Chronic Cesarean Scar Abscess Mimicking Scar Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Pitfall

In: Case Reports in Clinical Practice · 2026 · doi:10.18502/crcp.v10i6.21616 · W7162855236
article OA: diamond CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-04

A chronic cesarean scar abscess mimicking scar endometriosis in a 33-year-old woman was diagnosed intraoperatively after imaging suggested endometriosis, highlighting the diagnostic limitations of non-invasive methods for these lesions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-04 · read from full text

This case report describes a 33-year-old woman with chronic pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding after three cesarean sections, evaluated with transvaginal ultrasonography and non-contrast MRI for a cesarean scar lesion suspected to be scar endometriosis. Imaging suggested scar endometriosis and surgery was planned, but intraoperative exploration revealed a cystic lesion under the bladder peritoneum containing purulent material, and complete excision was performed. Histopathology confirmed an abscess with no evidence of endometriosis, highlighting that imaging can be limited in distinguishing cesarean scar lesions and that discordant laboratory findings or inconclusive imaging should broaden the differential. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it presents a diagnostic pitfall where an abscess mimicked scar endometriosis in a cesarean scar.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Cesarean scar–related masses represent a diagnostic challenge due to overlapping clinical and imaging features. Scar endometriosis is often the leading consideration; however, other entities may closely mimic its presentation. We report the case of a 33-year-old woman with a history of three cesarean sections presenting with chronic pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding. Imaging studies, including transvaginal ultrasonography and non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealed a lesion at the cesarean scar highly suggestive of scar endometriosis. Based on these findings, surgical intervention was planned. Intraoperative exploration demonstrated a cystic lesion beneath the bladder peritoneum containing purulent material. Complete excision was performed. Histopathological examination confirmed abscess formation with no evidence of endometriosis. This case highlights the limitations of imaging in differentiating cesarean scar lesions and emphasizes the importance of considering chronic abscess in the differential diagnosis, particularly when laboratory findings are discordant or imaging is inconclusive. Surgical exploration remains essential for definitive diagnosis and management.
Full text 1,492 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Publication Case Reports in Clinical Practice Record type Journal article Published 30 May 2026 Authors Emel Özalp The publisher of this work supports multiple resolution. The work is available from the following locations: {'doi': '10.18502/crcp.v10i6.21616', 'member_id': '7770', 'member': 'Knowledge E DMCC', 'container-title': 'Case Reports in Clinical Practice', 'primary-resource': 'https://publish.kne-publishing.com/index.php/crcp/article/view/21616', 'tld': 'kne-publishing.com', 'clearbit-logo': '/static/no_logo.svg', 'coaccess': [], 'multiple-resolution': [{'url': 'https://crcp.tums.ac.ir/index.php/crcp/article/view/1178', 'tld': 'tums.ac.ir', 'clearbit-logo': '/static/no_logo.svg'}], 'type': 'JOURNAL ARTICLE', 'published_date': '30 May 2026', 'publication': 'Case Reports in Clinical Practice', 'title': 'Chronic Cesarean Scar Abscess Mimicking Scar Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Pitfall', 'name': None, 'id': None, 'location': None, 'display_doi': 'https://doi.org/10.18502/crcp.v10i6.21616', 'grant_info': None, 'grant_info_funders': None, 'grant_info_funder_ids': '', 'grant_info_type': None, 'multiple_lead_investigators': [], 'multiple_co_lead_investigators': [], 'multiple_investigators': [], 'finances': [], 'project_description': None, 'award_amount': None, 'award_start': None, 'funding_scheme': None, 'internal_award_number': None, 'editors': None, 'authors': 'Emel Özalp', 'chairs': None, 'supplementary_ids': None} https://doi.org/10.18502/crcp.v10i6.21616 JSON XML

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-08-29T06:04:16.107210+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK