Stakeholders Perspective of Integrating Female Genital Schistosomiasis into HIV Care: A Qualitative Study in Ghana
This qualitative study explored stakeholders' perspectives on integrating Female Genital Schistosomiasis (FGS) and HIV care in Ghana, finding a significant knowledge gap for FGS among community members and health workers.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This qualitative study in Ghana’s Ga South Municipality used focus group discussions with Community Health Officers and key informant interviews across regional, district, and community healthcare levels, plus in-depth interviews with persons with female genital schistosomiasis (FGS) and HIV and with community groups, to explore feasibility, challenges, and opportunities for integrating FGS prevention/control into HIV continuum of care. The study found substantial knowledge gaps about FGS compared with HIV, including misconceptions by health workers that FGS is a sexually transmitted infection, while community knowledge was often limited to gynecological symptoms. Health-seeking behavior across health facilities, herbal centers, and spiritual centers in parallel or sequence was reported to hinder early detection and management among HIV clients, with integration further constrained by stigma, resource limitations, provider attitudes/practices, and cultural beliefs. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,102 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00