Extending the audiogram with loudness growth: revealing complementarity in bimodal aiding

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-16

Loudness growth measured separately by cochlear implant and hearing aid in 15 bimodal users correlated with bimodal benefit for speech in noise, indicating fitting for equal loudness may not always be optimal.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Introduction Clinically, the audiogram is the most commonly used measure when evaluating hearing loss and fitting hearing aids. As an extension, we present the loudness audiogram, which does not only show auditory thresholds but also visualises the full course of loudness perception. Methods In a group of 15 bimodal users, loudness growth was measured with the cochlear implant and hearing aid separately using a loudness scaling procedure. Loudness growth curves were constructed, using a novel loudness function, for each modality and then integrated in a graph plotting frequency, stimulus intensity level, and loudness perception. Bimodal benefit, defined as the difference between wearing a cochlear implant and hearing aid together versus wearing only a cochlear implant, was assessed for multiple speech outcomes. Results Loudness growth was related to bimodal benefit for speech understanding in noise and to some aspects of speech quality. No correlations between loudness and speech in quiet were found. Patients who had predominantly unequal loudness input from the hearing aid, gained more bimodal benefit for speech understanding in noise compared to those patients whose hearing aid provided mainly equivalent input. Discussion Fitting the cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid to create equal loudness at all frequencies may not always be beneficial for speech understanding.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00