Combining Medication With High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound for Adenomyosis: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

review OA: bronze public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This network meta-analysis of 31 trials found that combining high-intensity-focused ultrasound with GnRH-a and progestin best reduced pain, while progestin alone best reduced uterine volume and recurrence, and mifepristone best reduced menstrual volume.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This network meta-analysis synthesized randomized controlled trials to compare combination therapies for adenomyosis, using a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases through February 21, 2024. Outcomes included VAS scores for dysmenorrhea, uterine and lesion volumes, menstrual blood loss, and disease recurrence, with direct and indirect comparisons summarized using weighted mean differences or relative risks and presented with ranking probabilities. Across 31 included articles, HIFU combined with GnRH-a and progestin reduced dysmenorrhea VAS scores more than other combinations, while HIFU plus progestin performed better for uterine volume, lesion size, and recurrence rate, and HIFU plus mifepristone reduced menstrual volume more effectively. The paper does not report specific limitations in the provided text. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis—specifically, comparative effectiveness of medication plus high-intensity-focused ultrasound (HIFU) regimens using network meta-analysis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This network meta-analysis aims to identify the best possible combination therapy for individuals suffering from adenomyosis. To identify pertinent research for the network meta-analysis, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP, spanning from their commencement to February 21, 2024. The study's focus was on evaluating outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) scores for dysmenorrhea, measurements of uterine and lesion volumes, menstrual blood loss, and the rate of disease recurrence. The findings from both direct and indirect comparisons, which were quantitatively assessed using weighted mean differences or relative risk along with their respective 95% confidence intervals, were graphically depicted in forest plots. Additionally, the ranking probability was illustrated, which indicated the likelihood of various high-intensity-focused ultrasound (HIFU) combination therapies being the most effective across each measured outcome. In the final analysis, this network meta-analysis encompassed a total of 31 articles. The results showed that HIFU combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and progestin was more effective to decrease VAS score for dysmenorrhea than other combined therapies. HIFU combined with progestin was superior to other combined therapies in decreasing uterine volume, lesion size, and recurrence rate. HIFU combined with mifepristone was more effective to reduce menstrual volume compared to other combined therapies. The analysis suggests that regimens incorporating HIFU along with GnRH-a and progestin, or HIFU combined with progestin or HIFU combined with mifepristone might offer superior benefits in the clinical management of adenomyosis. These combined treatment approaches could potentially be more effective options for patients suffering from this condition.
Full text 2,403 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Combining Medication With High-Intensity-Focused Ultrasound for Adenomyosis A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials All authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Abstract This network meta-analysis aims to identify the best possible combination therapy for individuals suffering from adenomyosis. To identify pertinent research for the network meta-analysis, a comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP, spanning from their commencement to February 21, 2024. The study's focus was on evaluating outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) scores for dysmenorrhea, measurements of uterine and lesion volumes, menstrual blood loss, and the rate of disease recurrence. The findings from both direct and indirect comparisons, which were quantitatively assessed using weighted mean differences or relative risk along with their respective 95% confidence intervals, were graphically depicted in forest plots. Additionally, the ranking probability was illustrated, which indicated the likelihood of various high-intensity-focused ultrasound (HIFU) combination therapies being the most effective across each measured outcome. In the final analysis, this network meta-analysis encompassed a total of 31 articles. The results showed that HIFU combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and progestin was more effective to decrease VAS score for dysmenorrhea than other combined therapies. HIFU combined with progestin was superior to other combined therapies in decreasing uterine volume, lesion size, and recurrence rate. HIFU combined with mifepristone was more effective to reduce menstrual volume compared to other combined therapies. The analysis suggests that regimens incorporating HIFU along with GnRH-a and progestin, or HIFU combined with progestin or HIFU combined with mifepristone might offer superior benefits in the clinical management of adenomyosis. These combined treatment approaches could potentially be more effective options for patients suffering from this condition. Data Availability Statement The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain

Condition tags

dysmenorrheaadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

SciLite annotations

chemicals 4
progestin progestin mifepristone progestin

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-31T06:09:14.520117+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-31T06:06:23.560753+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:57:49.680383+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-11T08:34:28.763810+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine