Inappropriate Use of Antibiotics in Benign Gynecologic Surgery [2L]

In: Obstetrics & Gynecology · 2019 · vol. 133(1) , pp. 129S · doi:10.1097/01.aog/01.aog.0000559236.11557.7c · W2944360045
article OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative antibiotic overuse contributes to unnecessary healthcare costs, harmful drug reactions and the creation of drug resistant bacteria. Study objective was to examine inappropriate antibiotic use among laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries and evaluate for targetable trends. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective cohort study. We examined all laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries performed at Lenox Hill Hospital from 2016-2017. There were a total of 1269 cases performed by 63 gynecologists. Cases where antibiotics were indicated were excluded; 794 cases were studied. The two sample t-test was used for continuous variables and a Fisher's exact test or chi-square test were used to compare categorical variables between groups. Results were statistically significant if p < 0.05. Analysis was conducted using SAS v. 9.4. RESULTS: Antibiotics were inappropriately given in 80.3% of all procedures that met criteria. Myomectomies and endometriosis surgeries were more likely to receive antibiotics than adnexal surgeries. Faculty physicians were more likely to appropriately withhold antibiotics than voluntary staff (39.7% vs 11.4%, p < 0.001), oncologists were more likely than benign gynecologists to withhold antibiotics (36.3% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) and low volume surgeons were more likely than high volume to withhold antibiotics (35.8% vs. 12.4%, p < 0001). Diabetes and smoking status were both examined and did not appear to influence the decision to administer antibiotics. Low rates of 30 day complications (<1%) were seen among both groups. CONCLUSION: Future directions are to correct the high use of inappropriate antibiotics at our institution and target the groups most at risk.
Full text 1,839 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Preoperative antibiotic overuse contributes to unnecessary healthcare costs, harmful drug reactions and the creation of drug resistant bacteria. Study objective was to examine inappropriate antibiotic use among laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries and evaluate for targetable trends.

Methods

This is a single center retrospective cohort study. We examined all laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries performed at Lenox Hill Hospital from 2016-2017. There were a total of 1269 cases performed by 63 gynecologists. Cases where antibiotics were indicated were excluded; 794 cases were studied. The two sample t-test was used for continuous variables and a Fisher's exact test or chi-square test were used to compare categorical variables between groups. Results were statistically significant if p < 0.05. Analysis was conducted using SAS v. 9.4.

Results

Antibiotics were inappropriately given in 80.3% of all procedures that met criteria. Myomectomies and endometriosis surgeries were more likely to receive antibiotics than adnexal surgeries. Faculty physicians were more likely to appropriately withhold antibiotics than voluntary staff (39.7% vs 11.4%, p < 0.001), oncologists were more likely than benign gynecologists to withhold antibiotics (36.3% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001) and low volume surgeons were more likely than high volume to withhold antibiotics (35.8% vs. 12.4%, p < 0001). Diabetes and smoking status were both examined and did not appear to influence the decision to administer antibiotics. Low rates of 30 day complications (<1%) were seen among both groups.

Conclusion

Future directions are to correct the high use of inappropriate antibiotics at our institution and target the groups most at risk.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK