The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm... | F1000Research "use strict";function _typeof(t){return(_typeof="function"==typeof Symbol&&"symbol"==typeof Symbol.iterator?function(t){return typeof t}:function(t){return t&&"function"==typeof Symbol&&t.constructor===Symbol&&t!==Symbol.prototype?"symbol":typeof t})(t)}!function(){var t=function(){var t,e,o=[],n=window,r=n;for(;r;){try{if(r.frames.__tcfapiLocator){t=r;break}}catch(t){}if(r===n.top)break;r=r.parent}t||(!function t(){var e=n.document,o=!!n.frames.__tcfapiLocator;if(!o)if(e.body){var r=e.createElement("iframe");r.style.cssText="display:none",r.name="__tcfapiLocator",e.body.appendChild(r)}else setTimeout(t,5);return!o}(),n.__tcfapi=function(){for(var t=arguments.length,n=new Array(t),r=0;r 3&&2===parseInt(n[1],10)&&"boolean"==typeof n[3]&&(e=n[3],"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]("set",!0)):"ping"===n[0]?"function"==typeof n[2]&&n[2]({gdprApplies:e,cmpLoaded:!1,cmpStatus:"stub"}):o.push(n)},n.addEventListener("message",(function(t){var e="string"==typeof t.data,o={};if(e)try{o=JSON.parse(t.data)}catch(t){}else o=t.data;var n="object"===_typeof(o)&&null!==o?o.__tcfapiCall:null;n&&window.__tcfapi(n.command,n.version,(function(o,r){var a={__tcfapiReturn:{returnValue:o,success:r,callId:n.callId}};t&&t.source&&t.source.postMessage&&t.source.postMessage(e?JSON.stringify(a):a,"*")}),n.parameter)}),!1))};"undefined"!=typeof module?module.exports=t:t()}(); dataLayer = dataLayer || []; // Standard GTM initialization - Google Consent Mode handles consent automatically (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start': new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0], j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src= 'https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+ '>m_auth=hzk0Vc3qFsQYhCrIoHz68A>m_preview=env-1>m_cookies_win=x';f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f); })(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-MWFK8L5J'); ;window.NREUM||(NREUM={});NREUM.init={distributed_tracing:{enabled:true},privacy:{cookies_enabled:true},ajax:{deny_list:["bam.nr-data.net"]}}; ;NREUM.loader_config={accountID:"438030",trustKey:"438030",agentID:"772317073",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073"} ;NREUM.info={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net",licenseKey:"97f8f67f26",applicationID:"772317073",sa:1} ;/*! For license information please see nr-loader-spa-1.236.0.min.js.LICENSE.txt */ (()=>{"use strict";var e,t,r={5763:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P_:()=>l,Mt:()=>g,C5:()=>s,DL:()=>v,OP:()=>T,lF:()=>D,Yu:()=>y,Dg:()=>h,CX:()=>c,GE:()=>b,sU:()=>_});var n=r(8632),i=r(9567);const o={beacon:n.ce.beacon,errorBeacon:n.ce.errorBeacon,licenseKey:void 0,applicationID:void 0,sa:void 0,queueTime:void 0,applicationTime:void 0,ttGuid:void 0,user:void 0,account:void 0,product:void 0,extra:void 0,jsAttributes:{},userAttributes:void 0,atts:void 0,transactionName:void 0,tNamePlain:void 0},a={};function s(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");if(!a[e])throw new Error("Info for ".concat(e," was never set"));return a[e]}function c(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All info objects require an agent identifier!");a[e]=(0,i.D)(t,o),(0,n.Qy)(e,a[e],"info")}var u=r(7056);const d=()=>{const e={blockSelector:"[data-nr-block]",maskInputOptions:{password:!0}};return{allow_bfcache:!0,privacy:{cookies_enabled:!0},ajax:{deny_list:void 0,enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},distributed_tracing:{enabled:void 0,exclude_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_newrelic_header:void 0,cors_use_tracecontext_headers:void 0,allowed_origins:void 0},session:{domain:void 0,expiresMs:u.oD,inactiveMs:u.Hb},ssl:void 0,obfuscate:void 0,jserrors:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},metrics:{enabled:!0},page_action:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30},page_view_event:{enabled:!0},page_view_timing:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:30,long_task:!1},session_trace:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10},harvest:{tooManyRequestsDelay:60},session_replay:{enabled:!1,harvestTimeSeconds:60,sampleRate:.1,errorSampleRate:.1,maskTextSelector:"*",maskAllInputs:!0,get blockClass(){return"nr-block"},get ignoreClass(){return"nr-ignore"},get maskTextClass(){return"nr-mask"},get blockSelector(){return e.blockSelector},set blockSelector(t){e.blockSelector+=",".concat(t)},get maskInputOptions(){return e.maskInputOptions},set maskInputOptions(t){e.maskInputOptions={...t,password:!0}}},spa:{enabled:!0,harvestTimeSeconds:10}}},f={};function l(e){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");if(!f[e])throw new Error("Configuration for ".concat(e," was never set"));return f[e]}function h(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");f[e]=(0,i.D)(t,d()),(0,n.Qy)(e,f[e],"config")}function g(e,t){if(!e)throw new Error("All configuration objects require an agent identifier!");var r=l(e);if(r){for(var n=t.split("."),i=0;i {r.d(t,{D:()=>i});var n=r(50);function i(e,t){try{if(!e||"object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires an object as input");if(!t||"object"!=typeof t)return(0,n.Z)("Setting a Configurable requires a model to set its initial properties");const r=Object.create(Object.getPrototypeOf(t),Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptors(t)),o=0===Object.keys(r).length?e:r;for(let a in o)if(void 0!==e[a])try{"object"==typeof e[a]&&"object"==typeof t[a]?r[a]=i(e[a],t[a]):r[a]=e[a]}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occurred while setting a property of a Configurable",e)}return r}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting a Configurable",e)}}},6818:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Re:()=>i,gF:()=>o,q4:()=>n});const n="1.236.0",i="PROD",o="CDN"},385:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{FN:()=>a,IF:()=>u,Nk:()=>f,Tt:()=>s,_A:()=>o,il:()=>n,pL:()=>c,v6:()=>i,w1:()=>d});const n="undefined"!=typeof window&&!!window.document,i="undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis.navigator instanceof WorkerNavigator),o=n?window:"undefined"!=typeof WorkerGlobalScope&&("undefined"!=typeof self&&self instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&self||"undefined"!=typeof globalThis&&globalThis instanceof WorkerGlobalScope&&globalThis),a=""+o?.location,s=/iPad|iPhone|iPod/.test(navigator.userAgent),c=s&&"undefined"==typeof SharedWorker,u=(()=>{const e=navigator.userAgent.match(/Firefox[/\s](\d+\.\d+)/);return Array.isArray(e)&&e.length>=2?+e[1]:0})(),d=Boolean(n&&window.document.documentMode),f=!!navigator.sendBeacon},1117:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{w:()=>o});var n=r(50);const i={agentIdentifier:"",ee:void 0};class o{constructor(e){try{if("object"!=typeof e)return(0,n.Z)("shared context requires an object as input");this.sharedContext={},Object.assign(this.sharedContext,i),Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,r]=e;Object.keys(i).includes(t)&&(this.sharedContext[t]=r)}))}catch(e){(0,n.Z)("An error occured while setting SharedContext",e)}}}},8e3:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{L:()=>d,R:()=>c});var n=r(2177),i=r(1284),o=r(4322),a=r(3325);const s={};function c(e,t){const r={staged:!1,priority:a.p[t]||0};u(e),s[e].get(t)||s[e].set(t,r)}function u(e){e&&(s[e]||(s[e]=new Map))}function d(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:"",t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:"feature";if(u(e),!e||!s[e].get(t))return a(t);s[e].get(t).staged=!0;const r=[...s[e]];function a(t){const r=e?n.ee.get(e):n.ee,a=o.X.handlers;if(r.backlog&&a){var s=r.backlog[t],c=a[t];if(c){for(var u=0;s&&u {let[t,r]=e;return r.staged}))&&(r.sort(((e,t)=>e[1].priority-t[1].priority)),r.forEach((e=>{let[t]=e;a(t)})))}function f(e,t){var r=e[1];(0,i.D)(t[r],(function(t,r){var n=e[0];if(r[0]===n){var i=r[1],o=e[3],a=e[2];i.apply(o,a)}}))}},2177:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{c:()=>f,ee:()=>u});var n=r(8632),i=r(2210),o=r(1284),a=r(5763),s="nr@context";let c=(0,n.fP)();var u;function d(){}function f(e){return(0,i.X)(e,s,l)}function l(){return new d}function h(){u.aborted=!0,u.backlog={}}c.ee?u=c.ee:(u=function e(t,r){var n={},c={},f={},g=!1;try{g=16===r.length&&(0,a.OP)(r).isolatedBacklog}catch(e){}var p={on:b,addEventListener:b,removeEventListener:y,emit:v,get:x,listeners:w,context:m,buffer:A,abort:h,aborted:!1,isBuffering:E,debugId:r,backlog:g?{}:t&&"object"==typeof t.backlog?t.backlog:{}};return p;function m(e){return e&&e instanceof d?e:e?(0,i.X)(e,s,l):l()}function v(e,r,n,i,o){if(!1!==o&&(o=!0),!u.aborted||i){t&&o&&t.emit(e,r,n);for(var a=m(n),s=w(e),d=s.length,f=0;fn,p:()=>i});var n=r(2177).ee.get("handle");function i(e,t,r,i,o){o?(o.buffer([e],i),o.emit(e,t,r)):(n.buffer([e],i),n.emit(e,t,r))}},4322:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>o});var n=r(5546);o.on=a;var i=o.handlers={};function o(e,t,r,o){a(o||n.E,i,e,t,r)}function a(e,t,r,i,o){o||(o="feature"),e||(e=n.E);var a=t[o]=t[o]||{};(a[r]=a[r]||[]).push([e,i])}},3239:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{bP:()=>s,iz:()=>c,m$:()=>a});var n=r(385);let i=!1,o=!1;try{const e={get passive(){return i=!0,!1},get signal(){return o=!0,!1}};n._A.addEventListener("test",null,e),n._A.removeEventListener("test",null,e)}catch(e){}function a(e,t){return i||o?{capture:!!e,passive:i,signal:t}:!!e}function s(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;window.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}function c(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2],n=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;document.addEventListener(e,t,a(r,n))}},4402:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Ht:()=>u,M:()=>c,Rl:()=>a,ky:()=>s});var n=r(385);const i="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-4xxx-yxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx";function o(e,t){return e?15&e[t]:16*Math.random()|0}function a(){const e=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let t,r=0;return e&&e.getRandomValues&&(t=e.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31))),i.split("").map((e=>"x"===e?o(t,++r).toString(16):"y"===e?(3&o()|8).toString(16):e)).join("")}function s(e){const t=n._A?.crypto||n._A?.msCrypto;let r,i=0;t&&t.getRandomValues&&(r=t.getRandomValues(new Uint8Array(31)));const a=[];for(var s=0;s {r.d(t,{Bq:()=>n,Hb:()=>o,oD:()=>i});const n="NRBA",i=144e5,o=18e5},7894:(e,t,r)=>{function n(){return Math.round(performance.now())}r.d(t,{z:()=>n})},7243:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{e:()=>o});var n=r(385),i={};function o(e){if(e in i)return i[e];if(0===(e||"").indexOf("data:"))return{protocol:"data"};let t;var r=n._A?.location,o={};if(n.il)t=document.createElement("a"),t.href=e;else try{t=new URL(e,r.href)}catch(e){return o}o.port=t.port;var a=t.href.split("://");!o.port&&a[1]&&(o.port=a[1].split("/")[0].split("@").pop().split(":")[1]),o.port&&"0"!==o.port||(o.port="https"===a[0]?"443":"80"),o.hostname=t.hostname||r.hostname,o.pathname=t.pathname,o.protocol=a[0],"/"!==o.pathname.charAt(0)&&(o.pathname="/"+o.pathname);var s=!t.protocol||":"===t.protocol||t.protocol===r.protocol,c=t.hostname===r.hostname&&t.port===r.port;return o.sameOrigin=s&&(!t.hostname||c),"/"===o.pathname&&(i[e]=o),o}},50:(e,t,r)=>{function n(e,t){"function"==typeof console.warn&&(console.warn("New Relic: ".concat(e)),t&&console.warn(t))}r.d(t,{Z:()=>n})},2587:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>c,T:()=>u});var n=r(2177),i=r(5546),o=r(8e3),a=r(3325);const s={stn:[a.D.sessionTrace],err:[a.D.jserrors,a.D.metrics],ins:[a.D.pageAction],spa:[a.D.spa],sr:[a.D.sessionReplay,a.D.sessionTrace]};function c(e,t){const r=n.ee.get(t);e&&"object"==typeof e&&(Object.entries(e).forEach((e=>{let[t,n]=e;void 0===u[t]&&(s[t]?s[t].forEach((e=>{n?(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,e,r):(0,i.p)("block-"+t,[],void 0,e,r),(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+t,[Boolean(n)],void 0,e,r)})):n&&(0,i.p)("feat-"+t,[],void 0,void 0,r),u[t]=Boolean(n))})),Object.keys(s).forEach((e=>{void 0===u[e]&&(s[e]?.forEach((t=>(0,i.p)("rumresp-"+e,[!1],void 0,t,r))),u[e]=!1)})),(0,o.L)(t,a.D.pageViewEvent))}const u={}},2210:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{X:()=>i});var n=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty;function i(e,t,r){if(n.call(e,t))return e[t];var i=r();if(Object.defineProperty&&Object.keys)try{return Object.defineProperty(e,t,{value:i,writable:!0,enumerable:!1}),i}catch(e){}return e[t]=i,i}},1284:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n});const n=(e,t)=>Object.entries(e||{}).map((e=>{let[r,n]=e;return t(r,n)}))},4351:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{P:()=>o});var n=r(2177);const i=()=>{const e=new WeakSet;return(t,r)=>{if("object"==typeof r&&null!==r){if(e.has(r))return;e.add(r)}return r}};function o(e){try{return JSON.stringify(e,i())}catch(e){try{n.ee.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}}},3960:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{K:()=>a,b:()=>o});var n=r(3239);function i(){return"undefined"==typeof document||"complete"===document.readyState}function o(e,t){if(i())return e();(0,n.bP)("load",e,t)}function a(e){if(i())return e();(0,n.iz)("DOMContentLoaded",e)}},8632:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{EZ:()=>u,Qy:()=>c,ce:()=>o,fP:()=>a,gG:()=>d,mF:()=>s});var n=r(7894),i=r(385);const o={beacon:"bam.nr-data.net",errorBeacon:"bam.nr-data.net"};function a(){return i._A.NREUM||(i._A.NREUM={}),void 0===i._A.newrelic&&(i._A.newrelic=i._A.NREUM),i._A.NREUM}function s(){let e=a();return e.o||(e.o={ST:i._A.setTimeout,SI:i._A.setImmediate,CT:i._A.clearTimeout,XHR:i._A.XMLHttpRequest,REQ:i._A.Request,EV:i._A.Event,PR:i._A.Promise,MO:i._A.MutationObserver,FETCH:i._A.fetch}),e}function c(e,t,r){let i=a();const o=i.initializedAgents||{},s=o[e]||{};return Object.keys(s).length||(s.initializedAt={ms:(0,n.z)(),date:new Date}),i.initializedAgents={...o,[e]:{...s,[r]:t}},i}function u(e,t){a()[e]=t}function d(){return function(){let e=a();const t=e.info||{};e.info={beacon:o.beacon,errorBeacon:o.errorBeacon,...t}}(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.init||{};e.init={...t}}(),s(),function(){let e=a();const t=e.loader_config||{};e.loader_config={...t}}(),a()}},7956:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{N:()=>i});var n=r(3239);function i(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1],r=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,i=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0;return void(0,n.iz)("visibilitychange",(function(){if(t)return void("hidden"==document.visibilityState&&e());e(document.visibilityState)}),r,i)}},1214:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{em:()=>v,u5:()=>N,QU:()=>S,_L:()=>I,Gm:()=>L,Lg:()=>M,gy:()=>U,BV:()=>Q,Kf:()=>ee});var n=r(2177);const i="nr@original";var o=Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty,a=!1;function s(e,t){return e||(e=n.ee),r.inPlace=function(e,t,n,i,o){n||(n="");var a,s,c,u="-"===n.charAt(0);for(c=0;c 2?n-2:0),o=2;o {r(A[T],e,w),r(E[T],e,w)})),r(l._A,"fetch",y),t.on(y+"end",(function(e,r){var n=this;if(r){var i=r.headers.get("content-length");null!==i&&(n.rxSize=i),t.emit(y+"done",[null,r],n)}else t.emit(y+"done",[e],n)})),t}const O={},j=["pushState","replaceState"];function S(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("history")}(e);return!l.il||O[t.debugId]++||(O[t.debugId]=1,s(t).inPlace(window.history,j,"-")),t}var P=r(3239);const C={},R=["appendChild","insertBefore","replaceChild"];function I(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("jsonp")}(e);if(!l.il||C[t.debugId])return t;C[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=/[?&](?:callback|cb)=([^&#]+)/,o=/(.*)\.([^.]+)/,a=/^(\w+)(\.|$)(.*)$/;function c(e,t){var r=e.match(a),n=r[1],i=r[3];return i?c(i,t[n]):t[n]}return r.inPlace(Node.prototype,R,"dom-"),t.on("dom-start",(function(e){!function(e){if(!e||"string"!=typeof e.nodeName||"script"!==e.nodeName.toLowerCase())return;if("function"!=typeof e.addEventListener)return;var n=(a=e.src,s=a.match(i),s?s[1]:null);var a,s;if(!n)return;var u=function(e){var t=e.match(o);if(t&&t.length>=3)return{key:t[2],parent:c(t[1],window)};return{key:e,parent:window}}(n);if("function"!=typeof u.parent[u.key])return;var d={};function f(){t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}function l(){t.emit("jsonp-error",[],d),t.emit("jsonp-end",[],d),e.removeEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.removeEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1))}r.inPlace(u.parent,[u.key],"cb-",d),e.addEventListener("load",f,(0,P.m$)(!1)),e.addEventListener("error",l,(0,P.m$)(!1)),t.emit("new-jsonp",[e.src],d)}(e[0])})),t}var k=r(5763);const H={};function L(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("mutation")}(e);if(!l.il||H[t.debugId])return t;H[t.debugId]=!0;var r=s(t),i=k.Yu.MO;return i&&(window.MutationObserver=function(e){return this instanceof i?new i(r(e,"fn-")):i.apply(this,arguments)},MutationObserver.prototype=i.prototype),t}const z={};function M(e){const t=function(e){return(e||n.ee).get("promise")}(e);if(z[t.debugId])return t;z[t.debugId]=!0;var r=n.c,o=s(t),a=k.Yu.PR;return a&&function(){function e(r){var n=t.context(),i=o(r,"executor-",n,null,!1);const s=Reflect.construct(a,[i],e);return t.context(s).getCtx=function(){return n},s}l._A.Promise=e,Object.defineProperty(e,"name",{value:"Promise"}),e.toString=function(){return a.toString()},Object.setPrototypeOf(e,a),["all","race"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){let i=!1;[...e||[]].forEach((e=>{this.resolve(e).then(a("all"===r),a(!1))}));const o=n.apply(this,arguments);return o;function a(e){return function(){t.emit("propagate",[null,!i],o,!1,!1),i=i||!e}}}})),["resolve","reject"].forEach((function(r){const n=a[r];e[r]=function(e){const r=n.apply(this,arguments);return e!==r&&t.emit("propagate",[e,!0],r,!1,!1),r}})),e.prototype=a.prototype;const n=a.prototype.then;a.prototype.then=function(){var e=this,i=r(e);i.promise=e;for(var a=arguments.length,s=new Array(a),c=0;c e())),t};function m(e,t){i.inPlace(t,["onreadystatechange"],"fn-",E)}function b(){var e=this,t=r.context(e);e.readyState>3&&!t.resolved&&(t.resolved=!0,r.emit("xhr-resolved",[],e)),i.inPlace(e,f,"fn-",E)}if(function(e,t){for(var r in e)t[r]=e[r]}(o,p),p.prototype=o.prototype,i.inPlace(p.prototype,J,"-xhr-",E),r.on("send-xhr-start",(function(e,t){m(e,t),function(e){h.push(e),a&&(y?y.then(A):u?u(A):(w=-w,x.data=w))}(t)})),r.on("open-xhr-start",m),a){var y=c&&c.resolve();if(!u&&!c){var w=1,x=document.createTextNode(w);new a(A).observe(x,{characterData:!0})}}else t.on("fn-end",(function(e){e[0]&&e[0].type===d||A()}));function A(){for(var e=0;e {r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.ajax},6660:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{A:()=>i,t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.jserrors,i="nr@seenError"},3081:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{gF:()=>o,mY:()=>i,t9:()=>n,vz:()=>s,xS:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.metrics,i="sm",o="cm",a="storeSupportabilityMetrics",s="storeEventMetrics"},4649:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageAction},7633:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{Dz:()=>i,OJ:()=>a,qw:()=>o,t9:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewEvent,i="firstbyte",o="domcontent",a="windowload"},9251:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{t:()=>n});const n=r(3325).D.pageViewTiming},3614:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BST_RESOURCE:()=>i,END:()=>s,FEATURE_NAME:()=>n,FN_END:()=>u,FN_START:()=>c,PUSH_STATE:()=>d,RESOURCE:()=>o,START:()=>a});const n=r(3325).D.sessionTrace,i="bstResource",o="resource",a="-start",s="-end",c="fn"+a,u="fn"+s,d="pushState"},7836:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{BODY:()=>A,CB_END:()=>E,CB_START:()=>u,END:()=>x,FEATURE_NAME:()=>i,FETCH:()=>_,FETCH_BODY:()=>v,FETCH_DONE:()=>m,FETCH_START:()=>p,FN_END:()=>c,FN_START:()=>s,INTERACTION:()=>l,INTERACTION_API:()=>d,INTERACTION_EVENTS:()=>o,JSONP_END:()=>b,JSONP_NODE:()=>g,JS_TIME:()=>T,MAX_TIMER_BUDGET:()=>a,REMAINING:()=>f,SPA_NODE:()=>h,START:()=>w,originalSetTimeout:()=>y});var n=r(5763);const i=r(3325).D.spa,o=["click","submit","keypress","keydown","keyup","change"],a=999,s="fn-start",c="fn-end",u="cb-start",d="api-ixn-",f="remaining",l="interaction",h="spaNode",g="jsonpNode",p="fetch-start",m="fetch-done",v="fetch-body-",b="jsonp-end",y=n.Yu.ST,w="-start",x="-end",A="-body",E="cb"+x,T="jsTime",_="fetch"},5938:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{W:()=>o});var n=r(5763),i=r(2177);class o{constructor(e,t,r){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.aggregator=t,this.ee=i.ee.get(e,(0,n.OP)(this.agentIdentifier).isolatedBacklog),this.featureName=r,this.blocked=!1}}},9144:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{j:()=>m});var n=r(3325),i=r(5763),o=r(5546),a=r(2177),s=r(7894),c=r(8e3),u=r(3960),d=r(385),f=r(50),l=r(3081),h=r(8632);function g(){const e=(0,h.gG)();["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease","addPageAction","setCurrentRouteName","setPageViewName","setCustomAttribute","interaction","noticeError","setUserId"].forEach((t=>{e[t]=function(){for(var r=arguments.length,n=new Array(r),i=0;i 1?r-1:0),i=1;i {e.exposed&&e.api[t]&&o.push(e.api[t](...n))})),o.length>1?o:o[0]}(t,...n)}}))}var p=r(2587);function m(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:{},m=arguments.length>2?arguments[2]:void 0,v=arguments.length>3?arguments[3]:void 0,{init:b,info:y,loader_config:w,runtime:x={loaderType:m},exposed:A=!0}=t;const E=(0,h.gG)();y||(b=E.init,y=E.info,w=E.loader_config),(0,i.Dg)(e,b||{}),(0,i.GE)(e,w||{}),(0,i.sU)(e,x),y.jsAttributes??