Application of laparoscopy in current fertility practice

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2014 · pp. 362–365 · doi:10.5455/2320-1770.ijrcog20140615 · W2166563313
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-19

This prospective study of 50 infertile women established laparoscopy as a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool, revealing pelvic pathology in 86% of cases, particularly tubal and ovarian factors.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: The present study is carried out with the objective of establishing the role of diagnostic and operative laparoscopy as a simple, safe and accurate tool in the evaluation of infertility. The aims of current study were to study the application of laparoscopy in current fertility practice, to evaluate indications for diagnostic laparoscopy for infertility, to study findings of diagnostic laparoscopy and to study various operative procedures performed for correction of infertility. Methods: This is a prospective study of 50 women undergoing infertility workup in a private hospital from January 2011 to January 2012. All infertile women having primary or secondary infertility were included in the study. Couples having male factor infertility were excluded from the study. Data were collected and analyzed. Results: Our study is conducted in 50 cases of infertility patients out of which 74% were primary infertility and 26% were secondary infertility. Uterine factors were found in 16% of cases, tubal factors were found in 44% of cases, ovarian factors were implicated in 30% of cases out of which majority (12%) had PCOD. Among the peritoneal factors (18%) endometriosis and pelvic adhesions were found in 6% each. Inspite of thorough laparoscopic evaluation no cause (unexplained infertility) was found in 14% of cases and hence overall, the pelvic pathology was found in 86% of cases. Conclusions: Laparoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing tubal and peritoneal disease, endometriosis, adhesions and other pelvic pathology, because no other imaging technique provides the same degree of sensitivity and specificity.
Full text 4,696 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 6 sections · click to expand

Keywords

Laparoscopy, InfertilityAbstract

Background

The present study is carried out with the objective of establishing the role of diagnostic and operative laparoscopy as a simple, safe and accurate tool in the evaluation of infertility. The aims of current study were to study the application of laparoscopy in current fertility practice, to evaluate indications for diagnostic laparoscopy for infertility, to study findings of diagnostic laparoscopy and to study various operative procedures performed for correction of infertility.

Methods

This is a prospective study of 50 women undergoing infertility workup in a private hospital from January 2011 to January 2012. All infertile women having primary or secondary infertility were included in the study. Couples having male factor infertility were excluded from the study. Data were collected and analyzed.

Results

Our study is conducted in 50 cases of infertility patients out of which 74% were primary infertility and 26% were secondary infertility. Uterine factors were found in 16% of cases, tubal factors were found in 44% of cases, ovarian factors were implicated in 30% of cases out of which majority (12%) had PCOD. Among the peritoneal factors (18%) endometriosis and pelvic adhesions were found in 6% each. Inspite of thorough laparoscopic evaluation no cause (unexplained infertility) was found in 14% of cases and hence overall, the pelvic pathology was found in 86% of cases.

Conclusions

Laparoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosing tubal and peritoneal disease, endometriosis, adhesions and other pelvic pathology, because no other imaging technique provides the same degree of sensitivity and specificity. Metrics

References

Leon Speroff. Female infertility. In: Leon Speroff, Marc A. Fritz, eds. Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility. 17th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005: 1003-1058. V. G. Padubidri. Pathology of Conception. In: V. G. Padubidri, S. N. Daftary, eds. Shaw: Text book of Gynecology. 14th ed. Noida: Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd; 2008 : 198-199. Gomel V, Taylor PJ. History of laparoscopy. In: Gomel V, Taylor PJ, eds. Diagnostic and Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy. 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book Medical Publishers; 1995 : 46-62 Coltart, T. M. Laparoscopy in the diagnosis of tubal patency. BJOG. 1970;77:69-71. Shetty SS, ND Krishna VR. A comparative study of hysterosalpingogram vs. laparoscopy in patients with infertility. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1972;29:511-5. Klinger BE. Evaluation, therapy and outcome in 493 infertile couples. Fertil Steril.1984;4(1):40-6. Chakraborti DK, Kole SK. Diagnostic laparoscopy in gynecologic disorders. J Obstet Gynecol India. 1990;40:262-5. Sharma R, Sharma V. The infertile woman a study of 120 cases. J Indian Med Assoc.1991;82(2):13-32. Fertility Committee of RCOG Gynecological Laparoscopy. The report of the World party of the confidential enquiry into gynecological laparoscopy. Fertility Committee of RCOG Gynaecological Laparoscopy. 1992:126. Bhide AG., Nalbanski B, Sirakor M, Georgiev S. Diagnostic laparoscopy in female sterility. Khirugia Softia. 2003;50(3):35-6. Corson SL, Chen A, Gutmann JN. Laparoscopy in the normal infertile patient, a question revisired. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparo. 2000;7(3):317-24. Kumar P, Dang A. Is Laparoscopy necessary in all infertile patients? J Obstet Gynecol India. 2001;51(2):105-8. Jonathan S. Berek. Operative gynecology. In: Jonathan S. Berek, R. D. Rinehart, P. A. Hillard, Eli Y. Adashi, eds. Novak’s Gynecology. 14th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007: 973-974, 979-983. Tindal VR. Infertility and Subfertility. In: Tindal VR, eds. Jeffcoates Principles of Gynecology. 7th ed. Butterworth: Heinemann International ed; 2008: 699-741. Steptoe PC. Gynecology endoscopy, culdoscopy and laparoscopy in infertility. J Obstet Gynecol Br C Wealth. 1965;72:535. Gomel V, Taylor PJ. Diagnostic laparoscopy in infertility. In: Gomel V, Taylor PJ, eds. Diagnostic and Operative Gynecologic Laparoscopy. 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book Medical Publishers; 1995: 466-481. Gomel V, Taylor PJ. Indications and contraindications of diagnostic laparoscopy. In: Gomel V, Taylor PJ, eds. Diagnostic and Operative Gynaecology laparoscopy. 1st ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book Medical Publishers; 1995: 241-264. Naz T, Hassan L, Gulmeen, Nighat F, Sultan S. Laparoscopic evaluation in infertility. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Nov;19(11):704-7. Sakar MN, Gul T, Atay AE, Celik Y. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the evaluation of infertile women. Saudi Med J. 2008 Sep;29(9):1315-8.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (15)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK