Improved Graph-Based Antibody-Aware Epitope Prediction with Protein Language Model-Based Embeddings

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

The accurate identification of B-cell epitopes is critical in antibody design, diagnostics, and immunotherapies. Many in silico approaches have recently been proposed to predict epitopes, but these approaches struggle primarily because of the variational and conformational nature of epitopes. However, deep learning-based approaches have recently shown great promise in achieving better performance at the epitope prediction task. In this paper, we employ a graph convolutional network (GCN) coupled with pre-trained protein language model (PLM)-based embeddings for epitope prediction on a benchmark antibody-specific epitope prediction (AsEP) dataset. We explore the use of different PLM-embedding methods on the epitope prediction task and show that the choice of PLM embeddings impacts the performance. Specifically, we find that antibody-specific PLMs such as AntiBERTy and general PLMs such as ProtTrans and ESM-2 for antigens provide improved epitope prediction performance with an AUCROC of 0.65, precision of 0.28, and recall of 0.46. The source code is available at: https://github.com/mansoor181/walle-pp.git .
Full text 1,451 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract The accurate identification of B-cell epitopes is critical in antibody design, diagnostics, and immunotherapies. Many in silico approaches have recently been proposed to predict epitopes, but these approaches struggle primarily because of the variational and conformational nature of epitopes. However, deep learning-based approaches have recently shown great promise in achieving better performance at the epitope prediction task. In this paper, we employ a graph convolutional network (GCN) coupled with pre-trained protein language model (PLM)-based embeddings for epitope prediction on a benchmark antibody-specific epitope prediction (AsEP) dataset. We explore the use of different PLM-embedding methods on the epitope prediction task and show that the choice of PLM embeddings impacts the performance. Specifically, we find that antibody-specific PLMs such as AntiBERTy and general PLMs such as ProtTrans and ESM-2 for antigens provide improved epitope prediction performance with an AUCROC of 0.65, precision of 0.28, and recall of 0.46. The source code is available at: https://github.com/mansoor181/walle-pp.git. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Footnotes imdad.khan{at}lums.edu.pk sa4559{at}columbia.edu mahmed76{at}student.gsu.edu,ajan3{at}student.gsu.edu, mpatterson30{at}gsu.edu The bibliography and related work sections were revised with an overall reduction in the number of pages.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00