Repeatability and intra-class correlations from time-to-event data: towards a standardized approach

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Many biological features are expressed as “time-to-event” traits, such as time to first reproduction or response to some stimulus. The analysis of these traits frequently produces right-censored data in cases where no event has occurred within a certain timeframe. The Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model, a type of survival analysis, accounts for censored data by estimating the hazard of an event occurring at each time point. While random effect variances can be estimated in CPH models, it is currently not possible to estimate within-cluster variance. Consequently, we lack a general method for calculating ecologically and evolutionary relevant variances and metrics like repeatability from time-to-event data. We here present a solution to this issue. We first describe the characteristics of CPH models and introduce repeatability as an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We demonstrate how CPH models with discrete-time intervals are comparable to binomial generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs) with the complementary log-log link. Through this equivalence, we show how to estimate an ICC using the estimates of the random effects variance component(s) resulting from CPH models and the distribution-specific variance (within-cluster variance) from the binomial GLMM. We provide a case study and online materials to demonstrate how our new method for ICC for time-to-event data can be implemented and used. We conclude that the proposed method will not only generate a standard way to quantify consistent individual differences (ICC) from time-to-event data, but also broaden the use of survival analysis outside of the typical implementation for survivorship studies.
Full text 2,483 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Many biological features are expressed as “time-to-event” traits, such as time to first reproduction or response to some stimulus. The analysis of these traits frequently produces right-censored data in cases where no event has occurred within a certain timeframe. The Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model, a type of survival analysis, accounts for censored data by estimating the hazard of an event occurring at each time point. While random effect variances can be estimated in CPH models, it is currently not possible to estimate within-cluster variance. Consequently, we lack a general method for calculating ecologically and evolutionary relevant variances and metrics like repeatability from time-to-event data. We here present a solution to this issue. We first describe the characteristics of CPH models and introduce repeatability as an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). We demonstrate how CPH models with discrete-time intervals are comparable to binomial generalized linear mixed-effects models (GLMMs) with the complementary log-log link. Through this equivalence, we show how to estimate an ICC using the estimates of the random effects variance component(s) resulting from CPH models and the distribution-specific variance (within-cluster variance) from the binomial GLMM. We provide a case study and online materials to demonstrate how our new method for ICC for time-to-event data can be implemented and used. We conclude that the proposed method will not only generate a standard way to quantify consistent individual differences (ICC) from time-to-event data, but also broaden the use of survival analysis outside of the typical implementation for survivorship studies. DOI https://doi.org/10.32942/X25S50 Subjects Behavior and Ethology, Biology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Research Methods in Life Sciences

Keywords

consistent individual differences, Latency, repeatability, survival analysis, latency, Repeatability, Survival Analysis Dates Published: 2024-07-20 15:08 Last Updated: 2025-04-02 16:22 Older Versions License CC BY Attribution 4.0 International Additional Metadata Data and Code Availability Statement: All data and code are available: https://kelseybmccune.github.io/Time-to-Event_Repeatability/Supplementary-materials.html Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00