Author(s): N. Jayasree*1, K. Ruchitha2, Vijayalakshmi Cholavaram3, O. Susmitha4, Sk. Davood5
Email(s):
[email protected]
Address:
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Swathi College of Pharmacy, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh
Published In: Volume - 4, Issue - 10, Year - 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.71431/IJRPAS.2025.41006
ABSTRACT:
Hysterectomy, the surgical removal of the uterus, is one of the most frequently performed gynecological procedures worldwide. Beyond its reproductive and symptomatic benefits, growing evidence suggests that hysterectomy may have long-term systemic effects, particularly on cardiovascular health. Hypertension, a leading global risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, has been increasingly reported among women with a history of hysterectomy. The mechanisms underlying this association are not fully established but may involve both hormonal and vascular pathways. In women who undergo hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy, abrupt estrogen deprivation accelerates vascular aging, endothelial dysfunction, and blood pressure dysregulation. Even when ovaries are preserved, reduced ovarian blood flow and earlier onset of ovarian insufficiency may predispose to hypertension. Several observational and cohort studies indicate that women, especially those operated at a younger age, are at higher risk of incident hypertension compared to age-matched controls. Additional factors such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and pre-existing gynaecological conditions like uterine fibroids or endometriosis may further increase susceptibility. While the absolute risk is modest, the high prevalence of hysterectomy amplifies the public health significance of this association. Early recognition and targeted preventive strategies, including cardiovascular monitoring, weight management, and lifestyle counselling, are essential for women after hysterectomy. Further prospective studies are warranted to clarify causal pathways and to guide individualized risk reduction strategies. Overall, hysterectomy appears to be a potential contributor to increased hypertension risk, underscoring the need for long-term vigilance in clinical practice.
Cite this article:
N. Jayasree; K. Ruchitha; Vijayalakshmi Cholavaram; O. Susmitha; Sk. DavoodHysterectomy and Cardiometabolic Risk: A Comprehensive Review. IJRPAS, October 2025; 4(10): 85-95.DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71431/IJRPAS.2025.41006
1.
Mikhail E., Salemi J., Mogos M., Hart S.,
Salihu H., Imudia A. National trends of adnexal surgery at the time of
hysterectomy for benign indication, United States 1998-2011. J. Minim. Invasive
Gynecol. 2015 Mar 1;22(3):S18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.031
2.
Matthews KA, Gibson CJ, El Khoudary SR, et
al. Changes in cardiovascular risk factors by hysterectomy status with and
without oophorectomy: study of women’s health across the nation. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2013;62:191–200. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.042FREE Full Text Google
Scholar
3.
James SL, Abate D, Abate KH. Global,
regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability
for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a
systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet
2018;392:1789–858. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle
Scholar
4.
Mosca, L. ∙ Benjamin, E.J. ∙ Berra, K. ...
Effectiveness-Based Guidelines for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in
Women—2011 Update Circulation. 2011; 123:1243-1262 Crossref Scopus (1378)
PubMed Google Scholar
5.
R. Venturella et al.3 to 5 Years later:
long-term effects of prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian function
B.G. Kim et al. Relation of preprocedural haemoglobin level to outcomes after
percutaneous coronary intervention
6.
Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al.
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5Google
Scholar
7.
International Institute for Population
Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. (2021). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5),
2019–21: India. Mumbai, India. Available at:
8.
Bhaumik, S. (2013). Oxfam calls for new
regulations to reduce unnecessary hysterectomies in private hospitals. BMJ,
346, f852.
9.
Mills, K. T., Stefanescu, A., & He, J.
(2020). The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 16,
223–237.
10.
Zhou, B., Carrillo-Larco, R. M., Danaei,
G., et al. (2021). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in
treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: A pooled analysis of 1201
population-representative studies with 104 million participants. The Lancet,
398, 957–980.
11.
James, S. L., Abate, D., Abate, K. H., et
al. (2018). Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years
lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and
territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease
Study 2017. The Lancet, 392, 1789–1858.
12.
Ding, D.-C., & Sung, F.-C. (2018).
Authors’ reply re: Risk of hypertension after hysterectomy: A population-based
study. BJOG, 125, 1780.
13.
Laughlin-Tommaso, S. K., Khan, Z., Weaver,
A. L., et al. (2018). Cardiovascular and metabolic morbidity after hysterectomy
with ovarian conservation: A cohort study. Menopause, 25, 483–492.
14.
Halli, S. S., Singh, D. P., & Biradar,
R. A. (2020). Increased hypertension following hysterectomy among reproductive
women in India. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 4, 100131.
15.
Madika, A.-L., MacDonald, C. J., Gelot,
A., et al. (2021). Hysterectomy, non-malignant gynaecological diseases, and the
risk of incident hypertension: The E3N prospective cohort. Maturitas, 150,
22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.06.001
16.
International Institute for Population
Sciences (IIPS). (2020). Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI), Wave 1,
2017–18: India Report. Mumbai, India. Available at:
17.
Perianayagam, A., Bloom, D., Lee, J., et
al. (2022). Cohort profile: The longitudinal ageing study in India (LASI).
International Journal of Epidemiology, 51, e167–e176.
18.
Hammer, G. P., du Prel, J.-B., &
Blettner, M. (2009). Avoiding bias in observational studies: Part 8 in a series
of articles on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt
International, 106, 664–668.
19.
Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing
for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced
samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20, 25–46.
20.
Hainmueller, J., & Xu, Y. (2013).
Ebalance: A Stata package for entropy balancing. Journal of Statistical
Software, 54, 1–18.
21.
Luoto, R., Kaprio, J., Reunanen, A., et
al. (1995). Cardiovascular morbidity in relation to ovarian function after
hysterectomy. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 85, 515–522.
22.
Laughlin-Tommaso, S. K., Khan, Z., Weaver,
A. L., et al. (2016). Cardiovascular risk sfactors and diseases in women
undergoing hysterectomy with ovarian conservation. Menopause, 23, 121–128.
23.
Mikhail, E., Miladinovic, B., Velanovich,
V., et al. (2015). Association between obesity and the trends of routes of
hysterectomy performed for benign indications. Obstetrics & Gynaecology,
125, 912–918.
24.
Hossain, F. B., Adhikary, G., Chowdhury,
A. B., et al. (2019). Association between body mass index (BMI) and
hypertension in South Asian population: Evidence from nationally-representative
surveys. Clinical Hypertension, 25, 28.
25.
Dubey, R. K., Oparil, S., Imthurn, B., et
al. (2002). Sex hormones and hypertension. Cardiovascular Research, 53,
688–708.
26.
Lizcano, F., & Guzmán, G. (2014).
Estrogen deficiency and the origin of obesity during menopause. BioMed Research
International, 2014, 757461.
27.
Maas, A. H. E. M., & Franke, H. R.
(2009). Women’s health in menopause with a focus on hypertension. Netherlands
Heart Journal, 17, 68–72.
28.
Reckelhoff, J. F., & Fortepiani, L. A.
(2004). Novel mechanisms responsible for postmenopausal hypertension.
Hypertension, 43, 918–923.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.