Developing and testing a new instrument to measure women’s satisfaction with controlled ovarian stimulation treatment
article
OA: closed
CC0
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a new instrument (EFESO Questionnaire) to measure satisfaction with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment. METHODS: Literature review and focus groups with clinical experts provided content for the questionnaire. A preliminary version was pilot tested in 10 women to assess comprehension and relevance. The final version was administered to 606 women receiving COS. Feasibility, reliability and validity were tested by calculating the proportion of patients completing all items, by calculating Cronbach's alpha for the overall score, and by investigating whether the instrument discriminated between patients classified according to the level of overall satisfaction and response to treatment. Factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: The final questionnaire consisted of 17 items. 91.7% of patients completed all of the items. Cronbach's alpha was 0.93, indicating excellent reliability, and the instrument was capable of discriminating between patients categorized by responses to the question on overall satisfaction with treatment and by their response to treatment. Factor analysis showed the instrument to be unidimensional. CONCLUSIONS: The EFESO questionnaire is feasible, reliable and valid for the measurement of satisfaction with treatment in patients receiving COS treatment.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (1)
References (21)
- Infertility evaluation and management. Strategies for family physicians. via openalex
- doi:10.1002/9780470024522.ch3 via openalex
- doi:10.1309/w8lj-k377-dhra-cp0b via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000019868 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/1471-2377-10-28 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.04.001 via openalex
- W2124952726 via openalex
- W4205872254 via openalex
- W4285719527 via openalex
- doi:10.4135/9781412985642 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem.83.12.5296 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/bf00422218 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deq219 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/0470846283 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp039 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.08.021 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.990 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/der022 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-57 via openalex
- doi:10.4135/9781608712434.n1341 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.72252.x via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-14T06:04:04.317202+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK