Wave Function Collapse and the Nature of Causaility

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

The title has changed because the objective has also changed. The purpose of earlier versions was to clarify Einstein’s intent when he formulated his quantum theory of radiation: why choose statistical methods to derive Planck’s law, why emphasize momentum, and why are both important to a “final theory”. We find that Einstein’s methods have the common property that they are formulated statistically in continuous space and time. It means that the problem of the quantum-classical divide does not exist in any of his theories, and that his results are fully consistent in the presence of non-linear gravitational fields. To see if his unconventional methods can provide the insights necessary to resolve the long-standing problem of wave function collapse we will compare how the two versions interpret causality. We show that Gödel’s incompleteness theorem is key to resolving wave function collapse.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00