={},d.v6&&(y.jsAttributes.isWorker=!0),(0,i.CX)(e,y),g();const T=function(e,t){t||(0,c.R)(e,"api");const h={};var g=a.ee.get(e),p=g.get("tracer"),m="api-",v=m+"ixn-";function b(t,r,n,o){const a=(0,i.C5)(e);return null===r?delete a.jsAttributes[t]:(0,i.CX)(e,{...a,jsAttributes:{...a.jsAttributes,[t]:r}}),x(m,n,!0,o||null===r?"session":void 0)(t,r)}function y(){}["setErrorHandler","finished","addToTrace","inlineHit","addRelease"].forEach((e=>h[e]=x(m,e,!0,"api"))),h.addPageAction=x(m,"addPageAction",!0,n.D.pageAction),h.setCurrentRouteName=x(m,"routeName",!0,n.D.spa),h.setPageViewName=function(t,r){if("string"==typeof t)return"/"!==t.charAt(0)&&(t="/"+t),(0,i.OP)(e).customTransaction=(r||"http://custom.transaction")+t,x(m,"setPageViewName",!0)()},h.setCustomAttribute=function(e,t){let r=arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2]&&arguments[2];if("string"==typeof e){if(["string","number"].includes(typeof t)||null===t)return b(e,t,"setCustomAttribute",r);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nNon-null value must be a string or number type, but a type of was provided."))}else(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setCustomAttribute.\nName must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.setUserId=function(e){if("string"==typeof e||null===e)return b("enduser.id",e,"setUserId",!0);(0,f.Z)("Failed to execute setUserId.\nNon-null value must be a string type, but a type of was provided."))},h.interaction=function(){return(new y).get()};var w=y.prototype={createTracer:function(e,t){var r={},i=this,a="function"==typeof t;return(0,o.p)(v+"tracer",[(0,s.z)(),e,r],i,n.D.spa,g),function(){if(p.emit((a?"":"no-")+"fn-start",[(0,s.z)(),i,a],r),a)try{return t.apply(this,arguments)}catch(e){throw p.emit("fn-err",[arguments,this,"string"==typeof e?new Error(e):e],r),e}finally{p.emit("fn-end",[(0,s.z)()],r)}}}};function x(e,t,r,i){return function(){return(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/"+t+"/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),i&&(0,o.p)(e+t,[(0,s.z)(),...arguments],r?null:this,i,g),r?void 0:this}}function A(){r.e(439).then(r.bind(r,7438)).then((t=>{let{setAPI:r}=t;r(e),(0,c.L)(e,"api")})).catch((()=>(0,f.Z)("Downloading runtime APIs failed...")))}return["actionText","setName","setAttribute","save","ignore","onEnd","getContext","end","get"].forEach((e=>{w[e]=x(v,e,void 0,n.D.spa)})),h.noticeError=function(e,t){"string"==typeof e&&(e=new Error(e)),(0,o.p)(l.xS,["API/noticeError/called"],void 0,n.D.metrics,g),(0,o.p)("err",[e,(0,s.z)(),!1,t],void 0,n.D.jserrors,g)},d.il?(0,u.b)((()=>A()),!0):A(),h}(e,v);return(0,h.Qy)(e,T,"api"),(0,h.Qy)(e,A,"exposed"),(0,h.EZ)("activatedFeatures",p.T),T}},3325:(e,t,r)=>{r.d(t,{D:()=>n,p:()=>i});const n={ajax:"ajax",jserrors:"jserrors",metrics:"metrics",pageAction:"page_action",pageViewEvent:"page_view_event",pageViewTiming:"page_view_timing",sessionReplay:"session_replay",sessionTrace:"session_trace",spa:"spa"},i={[n.pageViewEvent]:1,[n.pageViewTiming]:2,[n.metrics]:3,[n.jserrors]:4,[n.ajax]:5,[n.sessionTrace]:6,[n.pageAction]:7,[n.spa]:8,[n.sessionReplay]:9}}},n={};function i(e){var t=n[e];if(void 0!==t)return t.exports;var o=n[e]={exports:{}};return r[e](o,o.exports,i),o.exports}i.m=r,i.d=(e,t)=>{for(var r in t)i.o(t,r)&&!i.o(e,r)&&Object.defineProperty(e,r,{enumerable:!0,get:t[r]})},i.f={},i.e=e=>Promise.all(Object.keys(i.f).reduce(((t,r)=>(i.f[r](e,t),t)),[])),i.u=e=>(({78:"page_action-aggregate",147:"metrics-aggregate",242:"session-manager",317:"jserrors-aggregate",348:"page_view_timing-aggregate",412:"lazy-feature-loader",439:"async-api",538:"recorder",590:"session_replay-aggregate",675:"compressor",733:"session_trace-aggregate",786:"page_view_event-aggregate",873:"spa-aggregate",898:"ajax-aggregate"}[e]||e)+"."+{78:"ac76d497",147:"3dc53903",148:"1a20d5fe",242:"2a64278a",317:"49e41428",348:"bd6de33a",412:"2f55ce66",439:"30bd804e",538:"1b18459f",590:"cf0efb30",675:"ae9f91a8",733:"83105561",786:"06482edd",860:"03a8b7a5",873:"e6b09d52",898:"998ef92b"}[e]+"-1.236.0.min.js"),i.o=(e,t)=>Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(e,t),e={},t="NRBA:",i.l=(r,n,o,a)=>{if(e[r])e[r].push(n);else{var s,c;if(void 0!==o)for(var u=document.getElementsByTagName("script"),d=0;d {s.onerror=s.onload=null,clearTimeout(h);var i=e[r];if(delete e[r],s.parentNode&&s.parentNode.removeChild(s),i&&i.forEach((e=>e(n))),t)return t(n)},h=setTimeout(l.bind(null,void 0,{type:"timeout",target:s}),12e4);s.onerror=l.bind(null,s.onerror),s.onload=l.bind(null,s.onload),c&&document.head.appendChild(s)}},i.r=e=>{"undefined"!=typeof Symbol&&Symbol.toStringTag&&Object.defineProperty(e,Symbol.toStringTag,{value:"Module"}),Object.defineProperty(e,"__esModule",{value:!0})},i.j=364,i.p="https://js-agent.newrelic.com/",(()=>{var e={364:0,953:0};i.f.j=(t,r)=>{var n=i.o(e,t)?e[t]:void 0;if(0!==n)if(n)r.push(n[2]);else{var o=new Promise(((r,i)=>n=e[t]=[r,i]));r.push(n[2]=o);var a=i.p+i.u(t),s=new Error;i.l(a,(r=>{if(i.o(e,t)&&(0!==(n=e[t])&&(e[t]=void 0),n)){var o=r&&("load"===r.type?"missing":r.type),a=r&&r.target&&r.target.src;s.message="Loading chunk "+t+" failed.\n("+o+": "+a+")",s.name="ChunkLoadError",s.type=o,s.request=a,n[1](s)}}),"chunk-"+t,t)}};var t=(t,r)=>{var n,o,[a,s,c]=r,u=0;if(a.some((t=>0!==e[t]))){for(n in s)i.o(s,n)&&(i.m[n]=s[n]);if(c)c(i)}for(t&&t(r);u {i.r(o);var e=i(3325),t=i(5763);const r=Object.values(e.D);function n(e){const n={};return r.forEach((r=>{n[r]=function(e,r){return!1!==(0,t.Mt)(r,"".concat(e,".enabled"))}(r,e)})),n}var a=i(9144);var s=i(5546),c=i(385),u=i(8e3),d=i(5938),f=i(3960),l=i(50);class h extends d.W{constructor(e,t,r){let n=!(arguments.length>3&&void 0!==arguments[3])||arguments[3];super(e,t,r),this.auto=n,this.abortHandler,this.featAggregate,this.onAggregateImported,n&&(0,u.R)(e,r)}importAggregator(){let e=arguments.length>0&&void 0!==arguments[0]?arguments[0]:{};if(this.featAggregate||!this.auto)return;const r=c.il&&!0===(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"privacy.cookies_enabled");let n;this.onAggregateImported=new Promise((e=>{n=e}));const o=async()=>{let t;try{if(r){const{setupAgentSession:e}=await Promise.all([i.e(860),i.e(242)]).then(i.bind(i,3228));t=e(this.agentIdentifier)}}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("A problem occurred when starting up session manager. This page will not start or extend any session.",e)}try{if(!this.shouldImportAgg(this.featureName,t))return void(0,u.L)(this.agentIdentifier,this.featureName);const{lazyFeatureLoader:r}=await i.e(412).then(i.bind(i,8582)),{Aggregate:o}=await r(this.featureName,"aggregate");this.featAggregate=new o(this.agentIdentifier,this.aggregator,e),n(!0)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Downloading and initializing ".concat(this.featureName," failed..."),e),this.abortHandler?.(),n(!1)}};c.il?(0,f.b)((()=>o()),!0):o()}shouldImportAgg(r,n){return r!==e.D.sessionReplay||!1!==(0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"session_trace.enabled")&&(!!n?.isNew||!!n?.state.sessionReplay)}}var g=i(7633),p=i(7894);class m extends h{static featureName=g.t9;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];if(super(r,n,g.t9,i),("undefined"==typeof PerformanceNavigationTiming||c.Tt)&&"undefined"!=typeof PerformanceTiming){const n=(0,t.OP)(r);n[g.Dz]=Math.max(Date.now()-n.offset,0),(0,f.K)((()=>n[g.qw]=Math.max((0,p.z)()-n[g.Dz],0))),(0,f.b)((()=>{const t=(0,p.z)();n[g.OJ]=Math.max(t-n[g.Dz],0),(0,s.p)("timing",["load",t],void 0,e.D.pageViewTiming,this.ee)}))}this.importAggregator()}}var v=i(1117),b=i(1284);class y extends v.w{constructor(e){super(e),this.aggregatedData={}}store(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,r,i);return o.metrics=function(e,t){t||(t={count:0});return t.count+=1,(0,b.D)(e,(function(e,r){t[e]=w(r,t[e])})),t}(n,o.metrics),o}merge(e,t,r,n,i){var o=this.getBucket(e,t,n,i);if(o.metrics){var a=o.metrics;a.count+=r.count,(0,b.D)(r,(function(e,t){if("count"!==e){var n=a[e],i=r[e];i&&!i.c?a[e]=w(i.t,n):a[e]=function(e,t){if(!t)return e;t.c||(t=x(t.t));return t.min=Math.min(e.min,t.min),t.max=Math.max(e.max,t.max),t.t+=e.t,t.sos+=e.sos,t.c+=e.c,t}(i,a[e])}}))}else o.metrics=r}storeMetric(e,t,r,n){var i=this.getBucket(e,t,r);return i.stats=w(n,i.stats),i}getBucket(e,t,r,n){this.aggregatedData[e]||(this.aggregatedData[e]={});var i=this.aggregatedData[e][t];return i||(i=this.aggregatedData[e][t]={params:r||{}},n&&(i.custom=n)),i}get(e,t){return t?this.aggregatedData[e]&&this.aggregatedData[e][t]:this.aggregatedData[e]}take(e){for(var t={},r="",n=!1,i=0;i t.max&&(t.max=e),e 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,r,j.t,n),c.il&&((0,t.OP)(e).initHidden=Boolean("hidden"===document.visibilityState),(0,N.N)((()=>(0,s.p)("docHidden",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee)),!0),(0,O.bP)("pagehide",(()=>(0,s.p)("winPagehide",[(0,p.z)()],void 0,j.t,this.ee))),this.importAggregator())}}var P=i(3081);class C extends h{static featureName=P.t9;constructor(e,t){let r=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,P.t9,r),this.importAggregator()}}var R,I=i(2210),k=i(1214),H=i(2177),L={};try{R=localStorage.getItem("__nr_flags").split(","),console&&"function"==typeof console.log&&(L.console=!0,-1!==R.indexOf("dev")&&(L.dev=!0),-1!==R.indexOf("nr_dev")&&(L.nrDev=!0))}catch(e){}function z(e){try{L.console&&z(e)}catch(e){}}L.nrDev&&H.ee.on("internal-error",(function(e){z(e.stack)})),L.dev&&H.ee.on("fn-err",(function(e,t,r){z(r.stack)})),L.dev&&(z("NR AGENT IN DEVELOPMENT MODE"),z("flags: "+(0,b.D)(L,(function(e,t){return e})).join(", ")));var M=i(6660);class B extends h{static featureName=M.t;constructor(r,n){let i=!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,M.t,i),this.skipNext=0;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}const o=this;o.ee.on("fn-start",(function(e,t,r){o.abortHandler&&(o.skipNext+=1)})),o.ee.on("fn-err",(function(t,r,n){o.abortHandler&&!n[M.A]&&((0,I.X)(n,M.A,(function(){return!0})),this.thrown=!0,(0,s.p)("err",[n,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee))})),o.ee.on("fn-end",(function(){o.abortHandler&&!this.thrown&&o.skipNext>0&&(o.skipNext-=1)})),o.ee.on("internal-error",(function(t){(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,o.ee)})),this.origOnerror=c._A.onerror,c._A.onerror=this.onerrorHandler.bind(this),c._A.addEventListener("unhandledrejection",(t=>{const r=function(e){let t="Unhandled Promise Rejection: ";if(e instanceof Error)try{return e.message=t+e.message,e}catch(t){return e}if(void 0===e)return new Error(t);try{return new Error(t+(0,D.P)(e))}catch(e){return new Error(t)}}(t.reason);(0,s.p)("err",[r,(0,p.z)(),!1,{unhandledPromiseRejection:1}],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}),(0,O.m$)(!1,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),(0,k.gy)(this.ee),(0,k.BV)(this.ee),(0,k.em)(this.ee),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}onerrorHandler(t,r,n,i,o){"function"==typeof this.origOnerror&&this.origOnerror(...arguments);try{this.skipNext?this.skipNext-=1:(0,s.p)("err",[o||new F(t,r,n),(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(t){try{(0,s.p)("ierr",[t,(0,p.z)(),!0],void 0,e.D.jserrors,this.ee)}catch(e){}}return!1}}function F(e,t,r){this.message=e||"Uncaught error with no additional information",this.sourceURL=t,this.line=r}let U=1;const q="nr@id";function G(e){const t=typeof e;return!e||"object"!==t&&"function"!==t?-1:e===c._A?0:(0,I.X)(e,q,(function(){return U++}))}function V(e){if("string"==typeof e&&e.length)return e.length;if("object"==typeof e){if("undefined"!=typeof ArrayBuffer&&e instanceof ArrayBuffer&&e.byteLength)return e.byteLength;if("undefined"!=typeof Blob&&e instanceof Blob&&e.size)return e.size;if(!("undefined"!=typeof FormData&&e instanceof FormData))try{return(0,D.P)(e).length}catch(e){return}}}var X=i(7243);class W{constructor(e){this.agentIdentifier=e,this.generateTracePayload=this.generateTracePayload.bind(this),this.shouldGenerateTrace=this.shouldGenerateTrace.bind(this)}generateTracePayload(e){if(!this.shouldGenerateTrace(e))return null;var r=(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier);if(!r)return null;var n=(r.accountID||"").toString()||null,i=(r.agentID||"").toString()||null,o=(r.trustKey||"").toString()||null;if(!n||!i)return null;var a=(0,_.M)(),s=(0,_.Ht)(),c=Date.now(),u={spanId:a,traceId:s,timestamp:c};return(e.sameOrigin||this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useTraceContextHeadersForCors())&&(u.traceContextParentHeader=this.generateTraceContextParentHeader(a,s),u.traceContextStateHeader=this.generateTraceContextStateHeader(a,c,n,i,o)),(e.sameOrigin&&!this.excludeNewrelicHeader()||!e.sameOrigin&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)&&this.useNewrelicHeaderForCors())&&(u.newrelicHeader=this.generateTraceHeader(a,s,c,n,i,o)),u}generateTraceContextParentHeader(e,t){return"00-"+t+"-"+e+"-01"}generateTraceContextStateHeader(e,t,r,n,i){return i+"@nr=0-1-"+r+"-"+n+"-"+e+"----"+t}generateTraceHeader(e,t,r,n,i,o){if(!("function"==typeof c._A?.btoa))return null;var a={v:[0,1],d:{ty:"Browser",ac:n,ap:i,id:e,tr:t,ti:r}};return o&&n!==o&&(a.d.tk=o),btoa((0,D.P)(a))}shouldGenerateTrace(e){return this.isDtEnabled()&&this.isAllowedOrigin(e)}isAllowedOrigin(e){var r=!1,n={};if((0,t.Mt)(this.agentIdentifier,"distributed_tracing")&&(n=(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier).distributed_tracing),e.sameOrigin)r=!0;else if(n.allowed_origins instanceof Array)for(var i=0;i 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(r,n,Z.t,i),(0,t.OP)(r).xhrWrappable&&(this.dt=new W(r),this.handler=(e,t,r,n)=>(0,s.p)(e,t,r,n,this.ee),(0,k.u5)(this.ee),(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),function(r,n,i,o){function a(e){var t=this;t.totalCbs=0,t.called=0,t.cbTime=0,t.end=E,t.ended=!1,t.xhrGuids={},t.lastSize=null,t.loadCaptureCalled=!1,t.params=this.params||{},t.metrics=this.metrics||{},e.addEventListener("load",(function(r){_(t,e)}),(0,O.m$)(!1)),c.IF||e.addEventListener("progress",(function(e){t.lastSize=e.loaded}),(0,O.m$)(!1))}function s(e){this.params={method:e[0]},T(this,e[1]),this.metrics={}}function u(e,n){var i=(0,t.DL)(r);i.xpid&&this.sameOrigin&&n.setRequestHeader("X-NewRelic-ID",i.xpid);var a=o.generateTracePayload(this.parsedOrigin);if(a){var s=!1;a.newrelicHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("newrelic",a.newrelicHeader),s=!0),a.traceContextParentHeader&&(n.setRequestHeader("traceparent",a.traceContextParentHeader),a.traceContextStateHeader&&n.setRequestHeader("tracestate",a.traceContextStateHeader),s=!0),s&&(this.dt=a)}}function d(e,t){var r=this.metrics,i=e[0],o=this;if(r&&i){var a=V(i);a&&(r.txSize=a)}this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.listener=function(e){try{"abort"!==e.type||o.loadCaptureCalled||(o.params.aborted=!0),("load"!==e.type||o.called===o.totalCbs&&(o.onloadCalled||"function"!=typeof t.onload)&&"function"==typeof o.end)&&o.end(t)}catch(e){try{n.emit("internal-error",[e])}catch(e){}}};for(var s=0;s 1?e[1]=i:e.push(i)}else e[0]&&e[0].headers&&s(e[0].headers,n)&&(this.dt=n);function s(e,t){var r=!1;return t.newrelicHeader&&(e.set("newrelic",t.newrelicHeader),r=!0),t.traceContextParentHeader&&(e.set("traceparent",t.traceContextParentHeader),t.traceContextStateHeader&&e.set("tracestate",t.traceContextStateHeader),r=!0),r}}function x(e,t){this.params={},this.metrics={},this.startTime=(0,p.z)(),this.dt=t,e.length>=1&&(this.target=e[0]),e.length>=2&&(this.opts=e[1]);var r,n=this.opts||{},i=this.target;"string"==typeof i?r=i:"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof Y?r=i.url:c._A?.URL&&"object"==typeof i&&i instanceof URL&&(r=i.href),T(this,r);var o=(""+(i&&i instanceof Y&&i.method||n.method||"GET")).toUpperCase();this.params.method=o,this.txSize=V(n.body)||0}function A(t,r){var n;this.endTime=(0,p.z)(),this.params||(this.params={}),this.params.status=r?r.status:0,"string"==typeof this.rxSize&&this.rxSize.length>0&&(n=+this.rxSize);var o={txSize:this.txSize,rxSize:n,duration:(0,p.z)()-this.startTime};i("xhr",[this.params,o,this.startTime,this.endTime,"fetch"],this,e.D.ajax)}function E(t){var r=this.params,n=this.metrics;if(!this.ended){this.ended=!0;for(var o=0;o 2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2];super(e,t,we.t,r),this.importAggregator()}}new class{constructor(e){let t=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]?arguments[1]:(0,_.ky)(16);c._A?(this.agentIdentifier=t,this.sharedAggregator=new y({agentIdentifier:this.agentIdentifier}),this.features={},this.desiredFeatures=new Set(e.features||[]),this.desiredFeatures.add(m),Object.assign(this,(0,a.j)(this.agentIdentifier,e,e.loaderType||"agent")),this.start()):(0,l.Z)("Failed to initial the agent. Could not determine the runtime environment.")}get config(){return{info:(0,t.C5)(this.agentIdentifier),init:(0,t.P_)(this.agentIdentifier),loader_config:(0,t.DL)(this.agentIdentifier),runtime:(0,t.OP)(this.agentIdentifier)}}start(){const t="features";try{const r=n(this.agentIdentifier),i=[...this.desiredFeatures];i.sort(((t,r)=>e.p[t.featureName]-e.p[r.featureName])),i.forEach((t=>{if(r[t.featureName]||t.featureName===e.D.pageViewEvent){const n=function(t){switch(t){case e.D.ajax:return[e.D.jserrors];case e.D.sessionTrace:return[e.D.ajax,e.D.pageViewEvent];case e.D.sessionReplay:return[e.D.sessionTrace];case e.D.pageViewTiming:return[e.D.pageViewEvent];default:return[]}}(t.featureName);n.every((e=>r[e]))||(0,l.Z)("".concat(t.featureName," is enabled but one or more dependent features has been disabled (").concat((0,D.P)(n),"). This may cause unintended consequences or missing data...")),this.features[t.featureName]=new t(this.agentIdentifier,this.sharedAggregator)}})),(0,T.Qy)(this.agentIdentifier,this.features,t)}catch(e){(0,l.Z)("Failed to initialize all enabled instrument classes (agent aborted) -",e);for(const e in this.features)this.features[e].abortHandler?.();const r=(0,T.fP)();return delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.api,delete r.initializedAgents[this.agentIdentifier]?.[t],delete this.sharedAggregator,r.ee?.abort(),delete r.ee?.get(this.agentIdentifier),!1}}}({features:[J,m,S,class extends h{static featureName=oe;constructor(t,r){if(super(t,r,oe,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;const n=this.ee;let i;(0,k.QU)(n),this.eventsEE=(0,k.em)(n),this.eventsEE.on(se,(function(e,t){this.bstStart=(0,p.z)()})),this.eventsEE.on(ae,(function(t,r){(0,s.p)("bst",[t[0],r,this.bstStart,(0,p.z)()],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),n.on(ce+ne,(function(e){this.time=(0,p.z)(),this.startPath=location.pathname+location.hash})),n.on(ce+ie,(function(t){(0,s.p)("bstHist",[location.pathname+location.hash,this.startPath,this.time],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)}));try{i=new PerformanceObserver((t=>{const r=t.getEntries();(0,s.p)(te,[r],void 0,e.D.sessionTrace,n)})),i.observe({type:re,buffered:!0})}catch(e){}this.importAggregator({resourceObserver:i})}},C,xe,B,class extends h{static featureName=de;constructor(e,r){if(super(e,r,de,!(arguments.length>2&&void 0!==arguments[2])||arguments[2]),!c.il)return;if(!(0,t.OP)(e).xhrWrappable)return;try{this.removeOnAbort=new AbortController}catch(e){}let n,i=0;const o=this.ee.get("tracer"),a=(0,k._L)(this.ee),s=(0,k.Lg)(this.ee),u=(0,k.BV)(this.ee),d=(0,k.Kf)(this.ee),f=this.ee.get("events"),l=(0,k.u5)(this.ee),h=(0,k.QU)(this.ee),g=(0,k.Gm)(this.ee);function m(e,t){h.emit("newURL",[""+window.location,t])}function v(){i++,n=window.location.hash,this[ve]=(0,p.z)()}function b(){i--,window.location.hash!==n&&m(0,!0);var e=(0,p.z)();this[pe]=~~this[pe]+e-this[ve],this[ye]=e}function y(e,t){e.on(t,(function(){this[t]=(0,p.z)()}))}this.ee.on(ve,v),s.on(be,v),a.on(be,v),this.ee.on(ye,b),s.on(ge,b),a.on(ge,b),this.ee.buffer([ve,ye,"xhr-resolved"],this.featureName),f.buffer([ve],this.featureName),u.buffer(["setTimeout"+le,"clearTimeout"+fe,ve],this.featureName),d.buffer([ve,"new-xhr","send-xhr"+fe],this.featureName),l.buffer([me+fe,me+"-done",me+he+fe,me+he+le],this.featureName),h.buffer(["newURL"],this.featureName),g.buffer([ve],this.featureName),s.buffer(["propagate",be,ge,"executor-err","resolve"+fe],this.featureName),o.buffer([ve,"no-"+ve],this.featureName),a.buffer(["new-jsonp","cb-start","jsonp-error","jsonp-end"],this.featureName),y(l,me+fe),y(l,me+"-done"),y(a,"new-jsonp"),y(a,"jsonp-end"),y(a,"cb-start"),h.on("pushState-end",m),h.on("replaceState-end",m),window.addEventListener("hashchange",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("load",m,(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),window.addEventListener("popstate",(function(){m(0,i>1)}),(0,O.m$)(!0,this.removeOnAbort?.signal)),this.abortHandler=this.#e,this.importAggregator()}#e(){this.removeOnAbort?.abort(),this.abortHandler=void 0}}],loaderType:"spa"})})(),window.NRBA=o})(); window.jQuery || document.write(' ') CKEDITOR_BASEPATH='https://f1000research.com/js/vendor/ckeditor/' window.reactTheme = 'research'; window.MathJax = { CommonHTML: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, 'HTML-CSS': { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, SVG: { linebreaks: { automatic: true } }, AuthorInit: function() { MathJax.Hub.Register.MessageHook('End Process', function () { let timeout = false; // holder for timeout id const delay = 250; // delay after event is "complete" to run callback const reflowMath = function() { const dispFormulas = document.querySelectorAll('.disp-formula.panel'); if (!dispFormulas) { return; } for (const dispFormula of dispFormulas) { const child = dispFormula.querySelector('.MathJax_Preview').nextSibling.firstChild; const isMultiline = MathJax.Hub.getAllJax(dispFormula)[0].root.isMultiline; if (dispFormula.offsetWidth < child.offsetWidth || isMultiline) { MathJax.Hub.Queue(['Rerender', MathJax.Hub, dispFormula]); } } }; window.addEventListener('resize', function() { clearTimeout(timeout); // clear the timeout timeout = setTimeout(reflowMath, delay); // start timing for event "completion" }); }); }, }; if (window.location.hash == '#_=_'){ window.location = window.location.href.split('#')[0] } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function() {n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)} ;if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0';n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script','https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq('init', '1641728616063202'); fbq('track', "PixelInitialized", {}); (function(h,o,t,j,a,r){ h.hj=h.hj||function(){(h.hj.q=h.hj.q||[]).push(arguments)}; h._hjSettings={hjid:2318163,hjsv:6}; a=o.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]; r=o.createElement('script');r.async=1; r.src=t+h._hjSettings.hjid+j+h._hjSettings.hjsv; a.appendChild(r); })(window,document,'https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-','.js?sv='); search file_upload Submit your research search menu close search Browse Gateways & Collections How to Publish Submit your Research My Submissions Article Guidelines Article Guidelines (New Versions) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines Open Data and Accessible Source Materials Guidelines (HSS) Open Data, Software and Code Guidelines (PSE) Prepublication Checks Production Process Posters and Slides Guidelines Document Guidelines Article Processing Charges Peer Review Finding Article Reviewers About How it Works For Reviewers Our Advisors Policies Glossary FAQs For Developers Newsroom Contact My Research Submissions Content and Tracking Alerts My Details Sign In file_upload Submit your research { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ScholarlyArticle", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361" }, "headline": "The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled...", "datePublished": "2023-10-18T14:24:34", "dateModified": "2024-03-19T15:07:12", "author": [ { "@type": "Person", "name": "Dimitrios Tsimouris" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "E. Grammatopoulou" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "Maria Papandreou" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "George Gioftsos" }, { "@type": "Person", "name": "George Koumantakis" } ], "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "F1000Research", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 480, "width": 60 } }, "image": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://f1000research.com/img/AMP/F1000Research_image.png", "height": 1200, "width": 150 }, "description": " Background Diaphragm dysfunction is prevalent among individuals with asthma due to lung hyperinflation and hyperventilation in asthma paroxysm. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma. Methods Adults with diagnosed stable asthma (n = 24), will be recruited from the General Hospital of Kifissia “Agioi Anargyroi” in Athens, Greece. The volunteers who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to two groups: (a) the experimental group (n = 12) that will receive 12 sessions of MDRT in conjunction with breathing retraining exercises (BRE), and (b) the control group (n = 12) that will receive 12 sessions of BRE. Measurements will occur at three time points: before the initiation of treatment sessions (week 0), followed by 12 treatment sessions (week 6), and three months from the beginning of the trial (week 12). The main outcomes will be the diaphragm excursion (ultrasonography) and chest expansion (inch tape), with secondary outcomes the maximal respiratory pressures (digital pressure manometer), dysfunctional breathing (Nijmegen questionnaire), asthma control (ACT), dyspnea (Borg scale) and quality of life (SF-12v2). Discussion The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm’s function in individuals with asthma. Manual Therapy (MT) is a low-cost alternative and supplementary therapy to standard treatment procedures that might improve the biomechanics of respiration in pulmonary rehabilitation. Trial Registration Registered on Clinical Trials.gov (ID: NCT05709054) Protocol version 29/09/2023 " } { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "1", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/", "name": "Home" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "2", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/browse/articles", "name": "Browse" } }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": "3", "item": { "@id": "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361", "name": "The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with..." } } ] } Home Browse The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with... ALL Metrics - Views Downloads Get PDF Get XML Cite How to cite this article Tsimouris D, Grammatopoulou E, Papandreou M et al. The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141455.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. Close Copy Citation Details Export Export Citation Sciwheel EndNote Ref. Manager Bibtex ProCite Sente EXPORT Select a format first Track Share ▬ ✚ Study Protocol Revised The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] Dimitrios Tsimouris https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-4440 1 , E. Grammatopoulou 1 , Maria Papandreou 1 , George Gioftsos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-3114 1 , George Koumantakis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7709-2802 1 Dimitrios Tsimouris https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-4440 1 , E. Grammatopoulou 1 , [...] Maria Papandreou 1 , George Gioftsos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3368-3114 1 , George Koumantakis https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7709-2802 1 PUBLISHED 19 Mar 2024 Author details Author details 1 Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243, Greece Dimitrios Tsimouris Roles: Project Administration, Writing – Review & Editing E. Grammatopoulou Roles: Supervision Maria Papandreou Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis George Gioftsos Roles: Funding Acquisition, Resources George Koumantakis Roles: Investigation OPEN PEER REVIEW DETAILS REVIEWER STATUS This article is included in the HEAL1000 gateway. Abstract Background Diaphragm dysfunction is prevalent among individuals with asthma due to lung hyperinflation and hyperventilation in asthma paroxysm. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma. Methods Adults with diagnosed stable asthma (n = 24), will be recruited from the General Hospital of Kifissia “Agioi Anargyroi” in Athens, Greece. The volunteers who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to two groups: (a) the experimental group (n = 12) that will receive 12 sessions of MDRT in conjunction with breathing retraining exercises (BRE), and (b) the control group (n = 12) that will receive 12 sessions of BRE. Measurements will occur at three time points: before the initiation of treatment sessions (week 0), followed by 12 treatment sessions (week 6), and three months from the beginning of the trial (week 12). The main outcomes will be the diaphragm excursion (ultrasonography) and chest expansion (inch tape), with secondary outcomes the maximal respiratory pressures (digital pressure manometer), dysfunctional breathing (Nijmegen questionnaire), asthma control (ACT), dyspnea (Borg scale) and quality of life (SF-12v2). Discussion The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm’s function in individuals with asthma. Manual Therapy (MT) is a low-cost alternative and supplementary therapy to standard treatment procedures that might improve the biomechanics of respiration in pulmonary rehabilitation. Trial Registration Registered on Clinical Trials.gov (ID: NCT05709054) Protocol version 29/09/2023 READ ALL READ LESS Keywords Key Words: Asthma; Manual Therapy; Diaphragm; Breathing retraining exercises; Diaphragm mobility, Ultrasound Corresponding Author(s) Dimitrios Tsimouris ( [email protected] ) Close Corresponding author: Dimitrios Tsimouris Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Copyright: © 2024 Tsimouris D et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. How to cite: Tsimouris D, Grammatopoulou E, Papandreou M et al. The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141455.2 ) First published: 18 Oct 2023, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141455.1 ) Latest published: 19 Mar 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141455.2 ) Revised Amendments from Version 1 Revisions made include changes to the text, new or revised/updated figures, updates to the author list, and additional data. Specifically, in response to the reviewers' comments and our own observations, we made 15 modifications at the level of text editing in sections including Introduction, Methods, Outcome Measures, Sample Size Calculation, Statistical Analysis, Declaration of Interests, and Discussion. We have adjusted sentences and paragraphs to enhance the clarity of sections, provided a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function and respiratory muscle strength, and emphasized the potential of the manual diaphragm release technique as a therapeutic intervention. This allows readers to better grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. We have also highlighted the impact on the research field and the research gap in the discussion section as requested. Additionally, we have added a table to enhance the reader's understanding of the therapeutic plan of our study. Furthermore, we have incorporated 11 new references into the main text where necessary. Finally, we have adjusted the reference list to the correct order during the typesetting process. We believe that these revisions significantly strengthen the quality and impact of our study and are confident that it will contribute meaningfully to the literature on asthma management. Revisions made include changes to the text, new or revised/updated figures, updates to the author list, and additional data. Specifically, in response to the reviewers' comments and our own observations, we made 15 modifications at the level of text editing in sections including Introduction, Methods, Outcome Measures, Sample Size Calculation, Statistical Analysis, Declaration of Interests, and Discussion. We have adjusted sentences and paragraphs to enhance the clarity of sections, provided a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function and respiratory muscle strength, and emphasized the potential of the manual diaphragm release technique as a therapeutic intervention. This allows readers to better grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. We have also highlighted the impact on the research field and the research gap in the discussion section as requested. Additionally, we have added a table to enhance the reader's understanding of the therapeutic plan of our study. Furthermore, we have incorporated 11 new references into the main text where necessary. Finally, we have adjusted the reference list to the correct order during the typesetting process. We believe that these revisions significantly strengthen the quality and impact of our study and are confident that it will contribute meaningfully to the literature on asthma management. See the authors' detailed response to the review by Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira See the authors' detailed response to the review by Ragab K. Elnaggar READ REVIEWER RESPONSES Introduction Due to its anatomical structure and contribution to minute ventilation (60–80%), the diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle. 1 – 3 An impaired diaphragm is associated with respiratory symptoms such as dyspnea, intolerance to exercise and sleep problems. 4 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are umbrella terms for various conditions characterized by chronic airway disease. 5 COPD and asthma patients frequently experience diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD). 6 The diaphragm’s ability to raise and expand the lower ribcage within the zone of apposition (ZOA), where the lower ribcage directly interacts with the diaphragm becomes compromised due to mechanical challenges. This is due to the diaphragm functioning at a disadvantageous shortened position caused by air trapping, which hinders its contraction capacity and increases the respiratory workload. 7 In COPD, air progressively remains trapped in the lungs due to airway constriction. The architecture of the thoracic cage is disrupted by this clinical condition during exercise and rest, reducing the diaphragm’s physiological advantage. 8 , 9 Similarly, Individuals with moderate to severe asthma may have pulmonary overstretching (asthma paroxysm), which can cause functional problems because it reduces expiratory flow (early airway closure), activates inspiratory muscles at the end of expiration, and reduces lung flexibility. 10 – 12 Although the underlying mechanisms for these two lung conditions, COPD and asthma, differ, both cause secondary complications (pulmonary hyperinflation, hyperventilation syndrome). These features lead to similar pathological changes that impair the diaphragm’s ability to elevate and expand the lower ribcage. 13 Consequently, during inspiration, the lower ribcage’s transverse diameter may decrease. 14 It’s also important to note that the mechanical disadvantage of the diaphragm in asthma can result in an increased workload for all inspiratory muscles, particularly during exercise, where dynamic hyperinflation may occur, leading to heightened dyspnea. 15 , 16 Over the past few decades, two research questions have emerged concerning how physiotherapy can enhance the mechanical efficiency of the thorax and the effectiveness of respiratory muscles during breathing in people with obstructive lung diseases. Researchers, from 1990 17 up to 2015, 18 have made several hypotheses and implemented physiotherapy interventions to find which procedure is more appropriate to improve the effectiveness of mechanical functioning of the thoracic cage in people with pulmonary diseases. Breathing retraining exercises (BRE) are a widely used, productive method, 19 – 21 simple, safe, accessible, with a high level of evidence-based efficacy. 22 – 24 Finally, although specific diaphragm MT techniques have not been documented yet, recent studies have reported evidence for their positive effect on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). 25 In particular, the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) aims to directly stretch the muscle fibers of the diaphragm, as detailed in Rochas’ research. 18 The study showed an improvement in diaphragm’s mobility, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and exercise capacity (EC) in people suffering from COPD. 18 We deem it pertinent to mention that previous studies have demonstrated that even a single MT session can have a positive effect on chest wall mechanics, dyspnea, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in individuals with COPD. 26 , 27 Therefore, dyspnea, being one of the primary symptoms of asthma, can adversely affect both exercise capacity (EC) levels and overall quality of life (QoL). 28 – 31 According to a study 26 a single MT session of soft tissue and joint mobilization immediately improved dyspnea (Borg Scale 0-10, pre: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.5). The authors reported that the mechanism underlying this improvement could be the increase in respiratory muscle length and thoracic cage flexibility induced by MT, consequently reducing breathing effort and the development of dyspnea in individuals with COPD. 32 As for asthma, there is currently no data regarding the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for the pilot study conducted by Macias and colleagues, 24 and the study by Elnaggar and colleagues, 33 which investigated the efficacy of MDRT in children. Considering the growing clinical interest in asthma and the recent publications in the field, we believe that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting intervention on the zone of apposition of the diaphragm using the MDRT in adults with asthma for outcomes assessment is warranted. Objective of the proposed trial The primary objective of this study is to explore the impact of MDRT on the diaphragm’s function, particularly on the length-tension relationship and chest wall expansion (CWE) in people suffering from asthma. Secondary improvements are expected in the domain of dyspnea, asthma control and dysfunctional breathing. The MDRT in people with asthma may contribute to better disease management. Methods Study design The present RCT will be a single centric, two arm parallel equivalence randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. This RCT followed the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement. 35 The completed SPIRIT checklist of the study is uploaded into an approved open repository (Reporting guidelines paragraph). The study’s flowchart is shown in Figure 1 . Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement. Setting The laboratory of Advanced Physiotherapy at the Physiotherapy Department of the University of West Attica (UNIWA) in Athens will be responsible for coordinating the trial. The recruitment of the patients will be conducted from the Pulmonology Department of the General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia “Agii Anargiri” (GOHK) in Athens (Greece). The hospital’s research committee approved the protocol (4479/09-03-22). Interventions and assessments will take place individually (home-based treatment) in Athens (Greece). Recruitment procedures The participants will be recruited from the GOHK. All participants will be out-patients with diagnosed stable asthma, referred by the director, pulmonologist, of the Pulmonary Department of the GOHK. The same pulmonologist will perform lung function testing on all participants (well-maintained and regularly calibrated equipment), will diagnose asthma and perform the measure of chest expansion. A radiologist will perform the ultrasonography (US) and a statistician will process the required analysis. Two separate physical therapists will implement the DMRT and BRE. All participants will read and sign the consent form. The declaration of consent refers to personal data privacy and participation protection. They will subsequently be informed about a) the objectives, methods, and details of the study, (b) that it will be the volunteers’ decision whether to take part or not, (c) they will always have the right to withdraw from the research even after signing, (d) they can also refuse to answer questions they will not wish or remain in the survey and (e) that the patient’s decision to participate will not affect the provision of our research services. Randomization and blinding procedures Following the initial assessment, eligible volunteers will be randomly assigned to two experimental groups if they meet the inclusion criteria by the secretariat of the Pulmonology Department of the GCHAA. The randomization will be carried out using sealed envelopes. Individuals will have their allocation concealed through the use of sealed envelopes that are sequentially numbered and opaque. 36 The envelopes will be opened only by the primary researcher, who is responsible for the research project and coordination of the study. The pulmonologist who will perform lung function testing on all participants (well-maintained and regularly calibrated equipment), diagnose asthma and perform the measure of chest expansion, the radiologist who will perform the ultrasonography (US), and the two separate physical therapists, who will implement the DMRT and BRE will be unaware of the group allocation. Participants and eligibility The pulmonologist of the trial will approach all eligible patients for recruitment into the study. They will be assessed through a set of questions to confirm eligibility. All patients will be requested to provide written informed consent (signed by the main researcher, the subject, and two witnesses) to participate in the study, including permission to publish results, with the understanding that they can withdraw at any time. Participants’ characteristics At least 24 adults will be recruited for the study. Inclusion criteria: aged 18-60 years, diagnosed with stable asthma 37 and correct use of the inhaler technique. Exclusion criteria: Participation in other physical therapy methods, the presence of cardiopulmonary conditions, prior cardiothoracic or abdominal surgeries, recent chest wall or abdominal trauma, unstable hemodynamic parameters (systolic arterial pressure >140 mmHg and diastolic >90 mmHg), inability to comprehend verbal instructions required for outcome assessments, pregnancy, neurological ailments, and concurrent involvement in interventional programs. Initial assessments A pulmonologist of GOHK with years of experience diagnosing and treating asthma patients will examine the chest expansion, the pulmonary function, and diagnosis of asthma. The radiologist will perform the US assessment, and the secretariat of the GOHK will administer the questionnaires in a random order and collect all data. Interventions The pulmonologist and the main researcher of the protocol will organize two online sessions with all the participants after the randomization. In one session, participants will be informed by the pulmonologist about (a) general asthma information, (b) asthma triggers, (c) recognition of asthma symptoms, (d) medication and proper use of asthma medications (inhaler techniques), (e) smoking, and (f) asthma control (symptom control/future risk domains/long-term goals). 38 As for the last domain (asthma control), information will be provided regarding, (i) the dynamic changes of asthma, (ii) the recognition of these changes based on PEF values and symptoms, (iii) the importance of early detection of clinical signs of worsening and the immediate initiation of appropriate medication. At the second online session the participants will be informed by the main researcher about (a) the breathing pattern, (b) the pathological pattern of breathing that is developing both in stable phase and in paroxysm, 39 (c) the role of physiotherapy and specifically about the BRE in PR, (d) the formation of a trusting relationship between a person living with asthma and a medical professional (e) the importance of self-efficacy in asthma self-management 40 – 43 and (f) the self-efficacy enhancement process. Following the two online sessions, there will be a discussion between patients and health professionals (pulmonologist - main researcher) lasting approximately one hour, during which patients can share their objectives, values, apprehensions, support and commendations. The structure of the online session will be determined by a) the long-term objectives for asthma management 5 and b) the health belief model. 