Clinical effects of two-stage joint replacement on septic arthritic knee
preprint
OA: closed
Abstract
Objective: To assess the clinical effect of staged joint replacement for the treatment of septic arthritic knee and the therapeutic differences between antibiotic cement beads and the tibial plateau spacer. Methods: 23 patients (24 knee joints) treated with staged joint replacement for septic arthritis knee were retrospectively reviewed between March 2014 and April 2018. At the first-stage, thoroughly debridement and irrigation with self-made antibiotic cement beads or tibial plateau spacer was performed; After that, systemic antibiotic treatment was followed; when the infection was surely eliminated, second-stage TKA was performed. Knee mobility (range of motion, abbreviated to ROM) and function (HSS scores system) were evaluated before surgery, in the interval period, and after joint replacement. Results: All patients finished follow-up and the mean follow-up time was 27.3 months (12-54 months). Each group has one patient replaced with a homotypic spacer, and all patients eventually cleared the infection. None of the patients had a recurrent infection. The mobility and HSS scores of the two groups were significantly improved post-operation (p<0.05). And there was no significant difference in post-surgery ROM (P=0.153) and the HSS score (P = 0.054) between the two groups. Conclusion: Staged joint replacement is an efficacious way for septic arthritic knees, whether tibial plateau spacer or antibiotic cement beads were used, which can effectively control infection and improve knee function.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00