentially significant yet underexplored pedagogical resource. Rather than positioning dance solely as cultural preservation or health promotion, there is a growing need to examine how dance may operate pedagogically within physical education to support engagement, embodied awareness, and demonstrable learning outcomes across flexible learning environments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDespite growing recognition of embodied learning within physical education, limited research has examined how such approaches can be operationalised within outcome-based higher education curricula. Existing dance scholarship has predominantly foregrounded health, participation, or expressive dimensions, offering comparatively limited insight into the pedagogical processes through which learning is intentionally structured, enacted, and experienced within physical education settings. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates how dance may function as an embodied pedagogical model capable of fostering student engagement, reflective bodily awareness, and curriculum-aligned learning outcomes in higher education physical education, particularly within distance-learning environments. By addressing how embodied learning can be operationalised within structured curriculum environments, this study responds to ongoing calls within sport pedagogy to move beyond skill acquisition models toward meaningful and educative movement experiences in higher education physical education.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"Methods","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec3\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eResearch Design\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study adopted a quasi-experimental mixed-methods sequential explanatory design integrating quantitative pre-post assessment with qualitative inquiry (Fetters et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR30\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2013\u003c/span\u003e). The study was implemented within an existing higher education physical education course, situating the research within authentic curriculum practice rather than a laboratory-controlled experimental environment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsistent with implementation-oriented educational research (Glasgow et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR40\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2003\u003c/span\u003e; Curran et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR24\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e), the design prioritised ecological validity and pedagogical feasibility. The absence of a control group reflected the study\u0026rsquo;s emphasis on examining learning processes within real educational settings, where withholding structured learning opportunities aligned with intended outcomes would conflict with principles of constructive alignment in higher education (Biggs \u0026amp; Tang, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR10\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2011\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe mixed-methods approach enabled simultaneous examination of measurable change and students\u0026rsquo; lived embodied learning experiences, allowing interpretation of outcomes alongside underlying pedagogical processes (Creswell \u0026amp; Plano Clark, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR22\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2018\u003c/span\u003e; Guetterman et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR41\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2015\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003eParticipants\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e Participants were 50 female undergraduate students enrolled in the PGPAUD programme at Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia. The mean age was 38.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.2 years (range 20\u0026ndash;60), reflecting the demographic characteristics of adult distance learners, with 70% engaged in full-time employment.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBaseline physical activity levels were classified as low (44%), moderate (40%), and high (16%). Inclusion criteria required active course enrolment, readiness for light-to-moderate physical activity verified through the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q), willingness to participate in all learning sessions and assessments, and provision of written informed consent. Exclusion criteria included recent major joint surgery, uncontrolled chronic illness contraindicating participation, pregnancy, or inability to provide consent.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAttendance averaged 16.4 of 18 sessions (91.1%), with 96% completing at least 75% of scheduled sessions. Power analysis indicated a minimum sample of 34 participants to detect medium effects (Cohen, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR18\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e1988\u003c/span\u003e); recruitment of 50 participants accounted for potential attrition (Lipsey et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR61\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2012\u003c/span\u003e).\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab1\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 1\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipant Characteristics (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;50)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"2\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCharacteristic\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eValue\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAge (years)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e38.5\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.2 (range: 20\u0026ndash;60)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSex\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFemale: 50 (100%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBody Mass Index (kg/m\u0026sup2;)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBMI Categories\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eNormal weight (18.5\u0026ndash;24.9): 28 (56%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOverweight (25.0-29.9): 18 (36%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eObese (\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;30.0): 4 (8%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmployment Status\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFull-time employed: 35 (70%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePart-time employed: 10 (20%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eUnemployed/Homemaker: 5 (10%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBaseline Physical Activity Level\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLow (\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;600 MET-min/week): 22 (44%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate (600\u0026ndash;1499 MET-min/week): 20 (40%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHigh (\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;1500 MET-min/week): 8 (16%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePedagogical programme Completion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCompleted\u0026thinsp;\u0026ge;\u0026thinsp;75% sessions: 48 (96%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDropout: 2 (4%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSession Attendance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e16.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;1.8 / 18 sessions (91.1%)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab2\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 2\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePedagogical Progression of the Dance-Based Pedagogical programme\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"5\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWeek\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePedagogical Focus\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLearning Tasks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEmbodied Emphasis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStudent Engagement Structure\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1\u0026ndash;2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFoundational body awareness and movement orientation\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBasic steps, weight transfer, postural alignment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhole-body coordination and proprioceptive awareness\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eGuided instruction, individual exploration, brief reflective journaling\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e3\u0026ndash;4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLower-extremity mobility and rhythmic coordination\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLunges, pli\u0026eacute;s, leg swings (Jaipong-inspired sequences)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHip and knee mobility integrated with rhythmic timing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmall-group practice, peer feedback, structured reflection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e5\u0026ndash;6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUpper-extremity integration and full-body synthesis\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eArm waves, shoulder isolations, rotational sequences (Saman-inspired), integrated choreography\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShoulder and spinal mobility within coordinated full-body movement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCollaborative choreography practice, peer synchronisation, collective reflection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ch3\u003ePedagogical Design of the Dance-Based Curriculum\u003c/h3\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe programme was conceptualised as a pedagogical enactment embedded within curriculum practice rather than as a therapeutic or exercise pedagogical programme. Dance activities were designed to support structured learning experiences through movement engagement, reflective participation, and collaborative interaction aligned with course learning objectives.