Effectiveness of Different Progestin Modalities Compared to Other Hormonal Therapies for Endometriosis: A Systematic Review

In: Siriraj Medical Journal · 2025 · vol. 77(6) , pp. 373–391 · doi:10.33192/smj.v77i6.272256 · W4411092161
review OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This systematic review found that progestin-only contraceptives, combined oral contraceptives, and GnRH agonists/antagonists effectively reduced endometriosis symptoms and improved quality of life, with irregular bleeding being the most common adverse effect.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17 · read from full text

This systematic review compiled studies in women with endometriosis comparing progestin-only therapies (including progestin-only contraceptives) with other hormonal therapies and placebo, with primary focus on improvement in endometriosis-associated pain and secondary outcomes including quality of life, treatment satisfaction, adverse effects, and recurrence. Across included hormonal comparators, progestogens such as combined oral contraceptives and other progestogen modalities (with dienogest highlighted as most used) were reported to significantly decrease symptoms and increase quality of life, while irregular bleeding was identified in almost all studies as the most common adverse effect. Recurrence was reported when progestin-only contraceptives were compared with each other and with GnRH agonists/antagonists, and these were described as similar. The review concludes there is no definitive statement on the superiority of specific progestogen types or administration routes, and it centrally addresses endometriosis by systematically evaluating different progestin modalities for endometriosis-associated pain, quality of life, adverse effects, and recurrence.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: A systematic review was conducted with a study compilation of women with endometriosis in determining the evidence of the use of various progestin modalities compared to other hormonal therapies in improving endometriosis-associated pain, enhancing quality of life (QoL) and minimizing adverse effects and reccurrenceof disease. Materials and Methods: This review carried out search strategies on various searching databases to analyze all comparisons of various progestin-only therapies with each other, other types of hormonal therapies, and placebo. The primary outcome is improvement of endometriosis-associated pain. Meanwhile, the secondary outcomes are the impact on QoL or treatment satisfaction, adverse effects, and disease recurrence. Results: Progestogen (including progestin-only contraceptives) combined oral contraceptives (COC), gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and antagonists are the hormonal therapies that were included in this study. These hormonal therapies significantly decrease the symptoms and increase the patient’s QoL, particularly dienogest, the most used progestogen in the study. The recurrence of the disease was mentioned when progestinonly contraceptives were compared to each other, GnRH agonists and antagonists, which were similar. In addition, almost all of the studies mentioned that irregular bleeding was the most commonly observed adverse effect. Conclusion: Progestin-only contraceptives are similarly effective and could be more effective than other hormonal therapies in decreasing endometriosis-related symptoms, improving QoL, recurrence rate and minimizing adverse effects. This study also concludes that there is no definite statement on the superiority of specific kinds oradministration routes of progestogen to other types of progestin or hormonal therapies.
Full text 11,751 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Objective

A systematic review was conducted with a study compilation of women with endometriosis in determining the evidence of the use of various progestin modalities compared to other hormonal therapies in improving endometriosis-associated pain, enhancing quality of life (QoL) and minimizing adverse effects and reccurrence of disease.

Materials and methods

This review carried out search strategies on various searching databases to analyze all comparisons of various progestin-only therapies with each other, other types of hormonal therapies, and placebo. The primary outcome is improvement of endometriosis-associated pain. Meanwhile, the secondary outcomes are the impact on QoL or treatment satisfaction, adverse effects, and disease recurrence.

Results

Progestogen (including progestin-only contraceptives) combined oral contraceptives (COC), gonadotropinreleasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, and antagonists are the hormonal therapies that were included in this study. These hormonal therapies significantly decrease the symptoms and increase the patient’s QoL, particularly dienogest, the most used progestogen in the study. The recurrence of the disease was mentioned when progestinonly contraceptives were compared to each other, GnRH agonists and antagonists, which were similar. In addition, almost all of the studies mentioned that irregular bleeding was the most commonly observed adverse effect.

Conclusion

Progestin-only contraceptives are similarly effective and could be more effective than other hormonal therapies in decreasing endometriosis-related symptoms, improving QoL, recurrence rate and minimizing adverse effects. This study also concludes that there is no definite statement on the superiority of specific kinds or administration routes of progestogen to other types of progestin or hormonal therapies.

