Placenta hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment in guinea pigs mitigates fetal sex dependent FGR-associated effects on kidney structure and blood pressure-related signaling pathways
Placental hIGF1 nanoparticle treatment in guinea pigs improved fetal growth and ameliorated fetal sex-dependent FGR-associated effects on kidney structure and blood pressure signaling.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The study examined whether improving the in utero growth environment using a non-viral placental nanoparticle gene therapy delivering human IGF1 could reverse fetal growth restriction (FGR)-associated alterations in fetal kidney structure and blood pressure-related signaling in a guinea pig maternal nutrient restriction model. Pregnant guinea pigs under nutrient restriction received three placental administrations of the hIGF1 nanoparticle gene therapy from mid-pregnancy, with fetal weight and placental efficiency improved and placental trophoblast showing transient increases in hIGF1 expression; fetal kidneys were analyzed near term. In sham-treated FGR fetuses, the authors observed differences in kidney structure (including glomeruli size) and altered gene expression related to extracellular matrix remodeling and blood pressure regulation, whereas these differences were not seen in FGR fetuses treated with the hIGF1 nanoparticles. The main caveat is that the work focused on near-term fetal kidney outcomes without assessing long-term cardiovascular function. The paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
1,799 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00