Method
for differentiation of fluke species in livestock 2
Short title: Detection techniques for fluke infection 3
Muhammad Abbas1, Kezia Kozel1, Olukayode Daramola2, Nick Selemetas3, Qasim Ali4, Shoaib 4
Ashraf5,6, , Isah Ibrahim7, Inaki Deza-Cruz8, Sai Fingerhood9, Mark W. Robinson10, Eric R 5
Morgan10, Umer Chaudhry 11 *, Martha Betson1* 6
1 Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, 7
University of Surrey, Guildford, UK 8
2School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom 9
3 Department of Microbial Sciences, School of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Surrey, 10
Guildford, UK 11
4 Department of Parasitology, Agriculture University Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan 12
5Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Riphah International 13
University, 54000 Lahore, Pakistan 14
6Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ross University, School of Veterinary Medicine 15
(RUSVM), St Kitts and Nevis, West Indies 16
7Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 17
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 18
8The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, The University of 19
Edinburgh Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Midlothian, EH25 9RG 20
9Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Nottingham, UK 21
10School of Biological Sciences, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK 22
11Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Lewyt College of Veterinary Medicine, 23
Long Island University, USA 24
Corresponding authors: 25
*Martha Betson,
[email protected] 26
* Umer Chaudhry,
[email protected] 27
28
29
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
2
Background
31
Trematode parasites, or flukes, are a significant economic threat to ruminant production 32
worldwide. Traditional diagnostic methods rely on egg sedimentation from faeces, a time-33
consuming methodology lacking sensitivity and specificity. This study aimed to develop and 34
validate two diagnostic methods: firstly, qPCR for accurate identification of Fasciola spp., 35
and secondly, tremabiome, deep amplicon sequencing technique for identifying fluke 36
species using faecal egg DNA. 37
Methodology: 38
To detect fluke infection primers targeting mitochondrial DNA were repurposed to develop 39
a SYBR Green qPCR diagnostic. For the identification of fluke species, a tremabiome 40
approach was developed. A reference sequence library and taxonomy file were generated 41
for 21 fluke species, enabling species sequence read separation and extracting amplicon 42
sequence variants (ASVs). To validate the qPCR and tremabiome approach, 402 faecal 43
samples were collected from cattle and sheep across the UK. Fluke eggs were isolated by 44
sedimentation, detected by microscopy and qPCR, and tremabiome used to identify fluke 45
eggs to species level. 46
Results
47
qPCR demonstrated high analytical sensitivity, detecting Fasciola hepatica DNA down to 48
19.2fg and F. gigantica down to 6.4fg, with no cross-amplification of other flukes. 49
Tremabiome was able to detect as few as five F. hepatica and Calicophoron daubneyi eggs 50
and identify mixed infections. High levels of co-infection (14.4%) of F. hepatica and C. 51
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
3
daubneyi were observed in faecal samples, followed by single infections with C. daubneyi 52
(12.6%) and F. hepatica (3.2%). Notably, tremabiome detected F. hepatica in 20 samples 53
missed by qPCR. Data analysis identified 55 and 32 ASVs for F. hepatica and C. daubneyi, 54
respectively, with phylogenetic clustering within their respective clades. 55
Conclusion
56
This study developed qPCR assay for Fasciola detection and validated a tremabiome deep 57
amplicon sequencing for fluke species differentiation. These approaches have improved 58
capacity to identify fluke species compared to microscopy and are valuable tools for 59
enhancing fasciolosis surveillance and control. 60
Keywords
trematode; amplicon deep sequencing; Fasciola; molecular detection; speciation 61
Author Summary 62
Flukes are flatworm parasites that cause disease domestic and wild animals and humans. 63
The main species infecting cattle and sheep globally are the liver flukes F. hepatica and F. 64
gigantica, with other species including the rumen fluke Calicophoron daubneyi locally 65
important or emerging. Infections result in serious economic losses. The traditional method 66
of diagnosing fluke infection involves observation of eggs in faecal samples under the 67
microscope, but this can be time-consuming and error prone, since the eggs of different 68
species often look similar. In this study, we developed and validated two methods to 69
improve detection: qPCR, a sensitive DNA-based test to identify Fasciola infections, and 70
tremabiome, a DNA sequencing technique that can accurately differentiate between 71
different fluke species. We tested these methods using faecal samples collected from cattle 72
and sheep across the UK. The qPCR could detect small amounts of Fasciola DNA, while 73
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
4
tremabiome was more sensitive, identifying different fluke species from as few as five eggs. 74
Our study found that co-infections of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi are common in the UK. 75
The approaches we have developed could be valuable tools for to improve fluke diagnosis 76
and enable better control of this important parasitic disease. 77
Introduction
78
Trematode parasites, or flukes, are widespread globally and include several species that 79
cause serious disease in animals and humans. Fasciolosis is a neglected foodborne tropical 80
disease caused by the zoonotic flukes Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica. Unlike other 81
neglected tropical diseases, Fasciola infections in humans and animals have a broad reach 82
globally, being found in more than 75 countries, with 2.4 million people infected, and 83
millions more at risk [1]. The prevalence in livestock is less well known, however, a recent 84
meta-analysis suggests the global prevalence of fasciolosis in cattle and sheep across 85
continents ranges from 12-97% and 9-58% respectively across continents [2]. 86
Ensuring food security is increasingly challenging with a growing global population. In 2020, 87
the agri-food sector contributed 115 billion GBP, making up 6.0% of the UK economy [3], 88
with other national economies considerably more dependent on farming. Recent global 89
estimates indicate that fasciolosis may cost annual losses in animal productivity exceeding 90
US$3.2 billion [4,5]. In the UK, fasciolosis prevails in ruminants, costing the cattle industry 91
13-40 million GBP yearly, reducing dairy farms’ net profit by 12% and beef farms’ by 6% [6]. 92
Fasciola infections can lead to delayed animal slaughter [7], and condemnation of damaged 93
livers [8]. According to the Food Standards Agency in 2014, 22% of British cattle livers are 94
condemned due to fluke [9]. Losses to fasciolosis are widespread; for example, Australia 95
faces one of the highest disease burdens, with estimated annual losses reaching 96
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
5
approximately 129 million (range 38–193 million) AUD annually [10]. Infected animals suffer 97
reduced weight, anaemia, reduced milk yield and fat content [8], lower reproduction, and 98
higher mortality [11]. 99
Flukes other than Fasciola spp. are also economically important. Calicophoron daubneyi 100
belongs to the family Paramphistomidae, a group of flukes typically found in the 101
forestomachs of ruminants. Unlike the flattened morphology common to most trematodes, 102
these flukes exhibit a distinct conical shape as adults [12]. C. daubneyi is considered an 103
emerging threat in Europe due to its impact on livestock productivity. The larval stage of 104
rumen fluke are released into the duodenum, where they attach to the intestinal lining and 105
causes tissue damage. Although chronic C. daubneyi infection is not typically associated with 106
clinical disease, some negative effects on production have been reported [12]. Recent 107
studies suggest that paramphistomosis is now more prevalent than fasciolosis in certain 108
regions of the UK [9–11]. However, currently, diagnostic options for rumen fluke are limited 109
and need further research. 110
Traditionally, diagnosis of both Fasciola and Calicophoron infections relies on microscopic 111
identification of fluke eggs in the host faeces [13–15], with eggs usually observed 10−12 112
weeks post-infection and thereafter [14–16]. The effectiveness of microscopy relies on 113
personnel training and expertise. Moreover, it becomes labour-intensive when handling a 114
large number of samples, particularly if the person lacks sufficient experience, leading to 115
low sensitivity [17]. Distinguishing between F. hepatica and C. daubneyi solely based on egg 116
morphology in faecal samples can be challenging as both parasites produce eggs with 117
comparable sizes and shapes [18,19]. Although, it is reported that F. hepatica eggs can be 118
identified by their operculum [20] and yellowish colour [21], these features can be difficult 119
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
6
to observe consistently using standard light microscopy. As a result, trusting solely in egg 120
morphology for diagnosis may lead to misidentification. Molecular diagnostics based on 121
Fasciola DNA detection are rapidly progressing; for instance, qPCR [22] and PCR techniques 122
have been applied to adult worms and infected snails [23]. Additionally, techniques such as 123
nested PCR [14] and Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) are being explored 124
[24] and are under assessment for their speed, reliability, and accuracy compared to other 125
Methods
[25]. However, significant challenges remain in detecting Fasciola DNA in faecal 126
material, highlighting the need for a reliable, time-efficient and accurate diagnostic method, 127
which can handle medium to large sample sizes and is capable of differentiating F. hepatica 128
infections from other fluke species. 129
Next-generation sequencing technologies are transforming the diagnosis of infectious 130
diseases whilst also paving the way for new research areas, such as microbiome studies [26–131
28]. Amplicon sequencing using next-generation approaches has been applied to identify 132
gastrointestinal nematode species in ruminants (“nemabiome”) [29], to quantify 133
trypanosome and piroplasm species in ruminant blood samples (“haemoprotobiome”) 134
[30,31]. Similar “tremabiome” technology has been applied to quantify single species adult 135
fluke infections in ruminants [32–34]. Despite the prevalence of mixed fluke infections in 136
ruminants [32,33], this approach has not yet been used to understand fluke egg 137
communities in single and mixed species infections. 138
This study aimed to develop a user-friendly real time diagnostic tool to detect F. hepatica 139
and F. gigantica infections, and to distinguish them from other species such as rumen fluke. 140
Specifically, a SYBR Green qPCR-based assay was utilised to amplify the mitochondrial 141
NADH1 (mt-ND1) DNA marker without the need for fluorescent probes. This assay was 142
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
7
designed to screen Fasciola spp. infections from faecal sedimented material of naturally 143
infected cattle and sheep. Additionally, we combined two previously published deep 144
amplicon sequencing approaches tested on adult flukes of Fasciola and Calicophoron spp. 145
[32,34] to create a tremabiome approach capable of differentiating between various species 146
of fluke. Finally, both methods were validated using field samples of fluke eggs and adults 147
collected from different regions across the UK and compared to microscopy. 148
Materials and methods
149
Ethical statement 150
Non-invasive collection of faecal samples was approved by the NASPA (Non-Animal 151
Scientific Procedures Act) sub-committee of AWERB, University of Surrey, UK, under the 152
Reference
NASPA-2122-04 for the project “Developing Novel Rapid Diagnostics for 153
Neglected Parasitic Diseases.” Adult F. hepatica were collected at licenced slaughterhouses 154
and through post-mortem examination. Completion of a University of Surrey SAGE-AR 155
indicated that no formal ethical approval was required for adult fluke sampling. 156
Positive control samples 157
All adult F. hepatica worms and sedimented eggs were collected from UK, whilst adult 158
worms and eggs purified from adult worms of F. gigantica, C. daubneyi, Paramphistomum 159
epiclitum and Explanatum explanatum were collected from abattoirs in Pakistan in our 160
previous studies [32–36]. Adult worm tissue was processed following a previously described 161
protocol [33] and DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, USA). 162
DNA was then extracted from eggs of positive controls (F. hepatica, F. gigantica, C. 163
daubneyi, E. explanatum) utilising the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kits (Qiagen, USA), with slight 164
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
8
modification. Briefly these modifications included the incubation of sedimented material 165
with the lysis buffer (CD1) for 10 minutes at 65°C, followed by 10 minutes of bead-beating in 166
a TissueLyser LT (Qiagen, USA). The manufacturer's protocol was then followed, with DNA 167
being eluted in 10mM Tris buffer and stored at -80°C for downstream analysis. 168
Field sample collection 169
To engage cattle and sheep farmers, the study was advertised by email to registered 170
veterinary practitioners using the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Find a Vet site 171
filtering for practices specialising in cattle, sheep and/or goats, and camelids. In addition, 172
societies for sheep and cattle listed by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural 173
Affairs (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/lists-of-recognised-animal-breeding-174
organisations) in the UK were also approached via the email contact listed. Participants 175
were sent a Royal Mail prepaid SafeBox with a sampling kit, a short questionnaire, and 176
participant information sheet and consent form according to ethical requirements. No 177
samples were used without the written informed consent of the farmer. A total of 402 178
faecal samples were collected from 19 cattle and sheep farms across various geographical 179
regions of the UK through 10 registered veterinary practitioners from December 2022 to 180
May 2024 (Table S1). 181
In addition to faecal samples, adult F. hepatica worms were collected from abattoirs and at 182
post-mortem analysis from cattle (n=2) originating from West Sussex, and East Sussex, as 183
well as from sheep (n=10) from West Sussex, Kent, Derbyshire, Renfrewshire Scotland and 184
County Tyrone Northern Ireland. All samples were transported to the School of Veterinary 185
Medicine at the University of Surrey, UK, and subsequently stored at -20°C for further 186
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
9
analysis. DNA from the adult flukes was extracted as described in section “Positive control 187
samples”. 188
Morphological identification of fluke eggs 189
Faecal samples were initially processed using standard sedimentation methodology [37] and 190
then to streamline the process a time-saving method Flukefinder® (Diagnostic System, USA) 191
was also used [18,38], with slight adjustments. Both methods utilised 7-10 grams of faecal 192
Material
which was combined with 50 ml of water, sieved through gauze and then passed 193
through the Flukefinder® apparatus. The collected filtered material from both methods was 194
then mixed with 250 ml of water in a conical beaker. After three minutes, the supernatant 195
was removed; this step was repeated thrice for clarity. The sediment was transferred to a 50 196
ml centrifuge tube filled with water, and the supernatant was aspirated after 3 minutes. This 197
process was repeated with a 15 ml centrifuge tube. Finally, the sediment was transferred to 198
a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube in 1 ml of PBS and was stored at 4°C for subsequent microscopy 199
and DNA isolation. 200
Morphological egg examination involved inspecting 100 to 500 μl of sedimented faeces 201
stained with 0.5% methylene blue (Pro-Lab, UK) in a counting chamber (Graticules Optics 202
Limited, UK) under a compound microscope (Nikon, Japan) at 100× magnification with a lens 203
containing a graticule. Samples positive for fluke eggs (n=128) were assessed for the 204
presence of F. hepatica or C. daubneyi eggs based on their morphological characteristics, 205
including size, shape, colour and operculum [18–21]. The overall workflow is summarised in 206
Fig. 1 (a). 207
Any sedimented faecal samples which were identified as positive for fluke eggs by 208
microscopy were subsequently subjected to DNA isolation utilising the DNeasy PowerSoil 209
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
10
Pro Kits (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions as described in the 210
section “Positive control samples”. 211
Molecular identification of fluke eggs 212
PCR was performed using universal ITS2 primers [39] on selected fluke egg-positive samples 213
and all positive controls. Further, Fasciola specific mt-ND1 primers [33] were applied to 214
selected samples to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of the PCR targets. This was followed by 215
Sanger sequencing to confirm the presence and correct amplification of DNA for different 216
fluke species. 217
All PCR reactions were prepared with DreamTaq Green PCR master mix (Thermo Scientific, 218
USA) in a 25 μl reaction mix, with primer concentrations of 200 nM and 4 μl of sample DNA 219
template. The PCR cycling conditions were initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 minutes, 220
followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 1 minute, annealing at 55°C (ITS2 primers), 221
50°C (mt-ND1 primers) for 1 minute, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute. The final extension 222
step was carried out at 72°C for 5 minutes. Positive controls consisted of DNA from F. 223
hepatica and F. gigantica adult worms. The resulting PCR products were purified and 224
cleaned using a NucleoMag kit for clean-up and size selection of NGS library prep reactions 225
(MACHEREY-NAGEL, GmbH & Co.KG). Sanger sequencing of the PCR product was performed 226
by Source Biosciences, UK and Eurofins Genomics, Germany. Selected samples were 227
subjected to conventional PCR and Sanger sequencing due to limited resources. All obtained 228
sequences were visualised using Geneious version 8.0.5 (https://www.geneious.com), and 229
the FASTA sequences were submited to the BLASTn tool on NCBI to confirm fluke species 230
identity. 231
Development and validation of a SYBR green qPCR to detect Fasciola eggs at species level 232
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
11
A SYBR green qPCR assay was developed to detect Fasciola spp., ingus mt-ND1 primers. 233
These mt-ND1 primers were previously designed and employed in a meta-barcoded PCR 234
[33]. In the SYBR green assay, 3 μl of DNA was subjected to qPCR using 10 μl of 2X 235
SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, USA), resulting in a total reaction 236
mix volume of 20 μL, including 500 nM of mt-ND1 primers. 237
The cycling program was initial denaturation at 98 ℃ for 3 mins, followed by 40 cycles of 238
denaturation at 98 ℃ for 15 secs and annealing at 60 ℃ for 30 secs on a CFX96 Real-Time 239
PCR machine (Bio-Rad, USA). Subsequently, a melt curve was generated from 65 ℃ to 95 ℃ 240
with an increment of 0.5 ℃ for 0.05 secs per plate read. Positive and negative controls were 241
employed as described above. All samples were subjected to qPCR in triplicate, and the 242
resulting data were visualised using CFX Maestro Version: 5.3.022.1030 (Bio-Rad, USA). 243
Detection sensitivity limits of the assay were assessed using five-fold serial dilutions of F. 244
hepatica (ranging from 300 pg to 0.768 fg) and F. gigantica (ranging from 500 pg to 1.28 fg) 245
adult worm DNA. The DNA was quantified using Qubit™ dsDNA HS and BR Assay Kits 246
(Invitrogen™). The analytical specificity of the assays was evaluated by testing 1 ng of DNA 247
from other prevalent flukes and nematodes found in sheep and cattle. These included C. 248
daubneyi, P. epiclitum, E. explanatum, and the nematode Teladorsagia circumcincta. The 249
sensitivity and specificity tests were conducted in triplicate and repeated twice. 250
The reliability of the method was measured by comparing inter- and intra-assay variations in 251
Cq values for F. hepatica and F. gigantica DNA. For validation, the newly developed qPCR 252
assay was applied to egg DNA extracted from sedimented faecal samples. 253
Development and validation of deep amplicon sequencing to detect fluke eggs at species 254
level 255
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
12
A universal ITS2 rDNA marker for a range of 21 different fluke species (Table S2; DOI: 256
10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1) targeting coding regions of 5.8S and 28S rDNA was used, expected 257
to produce a fragment of 490 –743 bp [39]. The primers were meta -barcoded by adding 258
Illumina adaptor sequences to the both forward and reverse primers, along with up to three 259
random 'N' nucleotides positioned between the adaptor sequences and the locus -specific 260
primers. Additionally, modified phosphate bonds were added between the last three 261
nucleotides of each primer to enhance their stability (Table S3) and used in PCR amplification 262
to detect fluke species. To assess the representation of spec ies read depth , mock DNA 263
mixtures were prepared in triplicate by pooling 250 eggs of each species, including F. 264
hepatica, F. gigantica, and C. daubneyi and subjected to amplicon sequencing in triplicate. 265
PCR cycle numbers were adjusted 35x, 30x and 25x in the first round to examine their effect 266
on species representation . Further, to evaluate species representation using egg DNA , we 267
created seven mock egg pools in triplicate , adjusting the proportion of F. hepatica and C. 268
daubneyi in an approximate total of 250 eggs with ratios of 99:1, 90:10, 70:30, 50:50, 30:70, 269
10:90, and 1:99. Moreover, to test the threshold of deep amplicon sequencing, pools of equal 270
egg proportions (50 eggs) were prepared from three out of four species ( F. hepatica , F. 271
gigantica, E. explanatum, C. daubneyi). The fourth species ( F. hepatica or C. daubneyi) was 272
then added in decreasing numbers of 500, 50, 20, 15, 5, and 0 eggs, creating six mock pools. 273
The first round of PCR was performed using the KAPA HiFi PCR Kit (KAPA BIOSYSTEMS, South 274
Africa). The modified primer sets, adaptors, barcoded PCR amplification conditions, magnetic 275
bead purification methods and bioinformatic analysis were based on our previously described 276
Methods
