Deep Chest: an artificial intelligence model for multi-disease diagnosis by chest x-rays

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher
AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-04 · read from full text

This paper describes development of Deep Chest, a computer-vision AI model for multi-label, multi-disease diagnosis of chest X-rays using limited training data. The authors trained a pre-trained EfficientNetB0 using transfer learning on six defined thoracic disease categories with 453 images from online sources and a hospital database, then performed external validation using a limited retrospective dataset; they reported an AUC of 0.98, sensitivity of 0.98, specificity of 0.80, and accuracy of 0.83, with strong performance for masses or nodules. The main caveats include retrospective use of de-identified chest X-rays without consent for some deceased patients and reliance on a limited external validation database, though ethical approval/consent is stated as not obtained due to the retrospective de-identification context. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used for analyzing image data in medicine. Objectives We aimed to develop a computer vision artificial intelligence (AI) application using limited training material to aid in the multi-label, multi-disease diagnosis of chest X-rays. Methods We trained an EfficientNetB0 pre-trained model, leveraging transfer learning and deep learning techniques. Six thoracic disease categories were defined, and the model was initially trained on images sourced online and chest X-rays from a hospital database for training and internal validation. Subsequently, the model underwent external validation. Results In constructing and validating Deep Chest, we utilized 453 images, achieving an area under curve (AUC) of 0.98, sensitivity of 0.98, specificity of 0.80, and accuracy of 0.83. Notably, for diagnosing masses or nodules, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.97, 0.81, and 0.83, respectively. We deployed Deep Chest as a free experimental web application. Conclusions This tool demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing both single and coexisting pulmonary pathologies, including pulmonary masses or nodules. Deep Chest thus represents a promising AI-based solution for enhancing diagnostic capabilities in thoracic radiology, with the potential to be utilized across various medical disciplines, especially in scenarios where expert support is limited.
Full text 3,714 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used for analyzing image data in medicine.

Objectives

We aimed to develop a computer vision artificial intelligence (AI) application using limited training material to aid in the multi-label, multi-disease diagnosis of chest X-rays.

Methods

We trained an EfficientNetB0 pre-trained model, leveraging transfer learning and deep learning techniques. Six thoracic disease categories were defined, and the model was initially trained on images sourced online and chest X-rays from a hospital database for training and internal validation. Subsequently, the model underwent external validation.

Results

In constructing and validating Deep Chest, we utilized 453 images, achieving an area under curve (AUC) of 0.98, sensitivity of 0.98, specificity of 0.80, and accuracy of 0.83. Notably, for diagnosing masses or nodules, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.97, 0.81, and 0.83, respectively. We deployed Deep Chest as a free experimental web application.

Conclusions

This tool demonstrated high accuracy in diagnosing both single and coexisting pulmonary pathologies, including pulmonary masses or nodules. Deep Chest thus represents a promising AI-based solution for enhancing diagnostic capabilities in thoracic radiology, with the potential to be utilized across various medical disciplines, especially in scenarios where expert support is limited. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest. Funding Statement This study did not receive any funding Author Declarations I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained. Yes The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: Vast majority of our dataset includes open source chest x-rays, however, additional limited number of patient chest x-rays were used to enrich the dataset. Again, limited retrospective external database of chest x-rays were used for validation purposes. For the limited number of real patients whose chest x-rays were used, due to the retrospective nature, it was not possible to obtain consent from these cases as some of them had unfortunately died at the time of data collection. All chest X-rays used for this study had been de-identified. Thus, no ethical committee approval or consent was obtained. I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals. Yes I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance). Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable. Yes Footnotes Declaration of interest: None. No financial relationship to declare. A free web application is provided online for experimental and scientific usage. Data Availability All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00