Application of the cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) for gynecological laparoscopic surgery using the rabbit as an animal model

Bradley S. Hurst, Caleb A. Awoniyi, Janet K. Stephens, Lori K. Thompson, Robert M. Riehl, William D. Schlaff
In: Fertility and Sterility · 1992 · vol. 58(2) , pp. 444–448 · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55194-2 · PMID:1386033 · W1441132800
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study investigated the application of the cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) for gynecological laparoscopic surgery in a rabbit model.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo study the potential application of the cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) in gynecological laparoscopic surgery using a rabbit animal model.DesignTwenty-six rabbits were prospectively randomized into two groups. Laparoscopically directed standard injuries were made on the randomly assigned horn and sidewall in all animals with the CUSA. Contralateral injuries were made with a contact neodymium-yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser in group 1 and with bipolar cautery in group 2. Adhesion and inflammation scores were assessed for two animals in each group at 24, 48, and 72 hours, and seven animals in each group at 14 days.SettingUniversity animal research facility.Main outcome measuresAdhesion and inflammation scores were compared between animals in the CUSA versus Nd:YAG study and the CUSA versus bipolar cautery at 14 days.ResultsNo significant difference in uterine or sidewall adhesion scores was noted between the CUSA versus Nd:YAG or the CUSA versus bipolar cautery. Bipolar cautery produced significantly less inflammation on the uterine horn compared with the CUSA (3.0 +/- 0.2 versus 5.3 +/- 0.7, P = 0.0001), but no difference in sidewall inflammation was noted between the CUSA compared with bipolar cautery. No difference in inflammation was observed between the CUSA and the Nd:YAG laser.ConclusionsThe bipolar cautery appears to be preferable to the CUSA for coagulation of uterine lesions, although dissection of the uterus is not possible with bipolar cautery. The CUSA and the Nd:YAG appear to be comparable for uterine horn dissection. Because the CUSA causes similar adhesion formation and tissue inflammation at the sidewall when compared with the Nd:YAG laser and bipolar cautery and may be less likely to damage blood vessels, ureters, or other collagen-rich tissues, the CUSA may represent a promising new surgical tool for laparoscopically directed peritoneal dissection.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (1)

References (25)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:16:54.145842+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK