Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?

Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343" }, "headline": "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?", "datePublished": "2024-11-08T14:31:32", "dateModified": "2025-01-27T14:37:43", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Pranav Vilas Chavare" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Smitha Nayak" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Ramona Birau" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Varalakshmi Alapati" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Introduction The social media landscape has radically changed and has revolutionized consumer perspectives, purchasing habits, and behaviors. Amidst this emerging trend is the rise of influencer marketing and its impact on the purchase intentions of followers. The objective is to explore the characteristics of influencers that contribute to their credibility. This research aims to explore the role of consumers’ attitude toward brands on their intention to adopt brands endorsed by influencers. Methods This cross-sectional research was undertaken among GenZ in the urban landscape of India. Data collected was analyzed using SmartPLS4 software. Findings Trust, expertise, and similarity were the significant antecedents of the formation of influencer credibility. Attractiveness did not have a significant influence on influencer credibility. A complementary partial mediation of Attitude towards a brand is observed in the association between influencer credibility and the purchase intention of followers. Attitude towards the video also had a significant positive influence on purchase intention. Conclusion The study found that Gen Z places little importance on an influencer’s attractiveness, as it has no significant impact on credibility. However, attitude toward the brand strongly influenced purchase intention and partially mediated the relationship between influencer credibility and purchase intention. " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3", "name": "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase..." } } ] } Home Browse Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Vilas Chavare P, Nayak S, Birau R and Alapati V. Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Research Article Revised Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] Pranav Vilas Chavare 1 , Smitha Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-2580 2 , Ramona Birau 3 , Varalakshmi Alapati 4 Pranav Vilas Chavare 1 , Smitha Nayak https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7171-2580 2 , Ramona Birau 3 , Varalakshmi Alapati 4 PUBLISHED 27 Jan 2025 Author details Author details 1 Department of Computer and Communication Engineering, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Faculty of Economic Science, U, University Constantin Brancusi of Tg-Jiu, Romania, Romania 4 Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Pranav Vilas Chavare Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Smitha Nayak Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Ramona Birau Roles: Conceptualization, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Varalakshmi Alapati Roles: Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the Manipal Academy of Higher Education gateway. Abstract Introduction The social media landscape has radically changed and has revolutionized consumer perspectives, purchasing habits, and behaviors. Amidst this emerging trend is the rise of influencer marketing and its impact on the purchase intentions of followers. The objective is to explore the characteristics of influencers that contribute to their credibility. This research aims to explore the role of consumers’ attitude toward brands on their intention to adopt brands endorsed by influencers. Methods This cross-sectional research was undertaken among GenZ in the urban landscape of India. Data collected was analyzed using SmartPLS4 software. Findings Trust, expertise, and similarity were the significant antecedents of the formation of influencer credibility. Attractiveness did not have a significant influence on influencer credibility. A complementary partial mediation of Attitude towards a brand is observed in the association between influencer credibility and the purchase intention of followers. Attitude towards the video also had a significant positive influence on purchase intention. Conclusion The study found that Gen Z places little importance on an influencer’s attractiveness, as it has no significant impact on credibility. However, attitude toward the brand strongly influenced purchase intention and partially mediated the relationship between influencer credibility and purchase intention. READ ALL READ LESS Keywords influencer credibility, purchase intention, attitude towards brand, India Corresponding Author(s) Smitha Nayak ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Smitha Nayak Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2025 Vilas Chavare P et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Vilas Chavare P, Nayak S, Birau R and Alapati V. Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.3 ) First published: 08 Nov 2024, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.1 ) Latest published: 27 Jan 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.3 ) Revised Amendments from Version 2 Few grammatical errors indicated by Reviewer 2 have been incorporated. In the methodology section, clarity on the 5 point Likert scale and Cronbach alpha is presented and same has been responded to reviewers as well. Few grammatical errors indicated by Reviewer 2 have been incorporated. In the methodology section, clarity on the 5 point Likert scale and Cronbach alpha is presented and same has been responded to reviewers as well. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Meenakshi Sharma See the authors' detailed response to the review by Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad READ REVIEWER RESPONSES 1. Introduction The social media landscape has undergone radical changes over the past few years. It has become an important part of people’s everyday routines and significantly influences cultural aspects of society. It has revolutionized consumer perspectives, purchasing habits, and behaviors ( Dwivedi et al., 2021 ). In today’s technology-driven world, social networking platforms have become an avenue where brands can extend their marketing campaigns to a wider range of consumers. Social media has transformed the way businesses connect with their audience, and India is no exception to this digital revolution social media platforms such as Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter have become the grounds for brands to engage with customers, build relationships, and drive sales. India has embraced the Internet, and its digital population has grown rapidly over the past decade, reaching 600 million active Internet users ( www.statista.com/, n.d. ). Access to social media has also enhanced the time spent by users on social media daily. A report published by The Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad on “New Age Digital Media Consumption: A survey of Social Media, OTT Content Online Gaming” reported that Indians, on average, spent 194 minutes daily on social media platforms ( The Esya Centre and IIM Ahmedabad, 2023 ) and most of them were in the age group of 18 to 34 years of age ( GWI, 2023 ). This forms a strong foothold for brands to emphasize digital marketing strategies to this specific age group. Amidst this emerging trend is the growth of a concept called marketing influencers. Marketing Influencers are defined as “people who have the power to affect the purchase decisions of others due to their real or perceived authority, knowledge, position, or relationship” ( Mavrck, 2014 ). A further classification of influencers based on the number of followers they have helps different businesses choose which influencers to partner with. While macro-influencers can claim millions of followers, micro-influencers usually have less than 100,000. Micro-influencers are everyday people who post meaningful content with a significant impact on social media sites such as Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. Social media organizations and celebrities are examples of macro-influencers. In the present digital landscape, consumers seek opinions from their peers (other consumers) and marketing influencers to make informed purchase decisions. Thus, influencers play a major role in shaping consumer purchase decisions and brand choices ( Anjali Chopra and Jaju, 2020 ). Influencer marketing has been used more recently, but there hasn’t been a single scholarly definition of it—especially when it comes to India ( Johansen and Guldvik, n.d. ). Based on the number of followers they have, around 4 million influencers in India are divided into four categories: elite, mega, macro, and micro as of June 2023 ( Katya Naydu, 2023 ). About 118 million Indians have purchased goods or services that influencers have promoted, according to Roshan Behera (2023) . The authors decided to look into the influencer marketing scene in India, specifically from the perspective of Generation Z (those born between 1997 and 2012), given the growing importance of influencers in the country and the paucity of scholarly research on the subject. Further, on social media, Gen Z users are more likely to be drawn to content about fashion, travel, and movies. According to a demographic comparison, millennials follow 52% of Instagram influencers, whereas Gen Z members follow about 97.9% of them ( Bandwagon Online, 2023 ). This highlights the importance of influencer marketing, especially when aimed at the Gen Z demographic in India. Although the influencers themselves have a charm factor, an important question is what makes their content truly appealing. The answer to this question is perhaps the relationship between the influencer’s credibility, the audience’s views towards the brand, and their attitude toward the content. This study aims to understand the connection between these factors and how the audiences’ attitudes mediate the influencers’ credibility and purchase intention. The objective is to analyze the influencer marketing sector in India and find insights into the characteristics of influencers that contribute to their credibility. Furthermore, study the mediating effect of the audiences’ attitude toward the brand on the relationship between influencer credibility and purchase intention. The proposed conceptual framework is presented in Figure 1 . The subsequent sections of the manuscript are structured as follows: the hypothesis development section presents literature related to the context of the present research endeavour and aids in conceptualizing the proposed conceptual model. The methodology section highlights the study setting, sampling procedure, and the research instrument development process. The results section presents the data analysis, followed by the discussion section and theoretical and managerial implications. The last section of the manuscript presents directions for future research and the limitations of the study. 2. Literature review & hypotheses development 2.1 Attractiveness Research reveals a positive link between the perceived attractiveness of a social media influencer and consumers’ likelihood to purchase the advertised cosmetic product. This attractiveness-purchase intention connection likely stems from several factors: grabbing attention, triggering positive emotions, creating social influence, and boosting perceived trust in the influencer’s opinion. However, the strength of this link can vary. Younger consumers or those who highly value physical appearance might be more susceptible to attractiveness pull. Hence it would be worth exploring this association between the attractiveness of the influencer and H1: The attractiveness of social media influencers has a significant positive impact on the credibility of the influencer. 2.2 Expertise The capacity of a communicator to make accurate representations in a certain field of knowledge is referred to as expertise ( Anthony R. Pratkanis, 2011 ). It includes knowledge, understanding, and experience gained from ongoing work in the same profession. A communicator must have in-depth knowledge, applicable abilities, or a respectable title that establishes credibility in their chosen field to be acknowledged as an expert ( Teresa Borges-Tiago et al., 2023 ). Consumers are more likely to buy a product endorsed by an influencer they perceive as knowledgeable and experienced, suggesting expertise builds trust and guides informed buying decisions. This knowledge-driven trust stems from several factors: reduced purchase risk due to the influencer’s proven experience, empowered decision-making through clear product explanations, and a boost in overall credibility based on their expertise ( Ashraf et al., 2023 ; Masuda et al., 2022 ). However, the strength of this connection can vary depending on factors like product type (expertise’s impact is stronger for complex products), target audience (consumers valuing knowledge are more influenced), and influencer niche (expertise relevant to the product matters most) ( Saima & Khan, 2020 ). So, expertise strengthens influencer credibility thereby converting likings into purchases. Understanding these dynamics among the GenZ followers would be worth exploring as GenZ is believed to be significantly influenced by peer reviews ( Costa E Silva et al., 2017 ). H2: The expertise of the Influencer has a significant impact on the Credibility of the Influencer. 