[33]. The first-round PCR products were subjected to a second -round PCR using a 277
barcoded primer set to attach a unique barcode index fragment required for Illumina 278
sequencing [30] Fig. 1 (b). 279
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
13
10 μl of each second round barcoded PCR product were combined to create a pooled library 280
and then purified by agarose gel electrophoresis to remove non-specific products and adaptor 281
dimers. During post -run processing, the MiSeq system separated all sequencing data by 282
sample quality using the barcoded indices to generate FASTQ files (raw sequence read files 283
available at Mendeley database DOI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1), see workflow diagram Fig. 1 284
(b). 285
The FASTQ files obtained from the post -run Illumina MiSeq (BioProject ID PRJNA1273189 ) 286
were analysed in Mothur/1.41.0-Python-2.7.15 [40] using the High-Performance Cluster (HPC) 287
system at the University of Surrey, UK . Pipelines described in our previous study [41] were 288
utilised with modifications of the newly developed reference sequence library (Script 289
available at DOI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). 290
To generate a taxonomy file, ITS2 rDNA reference sequences (n=545) were obtained from 291
NCBI, representing 21 fluke species (Table S2). The genetic distances between different fluke 292
species were then calculated based on the sequenced region. Overall, a variation in genetic 293
identity was found between different fluke species ranging from 40% to 99% (Table S4, DOI: 294
10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). Finally, a phylogenetic tree of 154 unique sequences showed a 295
distinct clustering of each fluke species (Fig. 2) as described in the section phylogenetic 296
analysis. 297
Following extraction of the taxonomy file, quality filtering was conducted for the 298
identification of unique fluke sequences, detailed count tables were generated and an 299
alignment (ALIGN) file of sequences across all samples was produced. This workflow ensured 300
a robust, high -quality dataset suitable for downstream taxonomic studies for flukes using a 301
series of commands (Script available at DOI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). 302
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
14
The count table and alignment (ALIGN) file were further used for the extraction of amplicon 303
sequence variants (ASVs) . The R script extracted specific ASVs corresponding to the target 304
species of flukes applying cutoff values of 250 reads each (NCBI accession numbers; 305
PV752375-PV752429, PV752431 -PV752462). The R script started by cleaning sequence 306
names, trimming whitespace and converting them to lowercase to ensure consistency for 307
successful merging. After identifying unmatched sequences, the datasets were merged based 308
on sequence names. The merged data was filtered to retain only rows with a ‘total’ count of 309
at least 250 reads, ensuring that only high-quality consensus sequences remained. A custom 310
function was employed to write the sequences into a combined FASTA file, preserving both 311
the sequence names and read counts. Next, the script utilised the Biostrings package to clean 312
the sequences by removing ‘N’ characters and ambiguous bases, saving the high -quality 313
sequences to a final FASTA file (R script available at D OI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). This 314
comprehensive approach ensure d accurate sequence extraction for subsequent analysis. 315
Finally, the sample-wise separated FASTA files were subjected to remote NCBI BLASTn loop 316
command using “ blastn: 2.16.0+ ” in the HPC cluster system ( command line available DOI: 317
10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). Mismatched sequences with the NCBI database were considered 318
contaminated sequences and discarded. 319
Statistical analysis of qPCR and deep amplicon sequencing data 320
For qPCR analysis, the raw Cq values were extracted from CFX Maestro Version: 321
5.3.022.1030 (Bio-Rad, USA) and a linear standard curve was created by plotting DNA 322
quantities against the average Cq values for each concentration tested. For deep amplicon 323
sequence reads data analysis, the sequences from the bioinformatics pipeline were further 324
analysed for sequence accuracy and percentage identity using remote blastn: 2.16.0+ with 325
the NCBI database. To determine the percentage composition of F. hepatica, F. gigantica, C. 326
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
15
daubneyi, and E. explanatum in mock egg mixtures (positive control) and field samples, 327
species composition percentages were calculated by dividing the classified sequence reads 328
for each species by the total reads per sample. A one-way ANOVA was applied to assess the 329
proportional representation of mock mixes comprising different fluke species eggs across 330
varying PCR amplification cycles. The association between qPCR and tremabiome results 331
was assessed using Chi-squared analysis. All visualisations of data were performed in R 332
version 4.3.3 (R scripts are available at DOI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1) 333
Phylogenetic analysis 334
Phylogenetic trees were generated from unique reference sequences of ITS2 rDNA from 21 335
different fluke species downloaded from NCBI GenBank (Table S2). The sequences were 336
aligned using the MUSCLE alignment tool in Geneious v8.0.5 (Biomatters Ltd, New Zealand) 337
and genetic distances were calculated (Table S4). Further, a phylogenetic tree of the unique 338
ITS2 rDNA sequences for all 21 fluke species and ASVs of the flukes was constructed using 339
the Neighbor-Joining method [42]. The evolutionary distances were computed using the 340
Maximum Composite Likelihood method [43] in MEGA11 [44] with a bootstrap value of 2000 341
[45]. 342
Results
343
Fluke identification by microscopy 344
A total of 402 faecal samples were examined, out of which 128 were positive for fluke eggs. 345
The sampled animals included cattle (n=154), sheep (n=233), water buffalo (n=1), alpaca 346
(n=4), and goats (n=2), with animal species unspecified for 8 samples. Of these samples, 191 347
had a history of Fasciola infection, 119 had no history, and 92 had an unknown history 348
(Table S1). The cattle and sheep sampled represented diverse age groups, ranging from 349
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
16
calves and lambs to adults, providing a comprehensive representation of the animal host 350
population. Notably, only one sheep farm from Wales was included, and no faecal samples 351
were collected from Northern Ireland. Based on egg morphology and staining, 30 samples 352
were identified as C. daubneyi, 71 as F. hepatica, five as mixed infection, and 22 remained 353
undecided (Table S5). 354
PCR and Sanger sequencing for fluke identification and comparison with microscopy 355
Out of 128 samples positive for fluke eggs, DNA was successfully extracted from 125. PCR 356
was performed on 85 randomly selected samples using universal ITS2 primers, with bands 357
observed in 73 samples. From the 71 samples believed to be F. hepatica by microscopy, 37 358
were screened by PCR, of which 31 samples were analysed by Sanger sequencing. Of these 359
31, three were confirmed as F. hepatica, 19 as C. daubneyi and nine samples demonstrated 360
poor sequence quality. Of the 30 C. daubneyi positive samples identified by microscopy, 30 361
were screened by PCR, of which 27 samples were then analysed by Sanger Sequencing. Of 362
these 27 samples, 16 were confirmed as C. daubneyi, one was confirmed to be F. hepatica, 363
one was identified as Paramphistomum epiclitum, and nine demonstrated poor sequence 364
quality. Of the five samples which were identified as mixed infections by microscopy (F. 365
hepatica and C. daubneyi), three were screened by PCR and analysed by Sanger sequencing. 366
Of these three mixed infection samples, Sanger sequencing identified one sample as F. 367
hepatica, and two as C. daubneyi. In the 22 samples where microscopy could not determine 368
the fluke species present, 15 samples were screened by PCR, of which 14 were subsequently 369
analysed by Sanger sequencing. From these, two samples were confirmed as F. hepatica, six 370
as C. daubneyi, and six demonstrated poor sequence quality (Table 1, Table S5). 371
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
17
In addition to the ITS2 PCR and Sanger sequencing, a third PCR based diagnostic test, 372
targeting mitochondrial target mt-ND1 and specific for identifying Fasciola spp. was utilised. 373
For this, 15 samples were randomly selected within the diagnostic categories already 374
created (F. hepatica, C. daubneyi, mixed and unknown). From the two morphologically 375
identified C. daubneyi samples selected, one was confirmed as F. hepatica, while the other 376
had poor sequence quality. For instance, from the nine morphologically identified F. 377
hepatica samples, two were initially identified as F. hepatica but were confirmed as C. 378
daubneyi by ITS2, whereas mt-ND1 sequencing confirmed them as F. hepatica. This suggests 379
that microscopy failed to identify mixed infections in those two samples. Additionally, one 380
sample had poor ITS2 sequence quality but was confirmed as F. hepatica by mt-ND1 and 381
three samples were not sequenced for ITS2 but were confirmed as F. hepatica by mt-ND1. 382
Additionally, one morphologically identified mixed infection by microscopy was supported 383
by ITS2 and ND1 PCR assays and subsequent Sanger sequencing, confirming the presence of 384
C. daubneyi and F. hepatica, respectively. Among the three morphologically unidentified 385
samples, one was confirmed as C. daubneyi by ITS2, with mt-ND1 sequencing demonstrating 386
poor sequence quality, while another was not sequenced for ITS2 but confirmed as F. 387
hepatica by mt-ND1. (Table 2, Table S5). These findings highlight discrepancies between 388
morphological identification and molecular confirmation using a nuclear and mitochondrial 389
DNA target, emphasising the need for more accurate molecular techniques. 390
Detection of Fasciola species using a newly developed qPCR assay 391
To provide a simple, low-cost, sensitive, universal, and accurate molecular method for 392
diagnosing Fasciola infections in faeces, a SYBR green qPCR assay was developed using a 393
repurposed primer set targeting mt-ND1 specific to F. hepatica and F. gigantica. The assay's 394
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
18
analytical sensitivity was first assessed using quantified F. hepatica and F. gigantica adult 395
worm DNA (positive controls). The assay’s limit of detection based on a 1:5 DNA dilution 396
series was found to be 19.2 fg for F. hepatica and 6.4 fg for F. gigantica DNA. A linear 397
standard curve was generated, showing an efficiency of 97% (R² = 0.9759) for F. hepatica 398
and 99% (R² = 0.9995) for F. gigantica, demonstrating efficient primer binding and target 399
amplification. Additionally, qPCR melt curve analysis identified distinct peaks at 81.50°C for 400
F. hepatica and F. gigantica (Fig. S1, A and B), confirming the specificity of primer binding to 401
the same DNA target, and absence of nonspecific primer interactions. The specificity of the 402
qPCR assay was evaluated against DNA from other prevalent fluke and nematode species. 403
The melt curve analysis confirmed that only F. hepatica and F. gigantica produced 404
amplification peaks at 81.50°C, with no cross-amplification (Fig. S2). The assay exhibited 405