44 , 45 Regarding the treatment sessions, every participant will receive twelve sessions twice weekly for six weeks, lasting one hour per session. Individual sessions will be provided in patients’ homes under the same conditions ( e.g. , day, time of day, temperature, therapeutic bed, and patient’s position). Physiotherapy intervention will be provided by two physical therapists, trained by the professor of chest physiotherapy and the professor of manual therapy respectively, at the Physiotherapy Department, UNIWA. Any departure from the administration of treatment sessions (such as missing more than one appointment) or any exacerbation of symptoms will lead to exclusion. Brief descriptions of the interventions planned for each group are provided below. Intervention Group: This group will receive MDRT plus BRE. MDRT is intended to stretch and mobilize the diaphragmatic muscle fibers indirectly. MDRT will be applied as described by Rocha and his colleagues. 18 MDRT: Participants will be instructed to lie in a supine position with relaxed limbs. The therapist will be positioned at the patient’s head. Manual contact will be made using the hypothenar region and the last three fingers bilaterally, placed under the seventh to tenth rib costal cartilages. The therapist’s forearms will align towards the patient’s shoulders. During inhalation, the therapist will apply gentle pulling and lateral elevation of the ribs in the inspiratory phase at the points of contact. As the participant exhales, the therapist’s touch will deepen towards the inner costal margin while maintaining resistance. This connection will further deepen within the costal margin in subsequent respiratory cycles. Regarding respiratory volumes, patients will be instructed to breathe progressively deeper from set to set, aiming for maximal diaphragmatic excursion and stretch. It is essential to ensure that the therapist’s grip on the lower thoracic aperture is maintained throughout. The entire process will consist of two sets of 10 repetitions, separated by a 1-minute interval lasting 10 minutes. 46 BRE: BRE will be conducted for 30 minutes. The primary objective of these exercises is to mitigate hyperventilation, hypocapnia, and dysfunctional breathing—common symptoms in individuals with asthma. 47 The initial step involves identifying and inhibiting an abnormal upper thoracic respiratory pattern and re-education of diaphragmatic and slow nasal breathing. Additionally, brief respiratory pauses will be introduced after each exhalation. 48 Subsequently, BRE aims to integrate the new breathing pattern into daily life. This stage focuses on incorporating diaphragmatic and slow nasal breathing into various daily activities, encompassing physical activities (e.g., speaking, swimming, walking, gardening), social activities (e.g., playing with children or pets), and work-related activities (e.g., managing work stress). 49 The phases of BRE will consist of: i) identification of the abnormal breathing pattern, ii) diaphragmatic breathing, ii) nose breathing, iii) slow breathing with controlled breath-holding at the end of exhalation, iv) adaptation of the new breathing pattern in everyday life activities and various positions (supine, semi-sitting, sitting), and v) breathing control in speech. The repetitions and sets of BRE are indicative, given that our priority was the progression and individualization during the sessions. For instance, the first session may only include recognition of the abnormal breathing pattern exercise and practice diaphragmatic and nose breathing retraining exercise. At the beginning of every session, each participant will be assessed for their compliance concerning the exercises (use of a calendar or via questions about their exercise). If a patient has not comprehended or cannot perform the exercises correctly, the previous session will have to be repeated. Once they have fully understood the instructions and execution, they will proceed to the subsequent BRE. The Table 1 illustrates the Key parameters of the rehabilitation program. Table 1. Key parameters of the rehabilitation program. Intervention Patient position Instructions to participants Time Sets/Breathing cycles Weekly repetition MDRT - Lie supine with relaxed limbs - 90 degrees flexion of the knees & hips 20-25 min 2S x 10BC 2/Week BRE Recognition of the abnormal breathing pattern - A pillow between the knees & head. - Half-lying supine (45 degrees of spine flexion from the neutral supine position). - “Put one relaxed hand on your upper chest and the other on your stomach and clavicle” - “Breathe normally, slowly, in your own manner” - “Take a big breath” 30 min 1S x 5BC 2/Week Practice diaphragmatic and nose breathing retraining - Half-lying supine position - Pillows behind the head & knees - one relaxed hand over the stomach and the other on the upper chest and clavicle - “Close your mouth and try to breathe easily, slowly and softly through your nose” - “Be careful not to inhale with “big” breaths, try during inhalation to raise only the stomach” - “Exhalation is passive through the nose and lets your stomach fall gently” 1S x 5BC Slow breathing and controlled breath holding after exhalation - Half-lying supine position - Pillows behind head and knees - One relaxed hand over stomach and the other on upper chest and clavicle - “Close your mouth and try to breathe easily, slowly and softly through your nose” - “Relax your shoulder & chest” - “Try to slow down your breaths” - “Sometimes it helps to count in your mind while you are breathing, e.g. breathe in for a slow count of 2 and breathe out for a slow count of 3until feel empty your stomach” - “Keep empty your stomach for 3-5 seconds” 1S x 10BC New breathing pattern in everyday life activities and various positions - Supine - Semi-sitting - Sitting - “Try to breathe in and out slowly and through the nose, even in the most challenging conditions” - “You will be able to recognize faulty breathing patterns, and you will be able to correct them” - “Try to use a calendar or a mobile phone reminder to implement a diaphragmatic slow nose breathing pattern and breathing exercises” 3S x 5BC Breathing control in speech - Supine - Semi-sitting - Sitting - “You must budget airflow to control the number of words you say per breath and the tone and loudness of particular words in a sentence” - “Apply a slow, through the nose, diaphragmatic breathing pattern at speech (max 4-6 words spoken during slow exhalation, with breathing pauses, and slow inhalations)” - “Breathe out so that your lungs feel empty, and, before inhaling again” - “At yawning and at sighing close your mouth” - “Poor voice quality (hoarseness, roughness, or a strained/strident voice) results from inadequate or badly controlled airflow. Speech prosody: rhythm and intonation” 3S x 5BC Control Group: This group will receive only BRE, as mentioned in the intervention group. Outcome measures The evaluations will take place at three time - points: prior to treatment (week 0), post-treatment (week 6), and three months subsequent (week 12). The primary outcomes will entail the measurement of diaphragm excursion using ultrasound 50 and chest expansion (CE) using a tape measure. 51 Secondary outcomes will also be employed: maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP/MEP), 52 , 53 dysfunctional breathing (Nijmegen questionnaire – - NQ), 54 asthma Control (ACT), 55 , 56 quality of life (SF-12v2), 57 and dyspnea (Borg scale). 58 Table 2 . illustrates the SPIRIT 34 schematic protocol of the study along with the schedule of assessments. Table 2. Standard protocol items: recommendations for interventional trials of this study (SPIRIT). TIME POINT Enrollment (-T1) Allocation (T0) Pre-intervention (T1) Intervention Post-Intervention (T2) (T3) ENROLLMENT: Eligibility screen X Informed consent X Demographic information X Allocation X Intervention MDRT + BRE BRE ASSESMENTS Neurological and cardiovascular assessments X Primary outcomes: US X X X CE X X X Secondary outcomes: MIP/MEP X X X NQ X X X ACT X X X Borg scale X X X SF-12v2 X X X Primary outcome measures Diaphragmatic excursion assessment with ultrasonography: Numerous studies have confirmed the effectiveness of the US to evaluate diaphragmatic function. Since 1970, 59 the US has been utilized to assess the diaphragm’s mobility. Modern medicine accepts its use as a completely safe method. The diagnostic US has 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity. 17 The examiners are not exposed to any radiation, and there is no need for special preparation, allowing for as many safe applications as required. The US offers the option of a dynamic inspection of the affected area in real time. The diaphragmatic excursion is measured in cm/mm. In this study the excursion of the diaphragm will be measured using the ultrasound device, E-CUBE 8LE (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Chest wall expansion (CWE): In clinical and research practice, the inch tape measure is an alternative method for assessing chest expansion. 60 By placing the tape measure at the level of the axilla (about the level of the sternal angle of Louis), the level of the xiphoid process, or between the xiphoid process and the umbilicus, the therapist identifies the upper, middle, and lower chest wall expansion, respectively. The therapist should repeat the measurement at least three times for each level for higher fidelity. 51 A tape measure (in centimeters) will assess the variance between values recorded during deep inhalation and exhalation, with greater values signifying improved results. 51 Norms have been developed according to age and sex. 60 Secondary outcome measures Nijmegen Questionnaire (NQ): The Nijmegen Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing dysfunctional breathing 62 in clinical practice and research. It is designed to identify the Hyperventilation Syndrome (HS). A score greater than 23 indicates the presence of HS in the general population. The NQ has shown 91% sensitivity and 95% specificity. 61 , 62 In previous research, NQ scores of 20, 22 and 23 have been used as cut-off scores to detect HS in subjects with and without asthma. 63 – 65 The NQ questionnaire has been validated in Greek adults with asthma, providing evidence of validity and reliability of measurements with a cut-off score of >17. 66 Asthma control test (ACT): The ACT questionnaire is a valid and reliable clinical and research tool. 67 Its quick completion time is one of its key features. It has five items, all about the most recent four weeks. 68 , 69 The ACT evaluates the frequency of wheezing and other general asthma symptoms and the need for emergency control self-assessment. The score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (good control of asthma). An ACT score >19 indicates controlled asthma. The ACT has been validated in the Greek population with asthma and has shown high indices of internal consistency (0.72) and test–retest reliability (IR = 0.85). 59 Sf-12v2 questionnaire: A simplified version of the SF-36 includes medications, and how well asthma affects daily functioning and overall asthma. The SF-12v2 is a practical, reliable, and valid way to assess physical and mental health. With one or two questions per domain, it assesses the exact eight health dimensions as the SF-36v2, which includes Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. The SF-12 is a valid alternative to the lengthy SF-36 for the self-assessment of quality of life by assessing the health status of healthy and patient population groups. 69 Higher ratings indicate better physical and mental wellbeing, ranging from 0 to 100. 70 It has been suggested that a cut-off of 50 or less can be used to identify a physical condition, while a score of 42 or less may signify clinical depression. 70 The Sf-12v2 has been weighted in the Greek general population. 71 Borg scale: The Borg dyspnea scale is a simple, non-proprietary scoring system. It is extensively used in clinical and research practice to evaluate symptoms of shortness of breath and provides valuable data. 72 , 73 It begins with 0 (no dyspnea), and goes up to 10 (extreme dyspnea). As a result, healthcare professionals must give patients enough time to learn and ensure they comprehend it before using it. 74 Anticipated dates of trial commencement and completion The study started in January 2023 and is scheduled to be completed in January 2024. Sample size calculation The sample size calculation was based on an alpha (α) level of 0.01, a power (β) of 0.85, and a large effect size, Cohen’s d, of 1.86 for a two-tailed independent t-test. This effect size was calculated based on the results reported by Rocha et al. (2015), 18 specifically from the mean (SD) values of the control and experimental groups following six manual therapy intervention sessions. Furthermore, the calculation accounted for an anticipated attrition rate of approximately 15%, foreseeing the potential for participant dropout or exclusion. This comprehensive approach to sample size calculation ensures the robustness and reliability of the study’s findings, enabling a precise detection of the large effect size with high statistical confidence. This resulted in a total sample size of 24 people (12 per group) considering a withdrawal rate of 15%. 75 Data collection methods Data regarding the outcomes pre and post-intervention will be meticulously collected from the main researcher. The collected information will undergo a thorough examination to analyze the outcomes. Throughout the study, the professor of chest physiotherapy (supervisor) will closely oversee the main researcher administering the study’s data. To ensure the patient adheres to the study, timely messages will be sent to their mobile phones, providing information and reminders regarding upcoming sessions. A 10% drop-out rate has been considered in the sample size calculation, thus minimizing potential interference with the study results. Data management Evaluation data will be sourced from a predefined spreadsheet containing baseline characteristics. A secure database will be employed to store all research-related data securely. Paper copies of evaluation forms signed informed consent forms, and other non-electronic documents will be securely stored in the study environment. A comprehensive backup of the data entries will be generated once a month until the conclusion of the trial. Upon completion of the study, the Excel spreadsheet will be published and forwarded to the statistician for the necessary analysis. A checklist will help prevent data loss from inefficient staff procedures. Given the extensive follow-up assessment for this experiment, participant retention and completion of follow-up assessments will be notably high. After six weeks from the end of interventions, the participants will be invited to a follow-up examination (12 weeks from the beginning of the trial). Statistical analysis The investigation will employ IBM SPSS software, specifically version 28, as the primary analytical tool for comprehensive data processing. Descriptive statistics will be employed to elucidate the distributional characteristics of the dataset. Subsequently, the Shapiro-Wilk test will be utilized to assess data normality for each dependent variable (including US, CWE, ACT, NQ, SF-12v2, and Borg scale) independently. Should normality assumptions be met, parametric tests, specifically the 2×3 ANOVA repeated measures, will be employed, accompanied by Bonferroni adjustment, to investigate the interaction between intervention (experimental and control groups) and time points (0, 6, and 12 weeks). Moreover, to evaluate the homogeneity of variance, Levene’s test will be conducted. The predetermined level of statistical significance is set at p<0.05. Monitoring Data monitoring A data monitoring committee of members from the UNIWA Physiotherapy Department will periodically review the accumulating data, determining if the trial should be modified or discontinued. Harms A clinical staff is going to supervise the entire procedure. Any adverse events will be immediately reported throughout the trial to the Physiotherapy Department of the UNIWA committee. Auditing An evaluation of the experiment will be performed each month. Every deviation from the protocol will be recorded and addressed. Ethics and dissemination Research ethics approval The Ethics Committee of the UNIWA in Greece approved this study under protocol 90853/04-10-2022. The study follows the Helsinki Declaration’s “Ethical Principles of Medical Research Involving Human Subjects.” Protocol modifications will be disclosed to the Ethics Committee as soon as possible. The trial has been proactively registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database with the identification number NCT05709054. Protocol amendments The study has already been modified and accepted in accordance with the Ethics Committee of the UNIWA in Greece suggestions. As a result, further modifications could not be made. Consent Study participants will receive a translated version of the study protocol. Prior to participation, all individuals involved in the study will be fully informed, and written consent will be obtained from each participant. Confidentiality The main researcher will collect personal data during the trial. A confidentiality statement on the permission form will be signed by the main researcher, the subject, and two witnesses. Whenever necessary to disclose information for the study, consent from the patients will always be obtained with utmost assurance of confidentiality. Access to data The main researcher and the statistician will have access to the final trial datasheet. Ancillary and post-trial care The entire procedure will be conducted under the oversight of clinicians and the physiotherapy department of the UNIWA committee. After the trial sessions, the participants will be under supervision for about four weeks so that they can take care if there is any harm. Discussion Although several studies assessing the efficacy of MT in obstructive lung diseases (OLD) have been conducted, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to their conflicting results. 45 A recent systematic review (SR) of the existing literature aimed to identify indications that may underscore the need for differentiated manual therapy (MT) approaches targeting the zone of apposition (ZOA) of the diaphragm in individuals with OLD suffering from pathological adaptations of their chest wall or from respiratory symptoms. 76 This SR outlined a model illustrating how MT delays the onset of fatigue in respiratory muscles. Additionally, it demonstrated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of MT on the diaphragm for treating individuals (adults) with asthma. 76 It is noteworthy that two previous studies have examined how MT on the ZOA of the diaphragm hampers the diaphragm’s function and pulmonary function in childhood asthma (RCT) 33 and in adults with asthma 24 (pilot study) accordingly. Up to this point, no RCT has comprehensively examined the impact of MDRT, in particular, on the ZOA by MDRT of the diaphragm in adults suffering from asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The protocol of this study is designed in accordance with accepted practices concerning randomization, concealed allocation, blinding of examiners, and appropriate sample size calculation. This rigorous approach ensures the reliability and robustness of the study’s findings. What sets this study apart is its original investigation into the mechanism of the MDRT on the ZOA of the diaphragm in individuals living with asthma. Finally, several significant constraints must be considered. The study sample is drawn exclusively from a single hospital, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the extended experimental period and the substantial number of sessions may lead to participant dropouts. Study status The study started in January 2023. Study dissemination This work will be presented in International Conference Proceedings and published in an indexed journal. Conclusions This RCT will be innovative as it will, for the first time, provide evidence of the effect of the MDRT on diaphragm function in people with asthma. MT is a low-cost alternative and supplementary therapy to standard treatment procedures that might improve the biomechanics of respiration in pulmonary rehabilitation. Data availability Underlying data No data are associated with this article. Reporting guidelines Figshare: SPIRIT checklist for ‘The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial’, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24191106 . 77 References 1. Nason LK, Walker CM, Mc Neeley MF, et al. : Imaging of the Diaphragm: Anatomy and Function. Radiographics. 2012; 32 (2): E51–E70. Publisher Full Text 2. Ricoya J, Rodríguez-Núnez N, Álvarez-Dobano JM, et al. : Diaphragmatic dysfunction. Pulmonology. 2018; 25 : 223–235. Publisher Full Text 3. Ratnovsky A, Elad D: Anatomical model of the human trunk for analysis of respiratory muscles mechanics. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2005; 148 (3): 245–62. 12. Publisher Full Text 4. Gibson GJ: Diaphragmatic paresis: pathophysiology, clinical features, and investigation. Thorax. 1989; 44 : 960–970. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 5. Global Initiative for Asthma: Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. 2023 Updated. 2023. Reference Source 6. Rocha FR, Brüggemann AKV, de Souza Francisco D , et al. : Diaphragmatic mobility: relationship with lung function, respiratory muscle strength, dyspnea, and physical activity in daily life in patients with COPD. J. Bras. Pneumol. 2017; 43 (1): 32–37. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 7. Greising SM, Ottenheijm CAC, O’Halloran KD, et al. : Diaphragm Plasticity in Aging and Disease: Therapies for Muscle Weakness go from Strength to Strength. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018; 125 : 243–253. Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 8. Decramer M: Hyperinflation and respiratory muscle interaction. Eur. Respir. J. 1997; 10 (4): 934–941. Publisher Full Text 9. De Troyer A: Effect of hyperinflation on the diaphragm. Eur. Respir. J. 1997; 10 (3): 708–713. Publisher Full Text 10. Silva IS, Fregonezi GAF, Dias FAL, et al. : Inspiratory muscle training for asthma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; 2013 (9): CD003792. Art. No.: CD003792. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 11. Burgel, et al. : Update on the roles of distal airways in asthma. Eur. Respir. Rev. 1980; 18 (112): 80–95. Publisher Full Text 12. Martin J, Powell E, Shore S, et al. : The Role of Respiratory Muscles in the Hyperinflation of Bronchial Asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 2008; 121 : 441–447. Publisher Full Text 13. Mauad T, Dolhnikoff M: Pathologic similarities and differences between asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 2008; 14 : 31–38. Publisher Full Text 14. Jean DA, Janssens P: The Pathophysiology of Respiratory Failure: Control of Breathing, Respiratory Load, and Muscle Capacity. Respiration. 2019; 97 : 93–104. Publisher Full Text 15. Blanco I, Diego I, Bueno P, et al. : Geographical distribution of COPD prevalence in Europe, estimated by an inverse distance weighting interpolation technique. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2018; 13 : 57–67. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 16. Decramer M: Hyperinflation and respiratory muscle interaction. Eur. Respir J. 1997; 10 (4): 934–941. PubMed Abstract 17. Boon AJ, Sekiguchi MDH, CaitlinM DJ, et al. : Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic ultrasound in the diagnosis of phrenic neuropathy. Neurology. 2014; 83 : 1264–1270. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 18. Rocha T, Souza H, Brandão DC, et al. : The Manual Diaphragm Release Technique improves diaphragmatic mobility, inspiratory capacity and exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised trial. J. Physiother. 2015; 61 (4): 182–189. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 19. Santino TA, Chaves GS, Freitas DA, et al. : Breathing exercises for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020; 3 (3): CD001277. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 20. Yufan L, Peijun L, Ning L: Effects of Home-Based Breathing Exercises in Subjects With COPD. Respir. Care. (2020) Mar; 65 (3): 377–387. Publisher Full Text 21. Mayer AF, Karloh M, Santos KD: Effects of acute use of pursed lips breathing during exercise in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2018; 104 (1): 9–17. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 22. Grammatopoulou E, Skordilis E, Stavrou N: The Effect of Physiotherapy-Based Breathing Retraining on Asthma Control. J. Asthma. 2011; 48 (6): 593–601. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 23. Ubolnuar N, Tantisuwat A, Thaveeratitham P, et al. : Effects of Breathing Exercises in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2019; 43 (4): 509–523. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 24. Borge CR, Hagen KB, Mengshoel AM, et al. : Effects of controlled breathing exercises and respiratory muscle training in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from evaluating the quality of evidence in systematic reviews. BMC Pulm. Med. 2014; 14 (1). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 25. Nair A, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, et al. : Comparison of Diaphragmatic Stretch Technique and Manual Diaphragm Release Technique on Diaphragmatic Excursion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Pulm. Med. 2019; 2019 : 1–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 26. Yilmaz Yelvar GD, Çirak Y, Demir YP, et al. : Immediate effect of manual therapy on respiratory functions and inspiratory muscle strength in patients with COPD. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2016 Jun; 11 : 1353–1357. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 27. Cruz– Montecinos C, Godoy–Olave D, Contreras–Briceño FA, et al. : The immediate effect of soft tissue manual therapy intervention on lung function in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis.2017; 12 : 691–696. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 28. Zogg S, Miedinger D, Steveling EH, et al. : Daily physical activity, functional capacity and quality of life in patients with COPD.COPD.2014; 11 (6): 689–696. Publisher Full Text 29. Andenæs R, Bentsen SB, Hvinden K, et al. : The relationships of self-efficacy, physical activity, and paid work to health-related quality of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).J. Multidiscip. Healthc.2014; 7 : 239–247. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 30. Pitta F, Troosters T, Spruit MA, et al. : Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med.2005; 171 (9): 972–977. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 31. Arne M, Janson C, Janson S, et al. : Physical activity and quality of life in subjects with chronic disease: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared with rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus.Scand. J. Prim. Health Care.2009; 27 (3): 141–147. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 32. Engel R, Vemulpad S: The role of spinal manipulation, soft-tissue therapy, and exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review of the literature and proposal of an anatomical explanation. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2011; 17 (9): 797–801. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 33. Elnaggar RK, Shendy MA, Mahmoud MZ: Prospective Effects of Manual Diaphragmatic Release and Thoracic Lymphatic Pumping in Childhood Asthma.Respir. Care.2019 Nov; 64 (11): 1422–1432. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 33. Leonés-Macías E, Torres-Sánchez I, Cabrera-Martos I, et al. : Effects of manual therapy on the diaphragm in asthmatic patients: A randomized pilot study. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. Int. J. Osteopath. Med. 2018; 29 : 26–31. Publisher Full Text 34. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. : SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013; 158 (3): 200–207. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 35. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. : SPIRIT statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann. Intern. Med. 2013; 158 (3): 200–207. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 36. Global Initiative for Asthma: Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention.2017. Reference Source 37. Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health:: NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health. JAMA. 1996 Jul 17; 276 (3): 241–246. PubMed Abstract 38. Grammatopoulou E, Skordilis E, Stavrou N, et al. : The effect to physiotherapy-based breathing retraining on asthma control. J. Asthma. 2011; 48 : 593–601. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 39. Bandura A: Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1997; 84 : 191–215. Publisher Full Text 40. Campbell TS, Lavoie KL, Bacon SL, et al. : Asthma self-efficacy, high frequency heart rate variability, and airflow obstruction during negative affect in daily life. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2006; 62 : 109–114. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 41. Mancuso CA, Rincon M, McCulloch CE, et al. : Self-efficacy, depressive symptoms and patients’ expectations predict outcomes in asthma. Med. Care. 2001; 39 (12): 1326–1338. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 41. Shortridge-Baggett LM: Self-efficacy: Measurement and intervention in nursing. Sch. Inq. Nurs. Pract. 2001; 15 (3): 183–188. PubMed Abstract 43. Becker MH: The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ. Monogr. 1974; 2 (4): 409–419. Publisher Full Text 44. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH: Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ. Behav. 1988; 15 : 175–183. Publisher Full Text 45. Bennett S, Siritaratiwat W, Tanrangka N, et al. : Effectiveness of the manual diaphragmatic stretching technique on respiratory function in cerebral palsy: A randomised controlled trial. Respir. Med. 2021; 184 : 106443. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 46. Tatsios PI, Grammatopoulou E, Dimitriadis Z, et al. : The Effectiveness of Manual Therapy in the Cervical Spine and Diaphragm, in Combination with Breathing Reeducation Exercises, in Patients with Non-Specific Chronic Neck Pain: Protocol for Development of Outcome Measures and a Randomized Controlled Trial. Diagnostics. (2022) Nov 4; 12 (11): 2690. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 47. Bruton A, Lee A, Yardley L, et al. : Physiotherapy breathing retraining for asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2018; 6 (1): 19–28. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 48. Holloway EA, West RJ: Integrated breathing and relaxation training (the Papworth method) for adults with asthma in primary care: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2007; 62 (12): 1039–1042. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 49. Vetrugno L, Guadagnin GM, Barbariol F, et al. : ULTRASOUND IMAGING FOR DIAPHRAGM DYSFUNCTION: A NARRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2019; 33 : 2525–2536. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 50. Olsén MF, Lindstrand H, Broberg JL, et al. : Measuring chest expansion; A study comparing two diferent instructions. Adv. Physiother. 2011; 13 (3): 128–132. Publisher Full Text 51. ATS/ERS Statement on Respiratory Muscle Testing. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002; 166 (4): 518–624. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 52. Black LF, Hyatt RE: Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1969; 99 (5): 696–702. PubMed Abstract 53. Grammatopoulou EP, Skordilis EK, Georgoudis G, et al. : Hyperventilation in asthma: a validation study of the Nijmegen Questionnaire–NQ. J. Asthma. 2014; 51 (8): 839–846. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 54. Nathan R, Sorkenss CA, Kosinski M, et al. : Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004; 113 : 59–65. Publisher Full Text 55. Schatz M, Sorkness CA, Li JT, et al. : Asthma Control Test: reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients not previously followed by asthma specialists. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006; 117 : 549–556. Publisher Full Text 56. Ware J, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Med. Care. 1992; 30 : 473–483. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 57. Borg G: Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics. 1998. Reference Source 58. Haber K, Asher M, Freimanis AK: Echographic evaluation of diaphragmatic motion in intra-abdominal diseases. Radiology. 1975; 114 (1): 141–144. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 59. Mohan V, Dzulkifli NH, Justine M, et al. : Reliability of Chest Expansion using Cloth Tape Measure Technique. Bangladesh J. Med. Sci. 2012; 11 (4): 307–311. Publisher Full Text 60. Özge İLLEEZMEMETOĞLU, Bülent BÜTÜN, İlhan SEZER: Chest Expansion and Modified Schober Measurement Values in a Healthy, Adult Population. Arch. Rheumatol. 2016; 31 (2): 145–150. Publisher Full Text 61. van Dixhoorn J , Dulvenvoorden H: Efficacy of Nijmegen questionnaire in recognition of the hyperventilation syndrome. J. Psychosom. Res. 1985; 29 : 199–206. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 62. Thomas M, McKinley R, Freeman E, et al. : Prevalence of dysfunctional breathing in patients treated for asthma in primary care: Cross sectional survey. Br. Med. J. 2001; 322 : 1098–1100. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 63. Hagman C, Janson C, Emtner M: A comparison between patients with dysfunctional breathing and patients with asthma. Clin. Respir. J. 2008; 2 : 86–91. Publisher Full Text 64. Courtney R, Greenwood K, Cohen M: Relationships between measures of dysfunctional breathing in a population with concerns about their breathing. J. Bodyw. Mov. Ther. 2011; 15 : 24–34. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 65. Grammatopoulou E, Skordilis E, Georgoudis G, et al. : Hyperventilation in asthma: A validation study of the Nijmegen Questionnaire - NQ. J. Asthma. 2014; 51 : 839–846. Publisher Full Text 66. Nathan R, Sorkenss CA, Kosinski M, et al. : Development of the asthma control test: A survey for assessing asthma control. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004; 113 : 59–65. Publisher Full Text 67. Grammatopoulou E, Skordilis E, Stavrou N, et al. : The effect of physiotherapy-based breathing retraining on asthma control. J. Asthma. 2011; 48 : 593–601. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 68. Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, et al. : Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health and Quality of LifeOutcomes. 2007; 5 : 55. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 69. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary Tests of Reliability and Validity.Medical Care.1996; 34 (3): 220–233. Publisher Full Text 70. Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, et al. : Validity of SF-12 summary scores in a Greek general population. Health Qual. Life Outcomes. 2007; 5 (1): 55. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 71. Pfeifer KA, Pivarnik JM, Womack CJ, et al. : Reliability and validity of the Borg and OMNI rating of perceived exertion scales in adolescent girls. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002; 34 : 2057–2061. Publisher Full Text 72. Sanjuas C, Alonso J, Ferrer M, et al. : Adaptation of the asthma quality of life questionnaire to a second language preserves its critical properties: The Spanish version. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2001; 54 : 182–189. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 73. Mitchell WH, Brubaker PH, Kaminsky LA, et al. : Validity of Rating of Perceived Exertion During Graded Exercise Testing in Apparently Healthy Adults and Cardiac Patients. J. Cardpulm. Rehabil. 1997; 17 (4): 261–267. Publisher Full Text 74. Gupta ΚΚ, Attri JP, Singh A, et al. : Basic concepts for sample size calculation: Critical step for any clinical trials! Saudi J Anaesth. 2016; 10 (3): 328–331. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 75. Roh JA, Kim KI, Jung HJ: The efficacy of manual therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2021; 16 (5): e0251291. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | Free Full Text 76. Tsimouris D, Arvanitidis M, Moutzouri M, et al. : Is manual therapy of the diaphragm effective for people with Obstructive Lung Diseases? A Systematic Review.Resp. Med. Res2023; 83 . PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text 77. Tsimouris D: SPIRIT_checklist.docx. figshare. Journal Contribution. 2023. Publisher Full Text Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment Author details Author details 1 Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, School of Health & Care Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243, Greece Dimitrios Tsimouris Roles: Project Administration, Writing – Review & Editing E. Grammatopoulou Roles: Supervision Maria Papandreou Roles: Data Curation, Formal Analysis George Gioftsos Roles: Funding Acquisition, Resources George Koumantakis Roles: Investigation Competing interests No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work. Article Versions (2) version 2 Revised Published: 19 Mar 2024, 12:1361 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141455.2 version 1 Published: 18 Oct 2023, 12:1361 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141455.1 Copyright © 2024 Tsimouris D et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Download Export To Sciwheel Bibtex EndNote ProCite Ref. Manager (RIS) Sente metrics Views Downloads F1000Research - - PubMed Central info_outline Data from PMC are received and updated monthly. - - Citations open_in_new 0 open_in_new 0 open_in_new SEE MORE DETAILS CITE how to cite this article Tsimouris D, Grammatopoulou E, Papandreou M et al. The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.141455.2 ) NOTE: If applicable, it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS track receive updates on this article Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article. TRACK THIS ARTICLE Share Open Peer Review Current Reviewer Status: ? Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW HIDE Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 19 Mar 2024 Revised Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Elnaggar RK. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257334 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2#referee-response-257334 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 25 Apr 2024 Ragab K. Elnaggar , Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia; Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257334 I appreciate the authors' thorough efforts in addressing the concerns raised ... Continue reading READ ALL I appreciate the authors' thorough efforts in addressing the concerns raised in the previous review round. Their revisions have significantly improved the manuscript. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Physical Therapy I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Elnaggar RK. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257334 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2#referee-response-257334 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Oliveira LVF. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257335 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2#referee-response-257335 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 04 Apr 2024 Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira , Human Movement and Rehabilitation Post Graduation Program, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil Approved VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257335 I am satisfied with the changes made by the authors. All suggestions were accepted. ... Continue reading READ ALL I am satisfied with the changes made by the authors. All suggestions were accepted. I declare that I have no conflict of interest with the manuscript or the authors. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: PhD in Health Sciences, specialist in Respiratory Physiotherapy and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Cardiorespiratory Sleep Disorders. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Oliveira LVF. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257335 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2#referee-response-257335 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Version 1 VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2023 Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Elnaggar RK. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r223569 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v1#referee-response-223569 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 20 Feb 2024 Ragab K. Elnaggar , Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia; Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r223569 This protocol for a prospective, randomized clinical trial will assess the effect of manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma. While, based on a brief search of the database, previous evidence on the effect of ... Continue reading READ ALL This protocol for a prospective, randomized clinical trial will assess the effect of manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma. While, based on a brief search of the database, previous evidence on the effect of this intervention is likely scarce, there is, therefore, a need for more well-controlled trials, employing adequate methodology, to conclusively evaluate the role of MDRT for patients with asthma. I partially disagree with the assertion that “The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma”. There is a previous publication on the role of MRDT in pediatric patients with asthma (1). Asthma encompasses heterogeneous phenotypes that vary widely in terms of their underlying causes, triggers, clinical manifestations, and response to treatment. Furthermore, the severity of asthma can range from mild and intermittent symptoms to severe and persistent symptoms that require frequent medical intervention. Understanding the heterogeneity of asthma is important because it helps healthcare professionals tailor treatment approaches to individual patients. It is unclear in this protocol which type/severity of asthma would be considered. While reading the introduction section, I noticed that it lacks a comprehensive background on patients with asthma, their diaphragmatic function, and the potential benefits of MDRT in addressing this issue. I believe that including these key elements would greatly enhance the clarity and contextual understanding of the intended study. Providing a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function, respiratory muscle strength, or altered breathing patterns, and emphasizing the potential of MDRT as a therapeutic intervention would help readers grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. I encourage the authors to consider revising the introduction accordingly to provide a more comprehensive background and set a firm foundation for the remainder of the study. The significance of the study is not clear. Authors may need to justify the importance of their work, highlight the impact it has on the research field, and define its contribution to new knowledge. More importantly, they need to pinpoint the research gap (in light of the related literature) and make it clear what drove them to conduct the study. Again, the statement “As for asthma, there is no data for the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for one pilot study” is not true and should be revised in light of the aforementioned publication. I have a concern regarding the study power. A sample size of 24 is a considerably small sample. The authors conducted an a priori power analysis to determine the minimum sample size necessary for detecting clinically significant results. They employed a substantial effect size (d = 1.36) and the minimum acceptable power level (80%) in their analysis. However, this approach may present challenges in detecting moderate or small changes in the outcome variable, potentially resulting in inconclusive findings and limiting the interpretability of the study conclusions. The authors aim to recruit a minimum of 24 participants, encompassing a broad age range from 8 to 60 years. However, it is recommended that the authors consider prioritizing either pediatric or adult patients for a more focused investigation. It is crucial to incorporate a thorough and detailed description of the pulmonary rehabilitation program within this protocol, as its current absence hinders the comprehensive understanding of the intervention being studied. The data analysis plan is appropriate. The utilization of 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment will be used to examine the interaction between intervention offer advantages for allowing for the examination of within-subject changes across multiple conditions or time points and accounting for the correlated nature of data within subjects. In summary, the implementation of the study as outlined in this protocol has the potential to offer supplementary or corroborating evidence concerning the efficacy of MDRT in individuals diagnosed with asthma. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Partly Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Partly Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Elnaggar RK, Shendy MA, Mahmoud MZ: Prospective Effects of Manual Diaphragmatic Release and Thoracic Lymphatic Pumping in Childhood Asthma. Respir Care . 2019; 64 (11): 1422-1432 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: Physical Therapy I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Elnaggar RK. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r223569 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v1#referee-response-223569 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 13 Apr 2024 Author Response Dear Ragab Elnaggar, Thank you for your thorough review and insightful feedback on our study protocol. Your contributions have significantly enhanced the quality of our work. We will meticulously ... Continue reading Dear Ragab Elnaggar, Thank you for your thorough review and insightful feedback on our study protocol. Your contributions have significantly enhanced the quality of our work. We will meticulously address all the concerns raised and further refine our manuscript. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Dear Ragab Elnaggar, Thank you for your thorough review and insightful feedback on our study protocol. Your contributions have significantly enhanced the quality of our work. We will meticulously address all the concerns raised and further refine our manuscript. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 13 Apr 2024 Author Response Dear Prof. Ragab Elnaggar, We would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and giving us the opportunity to revise it. We appreciate the time and effort you ... Continue reading Dear Prof. Ragab Elnaggar, We would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and giving us the opportunity to revise it. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to further improve our work. Before presenting our responses to your comments, we deemed it important to clarify that our study will only focus on adults with mild to moderate severity of asthma. Unfortunately, we found a typographical error in the inclusion criteria of our study, where "18" was mistakenly written as "8." We acknowledge that this significantly affected your assessment. Given the above, we here by provide our responses in the same order as you presented your comments. Please find our replies below: Comment 1: « I partially disagree with the assertion that “The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma”. There is a previous publication on the role of MRDT in pediatric patients with asthma (1).» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was a bit overstated. Following your suggestion, we decided to delete the sentence to improve the clarity of this section. Comment 2: « While reading the introduction section, I noticed that it lacks a comprehensive background on patients with asthma, their diaphragmatic function, and the potential benefits of MDRT in addressing this issue. I believe including these key elements would greatly enhance the clarity and contextual understanding of the intended study. Providing a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function, respiratory muscle strength, or altered breathing patterns and emphasizing the potential of MDRT as a therapeutic intervention would help readers grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. I encourage the authors to consider revising the introduction accordingly to provide a more comprehensive background and set a firm foundation for the remainder of the study.» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was inadequate. Following your suggestion, we have modified the introduction, providing a more comprehensive background. We have added the text as follows: « It's also important to note that the mechanical disadvantage of the diaphragm in asthma can result in an increased workload for all inspiratory muscles, particularly during exercise, where dynamic hyperinflation may occur, leading to heightened dyspnea 15 ,16 » « Finally, although specific diaphragm MT techniques have not been documented yet, recent studies have reported evidence for their positive effect on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). 25 In particular, the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) aims to directly stretch the muscle fibers of the diaphragm, as detailed in Rochas’ research. 18 The study showed an improvement in diaphragm’s mobility, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and exercise capacity (EC) in people suffering from COPD. 18 We deem it pertinent to mention that previous studies have demonstrated that even a single MT session can have a positive effect on chest wall mechanics, dyspnea, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in individuals with COPD. 26, 27 Therefore, dyspnea, being one of the primary symptoms of asthma, can adversely affect both exercise capacity (EC) levels and overall quality of life (QoL). 28-31 According to a study 26 a single MT session of soft tissue and joint mobilization immediately improved dyspnea (Borg Scale 0-10, pre: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.5). The authors reported that the mechanism underlying this improvement could be the increase in respiratory muscle length and thoracic cage flexibility induced by MT, consequently reducing breathing effort and the development of dyspnea in individuals with COPD. 32 As for asthma, there is currently no data regarding the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for the pilot study conducted by Macias and colleagues 24 , and the study by Elnaggar and colleagues 33 , which investigated the efficacy of MDRT in children. Considering the growing clinical interest in asthma and the recent publications in the field, we believe that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting intervention on the zone of apposition of the diaphragm using the MDRT in adults with asthma for outcomes assessment is warranted. .» Comment 3: « The significance of the study is not clear. Authors may need to justify the importance of their work, highlight the impact it has on the research field, and define its contribution to new knowledge.» Comment 4: « More importantly, they need to pinpoint the research gap (in light of the related literature) and make it clear what drove them to conduct the study.» Thank you for your suggestions. As requested, we highlighted the impact on the research field and the research gap at the discussion session. The text has been correspondingly modified as follows: “Although several studies assessing the efficacy of MT in obstructive lung diseases (OLD) have been conducted, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to their conflicting results. 45 A recent systematic review (SR) of the existing literature aimed to identify indications that may underscore the need for differentiated manual therapy (MT) approaches targeting the zone of apposition (ZOA) of the diaphragm in individuals with OLD suffering from pathological adaptations of their chest wall or from respiratory symptoms. 76 This SR outlined a model illustrating how MT delays the onset of fatigue in respiratory muscles. Additionally, it demonstrated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of MT on the diaphragm for treating individuals (adults) with asthma. 76 It is noteworthy that two previous studies have examined how MT on the ZOA of the diaphragm hampers the diaphragm's function and pulmonary function in childhood asthma (RCT) 33 and in adults with asthma 24 (pilot study) accordingly. Up to this point, no RCT has comprehensively examined the impact of MDRT, in particular, on the ZOA of the diaphragm by MDRT in adults suffering from asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The protocol of this study is designed in accordance with accepted practices concerning randomization, concealed allocation, blinding of examiners, and appropriate sample size calculation. This rigorous approach ensures the reliability and robustness of the study's findings. What sets this study apart is its original investigation into the mechanism of the MDRT on the ZOA of the diaphragm in individuals living with asthma. Finally, several significant constraints must be considered. The study sample is drawn exclusively from a single hospital, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the extended experimental period and the substantial number of sessions may lead to participant dropouts. ” Comment 5: «Again, the statement “As for asthma, there is no data for the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for one pilot study” is not true and should be revised in light of the aforementioned publication.» We believe that this comment has been addressed based on our previous replies. After clarifying that there was confusion due to the typographical error, we believe that this statement is now correct. Please do not hesitate to reach out for any further clarification. Comment 6: « I have a concern regarding the study power. A sample size of 24 is a considerably small sample. The authors conducted an a priori power analysis to determine the minimum sample size necessary for detecting clinically significant results. They employed a substantial effect size (d = 1.36) and the minimum acceptable power level (80%) in their analysis. However, this approach may present challenges in detecting moderate or small changes in the outcome variable, potentially resulting in inconclusive findings and limiting the interpretability of the study conclusions.» Thank you for your comment. We understand your concerns about the sample study calculation, and we would like to explain the rationale behind the participant number determined by our power analysis. In 2023, we conducted a systematic review ( Is manual therapy of the diaphragm effective for people with Obstructive Lung Diseases? A Systematic Review, Respir Med Res. 2023 Jun:83:101002. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101002. Epub 2023 Feb 15.) investigating the effects of specialized mobilization techniques applied to the zone of apposition of the diaphragm in patients with obstructive respiratory diseases, including asthma and COPD. The results of this study revealed a literature gap indicating that the applied techniques on the ZOA of the diaphragm have not been applied in people with asthma beyond, of course, your study (in the pediatric population) and that of Macias et al. 2018 ( Effects of manual therapy on the diaphragm in asthmatic patients: A randomized pilot studyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.07.006 ). The two studies included in our research represented the closest in design to our own protocol (participants, manual therapy techniques of the diaphragm, diaphragm excursion measured by the US), thus necessitating the power analysis calculation based on them. For your convenience, we hereby provide the two studies in our research, which served as the basis for our study power. Rocha T, Souza H, Brandão DC, et al.: The Manual Diaphragm Release Technique improves diaphragmatic mobility, inspiratory capacity and exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised trial. J. Physiother. 2015;61(4):182–189. 26386894 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.08.009 Nair A, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, et al.: Comparison of Diaphragmatic Stretch Technique and Manual Diaphragm Release Technique on Diaphragmatic Excursion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Pulm. Med. 2019;2019:1–7. 30719351 10.1155/2019/6364376 PMC6335861 These studies closely aligned with the design of our protocol and thus informed our power analysis calculation. The sample size calculation was based on an alpha (α) level of 0.01, a power (β) of 0.85, and a large effect size, Cohen's d, of 1.86 for a two-tailed independent t-test. This effect size was calculated based on the results reported by Rocha et al. (2015), specifically from the mean (SD) values of the control and experimental groups following six manual therapy intervention sessions. Furthermore, the calculation accounted for an anticipated attrition rate of approximately 15%, foreseeing the potential for participant dropout or exclusion. This comprehensive approach to sample size calculation ensures the robustness and reliability of the study's findings, enabling precise detection of the large effect size with high statistical confidence. This resulted in a total sample size of 24 people (12 per group), considering a withdrawal rate of 15%. Comment 7: « The authors aim to recruit a minimum of 24 participants, encompassing a broad age range from 8 to 60 years. However, it is recommended that the authors consider prioritizing either pediatric or adult patients for a more focused investigation.» We agree that this is a mistake. Thank you for pointing this out. We have modified the text according to your comment. Comment 8: « It is crucial to incorporate a thorough and detailed description of the pulmonary rehabilitation program within this protocol, as its current absence hinders the comprehensive understanding of the intervention being studied.» Thank you for prompting us to share the treatment regimen with our readers. It was an oversight, not to mention it in detail. The following paragraphs and Table 1. (Key parameters of the rehabilitation program) have been added to the manuscript (Interventions Section): “Regarding respiratory volumes, patients will be instructed to breathe progressively deeper from set to set, aiming for maximal diaphragmatic excursion and stretch. It is essential to ensure that the therapist's grip on the lower thoracic aperture is maintained throughout.” “The phases of BRE will consist of i) identification of the abnormal breathing pattern, ii) diaphragmatic breathing, ii) nose breathing, iii) slow breathing with controlled breath-holding at the end of exhalation, iv) adaptation of the new breathing pattern in everyday life activities and various positions (supine, semi-sitting, sitting), and v) breathing control in speech. The repetitions and sets of BRE are indicative, given that our priority was progression and individualization during the sessions. For instance, the first session may only include recognition of the abnormal breathing pattern exercise and practice diaphragmatic and nose breathing retraining exercise. At the beginning of every session, each participant will be assessed for their compliance concerning the exercises (use of a calendar or via questions about their exercise). If a patient has not comprehended or cannot perform the exercises correctly, the previous session will have to be repeated. Once they have fully understood the instructions and execution, they will proceed to the subsequent BRE.” Comment 9: « The data analysis plan is appropriate. The utilization of 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment will be used to examine the interaction between intervention offer advantages for allowing for the examination of within-subject changes across multiple conditions or time points and accounting for the correlated nature of data within subjects.» Thank you for reviewing and confirming that our statistical approach is appropriate. Dear Prof. Ragab Elnaggar, We would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and giving us the opportunity to revise it. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to further improve our work. Before presenting our responses to your comments, we deemed it important to clarify that our study will only focus on adults with mild to moderate severity of asthma. Unfortunately, we found a typographical error in the inclusion criteria of our study, where "18" was mistakenly written as "8." We acknowledge that this significantly affected your assessment. Given the above, we here by provide our responses in the same order as you presented your comments. Please find our replies below: Comment 1: « I partially disagree with the assertion that “The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma”. There is a previous publication on the role of MRDT in pediatric patients with asthma (1).» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was a bit overstated. Following your suggestion, we decided to delete the sentence to improve the clarity of this section. Comment 2: « While reading the introduction section, I noticed that it lacks a comprehensive background on patients with asthma, their diaphragmatic function, and the potential benefits of MDRT in addressing this issue. I believe including these key elements would greatly enhance the clarity and contextual understanding of the intended study. Providing a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function, respiratory muscle strength, or altered breathing patterns and emphasizing the potential of MDRT as a therapeutic intervention would help readers grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. I encourage the authors to consider revising the introduction accordingly to provide a more comprehensive background and set a firm foundation for the remainder of the study.» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was inadequate. Following your suggestion, we have modified the introduction, providing a more comprehensive background. We have added the text as follows: « It's also important to note that the mechanical disadvantage of the diaphragm in asthma can result in an increased workload for all inspiratory muscles, particularly during exercise, where dynamic hyperinflation may occur, leading to heightened dyspnea 15 ,16 » « Finally, although specific diaphragm MT techniques have not been documented yet, recent studies have reported evidence for their positive effect on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). 25 In particular, the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) aims to directly stretch the muscle fibers of the diaphragm, as detailed in Rochas’ research. 18 The study showed an improvement in diaphragm’s mobility, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and exercise capacity (EC) in people suffering from COPD. 18 We deem it pertinent to mention that previous studies have demonstrated that even a single MT session can have a positive effect on chest wall mechanics, dyspnea, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in individuals with COPD. 26, 27 Therefore, dyspnea, being one of the primary symptoms of asthma, can adversely affect both exercise capacity (EC) levels and overall quality of life (QoL). 28-31 According to a study 26 a single MT session of soft tissue and joint mobilization immediately improved dyspnea (Borg Scale 0-10, pre: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.5). The authors reported that the mechanism underlying this improvement could be the increase in respiratory muscle length and thoracic cage flexibility induced by MT, consequently reducing breathing effort and the development of dyspnea in individuals with COPD. 32 As for asthma, there is currently no data regarding the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for the pilot study conducted by Macias and colleagues 24 , and the study by Elnaggar and colleagues 33 , which investigated the efficacy of MDRT in children. Considering the growing clinical interest in asthma and the recent publications in the field, we believe that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting intervention on the zone of apposition of the diaphragm using the MDRT in adults with asthma for outcomes assessment is warranted. .» Comment 3: « The significance of the study is not clear. Authors may need to justify the importance of their work, highlight the impact it has on the research field, and define its contribution to new knowledge.» Comment 4: « More importantly, they need to pinpoint the research gap (in light of the related literature) and make it clear what drove them to conduct the study.» Thank you for your suggestions. As requested, we highlighted the impact on the research field and the research gap at the discussion session. The text has been correspondingly modified as follows: “Although several studies assessing the efficacy of MT in obstructive lung diseases (OLD) have been conducted, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to their conflicting results. 45 A recent systematic review (SR) of the existing literature aimed to identify indications that may underscore the need for differentiated manual therapy (MT) approaches targeting the zone of apposition (ZOA) of the diaphragm in individuals with OLD suffering from pathological adaptations of their chest wall or from respiratory symptoms. 