⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-03
· read from full text
ⓘ
This preprint studied how perceived stress relates to frontal cortical asymmetry and EEG beta-band activity across eyes-open versus eyes-closed conditions, using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and EEG measurements. In the eyes-open state, the authors reported a moderate-to-strong positive correlation between frontal asymmetry and perceived stress (r = 0.66), and found significant positive correlations between perceived stress and low beta power in the right hemisphere (FP2: r = 0.73, p < 0.01; FP1: r = 0.66, p < 0.05), with high beta showing weaker positive trends. In the eyes-closed condition, correlations for low beta were weak and non-significant, and only a weak association with frontal asymmetry remained, while beta power was generally higher during eyes closed. The study is a preprint and explicitly notes that it has not been peer reviewed, and the results are marked as preliminary. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Abstract
This study explores the connection between perceived stress, frontal cortical asymmetry, and brain activity in Low and High Beta frequency bands under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Utilizing EEG, the research assessed perceived stress through the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Results indicated a moderate to strong positive correlation (r = 0.66) between frontal asymmetry and perceived stress with eyes open. Conversely, the eyes-closed condition showed weak and non-significant correlations for Low Beta and a weak correlation for frontal asymmetry. In the eyes-open state, a significant positive correlation existed between perceived stress and Low Beta activity, particularly in the right hemisphere (FP2: r = 0.73, p < 0.01; FP1: r = 0.66, p < 0.05). High Beta activity also presented a positive trend, with a moderate correlation in the right hemisphere (r = 0.42) and weak in the left (r = 0.19). Beta power was generally higher when eyes were closed. These findings suggest that visual state crucially modulates the relationship among frontal Beta activity, cortical asymmetry, and stress, making eyes-open conditions a more reliable stress indicator. The study underscores the importance of visual state in EEG stress data interpretation and offers insights for developing neurophysiological stress biomarkers and neurofeedback interventions.
Full text
6,454 characters
· extracted from
preprint-html
· click to expand
Cortical Asymmetry and Modulation of Frontal Beta Brain Activity by Perceived Stress | Authorea try { document.documentElement.classList.add('js'); } catch (e) { } var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'G-8VDV14Y67G']); _gaq.push(['_trackPageview']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); Skip to main content Preprints Collections Wiley Open Research IET Open Research Ecological Society of Japan All Collections About About Authorea FAQs Contact Us Quick Search anywhere Search for preprint articles, keywords, etc. Search Search ADVANCED SEARCH SCROLL This is a preprint and has not been peer reviewed. Data may be preliminary. 5 September 2025 V1 Latest version Share on Cortical Asymmetry and Modulation of Frontal Beta Brain Activity by Perceived Stress Authors : I.E.F. Guimarães , P.R.K. Goulart , and F.A.F. Rocha 0000-0002-6148-1050 [email protected] Authors Info & Affiliations https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175706133.32153025/v1 125 views 67 downloads Contents Abstract Supplementary Material Information & Authors Metrics & Citations View Options References Figures Tables Media Share Abstract This study explores the connection between perceived stress, frontal cortical asymmetry, and brain activity in Low and High Beta frequency bands under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. Utilizing EEG, the research assessed perceived stress through the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Results indicated a moderate to strong positive correlation (r = 0.66) between frontal asymmetry and perceived stress with eyes open. Conversely, the eyes-closed condition showed weak and non-significant correlations for Low Beta and a weak correlation for frontal asymmetry. In the eyes-open state, a significant positive correlation existed between perceived stress and Low Beta activity, particularly in the right hemisphere (FP2: r = 0.73, p < 0.01; FP1: r = 0.66, p < 0.05). High Beta activity also presented a positive trend, with a moderate correlation in the right hemisphere (r = 0.42) and weak in the left (r = 0.19). Beta power was generally higher when eyes were closed. These findings suggest that visual state crucially modulates the relationship among frontal Beta activity, cortical asymmetry, and stress, making eyes-open conditions a more reliable stress indicator. The study underscores the importance of visual state in EEG stress data interpretation and offers insights for developing neurophysiological stress biomarkers and neurofeedback interventions. Supplementary Material File (anonymized main document.doc) Download 58.00 KB Information & Authors Information Version history V1 Version 1 05 September 2025 Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License. Authors Affiliations I.E.F. Guimarães Universidade Federal do Para View all articles by this author P.R.K. Goulart Universidade Federal do Para View all articles by this author F.A.F. Rocha 0000-0002-6148-1050 [email protected] Universidade Federal do Para View all articles by this author Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 125 views 67 downloads .FvxKWukQNSOunydq8rnd { width: 100px; } Citations Download citation I.E.F. Guimarães, P.R.K. Goulart, F.A.F. Rocha. Cortical Asymmetry and Modulation of Frontal Beta Brain Activity by Perceived Stress. Authorea . 05 September 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.175706133.32153025/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu . Format Please select one from the list RIS (ProCite, Reference Manager) EndNote BibTex Medlars RefWorks Direct import Tips for downloading citations document.getElementById('citMgrHelpLink').addEventListener('click', function() { popupHelp(this.href); return false; }); $(".js__slcInclude").on("change", function(e){ if ($(this).val() == 'refworks') $('#direct').prop("checked", false); $('#direct').prop("disabled", ($(this).val() == 'refworks')); }); View Options View options PDF View PDF Figures Tables Media Share Share Share article link Copy Link Copied! Copying failed. Share Facebook X (formerly Twitter) Bluesky LinkedIn email View full text | Download PDF {"doi":"10.22541/au.175706133.32153025/v1","type":"Article"} Now Reading: Share Figures Tables Close figure viewer Back to article Figure title goes here Change zoom level Go to figure location within the article Download figure Toggle share panel Toggle share panel Share Toggle information panel Toggle information panel Go to previous graphic Go to next graphic Go to previous table Go to next table All figures All tables View all material View all material xrefBack.goTo xrefBack.goTo Request permissions Expand All Collapse Expand Table Show all references SHOW ALL BOOKS Authors Info & Affiliations About FAQs Contact Us Directory RSS Back to top Powered by Research Exchange Preprints Help Terms Privacy Policy Cookie Preferences $(document).ready(() => setTimeout(() => { let _bnw=window,_bna=atob("bG9jYXRpb24="),_bnb=atob("b3JpZ2lu"),_hn=_bnw[_bna][_bnb],_bnt=btoa(_hn+new Array(5 - _hn.length % 4).join(" ")); $.get("/resource/lodash?t="+_bnt); },4000)); (function(){function c(){var b=a.contentDocument||a.contentWindow.document;if(b){var d=b.createElement('script');d.innerHTML="window.__CF$cv$params={r:'9fed14dfac724807',t:'MTc3OTI5ODM1NQ=='};var a=document.createElement('script');a.src='/cdn-cgi/challenge-platform/scripts/jsd/main.js';document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(a);";b.getElementsByTagName('head')[0].appendChild(d)}}if(document.body){var a=document.createElement('iframe');a.height=1;a.width=1;a.style.position='absolute';a.style.top=0;a.style.left=0;a.style.border='none';a.style.visibility='hidden';document.body.appendChild(a);if('loading'!==document.readyState)c();else if(window.addEventListener)document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded',c);else{var e=document.onreadystatechange||function(){};document.onreadystatechange=function(b){e(b);'loading'!==document.readyState&&(document.onreadystatechange=e,c())}}}})();
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.