strong reproducibility, with coefficients of variation (CV) below 6.0% for intra-assay and 406
inter-assay. The mean Cq values ranged from 21.96 to 38.26 for F. hepatica with DNA 407
dilutions ranging from 300 pg to 19.2 fg and 18.62 to 38.24 for F. gigantica with DNA 408
dilutions ranging from 500 pg to 6.4 fg), maintaining consistency across replicates (Table S6). 409
To gain further clarification on which Fasciola species were present in the 128 egg-positive 410
field samples obtained, the newly developed specific SYBR green qPCR was utilised. Of the 411
128 samples screened, 57 were positive for F. hepatica, 66 were negative, and five were 412
either not determined or failed DNA extraction. 413
Comparison of microscopy and qPCR for fluke species diagnosis 414
Among the 71 samples identified as F. hepatica positive by microscopy, qPCR confirmed F. 415
hepatica in 34 samples, while 33 samples were negative, and four were not determined or 416
failed DNA extraction. From the 30 samples identified as C. daubneyi by microscopy, qPCR 417
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
19
detected F. hepatica in seven samples, whereas 23 samples tested negative. From the five 418
samples identified as mixed infections by microscopy, qPCR confirmed four as positive for F. 419
hepatica infections, while one sample tested negative. Finally, of the 22 samples which were 420
undecided using microscopy, qPCR identified 12 as F. hepatica, nine as negative, and one 421
sample was not determined or with failed DNA extraction (Table 3, Table S5). 422
Detection of fluke species using a newly developed tremabiome deep amplicon 423
sequencing method 424
To accurately identify mixed-species as well as single-species fluke infections, a tremabiome 425
deep amplicon sequencing assay was developed using a universal primer set targeting rDNA 426
ITS2, specific to fluke species. Initially, the sequence representation of three different fluke 427
species F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and C. daubneyi in the deep amplicon sequencing assay was 428
determined (Fig. 3a). This allowed the evaluation of proportional DNA sequence output reads 429
relative to known species ratios. Each species showed significant representation in the 430
sequence counts in each mix (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, the number of cycles (25X, 30X and 35X) 431
used during the adaptor PCR were validated to ensure sufficient DNA was generated for 432
sequencing whilst maintaining a balance between amplification efficiency and accuracy. 433
Whilst it is known that an appropriate number of cycles helps minimise deviations and PCR 434
bias, and over -amplification causing sequence dominanc e, we found that the number of 435
cycles did not affect the sequence representation of any species. In each mock pool, C. 436
daubneyi generated the highest number of sequence reads, followed by F. gigantica and F. 437
hepatica. Despite these trends, no statistically significant differences were observed in the 438
proportional representation of any species across the different PCR amplification cycles ( F. 439
gigantica, P = 0.730; F. hepatica, P = 0.774; and C. daubneyi, P = 0.258) (Fig. 3a) . 440
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
20
We further assessed the assay’s accuracy in identifying relative species proportions in mixed 441
infections by testing pairwise mixtures of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi eggs (Fig. 3b). This 442
range of mixes enabled thorough validation of the sequencing assay, demonstrating reliable 443
detection of the two species across egg ratios, which is essential for accurately identifying 444
species representation in mixed infections. These species were selected due to their high 445
prevalence, frequent co -occurrence in UK cattle and sheep herds, and availability in our 446
laboratory (Fig. 3b, File S1). This approach addresse d the sensitivity of deep amplicon 447
sequencing assays in detecting trace -level amplicons. We observed minimal variation in 448
species representation across different mixes, which did not affect the overall interpretation 449
of relative species abundance. For example, the 99% F. hepatica: 1% C. daubneyi mix and the 450
90% F. hepatica: 10% C. daubneyi mix displayed similar species representations further . We 451
tested the thresholds of the deep amplicon assay for fluke egg DNA with decreasing egg levels 452
in mixed populations, for example, F. hepatica and C. daubneyi (Fig. 4a and 4b, File S2, and 453
File S3). A notable observation was the production of a lower number of sequenced reads, 454
particularly for F. hepatica; however, this does not affect the identification. Importantly, the 455
assay detected both F. hepatica and C. daubneyi DNA at levels down to 5 eggs per pool. 456
After validation, the assay was applied to 125 of the 128 fluke egg-positive samples to analyse 457
fluke species distributions in natural infections in cattle and sheep. In cattle, 67 samples (eggs: 458
n=65, worms: n=2) produced sequence reads. The data revealed that F. hepatica was present 459
in 4 samples (eggs: n=2, worms: n=2), C. daubneyi in 28, and mixed infections in 35 faecal 460
samples. Similarly, in sheep, 67 samples (eggs: n=57, worms: n=10) generated sequence 461
reads. The data showed F. hepatica in 21 samples (eggs: n=11, worms: n=10), C. daubneyi in 462
23, and mixed infections in 23 faecal samples (Fig. 5, File S4). Notably, out of the 125 faecal 463
samples sequenced, 122 produced reads, as 3 samples failed to yield sequencing reads. This 464
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
21
analysis highlights a higher prevalence of mixed infections followed by C. daubneyi and F. 465
hepatica singular infections in cattle and sheep. The sequence reads of all samples were 466
aligned with F. hepatica and C. daubneyi with BLASTn (DOI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). 467
Finally, ASVs were generated for C. daubneyi and F. hepatica from all sequence reads of the 468
samples collected from different counties in the UK. ASVs were up to 461 bp and 527 bp for 469
C. daubneyi and F. hepatica , respectively . In total, 87 ASVs were identified, including F. 470
hepatica (n=55) and C. daubneyi (n=32) (DOI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). A phylogenetic tree 471
of all ASVs with reference sequences of 21 fluke species (outlined in the methodology section) 472
showed that F. hepatica and C. daubneyi species separated into distinct clades (Fig. 6). 473
Comparison of microscopy and tremabiome deep amplicon sequening for fluke species 474
diagnosis 475
Of the 71 samples identified as F. hepatica by microscopy, tremabiome detected only 11 as 476
single F. hepatica infections. However, tremabiome classified 26 of the 71 samples as C. 477
daubneyi and 30 as mixed infections, suggesting that some samples identified as F. hepatica 478
by qPCR (n=34) were mixed infections. Among the 30 samples marked as C. daubneyi by 479
microscopy, tremabiome detected two as F. hepatica, 21 as C. daubneyi, and seven as mixed 480
infections. For the microscopically recognised five mixed infections, tremabiome confirmed 481
four as mixed infections, while one was classified as C. daubneyi. Lastly, among the 22 samples 482
that were undecided by microscopy, tremabiome identified three as C. daubneyi, 17 as mixed 483
infections, and two as not determined or with failed DNA extraction (Table. 3, Table S5). 484
Comparison of qPCR and tremabiome deep amplicon sequencing for fluke species diagnosis 485
A significant correlation (p<0.001) was noted between the identification of F. hepatica 486
infections using qPCR and the tremabiome approach. Nevertheless, there were 20 samples 487
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
22
which tested negative by qPCR, but F. hepatica sequences were detected by deep amplicon 488
(three single and 17 mixed infections). Conversely, deep amplicon sequencing did not produce 489
F. hepatica reads for 8 qPCR -positive samples (Table 4, Table S5). For these samples , FECs 490
ranged from 1-221 eggs per gram of faecal material, but due to mixed infections of F. hepatica 491
and C. daubneyi, the egg counts for individual fluke species are not clear . Interestingly, C. 492
daubneyi reads were generated for the 8 samples, which were positive by Fasciola qPCR, but 493
did not have F. hepatica reads in tremabiome, despite the qPCR demonstrating no specificity 494
issues towards C. daubneyi during assay validation. 495
Comparison of Sanger sequencing and tremabiome deep amplicon sequencing for species 496
identification 497
Sanger sequencing identified 7 samples as F. hepatica of which tremabiome confirmed two 498
as F. hepatica, and five as mixed infections, and none as C. daubneyi. Among the 43 samples 499
identified as C. daubneyi by Sanger sequencing, tremabiome confirmed 29 as C. daubneyi and 500
14 as mixed infections. Notably, the sample identified as P. epiclitum by Sanger sequencing 501
was detected as F. hepatica in tremabiome sequencng (Table. 5, Table S5). 502
Discussion
503
In this study we present new approaches for detecting and identifying fluke species in faecal 504
samples in the form of qPCR with high analytic al sensitivity and specificity for the detection 505
of Fasciola spp. and a deep amplicon sequencing assay which can accurately identify and 506
differentiate between closely related fluke species, such as F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and C. 507
daubneyi. These methods overcome important limitations of microscopic egg examination. 508
We selected the ITS2 and mt-ND1 genetic markers based on their previous application in fluke 509
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
23
species identification and their potential to differentiate between closely related flukes 510
[32,39]. 511
Multiple direct and indirect diagnostic approaches are available for diagnosing fluke 512
infections, each with its own set of limitations. However, farmers still require highly sensitive, 513
specific, and cost -effective early diagnostic procedures. Historically, the most widely used 514
traditional direct identification method is detecting fluke eggs in the hosts faeces. This can be 515
accomplished through various techniques such as FLOTAC [46], sedimentation, Flukefinder, 516
or the Kato -Katz thick smear method [47]. Whilst the use of fluke egg count s is simple, 517
however, this diagnostic route can be unreliable due to low intermittent egg deposition in the 518
faeces [48], and it is time-consuming and requires highly trained laboratory staff [37]. 519
Progress in the development of molecular-level diagnostic methods based on DNA detection 520
is underway, including PCR techniques [23], qPCR [22] and the LAMP approach [24]. High 521
throughput deep amplicon sequencing approach of metabarcoded DNA from parasite 522
populations using the Illumina MiSeq platform can offer a low -cost and potentially more 523
accurate alternative to traditional microscopic methods. For instance, adult Fasciola spp. and 524
C. daubneyi flukes ha ve previously been detected using tremabiome deep amplicon 525
sequencing [32–34] but this method has not been applied to the detection of eggs in faecal 526
samples. 527
In the present study, s pecies identification through m icroscopic examination was first 528
checked by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. Our findings demonstrated that microscopy 529
has limitations in accurately identifying fluke species compared to Sanger sequencing and 530
qPCR and is a time-consuming process, as previously reported by Calvani et al., (2017) [37]. 531
Only about half of the microscopically positive samples (n=51) were confirmed by ITS2 Sanger 532
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
24
sequencing to contain F. hepatica or C. daubneyi DNA. A major contributing factor to this 533
finding could be the presence of mixed infections since fluke eggs are morphologically similar, 534
and this was confirmed by mt-ND1 Sanger sequencing [18,19]. PCR bands were observed on 535
the agarose gel for most of the samples , which indicated successful DNA amplification . 536
However, Sanger sequencing produced poor-quality sequence reads for many samples. Poor 537
sequencing quality can be due to non-specific amplifications, artefacts, and samples 538
containing mixed DNA templates from double infections [49]. Since DNA was extracted from 539
faecal material, additional factors such as low DNA concentration may also have contributed 540
to low-quality Sanger sequencing results. These findings indicated the need for more sensitive 541
and specific molecular diagnostic tools , such as qPCR and tremabiome deep amplicon 542
sequencing, to improve detection accuracy, particularly in complex natural infections. 543
We repurposed mt-ND1 markers to develop a SYBR Green qPCR assay to detect Fasciola spp. 544
The choice to use SYBR Green over fluorescence probe -based systems was due to its cost -545
effectiveness and simplicity. In contrast , previous studies used TaqMan probes to identify 546
Fasciola species [22,37,50]. Our assay's analytical sensitivity (19.2 fg for F. hepatica and 6.4 fg 547
for F. gigantica DNA) is lower than that reported in previous studies. For instance, Shi et al. , 548
(2020) achieved a detection limit of 1.67 pg of DNA using a SYBR Green qPCR assay targeting 549
the ITS2 region [51]. Similarly, previous studies have demonstrated the ability to detect F. 550
hepatica at levels below 10 eggs per gram directly from 150 mg of faecal material using a 551
TaqMan qPCR assay [37] and sensitivities as low as 1 pg/μL [22] and 1.6 pg/μL when targeting 552
the ITS1 region [52]. F. hepatica eDNA (14-50 fg) was detected in water samples with similar 553
sensitivity to our assay [53]. In 2024, a qPCR assay was reported which could detect 10 fg of 554
Fasciola DNA in water and 1 pg in human stool samples [54]. A limitation of our study is that 555
qPCR was only performed on fluke egg-positive samples due to limited resources. Thus, it was 556
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
25
not possible to formally determine diagnostic performance. This will be determined in future 557
work. The diagnostic sensitivity of other qPCR methods was reported to be 66% in human 558
stool samples [52] and 91 –100% in sheep and cattle compared to microscopy-based 559
techniques [37]. These estimates assume, however, that microscopy is the gold standard, 560
whereas it could miss positive cases that are detectable using molecular methods. 561
A limitation of our qPCR assay is that we are only able to detect Fasciola in DNA extracted 562
from sedimented material, not DNA extracted directly from faecal samples. Raw faecal 563
samples were tested in this study using the same DNA extraction methodology as 564
sedimented eggs, but it was not possible to detect Fasciola DNA using the qPCR 565
methodology described in the study (data not shown). However, sensitivity improved when 566
Fasciola eggs were first concentrated using faecal egg sedimentation before applying the 567
bead-beating approach for DNA isolation [37]. Similarly, other studies also employed 568
molecular procedures following the sedimentation process [18,50,55], and a few studies 569
have applied molecular techniques to detect natural Fasciola infections directly from faecal 570
Material
and reported limitations [37,55]. One possible approach is LAMP [56], as this has 571
demonstrated low detection limits for Fasciola spp. DNA and results can be observed with 572
the naked eye [24,25]. A recent study successfully detected F. hepatica in DNA extracted 573
directly from faeces with a commercial kit, using both LAMP and PCR methodology targeting 574
ITS2 region [57]. Further work is needed to simplify extraction protocols. 575
In ruminants, fluke species often occur in complex and overlapping infections; for instance, F. 576
hepatica and C. daubneyi co-infections have been observed in cattle and sheep in the UK 577
[58,59] and the same has been reported elsewhere in Europe [18,60], including in Ireland [61] 578
and Germany [62]. We found that the microscopic egg identification for closely related flukes, 579
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
26
such as F. hepatica and C. daubneyi , is challenging due to their similar size and shape. 580
Therefore, the tremabiome technology was developed utilising universal ITS2 rDNA markers 581
to differentiate between multiple fluke species . The techniques were validated using fluke 582
egg DNA, isolated from faecal samples. To our knowledge, this is first time the tremabiome 583
deep amplicon sequencing approach has been applied to detect mixed fluke infections in 584
faeces. Previously the approach was applied to detect adult fluke samples [33,34]. 585
The tremabiome technique generated sequence reads for F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and C. 586
daubneyi. However, the proportion of sequence reads deviated from expected percentages . 587
For instance, we evaluated the assay's ability to accurately determine the relative species 588
proportions in pairwise combinations of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi. The results consistently 589
showed a higher proportion of reads for C. daubneyi compared to F. hepatica across all 590
mixtures. Such variation may arise from factors including the primers used for the target loci, 591
conserved priming sites, variations in DNA template concentrations during sample handling, 592
the number of PCR cycles, and the copy number of the target DNA locus [63]. Previously, for 593
nematodes, species-specific representation biases were addressed by calculating correction 594
factors using L3 larva l population DNA from different nematode species [29]. In the present 595
study, while working with fluke egg DNA obtained via faecal sedimentation , calculation of 596
correction factors did not remove sequence biases (File S5). This might be due to differences 597
in the eggshell chemistry or stability hardness of eggshells that has been described between 598
F. hepatica and C. daubneyi [64], leading to variations in DNA extraction efficiency. However, 599
we employed mechanical disruption before DNA isolation to mitigate this issue [37]. 600
Additionally, we used universal ITS2 primers to detect multiple fluke species in a single deep 601
amplicon sequencing run. Using species -specific primers in deep amplicon sequencing could 602
be a potential solution to reduce sequence biases [65]. Further, bioinformatics analysis of 603
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
27
sequencing data might introduce biases, leading to inaccuracies in species proportion 604
estimations. One major challenge can be the limited availability of reference sequence reads 605
in the NCBI database, for example, for F. hepatica 50 unique sequences and for C. daubneyi 606
19 unique sequences were found , which can impact species specific reads identification. 607
Additionally, taxa represented by low numbers of sequencing reads may pose a problem, as 608
these low -frequency reads were removed during data filtering while eliminating artefacts, 609
resulting in the underrepresentation of actual sequence reads. Therefore, there is a need for 610
more reference sequence data, which can enhance our capability of accurately distinguishing 611
true sequences. When the tremabiome technology was applied to field samples , many F. 612
hepatica and C. daubneyi co-infections were identified. Since F. hepatica is more pathogenic 613
and economically detrimental [6,66] than C. daubneyi [67,68], and treatment choices differ, 614
our method provides a valuable tool for differentiating co -infections of these two significant 615
parasites using faecal egg samples. 616
When applying the tremabiome approach to field samples, just over half of the 617
microscopically positive F. hepatica samples were confirmed by tremabiome deep amplicon 618
sequencing. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the identification of F. 619
hepatica infections using qPCR and the tremabiome approach. Notably, the tremabiome 620
approach generated F. hepatica sequence reads in samples which tested negative by qPCR. 621
Conversely, tremabiome deep amplicon sequencing did not produce F. hepatica reads for a 622
few qPCR-positive samples. It has been reported that false negative results for molecular tests 623
may be due to low egg count in faecal samples [18]. Furthermore, one sample identified as P. 624
epiclitum by Sanger sequencing was not confirmed by tremabiome, which instead identified 625
it as F. hepatica . Previously P. leydeni has been reported in sheep [69], and deer [70] in 626
Ireland, but was not identified in the UK in our study. Therefore, each method has limitations, 627
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
28
but tremabiome remained the preferred tool for species -level fluke identification as it can 628
identify mixed infections. 629
Regarding the implementation of these methods, microscopy can be a suitable option for 630
analysing a small number of samples due to its low cost and accessibility, although, there were 631
potential issues of misidentifications [18,37]. In particular, a high proportion of samples 632
identified as positive for F. hepatica based on egg morphology were confirmed by 633
tremabiome to contain C. daubneyi, despite careful identification. For medium to high sample 634
volumes, qPCR is suitable to identify Fasciola spp. infections only and tremabiome deep 635
amplicon sequencing is potentially more effective choices for species level differentiation of 636
different flukes with an advantage of high throughput, as a single Illumina MiSeq run can 637
process up to 384 samples simultaneously. This capability makes the method suitable for both 638
research and diagnostic applications . Presently, t his study offers evidence of the high 639
prevalence of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi in UK ruminants. Expanding this method to larger 640
sample sizes across the UK and in other countries would provide a more comprehensive 641
epidemiological understanding of these infections. 642
The sequencing data generated from the set of natural field samples enhanced our 643
understanding of the genetic variation within fluke populations by revealing their ASVs . 644
Notably with ITS2 markers , we observed more ASVs for F. hepatica than C. daubneyi , 645
indicating possible greater genetic diversity within F. hepatica populations. Previously, 646
Fasciola species in Pakistan were differentiated using ITS2 markers in adult worms [32,39], 647
while high genetic diversity was reported using mt -ND1 markers [32,33]. Similarly, a study 648
from Spain and Peru identified Fasciola flukes using nuclear DNA markers but reported high 649
genetic diversity based on mitochondrial markers [71]. Further, high genetic diversity and 650
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
29
gene flow among Fasciola populations have been reported i n the UK, using microsatellite 651
markers [72,73]. Therefore, t he ITS2 rDNA provides a useful taxonomic resolution [32,39], 652