References

Tsamantioti E, Mahdy H. Endometriosis. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567777/. Allaire C, Bedaiwy MA, Yong PJ. Diagnosis and management of endometriosis. CMAJ. 2023;195(10):E363-E71. Chauhan S, More A, Chauhan V, Kathane A. Endometriosis: A Review of Clinical Diagnosis, Treatment, and Pathogenesis. Cureus. 2022;14(9):e28864. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009. Vannuccini S, Clemenza S, Rossi M, Petraglia F. Hormonal treatments for endometriosis: The endocrine background. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022;23(3):333-55. Lee KH, Jung YW, Song SY, Kang BH, Yang JB, Ko YB, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of diegnogest and levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system after laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(9):1779-86. Carvalho N, Margatho D, Cursino K, Benetti-Pinto CL, Bahamondes L. Control of endometriosis-associated pain with etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant and 52-mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system: randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1129-36. Vahid-Dastjerdi M, Hosseini R, Rodi H, Rastad H, Hosseini L. Comparison of the effectiveness of Dienogest with medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic pain and recurrence of endometriosis after laparoscopic surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;308(1):149-55. Mehdizadeh Kashi A, Niakan G, Ebrahimpour M, Allahqoli L, Hassanlouei B, Gitas G, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of the comparative effects of dienogest and the combined oral contraceptive pill in women with endometriosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;156(1):124-32. Caruso S, Cianci A, Iraci Sareri M, Panella M, Caruso G, Cianci S. Randomized study on the effectiveness of nomegestrol acetate plus 17β-estradiol oral contraceptive versus dienogest oral pill in women with suspected endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):146. Niakan G, Rokhgireh S, Ebrahimpour M, Kashi AM. Comparing the effect of dienogest and OCPS on pain and quality of life in women with endometriosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Iran Med. 2021;24(9):670-7. Piacenti I, Viscardi MF, Masciullo L, Sangiuliano C, Scaramuzzino S, Piccioni MG, et al. Dienogest versus continuous oral levonorgestrel/EE in patients with endometriosis: what’s the best choice? Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(5):471-5. El Taha L, Abu Musa A, Khalifeh D, Khalil A, Abbasi S, Nassif J. Efficacy of dienogest vs combined oral contraceptive on pain associated with endometriosis: Randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;267:205-12. Abdou AM, Ammar IMM, Alnemr AAA, Abdelrhman AA. Dienogest Versus Leuprolide Acetate for Recurrent Pelvic Pain Following Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometriosis. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2018;68(4):306-13. Takaesu Y, Nishi H, Kojima J, Sasaki T, Nagamitsu Y, Kato R, et al. Dienogest compared with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist after conservative surgery for endometriosis. J Obstet Gynecol Res. 2016;42(9):1152-8. Purwanto JP, Effendi Y, Manan H, Hoesin M. Effectiveness, Safety and Obedience of Dienogest and Leuprolide Acetate in Postlaparoscopic Endometriosis Patients. Indones J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;8(1):44-51. Tang M, Yang W, Zhang H. Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):85. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Liverani S, Donati A, Ceccarello M, Manzone M, et al. Dienogest vs GnRH agonists as postoperative therapy after laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel and parametrial surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2021;37(10):930-3. Ozaki R, Kumakiri J, Jinushi M, Ikuma S, Murakami K, Kawasaki Y, et al. Comparison of effect of preoperative dienogest and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist administration on laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;302(4):969-76. Carr B, Dmowski WP, O’Brien C, Jiang P, Burke J, Jimenez R, et al. Elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist, versus subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for the treatment of endometriosis: Effects on bone mineral density. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(11):1341-51. Acién P, Velasco I, Acién M. Anastrozole and levonorgrestrel-releasing intrauterine device in the treatment of endometriosis: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):211. Tanmahasamut P, Saejong R, Rattanachaiyanont M, Angsuwathana S, Techatraisak K, Sanga-Areekul N. Postoperative desogestrel for pelvic endometriosis-related pain: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017;33(7):534-9. Lang J, Yu Q, Zhang S, Li H, Gude K, von Ludwig C, et al. Dienogest for Treatment of Endometriosis in Chinese Women: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Phase 3 Study. J Womens Health. 2018;27(2):148-55. Yu Q, Zhang S, Li H, Wang P, Zvolanek M, Ren X, et al. Dienogest for treatment of endometriosis in women: A 28-week, open-label, extension study. J Womens Health. 2019;28(2):170-7. La Torre F, Vannuccini S, Toscano F, Gallucci E, Orlandi G, Manzi V, et al. Long-term treatment for endometriosis with dienogest: efficacy, side effects and tolerability. Gynecological Endocrinology. 2024;40(1):2336121. Gokmen SB, Topbas Selcuki NF, Aydın A, Bahat PY, Akça A. Effects of Dienogest Therapy on Endometriosis-Related Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia, and Endometrioma Size. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e34162. Gezer A, Oral E. Progestin therapy in endometriosis. Womens Health (Lond). 2015;11(5):643-52. Pertama R. Konsesus Tata Laksana Nyeri Endometriosis. Himpunan Endokrinologi Reproduksi dan Fertilitas Indonesia (HIFERI). Perkumpulan Obstetri dan Ginekologi Indonesia (POGI), 2017.p.1. da Costa Pinheiro DJP, Pereira AMG, Antonini M, Maria Albuquerque Salgado I, Dias AT, Lopes RGC. Tolerability of endometriosis medical treatment: a comparison between combined hormonal contraceptives and progestins. BMC Womens Health. 2023;23(1):510. Lee J, Park HJ, Yi KW. Dienogest in endometriosis treatment: A narrative literature review. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2023;50(4):223-9. Crump J, Suker A, White L. Endometriosis: review of recent evidence and guideline. AJGP. 2024;53(1-2):11-8. Moehner S, Becker K, Lange JA, von Stockum S, Serrani M, Heinemann K. Long-term treatment of endometriosis with dienogest: Real-world results from the VIPOS study. J Endometr Pelvic Pain Disord. 2021;13(2):104-10. Techatraisak K, Hestiantoro A, Soon R, Banal-Silao MJ, Kim M-R, Seong SJ, et al. Impact of Long-Term Dienogest Therapy on Quality of Life in Asian Women with Endometriosis: the Prospective Non-Interventional Study ENVISIOeN. Reprod Sci. 2022;29(4):1157-69. Kalaitzopoulos DR, Samartzis N, Kolovos GN, Mareti E, Samartzis EP, Eberhard M, et al. Treatment of endometriosis: a review with comparison of 8 guidelines. BMC Womens Health. 2021;21(1):397. Saridogan E, Becker CM, Feki A, Grimbizis GF, Hummelshoj L, Keckstein J, et al. Recommendations for the Surgical Treatment of Endometriosis. Part 1: Ovarian Endometrioma. Hum Reprod Open. 2017;2017(4):hox016. Keukens A, Veth VB, Regis M, Mijatovic V, Bongers MY, Coppus SFPJ, et al. The effect of surgery or medication on pain and quality of life in women with endometrioma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;293:95-105. Ratan A, Pradhan S, Panigrahi PK, Sahu M, Peepal P, Das S. Role of Laparoscopy in Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometriosis Associated with Infertility: A Prospective Analysis. Siriraj Med J [internet]. 2021 Nov. 1 [cited 2025 Jan. 18];73(11):772-6. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/254174 Srichaikul P, Chalermchockcharoenkit A, Yahata H, Sirimai K, Sutchritpongsa P. Low Complication Rate Associated with Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomies Using the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Series of 1,092 Cases in Siriraj Hospital. Siriraj Med J [internet]. 2018 Jun. 20 [cited 2025 Jan. 18];70(3):191-7. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/129605 Chalermchockcharoenkit A, Techatraisak K. Diagnostic Laparoscopy and Endometriosis. Siriraj Med J [internet]. 2020 Aug. 11 [cited 2025 Jan. 18];53(3):145-51. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/244096 Sutchritpongsa P, K-W S, F O, H-R T. Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Adenomyosis and Endometriosis. Siriraj Med J [internet]. 2008 Nov. 1 [cited 2025 Jan. 18];60(6):320-3. available from: https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sirirajmedj/article/view/246499 Published How to Cite License Copyright (c) 2025 Siriraj Medical Journal This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following conditions: Copyright Transfer In submitting a manuscript, the authors acknowledge that the work will become the copyrighted property of Siriraj Medical Journal upon publication. License Articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows for the sharing of the work for non-commercial purposes with proper attribution to the authors and the journal. However, it does not permit modifications or the creation of derivative works. Sharing and Access Authors are encouraged to share their article on their personal or institutional websites and through other non-commercial platforms. Doing so can increase readership and citations.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

MUSA

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK