Increasing Generalizability: Naïve Bayes Vs K-Nearest Neighbors

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Marketing research is often criticized for lacking generalizability and inability to reproduce results. The problem lies in using models to fit data, rather than determining the predictive power of models in conditions of uncertainty. For instance, how does the predictive power of a model change when customer dynamics change? The current study suggests that marketing researchers can supplement existing research methods with non-probabilistic prediction methods, such as the kNN algorithm-based model. Unlike probabilistic models that rely on past outcomes to predict future events – and lose predictive power when newer events are observed - non-probabilistic models better capture uncertainty. In the current study, the predictive power of the kNN algorithm-based model and the Naïve Bayes model is compared using data from two real markets. The kNN algorithm-based model provides more accurate predictions, showing the utility of combining the kNN algorithm-based model with existing marketing research to improve the predictability and generalizability of models. Implications for research and future research are discussed.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00