however, mitochondrial markers such as (ND1 and COX1) and genetic markers are typically 653
preferred for detailed population genetic studies [33,71,72,74–76]. Therefore, further 654
investigations using mitochondrial ND1 and nuclear genetic markers are required to 655
understand the genetic diversity of these fluke populations and is work in progress. 656
Although validated on cattle and sheep samples in this study, both the qPCR and tremabiome 657
Methods
have a strong potential for the Fasciola spp. d etection in humans, particularly in 658
endemic regions where there is a possibility of zoonotic transmission of F. hepatica and F. 659
gigantica. Application of these methods on human faecal samples could improve case 660
detection, fluke species identification, and epidemiological understanding. 661
Conclusion
662
In conclusion, this study presents the first use of tremabiome deep amplicon sequencing for 663
detecting mixed infections of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi, and provides a direct comparison 664
between microscopy, PCR, Sanger sequencing, qPCR and tremabiome methods for 665
differentiating between fluke species. The tremabiome approach was highly effective for 666
detecting mixed fluke infections, compared to other techniques utilised in this study, 667
demonstrating high frequency of C. daubneyi and F. hepatica co-infections in farmed 668
ruminants in the UK. The methods were primarily validated using samples from natural 669
infections, with DNA extracted from faecal sedimented eggs, which allowed an easy and 670
non-invasive sampling approach at the farm level. Tremabiome and qPCR are promising 671
tools to complement microscopy in fluke disease surveillance and control in livestock and 672
humans. 673
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
30
Supporting information 674
675
File S1 Relative proportions of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi in egg DNA mixtures (XLSX) 676
File S2 Mock egg mixtures with gradually decreasing counts of F. hepatica eggs (XLSX) 677
File S3 Mock egg mixtures with gradually decreasing counts of C. daubneyi eggs (XLSX) 678
File S4 Deep amplicon sequence reads generated from field samples from cattle and 679
sheep (XLSX) 680
File S5 Correction factors calculations (PDF) 681
Table S1 Sample information (XLSX) 682
Table S2 Reference sequences downloaded from NCBI and unique sequence count (XLSX) 683
Table S3 mt-ND1 and ITS2 primer sequences (PDF) 684
Table S4 Genetic distances for different fluke species based on ITS2 marker (XLSX) 685
Table S5 Sample (n=128) details used for comparison of techniques for microscopy, PCR, 686
Sanger sequencing, qPCR, and tremabiome (XLSX) 687
Table S6 Coefficients of variation for qPCR (PDF) 688
Fig. S1 and Fig. S2 Analytical sensitivity and specificity of qPCR (PDF) 689
Acknowledgements
690
Part of this work was carried out using the computational HPC facilities and support provided 691
by the Research Computing Services team within IT Services at University of Surrey, 692
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
31
specifically the Eureka2 HPC cluster 693
(https://docs.pages.surrey.ac.uk/research_computing/hpc/clusters/eureka2.html). 694
This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), 695
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) through the FoodBioSystems 696
Doctoral Training Programme (BB/T008776/1) and the Sir Halley Stewart Trust (3153). For the 697
purpose of Open Access, the author s have applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 698
public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this 699
submission. 700
Credit authorship contribution statement 701
Muhammad Abbas : conceptualisation, investigation, methodology, bioinformatics, 702
validation, visualisation, data curations and analysis, writing original draft, review and editing; 703
Kezia Kozel : investigation, methodology, formal analysis, validation, writing original draft , 704
review and editing; Olukayode Daramola: writing original draft, review, formal analysis, data 705
curation, supervision; Nick Selemetas: review and editing, supervision; Qasim Ali: resources; 706
Shoaib Ashraf : resources; Isah Ibrahim : resources; Inaki Deza -Cruz: resources; review and 707
editing; Sai Fingerhood: resources; review and editing; Mark W Robinson: resources; review 708
and editing ; Eric R Morgan: funding acquisition; supervision, review and editing ; Umer 709
Chaudhry: conceptualisation, formal analysis, validation, data curation, writing, review and 710
editing, supervision; Martha Betson: conceptualisation, formal analysis, writing review and 711
editing, supervision, funding acquisition, project administration. 712
Data availability 713
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
32
All sequencing data produced in the paper are available at NCBI BioProject ID PRJNA1273189, 714
and accession numbers PV752160 -PV752182, PV752186 -PV752205, PV752431 -PV752462, 715
PV752238-PV752240, PV752248-PV752250, PV752375-PV752429, PV752270. 716
In addition, sequence data, scripts and codes are available at Mendeley data base DOI: 717
10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1. 718
All other data are reported in the paper and associated supplementary material. 719
Funding 720
Muhammad Abbas received funding from the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), 721
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) through the FoodBioSystems 722
Doctoral Training Programme for project ID FBS2022 titled “New tools for sustainable control 723
of liver fluke in ruminants” Grant Ref: BB/T008776/1 . Further, t his research was funded by 724
the Sir Halley Stewart Trust under the project “Rapid Diagnostics for Neglected Parasites.” 725
Competing Interest 726
The authors declare that no financial interests or personal relationships could have influenced 727
the work reported in this paper. 728
References
729
1. WHO. Neglected tropical diseases: Fascioliasis. [cited 14 Apr 2025]. Available: 730
https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/q-a-on-fascioliasis 731
2. Lan Z, Zhang X-H, Xing J-L, Zhang A-H, Wang H-R, Zhang X-C, et al. Global prevalence of 732
liver disease in human and domestic animals caused by Fasciola: A systematic review 733
and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2024;14: 04223. doi:10.7189/jogh.14.04223 734
3. DEFRA. Chapter 14: The food chain. In: GOV.UK [Internet]. 2022 [cited 13 Nov 2024]. 735
Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/agriculture-in-the-united-kingdom-736
2021/chapter-14-the-food-chain 737
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
33
4. Spithill TW, Piedrafita D, Smooker PM. Immunological approaches for the control of 738
fasciolosis. Int J Parasitol. 1997;27: 1221–1235. doi:10.1016/S0020-7519(97)00120-3 739
5. Utrera-Quintana F, Covarrubias-Balderas A, Olmedo-Juárez A, Cruz-Aviña J, Córdova-740
Izquierdo A, Pérez-Mendoza N, et al. Fasciolosis prevalence, risk factors and economic 741
losses due to bovine liver condemnation in abattoirs in Mexico. Microb Pathog. 2022;173: 742
105851. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105851 743
6. Shrestha S, Barratt A, Fox NJ, Vosough Ahmadi B, Hutchings MR. Financial impacts of liver 744
fluke on livestock farms under climate change–A farm level assessment. Front Vet Sci. 745
2020;7. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2020.564795 746
7. Mazeri S, Rydevik G, Handel I, Bronsvoort BMD, Sargison N. Estimation of the impact of 747
Fasciola hepatica infection on time taken for UK beef cattle to reach slaughter weight. Sci 748
Rep. 2017;7. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-07396-1 749
8. Skuce P, Zadoks R. Liver fluke–a growing threat to UK livestock production. Cattle Pract. 750
2013;21: 138–149. 751
9. Understanding liver rejections from the abattoir. Vet Rec. 2017;180: 259–259. 752
doi:10.1136/vr.j1242 753
10. Kelley JM, Rathinasamy V, Elliott TP, Rawlin G, Beddoe T, Stevenson MA, et al. 754
Determination of the prevalence and intensity of Fasciola hepatica infection in dairy cattle 755
from six irrigation regions of Victoria, South-eastern Australia, further identifying 756
significant triclabendazole resistance on three properties. Vet Parasitol. 2020;277: 757
109019. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.109019 758
11. Charlier J, van der Voort M, Kenyon F, Skuce P, Vercruysse J. Chasing helminths and their 759
economic impact on farmed ruminants. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30: 361–367. 760
doi:10.1016/j.pt.2014.04.009 761
12. Huson KM, Oliver NAM, Robinson MW. Paramphistomosis of ruminants: an emerging 762
parasitic disease in Europe. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33: 836–844. 763
doi:10.1016/j.pt.2017.07.002 764
13. Anderson N, Luong TT, Vo NG, Bui KL, Smooker PM, Spithill TW. The sensitivity and 765
specificity of two methods for detecting Fasciola infections in cattle. Vet Parasitol. 766
1999;83: 15–24. doi:10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00026-6 767
14. Martínez-Pérez JM, Robles-Pérez D, Rojo-Vázquez FA, Martínez-Valladares M. Comparison 768
of three different techniques to diagnose Fasciola hepatica infection in experimentally 769
and naturally infected sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2012;190: 80–86. 770
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.06.002 771
17. Yang Y, Li M, Pan C, Yang Y, Chen X, Yao C, et al. A duplex PCR for the simultaneous 772
detection of Fasciola hepatica and Clonorchis sinensis. Vet Parasitol. 2018;259: 1–5. 773
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.06.019 774
18. Hecker AS, Raulf M-K, König S, Knubben-Schweizer G, Wenzel C, May K, et al. In-herd 775
prevalence of Fasciola hepatica and Calicophoron / Paramphistomum spp. infections in 776
German dairy cows with comparison of two coproscopical methods and establishment of 777
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
34
real-time pyrosequencing for rumen fluke species differentiation. Vet Parasitol. 2024;327: 778
110142. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110142 779
19. Hussein A-NA, Hassan IM, Khalifa RMA. Development and hatching mechanism of 780
Fasciola eggs, light and scanning electron microscopic studies. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2010;17: 781
247–251. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2010.04.010 782
20. Kremer M, Chaker E. Operculated platyhelminth eggs: description of atypical forms and 783
attempted explanation of their genesis. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp . 1983;58: 337–45. 784
21. Chen M, Mott K. Progress in assessment of morbidity due to Fasciola hepatica infection: a 785
review of recent literature. Trop Dis Bull. 1990;87: R1-R38 ref.245. 786
22. Alasaad S, Soriguer RC, Abu-Madi M, El Behairy A, Jowers MJ, Baños PD, et al. A TaqMan 787
real-time PCR-based assay for the identification of Fasciola spp. Vet Parasitol. 2011;179: 788
266–271. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.059 789
23. Kozak M, Wedrychowicz H. The performance of a PCR assay for field studies on the 790
prevalence of Fasciola hepatica infection in Galba truncatula intermediate host snails. Vet 791
Parasitol. 2010;168: 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.10.014 792
24. Ai L, Li C, Elsheikha HM, Hong SJ, Chen JX, Chen SH, et al. Rapid identification and 793
differentiation of Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica by a loop-mediated isothermal 794
amplification (LAMP) assay. Vet Parasitol. 2010;174: 228–233. 795