2.3 Similarity Similarity implies the extent to which the audience resembles the communicator ( McCracken, 1989 ). A study was undertaken by Naderer et al. (2021) Documented that similarity with the influencer had a direct positive effect on the purchase intention of the promoted brand. This means that when the influencer showed a brand and a disclosure, it increased the participants’ intention to buy the product compared to not seeing any brand presentation. Furthermore, the researchers found that the trustworthiness of the influencer played a significant role in mediating the relationship between similarity and purchase intention. This is because brand information from someone similar to you is usually regarded as more genuine and credible than, say, a message from the business itself ( Willemsen et al., 2012 ). H3: The similarity of the Influencer with the target audience has a significant positive influence on the credibility of the influencer. 2.4 Trustworthiness Trust represents an individual’s belief or willingness to depend upon, an attitude-related object or phenomenon ( Ki et al., 2023 ). Trust in the context of influencer marketing can be defined as the influencer’s audience’s belief that the influencer is honest, transparent and genuinely supports the endorsed brand. An influencer can enhance their trust in the audience by being authentic in their content and interactions. In the absence of physical interaction, trust becomes a cornerstone for customers to establish trust in online activities ( Gibreel et al., 2018 ; Ventre & Kolbe, 2020 ). The audience is more likely to engage and show an enhanced purchase intention when they trust the parties involved. This is applicable in social media, e-commerce, online reviews, etc. ( Ventre & Kolbe, 2020 ). Confirmed the positive relationship between trust and purchase intention in the context of online reviews. Overall, trust is an important factor contributing to the success of influencer marketing ( Sokolova & Kefi, 2020 ). H4: Trust is a significant positive antecedent of Influencer credibility. 2.5 Attitude toward video Greer (2003) found that people’s opinions about the stories they read are influenced by their perception of the reliability of the material they get online. When it comes to health communication, people’s opinions on online health information are greatly influenced by the websites’ perceived legitimacy ( Wang et al., 2008 ). In the case of advertising, the literature currently in publication indicates a favorable relationship between customer perceptions of the trustworthiness of endorsers and their endorsements ( Goldsmith et al., 2000 ). It was established that a favorable correlation between attitudes toward website sponsors and their perceived credibility. According to research by Long and Chiagouris (2006) , website users’ opinions of a non-profit organization are greatly influenced by their perception of the website’s legitimacy. Hence in the digital space, it would be worthwhile to explore if the attitude towards the video of the social media influencer influences the purchase intention of their followers. H5: Attitude towards the video has a positive influence on purchase intention. 2.6 Attitude towards Brand An attitude-towards-the-ad model was developed by McCracken (1989) . These factors influence consumers’ perceptions of advertisements. The empirical study’s conclusions imply that consumers’ perceptions of advertisers and advertising are positively impacted by their perceived believability ( Aaker et al., 2012 ). Established that admired brands motivate consumers to purchase more from the brand. According to Roberts (2005) , Brands gain the respect of consumers by performing well, which eventually leads to the development of a positive reputation. According to a research project by Trivedi & Sama (2020) , consumer-favourite brands enjoy favorable relationships with their customers. Therefore, it may be necessary to investigate the extent to which brand attitude influences followers of social media influencers’ purchase intentions directly and through mediation. H6: Influencer credibility has a positive influence on Attitude toward the brand. H7: Attitude toward the brand positively influences purchase intention. H9: Attitude toward brand mediates the association between influencer credibility and purchase intention. 2.7 Influencer credibility Influencers on social media are essential for improving marketing campaigns in the digital era. Choosing influencers wisely about the target market can have a big impact on audience purchase intentions and increase brand recognition. Purchase intention, according to J. P. Trivedi (2018) and Shah and Pillai (2012) , arises from consumers’ comprehension of the thinking behind the choices they make regarding brands ( Ki et al., 2023 ). Claim that it illustrates a scenario in which consumers are likely to purchase a product in a given setting. By using influencers in their marketing campaigns, marketers can positively affect the brand by strengthening the image the influencers have established and enhancing product recognition. Customers are more likely to purchase the promoted products when influencers with a strong connection to the target market are used ( Lim et al., 2017 ). This finding aligns with a study by Singh and Banerjee (2018) . Which emphasizes the ability of influencers to attract clients and stimulate purchase intentions through effective communication with their audience. Hence, this research endeavor intends to explore the effect of influencer credibility on the purchase intention of the followers. H8: Influencer Credibility has a significant positive influence on the purchase intention of followers. Figure 1. Proposed conceptual framework. Source: Author’s own. 3. Methods 3.1 Study design The quantitative research methodology used in this study is called “cross-sectional research design.” “Post-positivism,” which emphasizes the development of empirical tools to interpret and evaluate human behaviour, is the fundamental research philosophy. The goal of the inquiry is to investigate the links that are described in the conceptual framework between independent, dependent, and mediating factors. This marketing study was exempt from submission to the Institutional Ethics Committee of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, by clause 6 of the circular titled “Project Exemption from Submission to IEC,” issued by the Institutional Ethics Committee on 14/01/2021. 3.2 Study setting & eligibility criteria A study undertaken by BrandWagon Online (2023) indicated that the Indian social media landscape, especially on Instagram, is cluttered by the Gen Z segment of the population, and 97.9 percent of them follow influencers. Hence, respondents for this study are restricted to Gen Z of the Indian Population. Additionally, results reported by Statista on “Use of social media platforms in India” read that 59 percent of the rural population in India did not use social media platforms and the same figure stood at 33 percent for the urban population. It is also revealed that 28 percent of the urban regions accessed at least 6 social media applications. Hence, this study is restricted to respondents from the urban regions of India only. The third inclusion criterion to respond to the questionnaire was that they had to follow influencers on social media platforms and have purchased at least one brand in the last 6 months endorsed by the influencer. These three inclusion criteria ensured that the response was obtained from a well-focused segment. A Google form was created to capture data from respondents. The respondents were contacted directly by the researchers, who additionally on the study’s objectives and guaranteed that their information would only be used for academic purposes. As a result, the participants were given access to the Google form, which they were asked to fill out and submit online. Data collection was undertaken from November 2023 to January 2024. 3.3 Data measurement A structured questionnaire was designed to collect data from the respondents. Scales to measure the underlying constructs {Purchase Intention ( Mahrous & Abdelmaaboud, 2017 ); Expertise ( Spake & Megehee, 2010 ); Attractiveness ( A. Dwivedi et al., 2015 ); Similarity ( Casaló et al., 2020 ); Trust ( Mahrous & Abdelmaaboud, 2017 ); Credibility ( Xiao et al., 2018 ); Attitude towards Brand ( Spears & Singh, 2004 ); Attitude Toward Advertisement ( Voss et al., 2003 )} were adapted and measured on 5-point Likert, as measured by the source authors. The questionnaire consisted of 29 questions including the inclusion criteria & demographic details. A Google form was generated and circulated to capture their response from the identified segment of respondents. They were informed that the data collected would be kept confidential and would be utilized only for academic purposes. 3.4 Sample size This study adopted a purposive sampling technique. Data was collected from students of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, and the students are the most representative of the target audience for this research. The sample size was estimated based on the number of indicators in the study by ten ( Sarstedt et al., 2017 ) i.e.: 29 *10 = 280. It further rounded off to 300. Finally, data was collected from 300 respondents. 3.5 Statistical methods Microsoft Excel (RRID:SCR_016137 available at https://www.microsoft.com/en-gb/ ) was used to undertake descriptive analysis and Smart PLS software (SmartPLS, RRID: SCR_022040) was used to analyze the underlying constructs of the study and assess the mediation analysis. The Partial Least Square Structural Equation Modelling technique was used to test the additive and linear models. 3.6 Pilot testing Before the completed questionnaire was sent out to participants to undertake a pilot study, two experienced researchers reviewed it to ensure face validity. The input gathered in this approach helped to improve the instrument’s readability. Further, to ensure the internal consistency of the scales, a pilot study was undertaken with 40sample response data. Cronbach alpha of all constructs of the study was above o.7 (Attitude towards brand = 0.956; Attitude towards video 0.938; Purchase Intention = 0.845; Attractiveness of Influencer = 0.777; Credibility = 0.934; Influencer Experience = 0.882; trust = 0.826) except of Similarity with the Influencer was below the threshold value of 0.7. In social science research, a construct with a Cronbach alpha above 0.6 in a pilot study could be retained as it is expected the increase with an increment in sample size. Hence the research team decided to retain the construct and explore it further during the final data analysis phase. 4. Results To investigate the proposed correlations, we used maximum-likelihood estimation in structural equation modeling (SEM). According to Hair (2009) , SEM was selected because of its capacity to evaluate the relationships between latent and observable variables directly. The construct’s reliability and validity were established by assessing Cronbach’s alpha, rhoa, and composite reliability, as outlined in Table 1 . The computed rhoa value surpassing the 0.7 cut-offs indicates ( Hair et al., 2010 ) robust reliability. Composite reliability is adopted to examine the internal consistency of the constructs and all values are above the threshold limit ( Werts et al., 1974 ). Cronbach alpha estimates reveal reliability of the all the indicators as all figures were above the threshold value of 0.7 ( Ken Kwong-Kay Wong, 2013 ). Convergent validity was established using Average Variance Extracted (AVE). All constructs have an AVE above the threshold of 0.5 ( Richard P. Bagozzi and Youjae Yi, 1988 ). Collinearity among the indicators was examined in the VIF estimates of the constructs. All the VIF values were less than 0.5 ( Sarstedt et al., 2017 ) no collinearity among the constructs of the study. Similarly, the absence of collinearity among the constructs of the study was established where the VIF values of the inner model of all the exogenous constructs were less than 3.3 ( Joseph F. Hair et al., 2017 ). This also ensures the absence of common method bias impacting the data ( Kock, 2015 ). Evaluation of the Structure Model is presented in Figure 2 . Indicating Discriminant validity was confirmed using the Fornell and Larcker methodology, as depicted in Table 2 . Table 1. Evaluation of structural model. Construct Indicators Outer loadings AVE Cronbach Alpha rho_a rho_c Outer weights VIF Attitude towards Brand (AB) AB1 0.842 *** 0.777 0.928 0.930 0.946 0.233 *** 1.746 AB2 0.881 *** 0.210 *** 1.746 AB3 0.886 *** 0.215 *** 2.341 AB4 0.902 *** 0.240 *** 3.180 AB5 0.896 *** 0.236 *** 3.322 Attractive ness (AT) AT1 0.923 *** 0.826 0.791 0.803 0.905 0.491 *** 3.300 AT2 0.894 *** 0.408 *** 3.214 Attitude Towards Video (AV) AV1 0.838 *** 0.752 0.918 0.934 0.938 0.188 *** 1.902 AV2 0.880 *** 0.193 *** 2.713 AV3 0.910 *** 0.281 *** 2.702 AV4 0.845 *** 0.266 *** 2.846 AV5 0.863 *** 0.223 *** 2.954 Credibility (C) C1 0.780 *** 0.732 0.908 0.912 0.932 0.205 *** 1.890 C2 0.873 *** 0.244 *** 2.111 C3 0.866 *** 0.231 *** 1.703 C4 0.879 *** 0.252 *** 1.675 C5 0.875 *** 0.236 *** 1.568 Expertise € E1 0.861 *** 0.739 0.823 0.823 0.895 0.397 *** 1.901 E2 0.881 *** 0.385 *** 2.578 E3 0.836 *** 0.382 *** 3.181 Purchase Intention (PI) PI1 0.870 *** 0.703 0.792 0.826 0.876 0.471 *** 3.158 PI2 0.766 *** 0.295 *** 2.325 PI3 0.874 *** 0.416 *** 2.875 Similarity (S) S1 0.747 *** 0.611 0.683 0.687 0.825 0.391 *** 1.343 S2 0.814 *** 0.413 *** 1.494 S3 0.783 *** 0.475 *** 1.264 Trust (T) T1 0.821 *** 0.656 0.743 0.772 0.851 0.433 *** 1.474 T2 0.752 *** 0.302 *** 1.467 T3 0.852 *** 0.490 *** 1.488 *** p<0.01. Figure 2. Structural Model. Table 2. Discriminant validity was confirmed using the Fornell and Larcker method. Constructs AB AT AV C E PI S T AB 0.882 AT 0.337 0.909 AV 0.515 0.396 0.867 C 0.458 0.362 0.386 0.856 E 0.301 0.288 0.319 0.567 0.860 PI 0.464 0.430 0.417 0.530 0.383 0.838 S 0.341 0.439 0.401 0.487 0.419 0.536 0.782 T 0.512 0.420 0.404 0.598 0.443 0.607 0.551 0.810 Subsequently, the structural model was assessed by the bootstrapping technique and the hypothesis was tested. The structural wall was further evaluated with the help of the path coefficients ( Table 3 ). R 2 and Q 2 were obtained from the structural model. R 2 indicates that a model’s prediction ability should be more than 0.1 ( Falk and Miller, 1992 ). Trust, Expertise, Attractiveness, and similarity explained 48.7 percent of the variance for Influencer credibility. The credibility of the influencer explained a 20.9 percent variance of Attitude towards Brand and both these constructs explained a 36.6 percent variance of the outcome construct Purchase Intention. Furthermore, Q 2 , which assesses the model’s predictive usefulness, ought to be greater than 0. The efficiency of the model was confirmed in the current investigation when both R 2 and Q 2 values were above the designated thresholds, thus the model’s predictive relevance was justified. Table 3. Testing direct relationships. Hypothesis Path coefficient Standard deviation (STDEV) t value (bootstrap) P values F 2 BI Status H1: At -> C 0.062 0.054 1.135 0.256 0.006 0.043, 0.169 Not supported H2:E -> C 0.342 *** 0.049 7.007 0.000 0.172 0.245, 0.437 Supported H3: S -> C 0.123 * 0.059 2.095 0.036 0.018 0.011, 0.239 Supported H4:T -> C 0.353 *** 0.054 6.549 0.000 0.149 0.245, 0.453 Supported H5:ATV->PI 0.167 *** 0.060 2.771 0.006 0.031 0.052, 0.286 Supported H6:C-> ATB 0.458 *** 0.050 9.063 0.000 0.265 0.357, 0.554 Supported H7:ATB-> PI 0.208 *** 0.056 3.697 0.000 0.045 0.099, 0.320 Supported H8: C ->PI 0.370 *** 0.060 6.134 0.000 0.164 0.250, 0.484 Supported R 2 AB = 0.209 Q 2 AB = 0.208 R 2 C = 0.487 Q 2 C = 0.465 R 2 PI = 0.363 Q 2 PI = 0.353 Abbreviation: BI = bias-corrected. *** p<0.01. ** p<0.05. * p<0.1. The results revealed that two exogenous constructs, Expertise (β = 0.342, t = 7.007 p = 0.000) & Trust (β = 0.353, t = 6.549, p = 0.000) had a significant positive impact on the credibility of the influencer. However, Similarity (β = 0.123, t = 2.095, p = 0.036) partially influenced the influencer credibility. Hypothesis 5 (Attitude towards Brand on Purchase Intention) and Credibility of Influencer on Attitude towards Brand were supported revealing two dimensions. Firstly, Attitude towards the Video (β = 0.167, t = 2.771, p = 0.006) has a significant positive association with to Purchase Intention of the followers, and secondly, Credibility of the Influencer (β = 0.458, t = 9.063, p = 0.000) had a significant positive influence on the Followers Attitude towards the Brand. Attitude towards the Brand (β = 0.208, t = 3.697, p = 0.000) and Credibility of the Influencer (β = 0.370, t = 6.134, p = 0.000) had a significant positive impact on the Purchase intention of the follower. Thus, H7 and H8 were also supported. 4.1 Mediating role of attitude towards the brand A mediation analysis was performed to assess the mediating effect of ATB on the linkage between Credibility and PI of the followers. The results ( Table 4 ) revealed that the total effect of Credibility on PI was significant (β = 0.524, t = 10.305, p = 0.000). With the inclusion of the mediating variable. Table 4. Mediation analysis. Path Direct effect, p-value Total effect, p-value Specific indirect effect SD T Value p Value BI (2.5%, 97.5%) Mediation H9: Credibility>Attitude towards Brand-> Purchase Intention 0.395, 0.000 0.524, 0.000 0.129, 0.000 0.031 4.201 0.000 0.077, 0.198 Complementary Partial The Standard Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR), with a suggested threshold of <0.8, was used to assess model fitness. ( Sarstedt et al., 2017 ). The model’s SRMR rating of 0.055 indicated that it suited the data quite well. Additionally, Q 2 was calculated to determine predictive relevance when the endogenous construct was greater than zero. 4.2 Importance Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA) IPMA’s result is presented as bootstrapping with 5,000 subsamples, demonstrating that all requirements for applying the IPMA approach are met and that some path coefficients are statistically significant. IPMA clarifies the comparative importance and effectiveness of exogenous (Trust, Expertise, Similarity, Attractiveness, Attitude towards Brand, Attitude towards the video, Influencers Credibility) on the endogenous construct (Purchase Intention). Their significance and efficacy are shown by their aggregate impacts and index values. The impact on the endogenous variables is significant. The intrinsic potential of the latent variable scores is demonstrated through effectiveness ( Table 5 , Figure 3 ). Table 5. Important-Performance Matrix Analysis of Behavior Intention. Latent construct Importance (Total effect) Performance (Index value) Att towards Brand 0.208 57.862 Attractiveness 0.029 62.887 Attitude towards Video 0.167 62.067 Credibility 0.466 52.412 Experience 0.159 61.272 Similarity 0.057 53.226 Trust 0.164 49.631 Figure 3. Importance performance matrix. 5. Discussion Influencer marketing has become a potent catalyst propelling brands’ social media investment in the ever-changing world of digital marketing. Influencers provide organizations with a means of accessing pre-existing communities and fostering genuine interactions with their target audiences. Influencers are frequently people with sizable and devoted online followings. Upholding the model proposed by Hovland et al. (1953) on Communication and persuasion, trust in the influencer significantly influences the credibility of the influencer. Similarity with the influencer and Expertise of the influencer is explored to have a significant role in determining the influencer’s Credibility. These findings are in line with the previously published literature on the construct of trust in the marketing influencer ( Johnsson, 2023 ; Saima & Khan, 2020 ; Trivedi & Sama, 2020 ; Patmawati & Miswanto, 2022 ). Digital media platforms provide internet users with substantial control over the information they share, which fosters a climate even conducive to the spread of misleading information, such as fake news. Internet users now place more emphasis on original information and reliable sources, highlighting the significance of real and honest information sources in the digital sphere. Further Naderer et al., (2021) documented that similarity with the influencer had a direct positive effect on the purchase intention of the promoted brand. Additionally, a qualitative study undertaken by Johnsson (2023) . Among GenZ of Bangladesh, it was documented that most of the followers compared themselves with celebrity influencers and tried to imitate them. This is not justified in our research context as attractiveness did not significantly influence the credibility of the influencer. Another study undertaken by Trivedi (2018) revealed a higher efficacy of attractiveness the social media influencers. Although the findings contradict the research findings of Johnsson (2023) and Trivedi (2018) , it is noteworthy to observe that these studies are undertaken in different contexts. Trivedi (2018) documented research in the context of fashion influencers. However, it is also documented by Masuda et al. (2022) that the strength of this association can vary depending on the age group of the followers and the product category under consideration. Younger consumers or those who highly value physical appearance might be more susceptible to attractiveness pull. Similarly, luxury or aspirational products can have a stronger effect. Attitude towards the Video content is documented to have a significant direct positive influence on purchase intention by the followers, leading to acceptance of H5. This finding is also affirmed by Trivedi (2018) that attitude towards the brand endorsed plays a significant role in determining the consumers’ purchase intention. This finding was significantly endorsed in the fashion marketing landscape. This strongly affirms the Theory of Reasoned Action ( Icek Ajzen, 1980 ). Attitude towards the brand significantly influenced Purchase Intention and it partially mediated the association between influencer credibility and purchase intention leading to acceptance of H7 and H9. The result is consistent with previous research, supporting the important role that attitudes are shaped by perceived information credibility, as has been shown in studies by Masuda et al. (2022) ; Naderer et al. (2021) and Wang et al. (2008) . This finding also raises questions about the possible value of using YouTube videos’ perceived legitimacy to forecast viewers’ purchase intentions for the products they showcase. The substantial correlation between attitudes and behavioral intentions is a link that Ajzen and Fishbein (1977) . Thoroughly examined gives rise to this assumption. 6. Theoretical and managerial implications This study is meaningful in its input to the theoretical understanding of using the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Tri Component Attitude Model in explaining the impact of relevant cues on influencer credibility and purchase intention. This research attempts to deepen knowledge of how GenZ influencer marketing in the context of the Indian market. This study closes a gap in the literature by examining the influence of social media influencers on purchase intentions in India, a topic that has not been well studied. By providing a thorough framework that clarifies the role of influencer qualities in influencing customer purchase intentions through the mediation of credibility, it advances our understanding of the subject. The importance of antecedents of the credibility of the influencer, namely expertise, trust, and similarity, has emerged in this research endeavor. The impact of influencer credibility on purchase intention is well documented and resonates outcomes of previous researchers. This study establishes the significance of the truthfulness and resemblance of the influencer to be effective with his or her followers. It is observed that the target segment (GenZ) gives less importance to the Attractiveness of the influencer and it was insignificant in influencing the credibility. In the backdrop of the Tri Component Attitude Model ( Rosenberg et al., 1960 ), this finding emphasizes the cognitive component of attitude formation. The Tripartite model, also recognized as the three components of attitude, encompasses affective, behavioural, and cognitive elements. Collectively, these elements create attitudes, with one element usually predominating over the others at any one time. The findings revealed that Attitude towards the brand has a significant positive influence on Purchase intention. The IPMA results also indicate that Attitude towards the brand is the second most important factor determining the purchase intention of followers. Similar previous studies ( J. P. Trivedi, 2018 ; J. Trivedi & Sama, 2020 ) have also highlighted the importance of attitude towards the brand in followers’ purchase intention. This strengthens our understanding of the need to build brands and consider influencers as mere enablers of decision-making. This is further validated by the mediation analysis performed in this study. A partial mediation is proved ( Table 4 ) which indicates that both the antecedents (attitude towards brand and influencer Credibility) have an important role to play in shaping followers’ purchase intention. The significant and positive impact of trustworthiness, similarity, and expertise on influencer credibility should inform advertisers or marketers to use trustworthiness as a criterion to evaluate the power of a social media influencer as a potential advertising partner. This project is also among one of the few studies to analyze the follower’s attitude towards video content on purchase intention. It indicates marketers to take special cognizance of this fact and encourages them to create defined standard operating procedures to be necessarily followed by the influencers. If social media influencer intends to continue their collaborations with advertisers, or wish to expand their followers they must connect with the followers. 7. Future directions and limitations There are certain drawbacks to this study. It doesn’t distinguish between different kinds of videos or brands/products; instead, it concentrates on social media influencers and brands/products in a general way. Subsequent investigations ought to improve the accuracy of influencer marketing theories by examining particular video categories (e.g., office supplies, alcoholic beverages, gaming videos), alternative content formats (e.g., blog posts, audio podcasts, Instagram/Facebook photos), or product genres (e.g., product reviews, how-to tutorials, gaming videos). Further research could also be extended to influencer marketing across specific product categories. Furthermore, examining particular groups of micro or macro influencers may reveal differences in the ways that trustworthiness is influenced. Additionally, this study uses a single survey instrument and depends on a single source of consumers, which could introduce a single-source bias. To get over this restriction, future research should think about selecting participants from a variety of sources and using a range of techniques to look more deeply into the dynamics of social media influencer marketing and how consumers perceive the reliability of information. Ethical approval and consent This marketing study was exempt from submission to the Institutional Ethics Committee of Manipal Academy of Higher Education, by clause 6 of the circular titled “Project Exemption from Submission to IEC,” issued by the Institutional Ethics Committee on 14/01/2021. Consent statement No minors were included in the study. It clearly states that while collecting data, respondents were briefed, and then handed over the Google form. The first section of the Google form briefed the respondent again and only if they consent, they clicked the link and presented their consent. Consent was taken Verbally and while filling questionnaire the following text was displayed first: Dear Respondent, Marketing Influencers have become a part of our digital ecosystem. In light of this pervasive influencer content that you actively follow, please address the following questions, reflecting on your exposure to these influencers and their messages. Your responses will be kept confidential. If you consent to provide data on your experience with marketing influencer content, click on the link below to proceed. Thank You" The respondent has to consent before clicking on the questionnaire link. This is now having to be how consent was captured from each respondent. Author contributions • Study conception and design: Prof Smitha Nayak, Pranav Chavare, Dr Ramon Birau • Data collection: Prof Smitha Nayak, Pranav Chavare, • Analysis and interpretation of results: Prof Smitha Nayak, Pranav Chavare, Dr Varalakshmi Alapati • Manuscript preparation. Prof Smitha Nayak, Pranav Chavare, Dr Ramona Birau, Dr Varalakshmi Alapati Data availability Underlying data Figshare: Influencer Marketing https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27094330.v1 ( Nayak, 2024 ). The project contains the following underlying data: • Impact of Marketing Influencers Dataset Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0). References Aaker JL, Garbinsky EN, Vohs KD: Cultivating admiration in brands: Warmth, competence, and landing in the “golden quadrant.”. J. Consum. Psychol. 2012; 22 (2): 191–194. Publisher Full Text Ajzen I, Fishbein M: Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychol. Bull. 1977; 84 (5): 888–918. Publisher Full Text Anjali Chopra VA, Jaju S: Influencer Marketing: An Exploratory Study to Identify Antecedents of Consumer Behavior of Millennials. Bus. Perspect. Res. 2020; 9 (1): 77–91. Publisher Full Text Pratkanis AR: The Science of Social Influence. 1st ed.2011. Ashraf A, Hameed I, Saeed SA: How do social media influencers inspire consumers’ purchase decisions? The mediating role of parasocial relationships. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2023; 47 (4): 1416–1433. Publisher Full Text Behera R: Influencing On The Way Up!, Part 2. Redseer Strategy Consultants. 2023, April 1. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y: On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988; 16 (1): 74–94. Publisher Full Text BrandWagon Online: 86% of Gen-Z prefer to follow Instagram influencers: Report. Financial Express. 2023, May. Casaló LV, Flavián C, Ibáñez-Sánchez S: Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and consequences of opinion leadership. J. Bus. Res. 2020; 117 : 510–519. Publisher Full Text Costa e Silva S, Machado JC, Cruz M: The influence of WOM and Peer Interaction in the Decision-Making Process of Generation Z within the family The influence of WOM and Peer Interaction in the Decision-Making Process of Generation Z within the family Evaluated by a double-blind review system. International Journal of Marketing, Communication and New Media. 2017. 2182–9306. Dwivedi A, Johnson LW, McDonald RE: Celebrity endorsement, self-brand connection, and consumer-based brand equity. J. Prod. Brand. Manag. 2015; 24 (5): 449–461. Publisher Full Text Dwivedi YK, Ismagilova E, Hughes DL, et al. : Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021; 59 : 102168. Publisher Full Text Falk RF, Miller NB: A primer for soft modeling. University of Akron Press; 1992. Gibreel O, AlOtaibi DA, Altmann J: Social commerce development in emerging markets. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2018; 27 : 152–162. Publisher Full Text Goldsmith RE, Lafferty BA, Newell SJ: The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands. J. Advert. 2000; 29 (3): 43–54. Publisher Full Text Greer JD: Evaluating the credibility of online information: A test of source and advertising influence. Mass Commun. Soc. 2003; 6 (1): 11–28. Publisher Full Text GWI, H: Social Media Behavior: GWI, Hootsuite 2023 Digital Report. Social Media Behavior: GWI, Hootsuite 2023 Digital Report.2023, October. Hair: Multivariate_Data_Analysis_7th_Edition.2009. Hair J, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. : Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed.NJ: Prentice-Hall Publication; 2010. Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH: Communication and persuasion; psychological studies of opinion change. Yale University Press; 1953. Icek Ajzen MF: Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall; 1980. Johansen IK, Guldvik CS: Influencer marketing and purchase intentions: How does influencer marketing affect purchase intentions? [Master’s thesis].n.d. Johnsson A-C: Samiya Akter The Impact Of Instagram Influencer Marketing On Consumer Behaviour In Bangladesh.2023. Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, et al. : Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications; 2017. Ken Kwong-Kay Wong: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Techniques Using SmartPLS.2013; 24 . Ki C-W(C), Chow TC, Li C: Bridging the Trust Gap in Influencer Marketing: Ways to Sustain Consumers’ Trust and Assuage Their Distrust in the Social Media Influencer Landscape. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2023; 39 (17): 3445–3460. Publisher Full Text Kock N: Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM. Int. J. Collab. Enterp. 2015; 11 (4): 1–10. Publisher Full Text Lim XJ, Mohd AR b, Cheah J-H(J), et al. : The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Purchase Intention and the Mediation Effect of Customer Attitude. Asian J. Bus. Res. 2017; 7 (2). Publisher Full Text Long MM, Chiagouris L: The role of credibility in shaping attitudes toward nonprofit websites. Int. J. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Mark. 2006; 11 (3): 239–249. Publisher Full Text Mahrous AA, Abdelmaaboud AK: Antecedents of participation in online brand communities and their purchasing behavior consequences. Serv. Bus. 2017; 11 (2): 229–251. Publisher Full Text Masuda H, Han SH, Lee J: Impacts of influencer attributes on purchase intentions in social media influencer marketing: Mediating roles of characterizations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022; 174 : 121246. Publisher Full Text Mavrck: Who Are Influencers?2014. Reference Source McCracken G: Who is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process. J. Consum. Res. 1989; 16 (3): 310. Publisher Full Text Naderer B, Matthes J, Schäfer S: Effects of disclosing ads on Instagram: the moderating impact of similarity to the influencer. Int. J. Advert. 2021; 40 (5): 686–707. Publisher Full Text Nayak S: Data Set _Influencer Marketing. figshare. [Dataset]. 2024. Publisher Full Text Naydu K: Over 100 mn Indians have tried products pushed by influencers and its growing. Business Insider (India). 2023, June 28. Patmawati D, Miswanto M: The Effect of Social Media Influencers on Purchase Intention: The Role Brand Awareness as a Mediator. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Management. 2022; 1 (2). Publisher Full Text Roberts K: ovemarks: The future beyond brands. Powerhouse books; 2005; vol. 2005 . . Rosenberg MJ, Hovland CI, McGuire WJ, et al. : Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components. (Yales studies in attitude and communication.). Yale. Yale University Press; 1960. Saima, Khan MA: Effect of Social Media Influencer Marketing on Consumers’ Purchase Intention and the Mediating Role of Credibility. J. Promot. Manag. 2020; 27 (4): 503–523. Publisher Full Text Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF: Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Handbook of Market Research. Springer International Publishing; 2017; pp. 1–40. Publisher Full Text Shah RB, Pillai P: Consumer’s Environmental Concern & its Influence on their Purchase Intention: SEM Approach. Business, Environmental Science. 2012. Singh RP, Banerjee N: Exploring the Influence of Celebrity Credibility on Brand Attitude, Advertisement Attitude and Purchase Intention. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2018; 19 (6): 1622–1639. Publisher Full Text Sokolova K, Kefi H: Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, so why should I buy it? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020; 53 : 101742. Publisher Full Text Spake DF, Megehee CM: Consumer sociability and service provider expertise influence service relationship success. J. Serv. Mark. 2010; 24 (4): 314–324. Publisher Full Text Spears N, Singh SN: Measuring Attitude toward the Brand and Purchase Intentions. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2004; 26 (2): 53–66. Publisher Full Text Teresa Borges-Tiago M, Santiago J, Tiago F: Mega or macro social media influencers: Who endorses brands better? J. Bus. Res. 2023; 157 : 113606. Publisher Full Text The Esya Centre and IIM Ahmedabad: New Age Digital Media Consumption: A survey of Social Media, OTT Content Online Gaming.2023, August. Trivedi JP: Measuring the comparative efficacy of an attractive celebrity influencer vis-à-vis an expert influencer fashion industry perspective. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management. 2018; 11 (3): 256–271. Publisher Full Text Trivedi J, Sama R: The Effect of Influencer Marketing on Consumers’ Brand Admiration and Online Purchase Intentions: An Emerging Market Perspective. J. Internet Commer. 2020; 19 (1): 103–124. Publisher Full Text Ventre I, Kolbe D: The Impact of Perceived Usefulness of Online Reviews, Trust and Perceived Risk on Online Purchase Intention in Emerging Markets: A Mexican Perspective. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 2020; 32 (4): 287–299. Publisher Full Text Voss KE, Spangenberg ER, Grohmann B: Measuring the Hedonic and Utilitarian Dimensions of Consumer Attitude. J. Mark. Res. 2003; 40 (3): 310–320. Publisher Full Text Wang Z, Walther JB, Pingree S, et al. : Health Information, Credibility, Homophily, and Influence via the Internet: Web Sites Versus Discussion Groups. Health Commun. 2008; 23 (4): 358–368. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Werts CE, Linn RL, Jöreskog KG: Intraclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1974; 34 (1): 25–33. Publisher Full Text Willemsen LM, Neijens PC, Bronner F: The Ironic Effect of Source Identification on the Perceived Credibility of Online Product Reviewers. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 2012; 18 (1): 16–31. Publisher Full Text www.statista.com/: n.d. Reference Source Xiao M, Wang R, Chan-Olmsted S: Factors affecting YouTube influencer marketing credibility: a heuristic-systematic model. J. Media Bus. Stud. 2018; 15 (3): 188–213. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Department of Computer and Communication Engineering, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Karnataka, 576104, India 2 Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, Karnataka, 576104, India 3 Faculty of Economic Science, U, University Constantin Brancusi of Tg-Jiu, Romania, Romania 4 Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, 576104, India Pranav Vilas Chavare Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation Smitha Nayak Roles: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing Ramona Birau Roles: Conceptualization, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing Varalakshmi Alapati Roles: Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (3) version 3 Revised Published: 27 Jan 2025, 13:1343 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.3 version 2 Revised Published: 09 Dec 2024, 13:1343 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.2 version 1 Published: 08 Nov 2024, 13:1343 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.1 Copyright © 2025 Vilas Chavare P et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Vilas Chavare P, Nayak S, Birau R and Alapati V. Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.157553.3 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 27 Jan 2025 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Balbir Singh HK. Reviewer Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.177412.r367236 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3#referee-response-367236 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 18 Feb 2025 Harjinder Kaur Balbir Singh , Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.177412.r367236 Introduction Strengths: The introduction provides a comprehensive overview of the topic and sets the stage for the research. It effectively highlights the importance of social media and influencer marketing ... Continue reading READ ALL Introduction Strengths: The introduction provides a comprehensive overview of the topic and sets the stage for the research. It effectively highlights the importance of social media and influencer marketing in India. Areas for Improvement: The introduction is somewhat lengthy. Consider condensing it to focus on the most critical points. Additionally, the transition between different ideas could be smoother to enhance readability. Suggest adding in the specific industry of the study in the title. 2.Literature Review and Hypotheses Development Strengths: The literature review is thorough and covers a wide range of relevant studies. The hypotheses are clearly stated and logically derived from the literature. Areas for Improvement: Some sections of the literature review read more like summaries rather than critical evaluations. Aim to provide more critical analysis of the studies reviewed. Additionally, ensure that each hypothesis is explicitly linked to the literature discussed. Better to have latest scholarly journals of 5 years data. 3. Methodology Study Design: Strengths: The cross-sectional research design is appropriate for the study. The explanation of the research philosophy is clear. Areas for Improvement: The explanation of the research philosophy could be more concise. Some sections are overly detailed and could be streamlined. Study Setting and Eligibility Criteria: Strengths: The criteria for selecting respondents are well-defined and justified. Areas for Improvement: The justification for focusing solely on urban Gen Z could be stronger. Discuss potential biases this might introduce and how they were mitigated. Data Measurement: Strengths: The use of established scales for measuring constructs is commendable. The questionnaire design and data collection process are well-explained. Areas for Improvement: Consider discussing potential biases in the questionnaire design. Were there any leading questions or ambiguities? Sample Size: Strengths: The sample size calculation is appropriate, and the use of a purposive sampling technique is justified. Areas for Improvement: The rationale for using a purposive sampling technique could be more critically discussed. Consider potential limitations of this approach. Statistical Methods: Strengths: The use of SEM and other statistical techniques is appropriate for the analysis. The explanation of the methods is clear and detailed. Areas for Improvement: Some sections could benefit from more detail on why specific methods were chosen. Discuss any assumptions made and how they were addressed. 4. Results Reliability and Validity: Strengths: The assessment of reliability and validity is thorough. The use of Cronbach's alpha, rhoa, and composite reliability is appropriate. Areas for Improvement: The discussion of reliability measures could be more critical. Were there any limitations in these measures? Structural Model: Strengths: The evaluation of the structural model is well-explained. The use of bootstrapping and the reporting of path coefficients, R2, and Q2 values are commendable. Areas for Improvement: The presentation of results could be more concise. Some sections are overly detailed and could be streamlined. Mediation Analysis: Strengths: The mediation analysis is well-conducted and clearly presented. Areas for Improvement: The interpretation of results could be more critical. Were there any limitations in the mediation analysis? Importance Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA): Strengths: The IPMA results are well-explained and provide valuable insights. Areas for Improvement: The discussion could be more critical. How do these results compare to existing literature? 5. Discussion Interpretation of Results: Strengths: The discussion section effectively interprets the results in the context of existing literature. The findings are well-explained and supported by relevant studies. Areas for Improvement: The discussion could be more critical. Some interpretations feel overly positive without sufficient critical analysis. Theoretical and Managerial Implications: Strengths: The implications are clearly stated and provide valuable insights for both theory and practice. Areas for Improvement: The discussion could be more critical. Are there any potential limitations or biases in these implications? Future Directions and Limitations Future Research: Strengths: The suggestions for future research are relevant and well-justified. Areas for Improvement: The suggestions could be more detailed. Consider discussing specific research questions or methodologies for future studies. Limitations: Strengths: The limitations are clearly stated and appropriately acknowledged. Areas for Improvement: The discussion of limitations could be more critical. Consider discussing potential biases and how they might impact the results. Overall Comments Strengths: The report is well-structured and comprehensive. It demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic and employs appropriate research methods. The writing is clear and concise, making the report easy to follow. The use of figures and tables enhances the presentation of the results. Areas for Improvement: The report could benefit from more critical analysis in several sections. Some areas are overly detailed and could be streamlined to enhance readability. Suggest relooking into each section above on the areas for improvement which will enhance better the report. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? No If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Marketing, Digital Marketing , Consumer Behaviour, Entrepreneurship I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Balbir Singh HK. Reviewer Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.177412.r367236 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3#referee-response-367236 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2024 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Sharma M. Reviewer Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339089 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v1#referee-response-339089 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 17 Dec 2024 Meenakshi Sharma , Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339089 Detailed Explanation: The narrative style of the paper is scientific. The paper has a high degree of clarity and is focused. It contributes to the body of knowledge in the marketing domain, especially in the context of ... Continue reading READ ALL Detailed Explanation: The narrative style of the paper is scientific. The paper has a high degree of clarity and is focused. It contributes to the body of knowledge in the marketing domain, especially in the context of GenZ. It has been clearly articulated. Figures and Tables: All figures and tables are in order and have an intext mentioned at appropriate places. Consistent with the paper's objective, the tables provide an overview of major findings. Methodology: The methodology section is well drafted and captures the process appropriately. However, the authors are advised to explain the sample size estimation process in detail. This will strengthen the methodology section. There appears to be an error in the data measurement section. Relook at the “5-5 point likert scale”. In the pilot testing section “Similarity with the Influencer was below the threshold value of 0.7. In social science research, a construct with a Cronbach alpha above 0.6 in a pilot study could be retained as it is expected the increase with an increment in sample size. Hence the research team decided to retain the construct and explore it further during the final data analysis phase.” Authors are advised to include a citation for this. Data sharing: data is shared on Figshare and incorporated in the manuscript. Discussion and Directions for future direction: The discussion section is well drafted and provides a comparison to previously published literature at appropriate places. A few grammatical errors are observed, Authors are advised to relook and incorporate corrections. Eg.. A sentence starts with “To address ……..”; Typo errors like 3.6….Cronbach alpha of all constructs of the study was above o.7 etc. Authors are advised to take a relook at the paper and incorporate the suggestions presented above. The paper maybe accepted for indexing as it is written well and contributes to the body of knowledge of management science. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Marketing, Green banking, Sensory marketing I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Sharma M. Reviewer Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339089 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v1#referee-response-339089 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 27 Jan 2025 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, 576104, India 27 Jan 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your observations and feedback on the manuscript. I acknowledge the typo errors in the document and have included the corrections in the new ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your observations and feedback on the manuscript. I acknowledge the typo errors in the document and have included the corrections in the new version of the manuscript. As far as the Cronbach Alpha goes, in social science research if the values are in the range of 0.5 to 0.7, it is still recommended to proceed with the scale as the assumption is that a bigger sample size will normalize this when the final data collection is undertaken. I am uploading a new version of the manuscript after refining it with your suggestions. Thank you again. Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your observations and feedback on the manuscript. I acknowledge the typo errors in the document and have included the corrections in the new version of the manuscript. As far as the Cronbach Alpha goes, in social science research if the values are in the range of 0.5 to 0.7, it is still recommended to proceed with the scale as the assumption is that a bigger sample size will normalize this when the final data collection is undertaken. I am uploading a new version of the manuscript after refining it with your suggestions. Thank you again. Competing Interests: I have no competing interests to be disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 27 Jan 2025 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, 576104, India 27 Jan 2025 Author Response Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your observations and feedback on the manuscript. I acknowledge the typo errors in the document and have included the corrections in the new ... Continue reading Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your observations and feedback on the manuscript. I acknowledge the typo errors in the document and have included the corrections in the new version of the manuscript. As far as the Cronbach Alpha goes, in social science research if the values are in the range of 0.5 to 0.7, it is still recommended to proceed with the scale as the assumption is that a bigger sample size will normalize this when the final data collection is undertaken. I am uploading a new version of the manuscript after refining it with your suggestions. Thank you again. Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your observations and feedback on the manuscript. I acknowledge the typo errors in the document and have included the corrections in the new version of the manuscript. As far as the Cronbach Alpha goes, in social science research if the values are in the range of 0.5 to 0.7, it is still recommended to proceed with the scale as the assumption is that a bigger sample size will normalize this when the final data collection is undertaken. I am uploading a new version of the manuscript after refining it with your suggestions. Thank you again. Competing Interests: I have no competing interests to be disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Rachmad YE. Reviewer Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339092 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v1#referee-response-339092 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 27 Nov 2024 Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad , Universal Institute of Professional Management, Shah Alam, Malaysia; Education, United Nations Foundation (Ringgold ID: 50472), District of Columbia, Washington, USA Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339092 Submission ID : 2024_IJWOE-237645 Title : Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? Authors : Pranav Vilas Chavare, Smitha Nayak, Ramona Birau, Varalakshmi Alapati. Journal : F1000Research 2024, 13:1343 Last ... Continue reading READ ALL Submission ID : 2024_IJWOE-237645 Title : Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? Authors : Pranav Vilas Chavare, Smitha Nayak, Ramona Birau, Varalakshmi Alapati. Journal : F1000Research 2024, 13:1343 Last updated: 13 NOV 2024 Dear Authors, Thank you for your submission of the manuscript titled "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?" This study offers a valuable and timely contribution to the field of influencer marketing, particularly in the context of Generation Z consumers in India. The research methodology, findings, and theoretical implications are well-articulated. However, I would like to suggest a few areas for improvement to further enhance the manuscript’s clarity, impact, and contribution. Feedback and Suggestions Clarity in Presentation Detailed Explanations: While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five-point Likert scale and its appropriateness in this context would enhance understanding. Consider including a justification for its use over other scales. Figures and Tables: Some figures and tables, such as the structural model and hypothesis testing results, could benefit from clearer captions or legends. For example, explicitly defining significance levels (e.g., p values) directly in the table or figure notes would improve readability. Data Accessibility and Reproducibility Data Sharing: It is commendable that the dataset is available on Figshare under a Creative Commons license. However, it may be beneficial to provide an appendix or a supplementary section with detailed instructions on how to access and use the dataset for replication studies. Discussion and Implications Comparative Context: The discussion section could be expanded to include comparisons with similar studies in other regions or demographic groups. This would contextualize the findings and highlight their generalizability. Practical Applications: Including examples of how brands or marketers can apply these findings to develop effective influencer strategies would increase the manuscript's practical utility. Future Research Directions Content and Product Categories: The study would benefit from a clearer acknowledgment of its limitations regarding generalizations across different content types or product categories. Suggestions for future research in these areas could provide valuable guidance for subsequent studies. Minor Corrections Consistency in Terms: Ensure all technical terms are consistently defined throughout the manuscript. For instance, maintaining uniform terminology for constructs like “trust,” “expertise,” and “credibility” will aid comprehension. Grammar and Typographical Errors: A few minor typographical errors were noted. A careful review of the manuscript will help ensure overall accuracy and readability. Overall, this manuscript represents a significant contribution to the literature on influencer marketing and consumer behavior. The innovative approach and detailed analysis are commendable, and I am confident that with these refinements, the paper will achieve even greater impact. Thank you for the opportunity to review this work. I look forward to the revised version. Best regards, Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad Reviewer Submission ID : 2024_IJWOE-237645 Title : Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? Authors : Pranav Vilas Chavare, Smitha Nayak, Ramona Birau, Varalakshmi Alapati. Journal : F1000Research 2024, 13:1343 Last updated: 13 NOV 2024 Dear Editor, The manuscript titled "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?" presents a compelling study that contributes significantly to the growing field of influencer marketing and its impact on consumer behavior, specifically within the context of Generation Z in India. While the research demonstrates robust methodology and meaningful findings, there are a few areas that I would recommend addressing to enhance the overall clarity and impact of the manuscript: Key Points for Consideration Clarity and Accessibility in Methodology: The study employs PLS-SEM to test hypotheses effectively. However, for a broader audience, providing additional context or illustrative examples regarding the structural model and key metrics (e.g., significance thresholds) would increase clarity and accessibility. Data Availability and Reproducibility: While the authors commendably provide access to the dataset on Figshare, it may be beneficial to suggest including explicit guidance or links in an appendix to facilitate easier replication by future researchers. Discussion of Findings and Generalizability: The discussion section could be expanded to compare the findings with similar research across different demographics or industries. Highlighting potential applications of the study's insights in other regions or sectors would underscore its broader relevance. Practical Implications: The paper makes significant theoretical contributions. To balance this, elaborating on how brands can implement these findings to design effective influencer campaigns could enhance the manuscript’s practical utility. Future Research Directions: The limitations section briefly mentions opportunities for future work. However, more detailed suggestions, such as examining content types or distinguishing between macro- and micro-influencers, would provide valuable guidance for subsequent research in this field. Overall Recommendation The manuscript offers a valuable addition to the literature on influencer marketing and consumer behavior. Addressing the points above through minor revisions would further strengthen its impact and readability. Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. I look forward to seeing its refined version. Best regards, Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad Reviewer Submission ID : 2024_IJWOE-237645 Title : Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? Authors : Pranav Vilas Chavare, Smitha Nayak, Ramona Birau, Varalakshmi Alapati. Journal : F1000Research 2024, 13:1343 Last updated: 13 NOV 2024 I recommend Minor Revisions for the manuscript titled " Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?". Justification for Recommendation : Innovative Approach: The manuscript provides an insightful examination of influencer credibility and its impact on purchase intention, particularly in the context of Generation Z in India. The integration of trust, expertise, and similarity in assessing influencer credibility adds a significant contribution to the literature on consumer behavior. Clarity and Detail: The study uses advanced methodologies such as PLS-SEM, which are well-documented. However, the manuscript would benefit from additional intuitive examples or explanations for readers less familiar with this approach. Adding more visuals or diagrams, particularly in the methodology section, could enhance clarity. Data Accessibility: While the dataset is made publicly available through Figshare, the authors should provide additional guidance or references for accessing and utilizing the data to support reproducibility. Discussion and Practical Implications: The discussion section is thorough but could be expanded with a stronger emphasis on practical applications. For instance, the authors could elaborate on how brands can leverage the findings to design effective influencer marketing campaigns. Minor Corrections: Some typographical errors and inconsistencies in the use of technical terms were noted. Ensuring uniformity in terminology and addressing these minor errors will improve the manuscript's readability. Conclusion: This manuscript is a valuable contribution to the understanding of influencer marketing and consumer behavior. The proposed revisions are minor and intended to enhance the manuscript's clarity, practical relevance, and broader impact. I look forward to reviewing the revised version. Best regards, Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad Reviewer Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Yes, I consider aspects of this article to be of major significance.Justification:The study provides critical insights into the mechanisms by which influencer credibility and brand attitude shape purchase intentions, particularly among Gen Z consumers in a rapidly digitizing market like India. This demographic and geographical focus offers unique value in understanding emerging consumer behaviors.Why It Is Significant:Practical Implications:The findings can guide brands and marketers in designing more effective influencer strategies, especially in leveraging trust and expertise over attractiveness.Theoretical Contribution:By identifying the mediating role of brand attitude, the study advances existing frameworks like the Theory of Reasoned Action, adding depth to literature on influencer marketing and consumer behavior.Emerging Market Focus:The focus on Gen Z in India highlights evolving trends in an underrepresented region, providing valuable insights that could inform both academic and industry strategies globally.The work bridges theoretical and practical gaps, making it a substantial addition to the field of marketing research. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Rachmad YE. Reviewer Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339092 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v1#referee-response-339092 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 09 Dec 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, 576104, India 09 Dec 2024 Author Response 1. While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five point likert scale. Response : Changes have been incorporated. As these scales were originally developed ... Continue reading 1. While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five point likert scale. Response : Changes have been incorporated. As these scales were originally developed and designed to be measured on 5 point likert scale, the same has been adopted in the manuscript. 2. Data Sharing: It is commendable that the dataset is available on Figshare under a Creative Commons license. However, it may be beneficial to provide an appendix or a supplementary section with detailed instructions on how to access and use the dataset for replication studies. Response: This statement has been included in the “Underlying Data“ section of the. The underlying data of the manuscript can be accessed on Figshare by clicking on this link 3. Including examples of how brands or marketers can apply these findings to develop effective influencer strategies would increase the manuscript's practical utility. Response: The same has already been addressed in the theoretical and managerial implication sections of the manuscript. 4. Content and Product Categories: The study would benefit from a clearer acknowledgment of its limitations regarding generalizations across different content types or product categories. Suggestions for future research in these areas could provide valuable guidance for subsequent studies. Response has been incorporated. 5. Manuscript has been rechecked for Consistency, Typographical errors and Grammatical errors. 1. While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five point likert scale. Response : Changes have been incorporated. As these scales were originally developed and designed to be measured on 5 point likert scale, the same has been adopted in the manuscript. 2. Data Sharing: It is commendable that the dataset is available on Figshare under a Creative Commons license. However, it may be beneficial to provide an appendix or a supplementary section with detailed instructions on how to access and use the dataset for replication studies. Response: This statement has been included in the “Underlying Data“ section of the. The underlying data of the manuscript can be accessed on Figshare by clicking on this link 3. Including examples of how brands or marketers can apply these findings to develop effective influencer strategies would increase the manuscript's practical utility. Response: The same has already been addressed in the theoretical and managerial implication sections of the manuscript. 4. Content and Product Categories: The study would benefit from a clearer acknowledgment of its limitations regarding generalizations across different content types or product categories. Suggestions for future research in these areas could provide valuable guidance for subsequent studies. Response has been incorporated. 5. Manuscript has been rechecked for Consistency, Typographical errors and Grammatical errors. Competing Interests: I do not have any competing interests to disclose. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 09 Dec 2024 smitha nayak , Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, 576104, India 09 Dec 2024 Author Response 1. While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five point likert scale. Response : Changes have been incorporated. As these scales were originally developed ... Continue reading 1. While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five point likert scale. Response : Changes have been incorporated. As these scales were originally developed and designed to be measured on 5 point likert scale, the same has been adopted in the manuscript. 2. Data Sharing: It is commendable that the dataset is available on Figshare under a Creative Commons license. However, it may be beneficial to provide an appendix or a supplementary section with detailed instructions on how to access and use the dataset for replication studies. Response: This statement has been included in the “Underlying Data“ section of the. The underlying data of the manuscript can be accessed on Figshare by clicking on this link 3. Including examples of how brands or marketers can apply these findings to develop effective influencer strategies would increase the manuscript's practical utility. Response: The same has already been addressed in the theoretical and managerial implication sections of the manuscript. 4. Content and Product Categories: The study would benefit from a clearer acknowledgment of its limitations regarding generalizations across different content types or product categories. Suggestions for future research in these areas could provide valuable guidance for subsequent studies. Response has been incorporated. 5. Manuscript has been rechecked for Consistency, Typographical errors and Grammatical errors. 1. While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five point likert scale. Response : Changes have been incorporated. As these scales were originally developed and designed to be measured on 5 point likert scale, the same has been adopted in the manuscript. 2. Data Sharing: It is commendable that the dataset is available on Figshare under a Creative Commons license. However, it may be beneficial to provide an appendix or a supplementary section with detailed instructions on how to access and use the dataset for replication studies. Response: This statement has been included in the “Underlying Data“ section of the. The underlying data of the manuscript can be accessed on Figshare by clicking on this link 3. Including examples of how brands or marketers can apply these findings to develop effective influencer strategies would increase the manuscript's practical utility. Response: The same has already been addressed in the theoretical and managerial implication sections of the manuscript. 4. Content and Product Categories: The study would benefit from a clearer acknowledgment of its limitations regarding generalizations across different content types or product categories. Suggestions for future research in these areas could provide valuable guidance for subsequent studies. Response has been incorporated. 5. Manuscript has been rechecked for Consistency, Typographical errors and Grammatical errors. Competing Interests: I do not have any competing interests to disclose. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 3 VERSION 3 PUBLISHED 08 Nov 2024 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 3 Version 3 (revision) 27 Jan 25 read Version 2 (revision) 09 Dec 24 Version 1 08 Nov 24 read read Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad , Universal Institute of Professional Management, Shah Alam, Malaysia; United Nations Foundation (Ringgold ID: 50472), District of Columbia, USA Meenakshi Sharma , Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India Harjinder Kaur Balbir Singh , Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2025 Balbir Singh H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 18 Feb 2025 | for Version 3 Harjinder Kaur Balbir Singh , Asia Pacific University of Technology and Innovation, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 0 Views copyright © 2025 Balbir Singh H. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Introduction Strengths: The introduction provides a comprehensive overview of the topic and sets the stage for the research. It effectively highlights the importance of social media and influencer marketing in India. Areas for Improvement: The introduction is somewhat lengthy. Consider condensing it to focus on the most critical points. Additionally, the transition between different ideas could be smoother to enhance readability. Suggest adding in the specific industry of the study in the title. 2.Literature Review and Hypotheses Development Strengths: The literature review is thorough and covers a wide range of relevant studies. The hypotheses are clearly stated and logically derived from the literature. Areas for Improvement: Some sections of the literature review read more like summaries rather than critical evaluations. Aim to provide more critical analysis of the studies reviewed. Additionally, ensure that each hypothesis is explicitly linked to the literature discussed. Better to have latest scholarly journals of 5 years data. 3. Methodology Study Design: Strengths: The cross-sectional research design is appropriate for the study. The explanation of the research philosophy is clear. Areas for Improvement: The explanation of the research philosophy could be more concise. Some sections are overly detailed and could be streamlined. Study Setting and Eligibility Criteria: Strengths: The criteria for selecting respondents are well-defined and justified. Areas for Improvement: The justification for focusing solely on urban Gen Z could be stronger. Discuss potential biases this might introduce and how they were mitigated. Data Measurement: Strengths: The use of established scales for measuring constructs is commendable. The questionnaire design and data collection process are well-explained. Areas for Improvement: Consider discussing potential biases in the questionnaire design. Were there any leading questions or ambiguities? Sample Size: Strengths: The sample size calculation is appropriate, and the use of a purposive sampling technique is justified. Areas for Improvement: The rationale for using a purposive sampling technique could be more critically discussed. Consider potential limitations of this approach. Statistical Methods: Strengths: The use of SEM and other statistical techniques is appropriate for the analysis. The explanation of the methods is clear and detailed. Areas for Improvement: Some sections could benefit from more detail on why specific methods were chosen. Discuss any assumptions made and how they were addressed. 4. Results Reliability and Validity: Strengths: The assessment of reliability and validity is thorough. The use of Cronbach's alpha, rhoa, and composite reliability is appropriate. Areas for Improvement: The discussion of reliability measures could be more critical. Were there any limitations in these measures? Structural Model: Strengths: The evaluation of the structural model is well-explained. The use of bootstrapping and the reporting of path coefficients, R2, and Q2 values are commendable. Areas for Improvement: The presentation of results could be more concise. Some sections are overly detailed and could be streamlined. Mediation Analysis: Strengths: The mediation analysis is well-conducted and clearly presented. Areas for Improvement: The interpretation of results could be more critical. Were there any limitations in the mediation analysis? Importance Performance Matrix Analysis (IPMA): Strengths: The IPMA results are well-explained and provide valuable insights. Areas for Improvement: The discussion could be more critical. How do these results compare to existing literature? 5. Discussion Interpretation of Results: Strengths: The discussion section effectively interprets the results in the context of existing literature. The findings are well-explained and supported by relevant studies. Areas for Improvement: The discussion could be more critical. Some interpretations feel overly positive without sufficient critical analysis. Theoretical and Managerial Implications: Strengths: The implications are clearly stated and provide valuable insights for both theory and practice. Areas for Improvement: The discussion could be more critical. Are there any potential limitations or biases in these implications? Future Directions and Limitations Future Research: Strengths: The suggestions for future research are relevant and well-justified. Areas for Improvement: The suggestions could be more detailed. Consider discussing specific research questions or methodologies for future studies. Limitations: Strengths: The limitations are clearly stated and appropriately acknowledged. Areas for Improvement: The discussion of limitations could be more critical. Consider discussing potential biases and how they might impact the results. Overall Comments Strengths: The report is well-structured and comprehensive. It demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic and employs appropriate research methods. The writing is clear and concise, making the report easy to follow. The use of figures and tables enhances the presentation of the results. Areas for Improvement: The report could benefit from more critical analysis in several sections. Some areas are overly detailed and could be streamlined to enhance readability. Suggest relooking into each section above on the areas for improvement which will enhance better the report. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? No If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Marketing, Digital Marketing , Consumer Behaviour, Entrepreneurship I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Balbir Singh HK. Peer Review Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.177412.r367236) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3#referee-response-367236 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Sharma M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 17 Dec 2024 | for Version 1 Meenakshi Sharma , Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India 0 Views copyright © 2024 Sharma M. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Detailed Explanation: The narrative style of the paper is scientific. The paper has a high degree of clarity and is focused. It contributes to the body of knowledge in the marketing domain, especially in the context of GenZ. It has been clearly articulated. Figures and Tables: All figures and tables are in order and have an intext mentioned at appropriate places. Consistent with the paper's objective, the tables provide an overview of major findings. Methodology: The methodology section is well drafted and captures the process appropriately. However, the authors are advised to explain the sample size estimation process in detail. This will strengthen the methodology section. There appears to be an error in the data measurement section. Relook at the “5-5 point likert scale”. In the pilot testing section “Similarity with the Influencer was below the threshold value of 0.7. In social science research, a construct with a Cronbach alpha above 0.6 in a pilot study could be retained as it is expected the increase with an increment in sample size. Hence the research team decided to retain the construct and explore it further during the final data analysis phase.” Authors are advised to include a citation for this. Data sharing: data is shared on Figshare and incorporated in the manuscript. Discussion and Directions for future direction: The discussion section is well drafted and provides a comparison to previously published literature at appropriate places. A few grammatical errors are observed, Authors are advised to relook and incorporate corrections. Eg.. A sentence starts with “To address ……..”; Typo errors like 3.6….Cronbach alpha of all constructs of the study was above o.7 etc. Authors are advised to take a relook at the paper and incorporate the suggestions presented above. The paper maybe accepted for indexing as it is written well and contributes to the body of knowledge of management science. Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Marketing, Green banking, Sensory marketing I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 27 Jan 2025 smitha nayak, Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, 576104, India Dear Reviewer, Thank you for your observations and feedback on the manuscript. I acknowledge the typo errors in the document and have included the corrections in the new version of the manuscript. As far as the Cronbach Alpha goes, in social science research if the values are in the range of 0.5 to 0.7, it is still recommended to proceed with the scale as the assumption is that a bigger sample size will normalize this when the final data collection is undertaken. I am uploading a new version of the manuscript after refining it with your suggestions. Thank you again. View more View less Competing Interests I have no competing interests to be disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Sharma M. Peer Review Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339089) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v1#referee-response-339089 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Rachmad Y. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 27 Nov 2024 | for Version 1 Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad , Universal Institute of Professional Management, Shah Alam, Malaysia; Education, United Nations Foundation (Ringgold ID: 50472), District of Columbia, Washington, USA 0 Views copyright © 2024 Rachmad Y. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (1) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Submission ID : 2024_IJWOE-237645 Title : Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? Authors : Pranav Vilas Chavare, Smitha Nayak, Ramona Birau, Varalakshmi Alapati. Journal : F1000Research 2024, 13:1343 Last updated: 13 NOV 2024 Dear Authors, Thank you for your submission of the manuscript titled "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?" This study offers a valuable and timely contribution to the field of influencer marketing, particularly in the context of Generation Z consumers in India. The research methodology, findings, and theoretical implications are well-articulated. However, I would like to suggest a few areas for improvement to further enhance the manuscript’s clarity, impact, and contribution. Feedback and Suggestions Clarity in Presentation Detailed Explanations: While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five-point Likert scale and its appropriateness in this context would enhance understanding. Consider including a justification for its use over other scales. Figures and Tables: Some figures and tables, such as the structural model and hypothesis testing results, could benefit from clearer captions or legends. For example, explicitly defining significance levels (e.g., p values) directly in the table or figure notes would improve readability. Data Accessibility and Reproducibility Data Sharing: It is commendable that the dataset is available on Figshare under a Creative Commons license. However, it may be beneficial to provide an appendix or a supplementary section with detailed instructions on how to access and use the dataset for replication studies. Discussion and Implications Comparative Context: The discussion section could be expanded to include comparisons with similar studies in other regions or demographic groups. This would contextualize the findings and highlight their generalizability. Practical Applications: Including examples of how brands or marketers can apply these findings to develop effective influencer strategies would increase the manuscript's practical utility. Future Research Directions Content and Product Categories: The study would benefit from a clearer acknowledgment of its limitations regarding generalizations across different content types or product categories. Suggestions for future research in these areas could provide valuable guidance for subsequent studies. Minor Corrections Consistency in Terms: Ensure all technical terms are consistently defined throughout the manuscript. For instance, maintaining uniform terminology for constructs like “trust,” “expertise,” and “credibility” will aid comprehension. Grammar and Typographical Errors: A few minor typographical errors were noted. A careful review of the manuscript will help ensure overall accuracy and readability. Overall, this manuscript represents a significant contribution to the literature on influencer marketing and consumer behavior. The innovative approach and detailed analysis are commendable, and I am confident that with these refinements, the paper will achieve even greater impact. Thank you for the opportunity to review this work. I look forward to the revised version. Best regards, Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad Reviewer Submission ID : 2024_IJWOE-237645 Title : Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? Authors : Pranav Vilas Chavare, Smitha Nayak, Ramona Birau, Varalakshmi Alapati. Journal : F1000Research 2024, 13:1343 Last updated: 13 NOV 2024 Dear Editor, The manuscript titled "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?" presents a compelling study that contributes significantly to the growing field of influencer marketing and its impact on consumer behavior, specifically within the context of Generation Z in India. While the research demonstrates robust methodology and meaningful findings, there are a few areas that I would recommend addressing to enhance the overall clarity and impact of the manuscript: Key Points for Consideration Clarity and Accessibility in Methodology: The study employs PLS-SEM to test hypotheses effectively. However, for a broader audience, providing additional context or illustrative examples regarding the structural model and key metrics (e.g., significance thresholds) would increase clarity and accessibility. Data Availability and Reproducibility: While the authors commendably provide access to the dataset on Figshare, it may be beneficial to suggest including explicit guidance or links in an appendix to facilitate easier replication by future researchers. Discussion of Findings and Generalizability: The discussion section could be expanded to compare the findings with similar research across different demographics or industries. Highlighting potential applications of the study's insights in other regions or sectors would underscore its broader relevance. Practical Implications: The paper makes significant theoretical contributions. To balance this, elaborating on how brands can implement these findings to design effective influencer campaigns could enhance the manuscript’s practical utility. Future Research Directions: The limitations section briefly mentions opportunities for future work. However, more detailed suggestions, such as examining content types or distinguishing between macro- and micro-influencers, would provide valuable guidance for subsequent research in this field. Overall Recommendation The manuscript offers a valuable addition to the literature on influencer marketing and consumer behavior. Addressing the points above through minor revisions would further strengthen its impact and readability. Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. I look forward to seeing its refined version. Best regards, Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad Reviewer Submission ID : 2024_IJWOE-237645 Title : Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? Authors : Pranav Vilas Chavare, Smitha Nayak, Ramona Birau, Varalakshmi Alapati. Journal : F1000Research 2024, 13:1343 Last updated: 13 NOV 2024 I recommend Minor Revisions for the manuscript titled " Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers?". Justification for Recommendation : Innovative Approach: The manuscript provides an insightful examination of influencer credibility and its impact on purchase intention, particularly in the context of Generation Z in India. The integration of trust, expertise, and similarity in assessing influencer credibility adds a significant contribution to the literature on consumer behavior. Clarity and Detail: The study uses advanced methodologies such as PLS-SEM, which are well-documented. However, the manuscript would benefit from additional intuitive examples or explanations for readers less familiar with this approach. Adding more visuals or diagrams, particularly in the methodology section, could enhance clarity. Data Accessibility: While the dataset is made publicly available through Figshare, the authors should provide additional guidance or references for accessing and utilizing the data to support reproducibility. Discussion and Practical Implications: The discussion section is thorough but could be expanded with a stronger emphasis on practical applications. For instance, the authors could elaborate on how brands can leverage the findings to design effective influencer marketing campaigns. Minor Corrections: Some typographical errors and inconsistencies in the use of technical terms were noted. Ensuring uniformity in terminology and addressing these minor errors will improve the manuscript's readability. Conclusion: This manuscript is a valuable contribution to the understanding of influencer marketing and consumer behavior. The proposed revisions are minor and intended to enhance the manuscript's clarity, practical relevance, and broader impact. I look forward to reviewing the revised version. Best regards, Prof. Dr. Yoesoep Edhie Rachmad Reviewer Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature? Yes Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others? Yes If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? Yes Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility? Yes Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results? Yes Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Yes, I consider aspects of this article to be of major significance.Justification:The study provides critical insights into the mechanisms by which influencer credibility and brand attitude shape purchase intentions, particularly among Gen Z consumers in a rapidly digitizing market like India. This demographic and geographical focus offers unique value in understanding emerging consumer behaviors.Why It Is Significant:Practical Implications:The findings can guide brands and marketers in designing more effective influencer strategies, especially in leveraging trust and expertise over attractiveness.Theoretical Contribution:By identifying the mediating role of brand attitude, the study advances existing frameworks like the Theory of Reasoned Action, adding depth to literature on influencer marketing and consumer behavior.Emerging Market Focus:The focus on Gen Z in India highlights evolving trends in an underrepresented region, providing valuable insights that could inform both academic and industry strategies globally.The work bridges theoretical and practical gaps, making it a substantial addition to the field of marketing research. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (1) Author Response 09 Dec 2024 smitha nayak, Department of Humanities and Management, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal Institute of Technology, 576104, India 1. While the methodology section is robust, additional explanations regarding the choice of a five point likert scale. Response : Changes have been incorporated. As these scales were originally developed and designed to be measured on 5 point likert scale, the same has been adopted in the manuscript. 2. Data Sharing: It is commendable that the dataset is available on Figshare under a Creative Commons license. However, it may be beneficial to provide an appendix or a supplementary section with detailed instructions on how to access and use the dataset for replication studies. Response: This statement has been included in the “Underlying Data“ section of the. The underlying data of the manuscript can be accessed on Figshare by clicking on this link 3. Including examples of how brands or marketers can apply these findings to develop effective influencer strategies would increase the manuscript's practical utility. Response: The same has already been addressed in the theoretical and managerial implication sections of the manuscript. 4. Content and Product Categories: The study would benefit from a clearer acknowledgment of its limitations regarding generalizations across different content types or product categories. Suggestions for future research in these areas could provide valuable guidance for subsequent studies. Response has been incorporated. 5. Manuscript has been rechecked for Consistency, Typographical errors and Grammatical errors. View more View less Competing Interests I do not have any competing interests to disclose. reply Respond Report a concern Rachmad YE. Peer Review Report For: Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping Purchase Intention of Indian GenZ Consumers? [version 3; peer review: 3 approved] . F1000Research 2025, 13 :1343 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.173012.r339092) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v1#referee-response-339092 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Vilas Chavare P et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343", templates : { twitter : "Does Brand Attitude Complement Influencer Credibility in Shaping.... Vilas Chavare P et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/13-1343/v3" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/157553/177412") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "177412"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "367236": 14, "355341": 0, "355340": 0, "355343": 0, "355342": 0, "355349": 0, "339093": 0, "355348": 0, "339092": 21, "339095": 0, "339094": 0, "355345": 0, "339089": 13, "355344": 0, "339088": 0, "355347": 0, "339091": 0, "355346": 0, "339090": 0, "339097": 0, "339096": 0, "353189": 0, "353188": 0, "353191": 0, "353190": 0, "353185": 0, "353184": 0, "353187": 0, "353186": 0, "353193": 0, "353192": 0, "362831": 0, "362830": 0, "351317": 0, "351316": 0, "351319": 0, "351318": 0, "351315": 0, "351324": 0, "346844": 0, "351321": 0, "351320": 0, "351323": 0, "351322": 0, "348261": 0, "348263": 0, "348262": 0, "348269": 0, "348268": 0, "348270": 0, "348265": 0, "348264": 0, "348267": 0, "348266": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "a735c04c-aa47-46bf-8262-5439679ec36e"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });