Actual and Anticipated Incentives for Reducing Mobile Usage
preprint
OA: closed
AI-generated summary
This RCT found that immediate incentives for mobile usage reduction led to sustained lower usage, while delayed incentives caused pre-incentive reduction but not sustained effects, which were achieved by extending the incentive period and targets.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
We conducted a randomized control trial (RCT) that incentivized smartphone usage reduction. Besides a control condition, two treatments were conducted. In treatment 1, subjects were incentivized to reduce their mobile screen time by 25% for the complete treatment period. In treatment 2, subjects were incentivized to reduce screen time by 25% only for the second half of the treatment period but were informed about their incentives and targets from the beginning. We find that subjects in treatment 1 reduced their mobile usage and sustained a lower post-treatment usage. Conversely, subjects in treatment 2, especially those with excessive mobile usage, started reducing their screen time even before the incentive period, but did not sustain a lower post-treatment usage. When we increased the incentive period and targets in a follow-up RCT, treatment 2 subjects sustained a lower usage. We also study the effects of reducing usage on academic performance and COVID-19 concern.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00