Abstract
The fitness consequences of cooperative breeding are increasingly well understood, but the ecological and demographic factors driving helping remain contentious. Comparative and single-species studies have identified factors that promote the evolution of helping, but analyses typically test single hypotheses so the relative importance of different factors, and the spatial scale of their influence, remain unknown. Our aim was to investigate multiple social and demographic drivers of helping decisions using 27 years of data from a facultative cooperative breeder, the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus. We analysed the decisions to help or not by 1,338 failed breeders to investigate the influence of metrics related to predation pressure, population density, availability of relatives and timing of breeding. We also examined the scale at which these features acted (100-1000m from a failed nest). We found that the availability of nests at a broad spatial scale of 400-500m from the failed nest was higher around those failed breeders that decided to help than those that did not. Specifically, helpers of either sex were surrounded by lower predation pressure, while male helpers were surrounded by more breeding attempts, more active nests, and later nests. However, the most important factor driving helping, and from a very fine spatial scale (100+m), was kinship: future helpers were surrounded by more social first order kin than non-helpers. This effect held for males, but not females, when considering the genetic pedigree. Our findings highlight the interplay of multiple ecological, demographic and social factors, acting at different spatial scales, offering new insights into the drivers of sociality.
Full text
2,652 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
You must log in to post a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Add a Comment
You must log in to post a comment.
Comments
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.
The fitness consequences of cooperative breeding are increasingly well understood, but the ecological and demographic factors driving helping remain contentious. Comparative and single-species studies have identified factors that promote the evolution of helping, but analyses typically test single hypotheses so the relative importance of different factors, and the spatial scale of their influence, remain unknown. Our aim was to investigate multiple social and demographic drivers of helping decisions using 27 years of data from a facultative cooperative breeder, the long-tailed tit Aegithalos caudatus. We analysed the decisions to help or not by 1,338 failed breeders to investigate the influence of metrics related to predation pressure, population density, availability of relatives and timing of breeding. We also examined the scale at which these features acted (100-1000m from a failed nest). We found that the availability of nests at a broad spatial scale of 400-500m from the failed nest was higher around those failed breeders that decided to help than those that did not. Specifically, helpers of either sex were surrounded by lower predation pressure, while male helpers were surrounded by more breeding attempts, more active nests, and later nests. However, the most important factor driving helping, and from a very fine spatial scale (100+m), was kinship: future helpers were surrounded by more social first order kin than non-helpers. This effect held for males, but not females, when considering the genetic pedigree. Our findings highlight the interplay of multiple ecological, demographic and social factors, acting at different spatial scales, offering new insights into the drivers of sociality.
https://doi.org/10.32942/X27D32
Behavior and Ethology, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences
Cooperative breeding, sociality, long-tailed tits Aegithalos caudatus, Helping, Cooperation, Drivers, relatedness, Kinship, kin selection
Published: 2025-11-13 19:35
Last Updated: 2025-11-14 18:13
CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data and Code Availability Statement:
Data and code will be made available upon acceptance by a Journal
Language:
English
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.