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe programme comprised 18 sessions delivered across six weeks (three sessions weekly, 60 minutes per session). Indonesian dance forms incorporating Jaipong and Saman movement elements were pedagogically adapted for higher education physical education contexts.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eLearning sessions emphasised progressive movement understanding rather than therapeutic outcomes. Each session followed a structured instructional sequence:\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col\u003e\n \u003cli\u003ePreparatory engagement (10 minutes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eDynamic mobility activities introduced foundational movement patterns while directing attention toward posture, coordination, and spatial orientation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"2\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eGuided movement exploration (25 minutes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eStudents engaged in progressively sequenced dance phrases emphasising weight transfer, multi-planar mobility, rhythmic coordination, and synchronised group movement. Discovery-oriented and task-based learning strategies supported exploration and adaptation rather than imitation (Smith et al., 2023).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"3\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eIntegrated strength and stability (15 minutes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBody-weight strengthening tasks were embedded within choreographic sequences to reinforce postural control and sustained movement capability (Turner et al., 2022).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003col start=\"4\"\u003e\n \u003cli\u003eReflection and consolidation (10 minutes)\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eSessions concluded with cool-down activities followed by structured reflection. Students documented bodily sensations, perceived learning progress, emotional responses, and movement challenges within reflective journals. Peer discussion facilitated shared interpretation and social interaction.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eInstruction was delivered by certified dance educators trained in adaptive physical activity pedagogy. Implementation fidelity was monitored through attendance documentation, instructor logs, and structured observation of engagement patterns (Bellg et al., 2004). The programme operated as a complex curricular practice shaped through instructor facilitation, peer interaction, and cultural relevance (Craig et al., 2008).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eOutcome Measures\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eOutcome measures were selected to capture multidimensional learning processes associated with embodied pedagogical engagement, including functional capability, bodily awareness, and psychosocial participation. Rather than assessing isolated physiological change, measurements were intended to reflect how movement-based learning experiences were enacted and experienced within the pedagogical programme.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAssessments were conducted at baseline and 48\u0026ndash;72 hours following programme completion under consistent testing conditions (Hopkins, 2000).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eJoint mobility and functional performance were assessed using standardised field-based procedures with established reliability (Gajdosik \u0026amp; Bohannon, 1987; Jones et al., 1999; Mayorga-Vega et al., 2014). Measures included active range of motion across major joints, flexibility (Sit-and-Reach), lower-extremity strength (Chair Stand), balance (Single-Leg Stand, Functional Reach, Berg Balance Scale), and cardiorespiratory endurance (6-Minute Walk Test).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePsychosocial dimensions were assessed using validated instruments including SF-12v2 and SF-36 subscales (Ware et al., 1996), Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale, Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, Body Awareness Questionnaire (Mehling et al., 2012), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Sullivan et al., 1995).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBaseline assessment indicated moderate limitations in lower-extremity mobility and balance relative to normative references, alongside below-average flexibility for adult populations.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eQuantitative Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eData were analysed using IBM SPSS 28.0. After examination of distributional assumptions (Razali \u0026amp; Wah, 2011), pre-post differences were analysed using paired-sample t-tests or non-parametric equivalents (\u0026alpha; = .05). Effect sizes (Cohen\u0026rsquo;s d) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to estimate magnitude of change (Cohen, 1988; Sullivan \u0026amp; Feinn, 2012), enabling transparent interpretation within a single-group educational design.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eQualitative Data Collection and Analysis\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFollowing quantitative analysis, purposive sampling identified 15 participants representing varied response profiles (Patton, 2015). Data sources included semi-structured interviews, session-based reflective journals, and structured observational notes.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eReflexive thematic analysis followed Braun and Clarke\u0026rsquo;s (2021) procedures involving iterative coding, theme development, review, and refinement. Trustworthiness was enhanced through triangulation, member checking, reflexive journaling, and peer debriefing (Lincoln \u0026amp; Guba, 1985; Tracy, 2010).\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eFour interconnected domains were identified: enhanced somatic awareness, improved joint comfort, mind\u0026ndash;body integration, and sustained engagement motivation.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eMixed-Methods Integration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntegration employed joint display analysis (Fetters et al., 2013; Guetterman et al., 2015). Quantitative trends in mobility, functional performance, and psychosocial indicators were interpreted alongside qualitative accounts describing embodied awareness, emotional regulation, and motivational engagement.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003ePatterns of convergence and expansion supported interpretation of measurable outcomes within students\u0026rsquo; lived learning experiences. High completion (96%) and attendance (91.1%) rates aligned with qualitative reports of enjoyment and social connection, indicating strong pedagogical acceptability.\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eTable 3. Integrated Mixed-Methods Interpretation of Learning Outcomes\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003ctable border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\"\u003e\n \u003ctbody\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLearning Domain\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eQuantitative Trend\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eStudent Experience\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePedagogical Interpretation\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eLower-body mobility\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eSignificant learning developments in hip and knee mobility\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudents reported reduced stiffness and greater ease in daily movement (e.g., stair use)\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStructured rhythmic movement facilitated embodied awareness of lower-limb coordination and functional confidence\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eUpper-body integration\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLargest gains observed in shoulder mobility\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eParticipants described improved overhead reach and reduced upper-body tension\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eChoreographic sequencing supported coordinated arm\u0026ndash;torso integration and movement fluidity\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eFunctional performance\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eMarked learning developments in flexibility, balance, and lower-limb endurance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudents noted progressive ease in physical tasks and reduced post-activity fatigue\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eProgressive task complexity enhanced movement competence and perceived capability\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003ePsychosocial engagement\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eLearning developments in vitality, self-efficacy, and mental well-being indicators\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eParticipants described stress reduction, emotional regulation, and intrinsic enjoyment\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eDance functioned as embodied pedagogy fostering affective regulation and sustained engagement\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003ctr\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eParticipation and adherence\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eHigh completion and attendance rates\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eStudents emphasized social connection and cultural resonance\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003ctd valign=\"top\"\u003e\n \u003cp\u003eCollaborative learning structure strengthened motivation and collective accountability\u003c/p\u003e\n \u003c/td\u003e\n \u003c/tr\u003e\n \u003c/tbody\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eEthical Considerations\u003c/strong\u003e\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eEthical approval was granted by the institutional research ethics committee (Approval No. UT-IRB-2024-087). All participants provided written informed consent prior to data collection. Data were stored in encrypted systems with restricted access. The study complied with national research ethics standards and the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.