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.005 796
25. Amiri S, Shemshadi B, Shirali S, Kheirandish F, Fallahi S. Accurate and rapid detection of 797
Fasciola hepatica copro-DNA in sheep using loop-mediated isothermal amplification 798
(LAMP) technique. Vet Med Sci. 2021;7: 1316–1324. doi:10.1002/vms3.455 799
26. Gloor GB, Hummelen R, Macklaim JM, Dickson RJ, Fernandes AD, MacPhee R, et al. 800
Microbiome profiling by Illumina sequencing of combinatorial sequence-tagged PCR 801
products. PLoS ONE. 2010;5: e15406. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015406 802
27. Rogers GB, Bruce KD. Next-generation sequencing in the analysis of human microbiota: 803
essential considerations for clinical application. Mol Diagn Ther. 2010;14: 343–350. 804
doi:10.1007/BF03256391 805
28. Wensel CR, Pluznick JL, Salzberg SL, Sears CL. Next-generation sequencing: insights to 806
advance clinical investigations of the microbiome. J Clin Invest. 2022;132: e154944. 807
doi:10.1172/JCI154944 808
29. Avramenko RW, Redman EM, Lewis R, Yazwinski TA, Wasmuth JD, Gilleard JS. Exploring 809
the gastrointestinal “Nemabiome”: deep amplicon sequencing to quantify the species 810
composition of parasitic nematode communities. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0143559. 811
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143559 812
30. Yasein G, Zahid O, Minter E, Ashraf K, Rashid I, Shabbir MZ, et al. A novel metabarcoded 813
deep amplicon sequencing tool for disease surveillance and determining the species 814
composition of Trypanosoma in cattle and other farm animals. Acta Tropica. 2022;230: 815
106416. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106416 816
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
35
31. Chaudhry U, Ali Q, Rashid I, Shabbir MZ, Ijaz M, Abbas M, et al. Development of a deep 817
amplicon sequencing method to determine the species composition of piroplasm 818
haemoprotozoa. Ticks tick-borne dis. 2019;10: 101276. doi:10.1016/j.ttbdis.2019.101276 819
32. Rehman ZU, Martin K, Zahid O, Ali Q, Rashid I, Hafeez MA, et al. High-throughput 820
sequencing of Fasciola spp. shows co-infection and intermediate forms in Balochistan, 821
but only Fasciola gigantica in the Punjab province of Pakistan. Infection, Genetics and 822
Evolution. 2021;94: 105012. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105012 823
33. Rehman ZU, Zahid O, Rashid I, Ali Q, Akbar MH, Oneeb M, et al. Genetic diversity and 824
multiplicity of infection in Fasciola gigantica isolates of Pakistani livestock. Parasitol Int. 825
2020;76: 102071. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2020.102071 826
34. Sargison ND, Shahzad K, Mazeri S, Chaudhry U. A high throughput deep amplicon 827
sequencing method to show the emergence and spread of Calicophoron daubneyi rumen 828
fluke infection in United Kingdom cattle herds. Vet Parasitol. 2019;268: 9–15. 829
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.02.007 830
35. Chaudhry U, van Paridon B, Lejeune M, Shabbir MZ, Rashid MI, Ashraf K, et al. 831
Morphological and molecular identification of Explanatum explanatum in domestic water 832
buffalo in Pakistan. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2017;8: 54–59. 833
doi:10.1016/j.vprsr.2017.02.002 834
36. Ali Q, Rashid I, Shabbir MZ, Akbar H, Shahzad K, Ashraf K, et al. First genetic evidence for 835
the presence of the rumen fluke Paramphistomum epiclitum in Pakistan. Parasitol Int. 836
2018;67: 533–537. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2018.05.005 837
37. Calvani NED, Windsor PA, Bush RD, Šlapeta J. Scrambled eggs: A highly sensitive 838
molecular diagnostic workflow for Fasciola species specific detection from faecal 839
samples. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11: e0005931. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005931 840
38. Foreyt WJ. Experimental fascioloides magna infections of mule deer (Odocoileus 841
hemionus hemionus). J Wildl Dis. 1992;28: 183–187. doi:10.7589/0090-3558-28.2.183 842
39. Chaudhry U, Paridon B van, Shabbir MZ, Shafee M, Ashraf K, Yaqub T, et al. Molecular 843
evidence shows that the liver fluke Fasciola gigantica is the predominant Fasciola species 844
in ruminants from Pakistan. J Helminthol. 2016;90: 206–213. 845
doi:10.1017/S0022149X15000176 846
40. Pd S, Sl W, T R, Jr H, M H, Eb H, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-847
independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial 848
communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75. doi:10.1128/AEM.01541-09 849
41. Khan MA, Afshan K, Firasat S, Abbas M, Sargison ND, Betson M, et al. Validation of deep 850
amplicon sequencing of Dicrocoelium in small ruminants from Northern regions of 851
Pakistan. PLoS One. 2024;19: e0302455. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0302455 852
42. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing 853
phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4: 406–425. 854
doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454 855
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
36
43. Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the 856
neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101: 11030–11035. 857
doi:10.1073/pnas.0404206101 858
44. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis 859
Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38: 3022–3027. doi:10.1093/molbev/msab120 860
45. Felsenstein J. Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. 861
Evolution. 1985;39: 783–791. doi:10.2307/2408678 862
46. Cringoli G, Maurelli MP, Levecke B, Bosco A, Vercruysse J, Utzinger J, et al. The Mini-863
FLOTAC technique for the diagnosis of helminth and protozoan infections in humans and 864
animals. Nat Protoc. 2017;12: 1723–1732. doi:10.1038/nprot.2017.067 865
47. Zárate-Rendón DA, Vlaminck J, Levecke B, Briones-Montero A, Geldhof P. Comparison of 866
Kato-Katz thick smear, Mini-FLOTAC, and Flukefinder for the detection and quantification 867
of Fasciola hepatica eggs in artificially spiked human stool. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;101: 868
59–61. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.18-0988 869
48. Caravedo MA, Cabada MM. Human fascioliasis: current epidemiological status and 870
strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and control. Res Rep Trop Med. 2020;11: 149–158. 871
doi:10.2147/RRTM.S237461 872
49. Al-Shuhaib MBS, Hashim HO. Mastering DNA chromatogram analysis in Sanger 873
sequencing for reliable clinical analysis. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2023;21: 115. 874
doi:10.1186/s43141-023-00587-6 875
50. Olaogun SC, Byaruhanga C, Ochai SO, Fosgate GT, Marufu MC. Comparison of three 876
diagnostic methods to detect the occurrence of Fasciola species in communally grazed 877
cattle in the north west province, South Africa. Pathogens. 2022;11: 1398. 878
doi:10.3390/pathogens11121398 879
51. Shi H, Li M, Huang X, Yao C, Chen X, Du A, et al. Development of SYBR Green real-time 880
PCR for diagnosis of fasciolosis in sheep. Vet Parasitol. 2020;283: 109193. 881
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109193 882
52. Cabada MM, Malaga JL, Castellanos-Gonzalez A, Bagwell KA, Naeger PA, Rogers HK, et al. 883
Recombinase polymerase amplification compared to real-time polymerase chain reaction 884
test for the detection of Fasciola hepatica in human stool. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;96: 885
341–346. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.16-0601 886
53. Rathinasamy V, Hosking C, Tran L, Kelley J, Williamson G, Swan J, et al. Development of a 887
multiplex quantitative PCR assay for detection and quantification of DNA from Fasciola 888
hepatica and the intermediate snail host, Austropeplea tomentosa, in water samples. Vet 889
Parasitol. 2018;259: 17–24. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.06.018 890
54. Fernandez-Baca MV, Castellanos-Gonzalez A, Ore RA, Alccacontor-Munoz JL, Hoban C, 891
Castro CA, et al. A PCR Test using the mini-PCR platform and simplified product detection 892
Methods
is highly sensitive and specific to detect Fasciola hepatica DNA mixed in human 893
stool, snail tissue, and water DNA specimens. Pathogens. 2024;13: 440. 894
doi:10.3390/pathogens13060440 895
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
37
55. Arifin MI, Höglund J, Novobilský A. Comparison of molecular and conventional methods 896
for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica infection in the field. Vet Parasitol. 2016;232: 8–11. 897
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.11.003 898
56. Mori Y, Notomi T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and 899
cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother. 2009;15: 900
62–69. doi:10.1007/s10156-009-0669-9 901
57. Bari T, Al Mamun MdA, Toet H, Rathinasamy V, Larkins J-A, Beddoe T, et al. Evaluation of 902
LAMP for Fasciola hepatica detection from faecal samples of experimentally and naturally 903
infected cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2024;327: 110132. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2024.110132 904
58. Hoyle RC, Rose Vineer H, Duncan JS, Williams DJL, Hodgkinson JE. A survey of sheep 905
and/or cattle farmers in the UK shows confusion over the diagnosis and control of rumen 906
fluke and liver fluke. Vet Parasitol. 2022;312: 109812. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2022.109812 907
59. Jones RA, Williams HW, Dalesman S, Brophy PM. Confirmation of Galba truncatula as an 908
intermediate host snail for Calicophoron daubneyi in Great Britain, with evidence of 909
alternative snail species hosting Fasciola hepatica. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8: 656. 910
doi:10.1186/s13071-015-1271-x 911
60. Forstmaier T, Knubben-Schweizer G, Strube C, Zablotski Y, Wenzel C. Rumen 912
(Calicophoron/Paramphistomum spp.) and liver flukes (Fasciola hepatica) in cattle 913
prevalence, distribution, and impact of management factors in germany. Animals. 914
2021;11: 2727. doi:10.3390/ani11092727 915
61. Naranjo-Lucena A, Munita Corbalán MP, Martínez-Ibeas AM, McGrath G, Murray G, Casey 916
M, et al. Spatial patterns of Fasciola hepatica and Calicophoron daubneyi infections in 917
ruminants in Ireland and modelling of C. daubneyi infection. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11: 918
531. doi:10.1186/s13071-018-3114-z 919
62. May K, Hecker AS, Strube C, Yin T, König S. Genetic parameters and single-step genome-920
wide association analysis for trematode (Fasciola hepatica and 921
Calicophoron/Paramphistomum spp.) infections in German dairy cows. Infect Genet Evol. 922
2025;128: 105712. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2025.105712 923
63. Krehenwinkel H, Wolf M, Lim JY, Rominger AJ, Simison WB, Gillespie RG. Estimating and 924
mitigating amplification bias in qualitative and quantitative arthropod metabarcoding. Sci 925
Rep. 2017;7: 17668. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17333-x 926
64. Clancy SM, Whitehead M, Oliver NAM, Huson KM, Kyle J, Demartini D, et al. The 927
Calicophoron daubneyi genome provides new insight into mechanisms of feeding, 928
eggshell synthesis and parasite-microbe interactions. BMC Biol. 2025;23: 11. 929
doi:10.1186/s12915-025-02114-0 930
65. Santa MA, Rezansoff AM, Chen R, Gilleard JS, Musiani M, Ruckstuhl KE, et al. Deep 931
amplicon sequencing highlights low intra-host genetic variability of Echinococcus 932
multilocularis and high prevalence of the European-type haplotypes in coyotes and red 933
