Chronic Cesarean Scar Abscess Mimicking Scar Endometriosis: A Diagnostic Pitfall
A chronic cesarean scar abscess mimicking scar endometriosis in a 33-year-old woman was diagnosed intraoperatively after imaging suggested endometriosis, highlighting the diagnostic limitations of non-invasive methods for these lesions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This case report describes a 33-year-old woman with chronic pelvic pain and abnormal uterine bleeding after three cesarean sections, evaluated with transvaginal ultrasonography and non-contrast MRI for a cesarean scar lesion suspected to be scar endometriosis. Imaging suggested scar endometriosis and surgery was planned, but intraoperative exploration revealed a cystic lesion under the bladder peritoneum containing purulent material, and complete excision was performed. Histopathology confirmed an abscess with no evidence of endometriosis, highlighting that imaging can be limited in distinguishing cesarean scar lesions and that discordant laboratory findings or inconclusive imaging should broaden the differential. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it presents a diagnostic pitfall where an abscess mimicked scar endometriosis in a cesarean scar.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,492 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-08-29T06:04:16.107210+00:00