\u003c/p\u003e\n"},{"header":"Results","content":"\u003cp\u003eResults are presented in relation to pedagogical learning domains emerging from participation in the dance-based curriculum rather than as isolated performance outcomes. Quantitative changes are therefore interpreted alongside their relevance to embodied learning processes, movement coordination, and students\u0026rsquo; developing engagement with curriculum-based physical education practice.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec12\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMobility and Functional Performance\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eParticipation in the dance-based curriculum was associated with statistically significant learning developments across all joint mobility measures, with consistently large effect sizes overall (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.80\u0026ndash;1.36). Upper-body movement capacities demonstrated the most pronounced gains, particularly in shoulder mobility, while lower-limb and axial regions also showed substantial learning development. The observed reduction in knee hyperextension indicates enhanced movement regulation and postural control rather than mechanical restriction.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunctional performance improved across flexibility, lower-limb strength, balance, and walking endurance domains (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.70\u0026ndash;1.06). Measures related to balance demonstrated notable enhancement, suggesting improved postural stability and coordinated movement control developed through repeated engagement in structured dance tasks. Although aerobic conditioning was not an explicit pedagogical objective, moderate learning developments in walking endurance were also observed.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDetailed pre-post values and effect sizes are presented in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab4\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e4\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab4\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 4\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre-Post Changes in Mobility and Functional Performance (N\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;50)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eDomain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeasure\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre (Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost (Mean\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;SD)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffect Size (d)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMagnitude\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUpper-body mobility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShoulder Abduction\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e148.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e162.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.36\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eShoulder Flexion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e156.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e168.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;10.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLower-body mobility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eKnee Flexion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e128.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e136.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.02\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e\u0026nbsp;\u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eHip Flexion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e108.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e116.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.88\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eAxial mobility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLumbar Flexion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e68.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.9\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e76.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.00\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFlexibility\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSit-and-Reach (cm)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e24.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;5.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.06\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eStrength\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eChair Stand (reps)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e14.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e17.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;3.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.94\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBalance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSingle-Leg Stand (sec)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e26.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;9.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.96\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEndurance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e6-Minute Walk (m)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e452.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;68.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e498.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;64.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.70\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003eNote: All changes significant at p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec13\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003ePsychosocial and Embodied Outcomes\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSignificant learning developments were observed across psychosocial indicators (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.60\u0026ndash;1.12). The largest effect was found in body awareness, aligning with the pedagogical programme\u0026rsquo;s emphasis on somatic attention and reflective movement practice. Substantial gains were also identified in exercise self-efficacy and physical activity enjoyment, indicating strengthened confidence and intrinsic engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMental well-being demonstrated moderate learning development, accompanied by strong gains in vitality. Reductions in maladaptive pain-related cognition suggest adaptive shifts in bodily interpretation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFull descriptive statistics and effect sizes are reported in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab5\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e5\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab5\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 5\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePsychosocial and Embodied Outcomes (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"6\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"char\" char=\".\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c5\" colnum=\"5\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c6\" colnum=\"6\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConstruct\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMeasure\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePre\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePost\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEffect Size (d)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMagnitude\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePhysical well-being\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSF-12 Physical\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e46.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e52.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.80\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMental well-being\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSF-12 Mental\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e48.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e53.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;7.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.60\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eVitality\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSF-36 Vitality\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e56.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e68.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.96\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBody awareness\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eBAQ\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e76.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;16.