foxes in Alberta, Canada. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15: e0009428. 934
doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009428 935
66. Schweizer G, Braun U, Deplazes P, Torgerson PR. Estimating the financial losses due to 936
bovine fasciolosis in Switzerland. Vet Rec. 2005;157: 188–193. doi:10.1136/vr.157.7.188 937
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
38
67. Fuertes M, Pérez V, Benavides J, González-Lanza MC, Mezo M, González-Warleta M, et al. 938
Pathological changes in cattle naturally infected by Calicophoron daubneyi adult flukes. 939
Vet Parasitol. 2015;209: 188–196. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.034 940
68. Zintl A, Garcia-Campos A, Trudgett A, Chryssafidis AL, Talavera-Arce S, Fu Y, et al. Bovine 941
paramphistomes in Ireland. Vet Parasitol. 2014;204: 199–208. 942
doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.024 943
69. Martinez-Ibeas AM, Munita MP, Lawlor K, Sekiya M, Mulcahy G, Sayers R. Rumen fluke in 944
Irish sheep: prevalence, risk factors and molecular identification of two paramphistome 945
species. BMC Vet Res. 2016;12: 143. doi:10.1186/s12917-016-0770-0 946
70. O’Toole A, Browne JA, Hogan S, Bassière T, DeWaal T, Mulcahy G, et al. Identity of rumen 947
fluke in deer. Parasitol Res. 2014;113: 4097–4103. doi:10.1007/s00436-014-4078-3 948
71. Thang TN, Vázquez-Prieto S, Vilas R, Paniagua E, Ubeira FM, Ichikawa-Seki M. Genetic 949
diversity of Fasciola hepatica in Spain and Peru. Parasitol Int. 2020;76: 102100. 950
doi:10.1016/j.parint.2020.102100 951
72. Beesley NJ, Williams DJL, Paterson S, Hodgkinson J. Fasciola hepatica demonstrates high 952
levels of genetic diversity, a lack of population structure and high gene flow: possible 953
implications for drug resistance. Int J Parasitol. 2017;47: 11–20. 954
doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.09.007 955
73. Cwiklinski K, Allen K, LaCourse J, Williams DJ, Paterson S, Hodgkinson JE. 956
Characterisation of a novel panel of polymorphic microsatellite loci for the liver fluke, 957
Fasciola hepatica, using a next generation sequencing approach. Infect Genet Evol. 958
2015;32: 298–304. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2015.03.014 959
74. Cabrera G, Cabezas C, Estay-Olea D, Stoore C, Baquedano MS, Paredes R, et al. 960
Molecular characterization of Fasciola hepatica obtained from cattle and horse in Central 961
Chile. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2024;56: 101130. doi:10.1016/j.vprsr.2024.101130 962
75. Teofanova D, Kantzoura V, Walker S, Radoslavov G, Hristov P, Theodoropoulos G, et al. 963
Genetic diversity of liver flukes (Fasciola hepatica) from Eastern Europe. Infect Genet Evol. 964
2011;11: 109–115. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2010.10.002 965
76. Mogha L, Kainga H, Kamanga N, Kapalamula TF, Wood C, Thomas LF, et al. Genetic 966
diversity and population structure of Fasciola gigantica isolated from cattle in Malawi. Vet 967
Res Commun. 2025;49: 157. doi:10.1007/s11259-025-10717-9 968
969
970
971
972
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
39
973
974
975
976
977
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
40
978
979
Fig. 1: Developmemt of qPCR and tremabiome 980
(a) Workflow adopted for developing qPCR and screening of faecal samples for the presence 981
of F. hepatica infection. (b) Overview of development of the tremabiome method and its 982
application on natural fluke infections in ruminants in the UK. 983
984
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
41
985
Fig. 2: Neighbor-Joining tree generated for fluke species including reference sequences of 21 986
different fluke species. The reference sequences were downloaded from NCBI data, and 154 987
unique sequences were selected and aligned (Table S2, DOI: 10.17632/zyvwc6ppy8.1). 988
Different fluke species are indicated with symbols of different colours and shapes. F. 989
hepatica red triangle, F. gigantica black triangle, C. daubneyi black circle, Paramphistomum 990
leydeni red diamond, P. cervi grey diamond, C. microbothrium light blue circle, P. epiclitum 991
black diamond, Gastrothylax crumenifer triangle with red boundary no fill, Fischoederius 992
elongatus triangle with black boundary no fill, Dicrocoelium dendriticum red square, C. 993
calicophorum yellow circle, Fischoederius cobboldi circle with black boundary no fill, C. 994
microbothrioides red circle, Homalogaster paloniae circle with light blue boundary no fill, E. 995
explanatum square with black boundary no fill, C. raja grey circle, Watsonius watsoni 996
triangle with dark blue border no fill, Gastrodiscoides hominis triangle with light blue 997
boundary no fill, D. orientalis black square, D. hospes grey square, and Dicrocoelium 998
chinensis dark blue square. 999
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
42
1000
1001
1002
Fig. 3: Sequence representation of the mock mixture of fluke species in deep amplicon 1003
sequencing. 1004
(a) F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and C. daubneyi. DNA was extracted in triplicate from pooled 1005
samples containing 250 eggs of each species. The DNA mixture was amplified using PCR at 1006
three cycle levels (25X, 30X, and 35X), with triplicate testing for each pool. The x-axis 1007
indicates PCR cycle numbers, while the y-axis represents each species' percentage of ITS2 1008
rDNA sequence reads. Triplicates were averaged and grouped based on the amplification 1009
cycles in the last three columns. (b) Relative proportions of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi in 1010
egg DNA mixtures were assessed using deep amplicon sequencing. DNA was extracted from 1011
mock pools containing varying ratios of these two fluke species, enabling evaluation of the 1012
assay’s accuracy across a range of species proportions. The x-axis represents egg mixtures 1013
with varying F. hepatica: C. daubneyi ratios: M1 (negative control), M2 (99:1), M3 (90:10), 1014
M4 (70:30), M5 (50:50), M6 (30:70), M7 (10:90), M8 (1:99), M9 (100% C. daubneyi), and 1015
M10 (100% F. hepatica). The y-axis shows the percentage of ITS2 rDNA sequence reads for 1016
each species. 1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
43
1028
1029
1030
1031
Fig. 4. Threshold of deep amplicon sequencing 1032
Application of deep amplicon sequencing to mock egg mixtures with gradually lower counts 1033
of F. hepatica and C. daubneyi eggs. Two sets of mixtures were designed using eggs from 1034
four fluke species (F. hepatica, F. gigantica, E. explanatum, and C. daubneyi). In panel (a), 1035
which focuses on F. hepatica, MM1 contained 500 eggs of F. hepatica along with 50 eggs of 1036
each of the other three species, creating a high relative abundance of F. hepatica. In 1037
mixtures MM2 through MM6, the number of F. hepatica eggs was reduced to 50, 20, 15 5, 1038
and 0 eggs, respectively, while the counts for the other three fluke species remained 1039
constant at 50 eggs. Panel (b) follows a similar design but targets C. daubneyi: MM1 1040
contained 500 eggs of C. daubneyi plus 50 eggs each of F. hepatica, F. gigantica, and E. 1041
explanatum, and in mixtures MM2 to MM6 the number of C. daubneyi eggs was reduced to 1042
50, 20, 15, 5, and 0 eggs, with the other species maintained at 50 eggs each. Additionally, 1043
single-species control pools were included as MM7 (F. hepatica), MM8 (F. gigantica), MM9 1044
(E. explanatum), and MM10 (C. daubneyi), each containing 50 eggs. The assay results show 1045
the ability to detect and accurately quantify trace levels of target DNA in mixed fluke egg 1046
populations. 1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
44
1054
Fig. 5: Tremabiome deep amplicon sequencing application on the field samples 1055
This figure illustrates the application of the tremabiome deep amplicon sequencing assay 1056
on DNA extracted from sedimented faecal eggs and adult worm populations collected from 1057
cattle and sheep across various regions in the UK. The charts display species proportions 1058
based on the percentage of sequence reads generated after 35 amplification cycles. 1059
Percentages of F. hepatica are represented in blue and C. daubneyi in green on the Y-axis. 1060
(a) Samples from cattle. (b) Samples from sheep. 1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
45
1073
1074
Fig. 6: A Neighbor-Joining tree of rDNA ITS2 sequences constructed using 154 reference 1075
sequences of different fluke species downloaded from the NCBI database, along with 87 1076
ASVs identified in this study 55 from F. hepatica and 32 from C. daubneyi. ASVs 1077
corresponding to F. hepatica are marked with blue triangles, while those of C. daubneyi are 1078
represented by blue circles. The ASVs clustered closely with their respective reference taxa, 1079
confirming accurate taxonomic assignment. 1080
1081
1082
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
46
1083
Table. 1: Comparison of microscopy, ITS2 PCR and Sanger sequencing on fluke egg-positive samples 1084
Microscopy
PCR Sanger sequencing using ITS2
Negative Positive Not
performed
ND2 Total F.
hepatica
C.
daubneyi
Paramphistomum
epiclitum
PSQ Not
performed
ND2 Total
F. hepatica 7 30 32 2 71 3 19 0 9 38 2 71
C. daubneyi 4 26 0 0 30 1 16 1 9 3 0 30
Mixed 0 3 2 0 5 1 2 0 0 2 0 5
Fluke1 1 14 6 1 22 2 6 0 6 7 1 22
Total 12 73 40 3 128 7 43 1 24 50 3 128
1Unidentified flukes; 2 ND = DNA extraction failed; PSQ = poor sequence quality 1085
1086
1087
Table. 2: Comparison of microscopy and Sanger sequencing using mt-ND-1 markers on fluke egg-positive samples 1088
Microscopy Sanger sequencing using ND1
F. hepatica C. daubneyi PSQ Not performed ND2 Total
F. hepatica 6 0 3 60 2 71
C. daubneyi 1 0 1 28 0 30
Mixed 1 0 0 4 0 5
Fluke1 1 0 2 18 1 22
Total 9 0 6 110 3 128
1Unidentified flukes; 2 ND = DNA extraction failed; PSQ = poor sequence quality 1089
1090
1091
1092
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
47
Table. 3: Comparison of microscopy, qPCR (for F. hepatica) and tremabiome on 128 fluke egg-positive samples 1093
Microscopy
qPCR Tremabiome
Negative Positive ND NP Total F. hepatica C. daubneyi Mixed ND2 No
reads
Total
F. hepatica 33 34 2 2 71 11 26 30 2 2 71
C. daubneyi 23 7 0 0 30 2 21 7 0 0 30
Mixed 1 4 0 0 5 0 1 4 0 0 5
Fluke1 9 12 1 0 22 0 3 17 1 1 22
Total 66 57 3 2 128 13 51 58 3 3 128
1Unidentified flukes; 2 ND = DNA extraction failed; NP=Not performed 1094
1095
1096
Table. 4: Comparison of qPCR and tremabiome on 128 fluke egg-positive samples 1097
qPCR Tremabiome
C. daubneyi F. hepatica Mixed ND No reads Total
Negative 43 3 17 0 3 66
F. hepatica 8 10 39 0 0 57
ND 0 0 0 3 0 3
NP 0 0 2 0 0 2
Total 51 13 58 3 3 128
ND = DNA extraction failed, NP =Not performed 1098
1099
1100
1101
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
48
1102
Table. 5: Comparison of Sanger sequencing and tremabiome on selected samples 1103
Tremabiome
Sanger sequencing using ITS2
F.
hepatica
C.
daubneyi
Paramphistomum
epiclitum
PSQ Not
performed
ND1 Total
F. hepatica 2 0 1 2 8 0 13
C. daubneyi 0 29 0 9 13 0 51
Mixed 5 14 0 10 29 0 58
No reads 0 0 0 3 0 0 3
ND 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
Total 7 43 1 24 50 3 128
1ND = DNA extraction failed; PSQ = poor sequence quality 1104
1105
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
.CC-BY 4.0 International licensemade available under a
(which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is
The copyright holder for this preprintthis version posted August 2, 2025. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.31.667929doi: bioRxiv preprint
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.