Diagnostic value of MRI in chronic pelvic pain: A comparison study using laparoscopy as standard of reference
This study compared the diagnostic value of MRI to laparoscopy for identifying causes of chronic pelvic pain in women.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This prospective study evaluated MRI’s sensitivity as part of the preoperative work-up for chronic pelvic pain in 50 women scheduled for laparoscopy, using a 1.5T scanner with T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences and blind consensus image interpretation by two radiologists. Laparoscopy identified multifactorial causes in 13 patients, including uterine adenomyosis in 25 and deep pelvic endometriosis in 16, along with pelvic adhesions (12) and ovarian endometriomas (10). MRI showed an overall sensitivity of 93% for identifying the origin of pain, with reported sensitivities of 100% for uterine adenomyosis, 83% for deep pelvic endometriosis, and 80% for pelvic adhesions; a key limitation noted in the study’s framed comparison is that performance is reported in terms of sensitivity relative to the laparoscopy reference standard. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and adenomyosis—MRI sensitivity for uterine adenomyosis and deep pelvic endometriosis in women with chronic pelvic pain.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
2,613 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 5 sections
· click to expand
Keywords
Methods
Results
Conclusion
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00