Ways to Repair Multicompartment Prolapse: Decision-Making and Surgical Approach.
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This review outlines decision-making and surgical approaches for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse, emphasizing multidisciplinary care and various techniques like robotic or vaginal repair to optimize treatment outcomes.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occurs when multiple pelvic organs herniate through the pelvic floor, impacting quality of life and daily function. Concomitant POP and rectal prolapse are common but often underrecognized. A multidisciplinary approach involving urology, urogynecology, and colorectal surgery is essential for comprehensive care and improved outcomes. Concurrent surgeries are increasingly performed, allowing patients to address both conditions in a single operation without heightened complication rates. Treatment for rectal and vaginal prolapse can be achieved through robotic, laparoscopic, open abdominal, or vaginal/perineal approaches. Surgical selection is guided by patient comorbidities, treatment goals, the choice of mesh versus native tissue repair, and the surgeon's experience. This article presents five different approaches to illustrate the nuances of combined surgical approaches, offering insights into optimizing the treatment of multicompartment POP.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00