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e94.2\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;14.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.12\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSelf-efficacy\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExercise Confidence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e62.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;12.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e74.8\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;11.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.04\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnjoyment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePA Enjoyment\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e86.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;18.6\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e104.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;16.2\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.06\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePain cognition\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eCatastrophizing\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e18.6\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;8.4\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\"\u0026plusmn;\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.4\u0026thinsp;\u0026plusmn;\u0026thinsp;6.8\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"char\" char=\".\" colname=\"c5\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e0.84\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c6\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003ctfoot\u003e \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd colspan=\"6\"\u003eNote: All changes significant at p\u0026thinsp;\u0026lt;\u0026thinsp;0.001.\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tfoot\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec14\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eProgram Engagement\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eProgram adherence was high (96% completion; 91% attendance), with no adverse events recorded across 900 participant-sessions. The two withdrawals were attributable to scheduling constraints rather than dissatisfaction. This retention pattern aligns with qualitative accounts emphasizing enjoyment and social connection.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec15\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eMixed-Methods Integration\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative analysis converged around four experiential domains: enhanced somatic awareness, improved joint comfort, mind-body integration, and sustained motivation. These themes closely aligned with quantitative trends.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhanced somatic awareness corresponded with the largest psychometric gains in body awareness. Universal reports of reduced stiffness and improved functional ease paralleled mobility learning developments. Moderate quantitative gains in mental well-being were expanded through narratives of stress regulation and embodied presence. High adherence was strongly supported by accounts of intrinsic enjoyment and collaborative engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegration of quantitative and qualitative findings is summarised in Table\u0026nbsp;\u003cspan refid=\"Tab6\" class=\"InternalRef\"\u003e6\u003c/span\u003e.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"gridtable\"\u003e\u003ctable float=\"Yes\" id=\"Tab6\" border=\"1\"\u003e \u003ccaption language=\"En\"\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionNumber\"\u003eTable 6\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv class=\"CaptionContent\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMixed-Methods Integration Matrix\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003c/caption\u003e \u003ccolgroup cols=\"4\"\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c1\" colnum=\"1\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c2\" colnum=\"2\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c3\" colnum=\"3\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv align=\"left\" class=\"colspec\" colname=\"c4\" colnum=\"4\"\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003cthead\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLearning Domain\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuantitative Trend\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative Insight\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003cth align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegration Pattern\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/th\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/thead\u003e \u003ctbody\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eSomatic awareness\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLargest effect (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.12)\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eWidespread reports of enhanced proprioceptive sensitivity\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConvergence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eJoint comfort\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge mobility gains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversal reports of reduced stiffness and easier daily movement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConvergence\u0026thinsp;+\u0026thinsp;expansion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eFunctional performance\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eLarge balance and strength gains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eProgressive task ease and reduced fatigue\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConvergence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMind\u0026ndash;body integration\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eModerate mental health gains\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003ePresent-moment focus and breath\u0026ndash;movement awareness\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eExpansion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003ctr\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c1\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eMotivation \u0026amp; adherence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c2\"\u003e \u003cp\u003e96% completion\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c3\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eUniversal enjoyment and strong social connection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003ctd align=\"left\" colname=\"c4\"\u003e \u003cp\u003eConvergence\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/td\u003e \u003c/tr\u003e \u003c/tbody\u003e \u003c/colgroup\u003e \u003c/table\u003e\u003c/div\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Discussion","content":"\u003cdiv id=\"Sec17\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eSummary of Findings\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study examined how dance functioned pedagogically within higher education physical education, demonstrating how embodied learning processes may be intentionally structured through curriculum design. Quantitative findings indicated significant learning developments in joint mobility and functional performance (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.70\u0026ndash;1.36), alongside moderate-to-large psychosocial gains (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.60\u0026ndash;1.12). The largest psychometric effect was observed in body awareness, while high levels of attendance (91%) and completion (96%) reflected sustained student engagement within the learning programme.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eQualitative findings complemented these outcomes, with participants describing enhanced somatic awareness, reduced stiffness in everyday activities, increased confidence in movement participation, and continued enjoyment of physical activity. Collectively, these findings indicate that structured dance participation operated not only as physical practice but as a pedagogical environment through which movement competence, perception, and motivation developed concurrently.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRather than positioning dance as an alternative to conventional exercise approaches, the findings illustrate how culturally grounded movement practices may function within physical education as intentionally organised and assessable learning experiences aligned with curricular objectives.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec18\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eContribution to Sport Pedagogy\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis study contributes to ongoing discussions within sport pedagogy regarding embodied approaches to learning (Shilling, \u003cspan citationid=\"CR88\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2021\u003c/span\u003e; Klemola et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR55\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2023\u003c/span\u003e). While prior research has established that dance can improve health-related outcomes, fewer studies have examined how dance functions pedagogically within formal physical education settings.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe findings suggest that embodied pedagogies may support learning across multiple domains simultaneously: physical capacity, perceptual awareness, and motivational engagement. Importantly, these outcomes were measurable and aligned with clearly articulated learning objectives, indicating that embodied learning can be systematically integrated into curriculum design rather than treated as supplementary activity.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study therefore extends existing literature by illustrating how embodied practice can be structured, assessed, and interpreted within sport pedagogy frameworks, particularly in adult and distance-learning populations. The findings further indicate that dance-based learning operated through identifiable pedagogical mechanisms, including progressive task sequencing, reflective bodily awareness, and collaborative synchronisation among participants. These mechanisms supported the integration of physical engagement with reflective learning processes, suggesting that embodied pedagogy functions not merely through activity participation but through intentional instructional design. In this sense, dance may be understood as a transferable pedagogical model capable of structuring meaningful learning experiences within higher education physical education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec19\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImplications for Physical Education Curriculum\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results have practical implications for curriculum design in higher education physical education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirst, movement-based learning can be intentionally structured to support both functional performance and reflective awareness. The integration of choreographic progression, guided reflection, and peer interaction appears to have supported both physical development and intrinsic motivation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecond, culturally relevant movement practices may enhance engagement. Participants frequently referenced cultural resonance and collective participation as meaningful aspects of the experience. This suggests that curriculum designers should consider contextual adaptation rather than standardized exercise prescriptions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe incorporation of culturally familiar dance practices may also have contributed to students\u0026rsquo; sense of belonging and participation, indicating that embodied pedagogies are shaped not only by instructional structure but also by cultural resonance within learning environments.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThird, the high retention rate indicates that embodied pedagogies may support sustained participation, an ongoing challenge in adult and distance education contexts (Bozkurt et al., \u003cspan citationid=\"CR13\" class=\"CitationRef\"\u003e2022\u003c/span\u003e). While the present study does not establish long-term behavioural change, it suggests that intrinsic engagement may be fostered when movement is framed as expressive and socially meaningful rather than obligation-driven.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec20\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eImplications for Teacher Education\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFor teacher education programs, the findings highlight the importance of pedagogical structure rather than simply activity selection. The effectiveness of the pedagogical programme appeared to depend on:\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e \u003col\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eProgressive sequencing of movement tasks\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eExplicit learning goals\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eOpportunities for reflection\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003cspan\u003e \u003cli\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocial interaction and collaborative movement\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/li\u003e \u003c/span\u003e \u003c/ol\u003e \u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThis reinforces the view that embodied pedagogy requires instructional intentionality. Dance in physical education should not be reduced to performance replication or entertainment; rather, it can be designed as a learning environment that cultivates movement literacy, body awareness, and relational engagement.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTeacher education programs may therefore benefit from preparing future educators to design, scaffold, and assess embodied learning experiences using both quantitative and qualitative tools.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec21\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eLimitations\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeveral limitations warrant consideration.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFirst, the quasi-experimental design without a control group limits causal inference. However, the purpose of the present study was not to establish causal superiority over alternative instructional approaches but to examine how embodied learning processes may emerge within authentic curriculum implementation contexts. The design therefore prioritised pedagogical realism over experimental control.While learning developments were statistically significant, alternative explanations such as maturation effects cannot be fully excluded.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSecond, the sample consisted exclusively of female university students within one institutional context, which restricts generalisability. Cultural specificity may have contributed positively to engagement, and results may differ in other contexts.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThird, psychosocial measures were collected in a subsample (n\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;30), and longer-term follow-up was not conducted. The sustainability of observed changes remains unknown.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, although quantitative measures demonstrated reliability, mobility and functional performance were assessed over a relatively short pedagogical programme period.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThese limitations suggest caution in interpreting the findings as definitive evidence of superiority over other pedagogical approaches.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e \u003cdiv id=\"Sec22\" class=\"Section2\"\u003e \u003ch2\u003eFuture Research\u003c/h2\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture studies may extend this work in several directions.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControlled comparative designs could examine differences between dance-based pedagogy and other movement approaches. Longitudinal research would help determine whether embodied learning experiences influence sustained physical activity participation.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurther qualitative work may explore how cultural adaptation shapes engagement across diverse contexts. Research involving mixed-gender or multi-institutional samples would strengthen generalisability.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinally, future investigations might examine how embodied pedagogies interact with digital or hybrid learning environments, particularly in distance higher education settings. In this regard, dance-based embodied pedagogy offers not simply an alternative activity but a conceptual reorientation of how learning through movement may be designed, experienced, and evaluated within contemporary physical education.\u003c/p\u003e \u003c/div\u003e"},{"header":"Conclusion","content":"\u003cp\u003eThis study demonstrates how dance may operate as a pedagogically purposeful approach within higher education physical education, illustrating the capacity of embodied learning to be intentionally structured through curriculum design. Participation in the programme was associated with consistent learning developments in mobility and functional performance (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;0.70\u0026ndash;1.36), alongside substantial gains in body awareness (d\u0026thinsp;=\u0026thinsp;1.12) and psychosocial engagement. High completion rates (96%) and widespread reports of enjoyment indicate that movement-based learning was experienced by students as both measurable and educationally meaningful. Collectively, these findings suggest that embodied learning outcomes can be deliberately designed, implemented, and evaluated within formal curriculum frameworks rather than positioned as supplementary wellness or recreational activities.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe study contributes to ongoing discussions in sport pedagogy by demonstrating how dance-based pedagogical practices may support student engagement and capability development through structured movement experiences. Engagement in dance enabled students to develop physical competence, somatic awareness, and social connection within an organised instructional environment. The convergence of quantitative learning developments with qualitative accounts of increased comfort, confidence, and attentional presence highlights the pedagogical potential of integrating movement practices that connect physical development with reflective learning processes.\u003c/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWithin higher education particularly distance-learning contexts where reduced opportunities for embodied participation remain a persistent challenge dance-based physical education represents a viable curricular strategy. Aligning embodied practice with assessable learning outcomes allows institutions to support holistic student development while maintaining academic accountability. Future research may further examine how embodied pedagogies can be adapted across diverse cultural and institutional settings to strengthen physical education curriculum design and inform teacher education practices. Taken together, these findings suggest that dance-based embodied practice may serve as a viable pedagogical model for rethinking learning design and student engagement in contemporary higher education physical education. Rather than functioning as supplementary activity, embodied pedagogies enable the integration of physical, reflective, and relational dimensions of learning within curriculum structures.\u003c/p\u003e"},{"header":"References","content":"\u003col\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAfonso, J., Rocha, L., Ramirez-Campillo, R., \u0026amp; Sarmento, H. (2023). The effectiveness of pre-exercise routines to enhance jumping performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 53(4), 825\u0026ndash;841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01774-0\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., \u0026amp; Joo, H. (2022). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 291\u0026ndash;317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120968276\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAmerican Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145\u0026ndash;156. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11410403\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAngrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208932\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarbado, D., S\u0026aacute;nchez-Molina, D., Maroto-Izquierdo, S., \u0026amp; L\u0026oacute;pez-Garc\u0026iacute;a, J. J. (2023). Core stability assessment and training methods in older adults: A systematic review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 31(2), 141\u0026ndash;156. https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2021-0388\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBarene, S., Krustrup, P., Jackman, S. R., Brekke, O. L., \u0026amp; Holtermann, A. (2014). Do soccer and Zumba exercise improve fitness and indicators of health among female hospital employees? A 12-week RCT. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine \u0026amp; Science in Sports, 24(6), 990\u0026ndash;999. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12138\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBellg, A. J., Borrelli, B., Resnick, B., Hecht, J., Minicucci, D. S., Ory, M., Ogedegbe, G., Orwig, D., Ernst, D., \u0026amp; Czajkowski, S. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychology, 23(5), 443\u0026ndash;451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBiesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: Qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory, 70(1), 89\u0026ndash;104. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12411\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBiggs, J., \u0026amp; Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBohannon, R. W. (2006). Reference values for the timed up and go test: A descriptive meta-analysis. Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 29(2), 64\u0026ndash;68. https://doi.org/10.1519/00139143-200608000-00004\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., Pham, P., Chong, S. W., \u0026amp; Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(4), 1\u0026ndash;41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00436-z\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBozkurt, A., Jung, I., Xiao, J., Vladimirschi, V., Schuwer, R., Egorov, G., Lambert, S., Al-Freih, M., Pete, J., Olcott, D., Rodes, V., Aranciaga, I., Bali, M., Alvarez, A. V., Roberts, J., Pazurek, A., Raffaghelli, J. E., Panagiotou, N., de Co\u0026euml;tlogon, P., \u0026hellip; Paskevicius, M. (2022). A global outlook to the interruption of education due to COVID-19 pandemic: Navigating in a time of uncertainty and crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1\u0026ndash;126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3878572\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBraun, V., \u0026amp; Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77\u0026ndash;101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBraun, V., \u0026amp; Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328\u0026ndash;352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCasey, A., \u0026amp; MacPhail, A. (2022). Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(1), 1\u0026ndash;6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1990249\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChen, X., \u0026amp; Wang, L. (2025). From expression to profession: Investigating how dance education in China enhances student development across health, career, and cultural dimensions. Educational Studies, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245251363200\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCraig, C. L., Marshall, A. L., Sj\u0026ouml;str\u0026ouml;m, M., Bauman, A. E., Booth, M. L., Ainsworth, B. E., Pratt, M., Ekelund, U., Yngve, A., Sallis, J. F., \u0026amp; Oja, P. (2003). International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine \u0026amp; Science in Sports \u0026amp; Exercise, 35(8), 1381\u0026ndash;1395. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCraig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., \u0026amp; Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluating complex pedagogical programmes: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337, a1655. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCreswell, J. W., \u0026amp; Guetterman, T. C. (2020). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCreswell, J. W., \u0026amp; Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCsikszentmihalyi, M. (2020). Finding flow: The psychology of engagement with everyday life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(4), 1209\u0026ndash;1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00150-4\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCurran, G. M., Bauer, M., Mittman, B., Pyne, J. M., \u0026amp; Stetler, C. (2012). Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Medical Care, 50(3), 217\u0026ndash;226. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDaly, C., Pachler, N., Mor, Y., \u0026amp; Mellar, H. (2023). Exploring the pedagogical potential of video-based learning designs. Learning, Media and Technology, 35(3), 289\u0026ndash;306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2010.509347\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDeci, E. L., \u0026amp; Ryan, R. M. (2000). The \u0026quot;what\u0026quot; and \u0026quot;why\u0026quot; of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227\u0026ndash;268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDowns, S., Marquez, J., \u0026amp; Chiarelli, P. (2013). The Berg Balance Scale has high intra- and inter-rater reliability but absolute reliability varies across the scale: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy, 59(2), 93\u0026ndash;99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70161-9\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eDuncan, P. W., Weiner, D. K., Chandler, J., \u0026amp; Studenski, S. (1990). Functional reach: A new clinical measure of balance. Journal of Gerontology, 45(6), M192\u0026ndash;M197. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/45.6.M192\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEmerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., \u0026amp; Shaw, L. L. (2020). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226337722.001.0001\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., \u0026amp; Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs\u0026mdash;principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134\u0026ndash;2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eField, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFranchignoni, F., Vercelli, S., Giordano, A., Sartorio, F., Bravini, E., \u0026amp; Ferriero, G. (2014). Minimal clinically important difference of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). Journal of Orthopaedic \u0026amp; Sports Physical Therapy, 44(1), 30\u0026ndash;39. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2014.4893\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFreitas, S. R., Andrade, R. J., Larcoupaille, L., Mil-Homens, P., \u0026amp; Nordez, A. (2018). Muscle and joint responses during and after static stretching performed at different intensities. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 118(6), 1363\u0026ndash;1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-018-3874-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eFuchs, T., \u0026amp; Koch, S. C. (2014). Embodied affectivity: On moving and being moved. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00508\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGajdosik, R. L., \u0026amp; Bohannon, R. W. (1987). Clinical measurement of range of motion: Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Physical Therapy, 67(12), 1867\u0026ndash;1872. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.12.1867\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGallagher, S., \u0026amp; Lindgren, R. (2020). Enactive metaphors: Learning through full-body engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 391\u0026ndash;404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9327-1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGarrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGarrison, D. R., \u0026amp; Vaughan, N. D. (2020). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley \u0026amp; Sons.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGirden, E. R. (1992). ANOVA: Repeated measures (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). SAGE Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGlasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., \u0026amp; Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don\u0026apos;t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261\u0026ndash;1267. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eGuetterman, T. C., Curry, L. A., \u0026amp; Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554\u0026ndash;561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHarden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: The ostrich, the peacock and the beaver. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 666\u0026ndash;671. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701729948\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHawe, P., Shiell, A., \u0026amp; Riley, T. (2004). Complex pedagogical programmes: How \u0026quot;out of control\u0026quot; can a randomised controlled trial be? BMJ, 328(7455), 1561\u0026ndash;1563. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1561\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHecksteden, A., Kraushaar, J., Schrettl, J., \u0026amp; Meyer, T. (2018). Individual anaerobic threshold is unchanged after high-intensity interval training. Frontiers in Physiology, 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00033\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine, 30(1), 1\u0026ndash;15. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHwang, P. W., \u0026amp; Braun, K. L. (2015). The effectiveness of dance pedagogical programmes to improve older adults\u0026apos; health: A systematic literature review. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 21(5), 64\u0026ndash;70.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eIndonesian National Research Ethics Committee. (2017). Ethical review guidelines for human research. Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJohnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., \u0026amp; Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112\u0026ndash;133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJones, C. J., Rikli, R. E., \u0026amp; Beam, W. C. (1999). A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(2), 113\u0026ndash;119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608028\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKandasamy, G., Alqahtani, M. S., Bhuvaneswari, A. S., Verma, A. K., Alshahrani, M. Y., Alqahtani, Y. A., Faqihi, A. A., Samman, A. A., Alasiri, A. M., Alshahrani, S. A., Jali, M. V., \u0026amp; Acharya, S. (2024). Prevalence of musculoskeletal pain among undergraduate students. Frontiers in Medicine, 11, 1403267. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1403267\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKarpati, F. J., Giacosa, C., Foster, N. E., Penhune, V. B., \u0026amp; Hyde, K. L. (2020). Dance and music share gray matter structural correlates. Brain Research, 1657, 62\u0026ndash;73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.11.029\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKelley, K., \u0026amp; Preacher, K. J. (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 137\u0026ndash;152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028086\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKleinman, E., Cohen, Z. D., DeRubeis, R. J., \u0026amp; DeRubeis, R. (2024). Effects of a body-based mindfulness program on alexithymia, dispositional mindfulness, and distress symptoms: A pilot clinical trial. Mindfulness, 15(12), 3056\u0026ndash;3069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-024-02493-3\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKlemola, U., Heikinaro-Johansson, P., \u0026amp; O\u0026apos;Sullivan, M. (2023). Physical education student teachers and embodied knowledge. Sport, Education and Society, 18(6), 717\u0026ndash;731. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.608941\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKoo, T. K., \u0026amp; Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155\u0026ndash;163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eKshtriya, S., Barnstaple, K., Rabinovich, D. B., \u0026amp; DeSouza, J. F. (2015). Dance and aging: A critical review of findings in neuroscience. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 37(2), 81\u0026ndash;112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10465-015-9196-7\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLaucis, N. C., Hays, R. D., \u0026amp; Bhattacharyya, T. (2014). Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: A brief guide. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 96(19), 1628\u0026ndash;1634. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01077\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLima, C. K., Barbosa, I. R., Souza, R. A., Lima, M. S., \u0026amp; Silva, E. M. (2024). Co-occurrence of obesogenic behaviors and their implications for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study with university students. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 1538. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19031-6\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLincoln, Y. S., \u0026amp; Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLipsey, M. W., Puzak, R. S., \u0026amp; Kelley, A. (2012). Design analysis: A comprehensive resource for planning and evaluating research. SAGE Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eLiu, X., Zhang, Y., \u0026amp; Wang, H. (2025). The effect of VR technology-assisted college dance education on college students\u0026apos; physical and mental health and their comprehensive qualities. SAGE Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14727978251321392\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMattle, M., Chocano-Bedoya, P. O., Fischbacher, M., Meyer, U., Abderhalden, L. A., Lang, W., Mansky, R., Kressig, R. W., Steurer, J., Orav, E. J., Egli, A., \u0026amp; Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A. (2020). Association of dance-based mind-motor activities with falls and physical function among healthy older adults. JAMA Network Open, 3(9), e2017688. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.17688\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMaxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., \u0026amp; Howard, G. S. (2020). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does \u0026quot;failure to replicate\u0026quot; really mean? American Psychologist, 70(6), 487\u0026ndash;498. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMayorga-Vega, D., Merino-Marban, R., \u0026amp; Viciana, J. (2014). Criterion-related validity of sit-and-reach tests for estimating hamstring and lumbar extensibility: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Science \u0026amp; Medicine, 13(1), 1\u0026ndash;14.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMcAuley, E., \u0026amp; Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28(2), 85\u0026ndash;88.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMehling, W. E., Gopisetty, V., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Hecht, F. M., \u0026amp; Stewart, A. (2009). Body awareness: Construct and self-report measures. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5614. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005614\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMinistry of Education and Culture, Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Panduan pengembangan kurikulum program studi di perguruan tinggi [Guidelines for curriculum development in higher education study programs. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barlow, J., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., Moore, L., O\u0026apos;Cathain, A., Tinati, T., Wight, D., \u0026amp; Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex pedagogical programmes: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 350, h1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h1258\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoore, M. G., \u0026amp; Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Wadsworth.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMoon, J. A. (2006). Learning journals: A handbook for reflective practice and professional development (2nd ed.). Routledge.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNiemann, C., Godde, B., Staudinger, U. M., \u0026amp; Voelcker-Rehage, C. (2020). Exercise-induced changes in basal ganglia volume and cognition in older adults. Neuroscience, 281, 147\u0026ndash;163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.033\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., \u0026amp; Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1\u0026ndash;13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eNguyen, T. M., \u0026amp; Hab\u0026oacute;k, A. (2021). Vietnamese teachers\u0026apos; perspectives on outcome-based education. Educational Studies, 47(5), 571\u0026ndash;591. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1717930\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research \u0026amp; evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePeters, D. H., Adam, T., Alonge, O., Agyepong, I. A., \u0026amp; Tran, N. (2013). Implementation research: What it is and how to do it. BMJ, 347, f6753. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f6753\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePortney, L. G., \u0026amp; Watkins, M. P. (2015). Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice (3rd ed.). F.A. Davis Company.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRahman, A., Susanto, H., \u0026amp; Hartono, R. (2024). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka belajar dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia berbasis kearifan lokal [Implementation of Merdeka Belajar curriculum in Indonesian language learning based on local wisdom]. EL-Tsaqafah: Jurnal Jurusan PBA, 23(2), 315\u0026ndash;328. https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v23i2.11712\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRazali, N. M., \u0026amp; Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21\u0026ndash;33.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRehfeld, K., L\u0026uuml;ders, A., H\u0026ouml;kelmann, A., Lessmann, V., Kaufmann, J., Brigadski, T., M\u0026uuml;ller, P., \u0026amp; M\u0026uuml;ller, N. G. (2018). Dance training is superior to repetitive physical exercise in inducing brain plasticity in the elderly. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0196636. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196636\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRodrigues, J., Prussak, K. A., \u0026amp; Graber, K. C. (2021). Reconceptualizing dance as physical activity. Quest, 63(3), 271\u0026ndash;282. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2011.10483680\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eRose, D. H., \u0026amp; Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal Design for Learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSamsa, G., Edelman, D., Rothman, M. L., Williams, G. R., Lipscomb, J., \u0026amp; Matchar, D. (1999). Determining clinically important differences in health status measures. PharmacoEconomics, 15(2), 141\u0026ndash;155. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199915020-00003\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchoenfeld, B. J., Ogborn, D., \u0026amp; Krieger, J. W. (2016). Dose-response relationships between resistance training volume and muscle hypertrophy: A systematic review and nonlinear meta-regression modelling. Sports Medicine, 46(11), 1635\u0026ndash;1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-016-0559-2\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSchwender, T. M., Spengler, S., Oedl, C., \u0026amp; Mess, F. (2018). Effects of dance pedagogical programmes on aspects of the participants\u0026apos; self: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01130\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., \u0026amp; Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShapiro, L., \u0026amp; Stolz, S. A. (2022). Embodied cognition and its significance for education. Theory and Research in Education, 17(1), 19\u0026ndash;39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878518822149\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eShilling, C. (2021). Body pedagogics: Embodiment, cognition and cultural transmission. Sociology, 55(6), 1148\u0026ndash;1164. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385211028743\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSilva, A. P., Marques, D. L., Vieira, J. M., Silva, M. N., Teixeira, P. J., \u0026amp; Palmeira, A. L. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effects of dance programs on physical performance: Appropriate health promotion for healthy older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12335. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912335\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSmith, J. A., Flowers, P., \u0026amp; Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSmith, L., Wang, C., \u0026amp; Martinez, J. (2023). Contemporary dance pedagogy: Principles and practice in movement education. Journal of Dance Education, 23(1), 45\u0026ndash;62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15290824.2022.2156789\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSullivan, G. M., \u0026amp; Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279\u0026ndash;282. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSullivan, M. J., Bishop, S. R., \u0026amp; Pivik, J. (1995). The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7(4), 524\u0026ndash;532. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSusanto, H., \u0026amp; Hartono, R. (2022). The development of teaching materials based outcome-based education curriculum to encourage teacher skill. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 22(3), 245\u0026ndash;258. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v22i3.53785\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTarr, B., Launay, J., \u0026amp; Dunbar, R. I. (2014). Music and social bonding: \u0026quot;Self-other\u0026quot; merging and neurohormonal mechanisms. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1096. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01096\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTeixeira, P. J., Carra\u0026ccedil;a, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., \u0026amp; Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight \u0026quot;big-tent\u0026quot; criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837\u0026ndash;851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eTurner, K., Davis, J., \u0026amp; Anderson, L. (2022). Resistance exercise and functional capacity in older adults: A meta-analysis. Journal of Aging and Health, 34(4), 521\u0026ndash;543. https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643211067890\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eUNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education\u0026mdash;All means all. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVarea, V., \u0026amp; Gonz\u0026aacute;lez-Calvo, G. (2021). Touchless classes and absent bodies: Teaching physical education in times of Covid-19. Sport, Education and Society, 26(8), 831\u0026ndash;845. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2020.1791814\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWang, Y., Chen, L., \u0026amp; Zhang, M. (2025). An experimental study on the impact of sports dance exercise on college students\u0026apos; mental health. International Education Forum, 7(2), 123\u0026ndash;135. https://doi.org/10.54005/ief.v7i2.12764\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWare, J. E., Kosinski, M., \u0026amp; Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220\u0026ndash;233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWestbrook, C., Creswell, J. D., Lam, S., Dutton, M. A., Carmody, J., \u0026amp; Baer, R. A. (2024). A systematic review of brief respiratory, embodiment, cognitive, and mindfulness pedagogical programmes to reduce state anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1412928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1412928\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWiggins, G., \u0026amp; McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWijaya, H., Susanto, R., \u0026amp; Pratama, A. (2024). Implementation of early childhood education kits in higher education student learning: Ex-post facto study of Open University students. Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 18(1), 82\u0026ndash;100. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpud.181.06\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWoods, K., Bishop, P., \u0026amp; Jones, E. (2007). Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury. Sports Medicine, 37(12), 1089\u0026ndash;1099. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200737120-00006\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eWyon, M. A., Harris, J., Adams, J., \u0026amp; Cloak, R. (2020). The impact of dance-specific neuromuscular conditioning and injury prevention training on motor control, stability, balance, function and injury in professional ballet dancers: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566851\u003c/li\u003e\n\u003c/ol\u003e"}],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":true,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":true,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":false,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":false,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"Dance Pedagogy, Embodied Learning, Physical Education, Higher Education, Student Engagement","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9001347/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9001347/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eDance is frequently positioned in higher education physical education as an expressive or recreational activity, with limited attention to its pedagogical function in shaping meaningful learning experiences. This study examined how dance can operate as an embodied pedagogical approach within university physical education, particularly in a distance-learning context. A mixed-methods pedagogical programme was conducted with undergraduate students who participated in a six-week structured dance programme. Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated to explore changes in student engagement, embodied awareness, and perceived learning outcomes. Findings indicated increased participation, deeper bodily awareness, and strengthened connections between movement, reflection, and self-regulation. Students described dance as fostering attentiveness to movement quality, relational interaction, and sustained motivation to engage in physical activity. The convergence of numerical trends and experiential accounts suggests that dance functioned not merely as physical exercise but as a mode of embodied learning aligned with curricular learning objectives. These findings contribute to sport pedagogy scholarship by positioning dance as a pedagogically purposeful practice capable of enhancing engagement and learning in higher education physical education, including flexible and distance delivery formats. The study contributes to physical education pedagogy by demonstrating how dance can operate as an embodied pedagogical model aligning movement practice with curriculum-based learning outcomes in higher education.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Dance as Embodied Pedagogy in Higher Education Physical Education: A Mixed-Methods Curriculum Pedagogical Programme","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2026-03-03 15:03:43","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-9001347/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"5ecdf5ae-fbd7-479b-b1e5-17e98c1b0815","owner":[],"postedDate":"March 3rd, 2026","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-03-03T15:03:43+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2026-03-03 15:03:43","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-9001347","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-9001347","identity":"rs-9001347","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"XKTyCvWXoU3ODBz1xrDgd","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}