76 This SR outlined a model illustrating how MT delays the onset of fatigue in respiratory muscles. Additionally, it demonstrated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of MT on the diaphragm for treating individuals (adults) with asthma. 76 It is noteworthy that two previous studies have examined how MT on the ZOA of the diaphragm hampers the diaphragm's function and pulmonary function in childhood asthma (RCT) 33 and in adults with asthma 24 (pilot study) accordingly. Up to this point, no RCT has comprehensively examined the impact of MDRT, in particular, on the ZOA of the diaphragm by MDRT in adults suffering from asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The protocol of this study is designed in accordance with accepted practices concerning randomization, concealed allocation, blinding of examiners, and appropriate sample size calculation. This rigorous approach ensures the reliability and robustness of the study's findings. What sets this study apart is its original investigation into the mechanism of the MDRT on the ZOA of the diaphragm in individuals living with asthma. Finally, several significant constraints must be considered. The study sample is drawn exclusively from a single hospital, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the extended experimental period and the substantial number of sessions may lead to participant dropouts. ” Comment 5: «Again, the statement “As for asthma, there is no data for the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for one pilot study” is not true and should be revised in light of the aforementioned publication.» We believe that this comment has been addressed based on our previous replies. After clarifying that there was confusion due to the typographical error, we believe that this statement is now correct. Please do not hesitate to reach out for any further clarification. Comment 6: « I have a concern regarding the study power. A sample size of 24 is a considerably small sample. The authors conducted an a priori power analysis to determine the minimum sample size necessary for detecting clinically significant results. They employed a substantial effect size (d = 1.36) and the minimum acceptable power level (80%) in their analysis. However, this approach may present challenges in detecting moderate or small changes in the outcome variable, potentially resulting in inconclusive findings and limiting the interpretability of the study conclusions.» Thank you for your comment. We understand your concerns about the sample study calculation, and we would like to explain the rationale behind the participant number determined by our power analysis. In 2023, we conducted a systematic review ( Is manual therapy of the diaphragm effective for people with Obstructive Lung Diseases? A Systematic Review, Respir Med Res. 2023 Jun:83:101002. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101002. Epub 2023 Feb 15.) investigating the effects of specialized mobilization techniques applied to the zone of apposition of the diaphragm in patients with obstructive respiratory diseases, including asthma and COPD. The results of this study revealed a literature gap indicating that the applied techniques on the ZOA of the diaphragm have not been applied in people with asthma beyond, of course, your study (in the pediatric population) and that of Macias et al. 2018 ( Effects of manual therapy on the diaphragm in asthmatic patients: A randomized pilot studyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.07.006 ). The two studies included in our research represented the closest in design to our own protocol (participants, manual therapy techniques of the diaphragm, diaphragm excursion measured by the US), thus necessitating the power analysis calculation based on them. For your convenience, we hereby provide the two studies in our research, which served as the basis for our study power. Rocha T, Souza H, Brandão DC, et al.: The Manual Diaphragm Release Technique improves diaphragmatic mobility, inspiratory capacity and exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised trial. J. Physiother. 2015;61(4):182–189. 26386894 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.08.009 Nair A, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, et al.: Comparison of Diaphragmatic Stretch Technique and Manual Diaphragm Release Technique on Diaphragmatic Excursion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Pulm. Med. 2019;2019:1–7. 30719351 10.1155/2019/6364376 PMC6335861 These studies closely aligned with the design of our protocol and thus informed our power analysis calculation. The sample size calculation was based on an alpha (α) level of 0.01, a power (β) of 0.85, and a large effect size, Cohen's d, of 1.86 for a two-tailed independent t-test. This effect size was calculated based on the results reported by Rocha et al. (2015), specifically from the mean (SD) values of the control and experimental groups following six manual therapy intervention sessions. Furthermore, the calculation accounted for an anticipated attrition rate of approximately 15%, foreseeing the potential for participant dropout or exclusion. This comprehensive approach to sample size calculation ensures the robustness and reliability of the study's findings, enabling precise detection of the large effect size with high statistical confidence. This resulted in a total sample size of 24 people (12 per group), considering a withdrawal rate of 15%. Comment 7: « The authors aim to recruit a minimum of 24 participants, encompassing a broad age range from 8 to 60 years. However, it is recommended that the authors consider prioritizing either pediatric or adult patients for a more focused investigation.» We agree that this is a mistake. Thank you for pointing this out. We have modified the text according to your comment. Comment 8: « It is crucial to incorporate a thorough and detailed description of the pulmonary rehabilitation program within this protocol, as its current absence hinders the comprehensive understanding of the intervention being studied.» Thank you for prompting us to share the treatment regimen with our readers. It was an oversight, not to mention it in detail. The following paragraphs and Table 1. (Key parameters of the rehabilitation program) have been added to the manuscript (Interventions Section): “Regarding respiratory volumes, patients will be instructed to breathe progressively deeper from set to set, aiming for maximal diaphragmatic excursion and stretch. It is essential to ensure that the therapist's grip on the lower thoracic aperture is maintained throughout.” “The phases of BRE will consist of i) identification of the abnormal breathing pattern, ii) diaphragmatic breathing, ii) nose breathing, iii) slow breathing with controlled breath-holding at the end of exhalation, iv) adaptation of the new breathing pattern in everyday life activities and various positions (supine, semi-sitting, sitting), and v) breathing control in speech. The repetitions and sets of BRE are indicative, given that our priority was progression and individualization during the sessions. For instance, the first session may only include recognition of the abnormal breathing pattern exercise and practice diaphragmatic and nose breathing retraining exercise. At the beginning of every session, each participant will be assessed for their compliance concerning the exercises (use of a calendar or via questions about their exercise). If a patient has not comprehended or cannot perform the exercises correctly, the previous session will have to be repeated. Once they have fully understood the instructions and execution, they will proceed to the subsequent BRE.” Comment 9: « The data analysis plan is appropriate. The utilization of 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment will be used to examine the interaction between intervention offer advantages for allowing for the examination of within-subject changes across multiple conditions or time points and accounting for the correlated nature of data within subjects.» Thank you for reviewing and confirming that our statistical approach is appropriate. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 13 Apr 2024 Author Response Dear Ragab Elnaggar, Thank you for your thorough review and insightful feedback on our study protocol. Your contributions have significantly enhanced the quality of our work. We will meticulously ... Continue reading Dear Ragab Elnaggar, Thank you for your thorough review and insightful feedback on our study protocol. Your contributions have significantly enhanced the quality of our work. We will meticulously address all the concerns raised and further refine our manuscript. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Dear Ragab Elnaggar, Thank you for your thorough review and insightful feedback on our study protocol. Your contributions have significantly enhanced the quality of our work. We will meticulously address all the concerns raised and further refine our manuscript. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 13 Apr 2024 Author Response Dear Prof. Ragab Elnaggar, We would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and giving us the opportunity to revise it. We appreciate the time and effort you ... Continue reading Dear Prof. Ragab Elnaggar, We would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and giving us the opportunity to revise it. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to further improve our work. Before presenting our responses to your comments, we deemed it important to clarify that our study will only focus on adults with mild to moderate severity of asthma. Unfortunately, we found a typographical error in the inclusion criteria of our study, where "18" was mistakenly written as "8." We acknowledge that this significantly affected your assessment. Given the above, we here by provide our responses in the same order as you presented your comments. Please find our replies below: Comment 1: « I partially disagree with the assertion that “The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma”. There is a previous publication on the role of MRDT in pediatric patients with asthma (1).» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was a bit overstated. Following your suggestion, we decided to delete the sentence to improve the clarity of this section. Comment 2: « While reading the introduction section, I noticed that it lacks a comprehensive background on patients with asthma, their diaphragmatic function, and the potential benefits of MDRT in addressing this issue. I believe including these key elements would greatly enhance the clarity and contextual understanding of the intended study. Providing a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function, respiratory muscle strength, or altered breathing patterns and emphasizing the potential of MDRT as a therapeutic intervention would help readers grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. I encourage the authors to consider revising the introduction accordingly to provide a more comprehensive background and set a firm foundation for the remainder of the study.» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was inadequate. Following your suggestion, we have modified the introduction, providing a more comprehensive background. We have added the text as follows: « It's also important to note that the mechanical disadvantage of the diaphragm in asthma can result in an increased workload for all inspiratory muscles, particularly during exercise, where dynamic hyperinflation may occur, leading to heightened dyspnea 15 ,16 » « Finally, although specific diaphragm MT techniques have not been documented yet, recent studies have reported evidence for their positive effect on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). 25 In particular, the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) aims to directly stretch the muscle fibers of the diaphragm, as detailed in Rochas’ research. 18 The study showed an improvement in diaphragm’s mobility, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and exercise capacity (EC) in people suffering from COPD. 18 We deem it pertinent to mention that previous studies have demonstrated that even a single MT session can have a positive effect on chest wall mechanics, dyspnea, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in individuals with COPD. 26, 27 Therefore, dyspnea, being one of the primary symptoms of asthma, can adversely affect both exercise capacity (EC) levels and overall quality of life (QoL). 28-31 According to a study 26 a single MT session of soft tissue and joint mobilization immediately improved dyspnea (Borg Scale 0-10, pre: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.5). The authors reported that the mechanism underlying this improvement could be the increase in respiratory muscle length and thoracic cage flexibility induced by MT, consequently reducing breathing effort and the development of dyspnea in individuals with COPD. 32 As for asthma, there is currently no data regarding the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for the pilot study conducted by Macias and colleagues 24 , and the study by Elnaggar and colleagues 33 , which investigated the efficacy of MDRT in children. Considering the growing clinical interest in asthma and the recent publications in the field, we believe that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting intervention on the zone of apposition of the diaphragm using the MDRT in adults with asthma for outcomes assessment is warranted. .» Comment 3: « The significance of the study is not clear. Authors may need to justify the importance of their work, highlight the impact it has on the research field, and define its contribution to new knowledge.» Comment 4: « More importantly, they need to pinpoint the research gap (in light of the related literature) and make it clear what drove them to conduct the study.» Thank you for your suggestions. As requested, we highlighted the impact on the research field and the research gap at the discussion session. The text has been correspondingly modified as follows: “Although several studies assessing the efficacy of MT in obstructive lung diseases (OLD) have been conducted, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to their conflicting results. 45 A recent systematic review (SR) of the existing literature aimed to identify indications that may underscore the need for differentiated manual therapy (MT) approaches targeting the zone of apposition (ZOA) of the diaphragm in individuals with OLD suffering from pathological adaptations of their chest wall or from respiratory symptoms. 76 This SR outlined a model illustrating how MT delays the onset of fatigue in respiratory muscles. Additionally, it demonstrated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of MT on the diaphragm for treating individuals (adults) with asthma. 76 It is noteworthy that two previous studies have examined how MT on the ZOA of the diaphragm hampers the diaphragm's function and pulmonary function in childhood asthma (RCT) 33 and in adults with asthma 24 (pilot study) accordingly. Up to this point, no RCT has comprehensively examined the impact of MDRT, in particular, on the ZOA of the diaphragm by MDRT in adults suffering from asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The protocol of this study is designed in accordance with accepted practices concerning randomization, concealed allocation, blinding of examiners, and appropriate sample size calculation. This rigorous approach ensures the reliability and robustness of the study's findings. What sets this study apart is its original investigation into the mechanism of the MDRT on the ZOA of the diaphragm in individuals living with asthma. Finally, several significant constraints must be considered. The study sample is drawn exclusively from a single hospital, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the extended experimental period and the substantial number of sessions may lead to participant dropouts. ” Comment 5: «Again, the statement “As for asthma, there is no data for the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for one pilot study” is not true and should be revised in light of the aforementioned publication.» We believe that this comment has been addressed based on our previous replies. After clarifying that there was confusion due to the typographical error, we believe that this statement is now correct. Please do not hesitate to reach out for any further clarification. Comment 6: « I have a concern regarding the study power. A sample size of 24 is a considerably small sample. The authors conducted an a priori power analysis to determine the minimum sample size necessary for detecting clinically significant results. They employed a substantial effect size (d = 1.36) and the minimum acceptable power level (80%) in their analysis. However, this approach may present challenges in detecting moderate or small changes in the outcome variable, potentially resulting in inconclusive findings and limiting the interpretability of the study conclusions.» Thank you for your comment. We understand your concerns about the sample study calculation, and we would like to explain the rationale behind the participant number determined by our power analysis. In 2023, we conducted a systematic review ( Is manual therapy of the diaphragm effective for people with Obstructive Lung Diseases? A Systematic Review, Respir Med Res. 2023 Jun:83:101002. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101002. Epub 2023 Feb 15.) investigating the effects of specialized mobilization techniques applied to the zone of apposition of the diaphragm in patients with obstructive respiratory diseases, including asthma and COPD. The results of this study revealed a literature gap indicating that the applied techniques on the ZOA of the diaphragm have not been applied in people with asthma beyond, of course, your study (in the pediatric population) and that of Macias et al. 2018 ( Effects of manual therapy on the diaphragm in asthmatic patients: A randomized pilot studyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.07.006 ). The two studies included in our research represented the closest in design to our own protocol (participants, manual therapy techniques of the diaphragm, diaphragm excursion measured by the US), thus necessitating the power analysis calculation based on them. For your convenience, we hereby provide the two studies in our research, which served as the basis for our study power. Rocha T, Souza H, Brandão DC, et al.: The Manual Diaphragm Release Technique improves diaphragmatic mobility, inspiratory capacity and exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised trial. J. Physiother. 2015;61(4):182–189. 26386894 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.08.009 Nair A, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, et al.: Comparison of Diaphragmatic Stretch Technique and Manual Diaphragm Release Technique on Diaphragmatic Excursion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Pulm. Med. 2019;2019:1–7. 30719351 10.1155/2019/6364376 PMC6335861 These studies closely aligned with the design of our protocol and thus informed our power analysis calculation. The sample size calculation was based on an alpha (α) level of 0.01, a power (β) of 0.85, and a large effect size, Cohen's d, of 1.86 for a two-tailed independent t-test. This effect size was calculated based on the results reported by Rocha et al. (2015), specifically from the mean (SD) values of the control and experimental groups following six manual therapy intervention sessions. Furthermore, the calculation accounted for an anticipated attrition rate of approximately 15%, foreseeing the potential for participant dropout or exclusion. This comprehensive approach to sample size calculation ensures the robustness and reliability of the study's findings, enabling precise detection of the large effect size with high statistical confidence. This resulted in a total sample size of 24 people (12 per group), considering a withdrawal rate of 15%. Comment 7: « The authors aim to recruit a minimum of 24 participants, encompassing a broad age range from 8 to 60 years. However, it is recommended that the authors consider prioritizing either pediatric or adult patients for a more focused investigation.» We agree that this is a mistake. Thank you for pointing this out. We have modified the text according to your comment. Comment 8: « It is crucial to incorporate a thorough and detailed description of the pulmonary rehabilitation program within this protocol, as its current absence hinders the comprehensive understanding of the intervention being studied.» Thank you for prompting us to share the treatment regimen with our readers. It was an oversight, not to mention it in detail. The following paragraphs and Table 1. (Key parameters of the rehabilitation program) have been added to the manuscript (Interventions Section): “Regarding respiratory volumes, patients will be instructed to breathe progressively deeper from set to set, aiming for maximal diaphragmatic excursion and stretch. It is essential to ensure that the therapist's grip on the lower thoracic aperture is maintained throughout.” “The phases of BRE will consist of i) identification of the abnormal breathing pattern, ii) diaphragmatic breathing, ii) nose breathing, iii) slow breathing with controlled breath-holding at the end of exhalation, iv) adaptation of the new breathing pattern in everyday life activities and various positions (supine, semi-sitting, sitting), and v) breathing control in speech. The repetitions and sets of BRE are indicative, given that our priority was progression and individualization during the sessions. For instance, the first session may only include recognition of the abnormal breathing pattern exercise and practice diaphragmatic and nose breathing retraining exercise. At the beginning of every session, each participant will be assessed for their compliance concerning the exercises (use of a calendar or via questions about their exercise). If a patient has not comprehended or cannot perform the exercises correctly, the previous session will have to be repeated. Once they have fully understood the instructions and execution, they will proceed to the subsequent BRE.” Comment 9: « The data analysis plan is appropriate. The utilization of 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment will be used to examine the interaction between intervention offer advantages for allowing for the examination of within-subject changes across multiple conditions or time points and accounting for the correlated nature of data within subjects.» Thank you for reviewing and confirming that our statistical approach is appropriate. Dear Prof. Ragab Elnaggar, We would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and giving us the opportunity to revise it. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to further improve our work. Before presenting our responses to your comments, we deemed it important to clarify that our study will only focus on adults with mild to moderate severity of asthma. Unfortunately, we found a typographical error in the inclusion criteria of our study, where "18" was mistakenly written as "8." We acknowledge that this significantly affected your assessment. Given the above, we here by provide our responses in the same order as you presented your comments. Please find our replies below: Comment 1: « I partially disagree with the assertion that “The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma”. There is a previous publication on the role of MRDT in pediatric patients with asthma (1).» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was a bit overstated. Following your suggestion, we decided to delete the sentence to improve the clarity of this section. Comment 2: « While reading the introduction section, I noticed that it lacks a comprehensive background on patients with asthma, their diaphragmatic function, and the potential benefits of MDRT in addressing this issue. I believe including these key elements would greatly enhance the clarity and contextual understanding of the intended study. Providing a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function, respiratory muscle strength, or altered breathing patterns and emphasizing the potential of MDRT as a therapeutic intervention would help readers grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. I encourage the authors to consider revising the introduction accordingly to provide a more comprehensive background and set a firm foundation for the remainder of the study.» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was inadequate. Following your suggestion, we have modified the introduction, providing a more comprehensive background. We have added the text as follows: « It's also important to note that the mechanical disadvantage of the diaphragm in asthma can result in an increased workload for all inspiratory muscles, particularly during exercise, where dynamic hyperinflation may occur, leading to heightened dyspnea 15 ,16 » « Finally, although specific diaphragm MT techniques have not been documented yet, recent studies have reported evidence for their positive effect on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). 25 In particular, the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) aims to directly stretch the muscle fibers of the diaphragm, as detailed in Rochas’ research. 18 The study showed an improvement in diaphragm’s mobility, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and exercise capacity (EC) in people suffering from COPD. 18 We deem it pertinent to mention that previous studies have demonstrated that even a single MT session can have a positive effect on chest wall mechanics, dyspnea, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in individuals with COPD. 26, 27 Therefore, dyspnea, being one of the primary symptoms of asthma, can adversely affect both exercise capacity (EC) levels and overall quality of life (QoL). 28-31 According to a study 26 a single MT session of soft tissue and joint mobilization immediately improved dyspnea (Borg Scale 0-10, pre: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.5). The authors reported that the mechanism underlying this improvement could be the increase in respiratory muscle length and thoracic cage flexibility induced by MT, consequently reducing breathing effort and the development of dyspnea in individuals with COPD. 32 As for asthma, there is currently no data regarding the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for the pilot study conducted by Macias and colleagues 24 , and the study by Elnaggar and colleagues 33 , which investigated the efficacy of MDRT in children. Considering the growing clinical interest in asthma and the recent publications in the field, we believe that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting intervention on the zone of apposition of the diaphragm using the MDRT in adults with asthma for outcomes assessment is warranted. .» Comment 3: « The significance of the study is not clear. Authors may need to justify the importance of their work, highlight the impact it has on the research field, and define its contribution to new knowledge.» Comment 4: « More importantly, they need to pinpoint the research gap (in light of the related literature) and make it clear what drove them to conduct the study.» Thank you for your suggestions. As requested, we highlighted the impact on the research field and the research gap at the discussion session. The text has been correspondingly modified as follows: “Although several studies assessing the efficacy of MT in obstructive lung diseases (OLD) have been conducted, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to their conflicting results. 45 A recent systematic review (SR) of the existing literature aimed to identify indications that may underscore the need for differentiated manual therapy (MT) approaches targeting the zone of apposition (ZOA) of the diaphragm in individuals with OLD suffering from pathological adaptations of their chest wall or from respiratory symptoms. 76 This SR outlined a model illustrating how MT delays the onset of fatigue in respiratory muscles. Additionally, it demonstrated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of MT on the diaphragm for treating individuals (adults) with asthma. 76 It is noteworthy that two previous studies have examined how MT on the ZOA of the diaphragm hampers the diaphragm's function and pulmonary function in childhood asthma (RCT) 33 and in adults with asthma 24 (pilot study) accordingly. Up to this point, no RCT has comprehensively examined the impact of MDRT, in particular, on the ZOA of the diaphragm by MDRT in adults suffering from asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The protocol of this study is designed in accordance with accepted practices concerning randomization, concealed allocation, blinding of examiners, and appropriate sample size calculation. This rigorous approach ensures the reliability and robustness of the study's findings. What sets this study apart is its original investigation into the mechanism of the MDRT on the ZOA of the diaphragm in individuals living with asthma. Finally, several significant constraints must be considered. The study sample is drawn exclusively from a single hospital, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the extended experimental period and the substantial number of sessions may lead to participant dropouts. ” Comment 5: «Again, the statement “As for asthma, there is no data for the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for one pilot study” is not true and should be revised in light of the aforementioned publication.» We believe that this comment has been addressed based on our previous replies. After clarifying that there was confusion due to the typographical error, we believe that this statement is now correct. Please do not hesitate to reach out for any further clarification. Comment 6: « I have a concern regarding the study power. A sample size of 24 is a considerably small sample. The authors conducted an a priori power analysis to determine the minimum sample size necessary for detecting clinically significant results. They employed a substantial effect size (d = 1.36) and the minimum acceptable power level (80%) in their analysis. However, this approach may present challenges in detecting moderate or small changes in the outcome variable, potentially resulting in inconclusive findings and limiting the interpretability of the study conclusions.» Thank you for your comment. We understand your concerns about the sample study calculation, and we would like to explain the rationale behind the participant number determined by our power analysis. In 2023, we conducted a systematic review ( Is manual therapy of the diaphragm effective for people with Obstructive Lung Diseases? A Systematic Review, Respir Med Res. 2023 Jun:83:101002. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101002. Epub 2023 Feb 15.) investigating the effects of specialized mobilization techniques applied to the zone of apposition of the diaphragm in patients with obstructive respiratory diseases, including asthma and COPD. The results of this study revealed a literature gap indicating that the applied techniques on the ZOA of the diaphragm have not been applied in people with asthma beyond, of course, your study (in the pediatric population) and that of Macias et al. 2018 ( Effects of manual therapy on the diaphragm in asthmatic patients: A randomized pilot studyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.07.006 ). The two studies included in our research represented the closest in design to our own protocol (participants, manual therapy techniques of the diaphragm, diaphragm excursion measured by the US), thus necessitating the power analysis calculation based on them. For your convenience, we hereby provide the two studies in our research, which served as the basis for our study power. Rocha T, Souza H, Brandão DC, et al.: The Manual Diaphragm Release Technique improves diaphragmatic mobility, inspiratory capacity and exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised trial. J. Physiother. 2015;61(4):182–189. 26386894 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.08.009 Nair A, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, et al.: Comparison of Diaphragmatic Stretch Technique and Manual Diaphragm Release Technique on Diaphragmatic Excursion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Pulm. Med. 2019;2019:1–7. 30719351 10.1155/2019/6364376 PMC6335861 These studies closely aligned with the design of our protocol and thus informed our power analysis calculation. The sample size calculation was based on an alpha (α) level of 0.01, a power (β) of 0.85, and a large effect size, Cohen's d, of 1.86 for a two-tailed independent t-test. This effect size was calculated based on the results reported by Rocha et al. (2015), specifically from the mean (SD) values of the control and experimental groups following six manual therapy intervention sessions. Furthermore, the calculation accounted for an anticipated attrition rate of approximately 15%, foreseeing the potential for participant dropout or exclusion. This comprehensive approach to sample size calculation ensures the robustness and reliability of the study's findings, enabling precise detection of the large effect size with high statistical confidence. This resulted in a total sample size of 24 people (12 per group), considering a withdrawal rate of 15%. Comment 7: « The authors aim to recruit a minimum of 24 participants, encompassing a broad age range from 8 to 60 years. However, it is recommended that the authors consider prioritizing either pediatric or adult patients for a more focused investigation.» We agree that this is a mistake. Thank you for pointing this out. We have modified the text according to your comment. Comment 8: « It is crucial to incorporate a thorough and detailed description of the pulmonary rehabilitation program within this protocol, as its current absence hinders the comprehensive understanding of the intervention being studied.» Thank you for prompting us to share the treatment regimen with our readers. It was an oversight, not to mention it in detail. The following paragraphs and Table 1. (Key parameters of the rehabilitation program) have been added to the manuscript (Interventions Section): “Regarding respiratory volumes, patients will be instructed to breathe progressively deeper from set to set, aiming for maximal diaphragmatic excursion and stretch. It is essential to ensure that the therapist's grip on the lower thoracic aperture is maintained throughout.” “The phases of BRE will consist of i) identification of the abnormal breathing pattern, ii) diaphragmatic breathing, ii) nose breathing, iii) slow breathing with controlled breath-holding at the end of exhalation, iv) adaptation of the new breathing pattern in everyday life activities and various positions (supine, semi-sitting, sitting), and v) breathing control in speech. The repetitions and sets of BRE are indicative, given that our priority was progression and individualization during the sessions. For instance, the first session may only include recognition of the abnormal breathing pattern exercise and practice diaphragmatic and nose breathing retraining exercise. At the beginning of every session, each participant will be assessed for their compliance concerning the exercises (use of a calendar or via questions about their exercise). If a patient has not comprehended or cannot perform the exercises correctly, the previous session will have to be repeated. Once they have fully understood the instructions and execution, they will proceed to the subsequent BRE.” Comment 9: « The data analysis plan is appropriate. The utilization of 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment will be used to examine the interaction between intervention offer advantages for allowing for the examination of within-subject changes across multiple conditions or time points and accounting for the correlated nature of data within subjects.» Thank you for reviewing and confirming that our statistical approach is appropriate. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Views 0 Cite How to cite this report: Oliveira LVF. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r216768 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v1#referee-response-216768 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. Close Copy Citation Details Reviewer Report 25 Oct 2023 Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira , Human Movement and Rehabilitation Post Graduation Program, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil Approved with Reservations VIEWS 0 https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r216768 This RCT will be innovative as it will, for the first time, provide evidence of the effect of the manual diaphragm release technique on diaphragm function in people with asthma. Manual Therapy is a low-cost alternative and supplementary therapy to ... Continue reading READ ALL This RCT will be innovative as it will, for the first time, provide evidence of the effect of the manual diaphragm release technique on diaphragm function in people with asthma. Manual Therapy is a low-cost alternative and supplementary therapy to standard treatment procedures that might improve the biomechanics of breathing in pulmonary rehabilitation. Studies aimed at investigating intervention strategies that seek to improve the functioning of the main muscle of our breathing (diaphragm) are extremely important around the world. The authors propose a low-cost intervention strategy without any risk to patients. I believe that the results of this study protocol will make important contributions to Pulmonology and Respiratory Physiotherapy around the world. Below I describe some suggestions to improve the presentation of the study protocol. The title of the study complies with the PICOS strategy, characterizing the proposal well. It is noteworthy that the study protocol is already registered at Clinical Trials.gov (ID: NCT05709054). The manuscript contains all sessions necessary for a study protocol. The abstract of the manuscript is well written and well designed, summarizing the study proposal very well. I suggest stating in the title of Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement. In the “Methods - Study design” section I suggest maintaining what is described about the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement, in relation to the protocol design, however adding that the study will be a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. I suggest adding the acronym SPIRIT to the end of the title of Table 1. In the primary outcome assessment item, add the commercial references of the ultrasound equipment that will be used to analyze the movement of the diaphragm. These details are important to allow other researchers to reproduce the study. I suggest improving the description of the statistical analysis, adding more details about the analyses. In this same item, please add the commercial description of the software to be used. The study does not mention whether there are conflicts of interest between the authors. It would be interesting to mention if there is any type of conflict. I suggest that the authors standardize bibliographic references. There are some non-standard ones. I would also like to congratulate the authors for the brilliant proposal. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise: PhD in Health Sciences, specialist in Respiratory Physiotherapy and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Cardiorespiratory Sleep Disorders. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. Close READ LESS CITE CITE HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT Oliveira LVF. Reviewer Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r216768 ) The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v1#referee-response-216768 NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article. COPY CITATION DETAILS Report a concern Author Response 28 Nov 2023 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 28 Nov 2023 Author Response Dear Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, I extend my sincere thanks for your meticulous evaluation of our study protocol and for providing valuable feedback that helped us improve our work's ... Continue reading Dear Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, I extend my sincere thanks for your meticulous evaluation of our study protocol and for providing valuable feedback that helped us improve our work's quality. Please be reassured that we will address all the issues mentioned and further improve the manuscript. We are excited to share our findings with the broader research community and hope they interest readers. The publication of our study will provide new insights and stimulate further research in this area. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Dear Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, I extend my sincere thanks for your meticulous evaluation of our study protocol and for providing valuable feedback that helped us improve our work's quality. Please be reassured that we will address all the issues mentioned and further improve the manuscript. We are excited to share our findings with the broader research community and hope they interest readers. The publication of our study will provide new insights and stimulate further research in this area. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Competing Interests: There are no competing interests. Close Report a concern Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 13 Apr 2024 Author Response Dear Prof. Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, We would like to thank you for allowing us to revise the manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this ... Continue reading Dear Prof. Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, We would like to thank you for allowing us to revise the manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to improve our work further. We have responded to all the comments. Please find our replies below. Comment 1: «I suggest stating in the title of Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement.» Thank you for the suggestion. The heading of Figure 1 has been changed. Comment 2: «In the “Methods - Study design” section, I suggest maintaining what is described about the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement in relation to the protocol design, however adding that the study will be a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now added that our study is a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. Comment 3: «I suggest adding the acronym SPIRIT to the end of the title of Table 1» Thank you for this suggestion. The acronym SPIRIT has been added to the end of the title of Table 1, as you suggested. Comment 4: «In the primary outcome assessment item, add the commercial references of the ultrasound equipment that will be used to analyze the movement of the diaphragm. These details are important to allow other researchers to reproduce the study.» Thank you for your comment. As you suggested, the commercial references to the ultrasound equipment were added to the main text. Comment 5: «I suggest improving the description of the statistical analysis, adding more details about the analyses. In this same item, please add the commercial description of the software to be used» Following your suggestion, we have improved the subsection on statistical analysis as requested. As you suggested, we have uploaded details about both the analyses and the commercial description of the software to be used. Comment 6: «The study does not mention whether there are conflicts of interest between the authors. It would be interesting to mention if there is any conflict.» Thank you for pointing out. Here and in the main text, we would like to disclose no conflicts of interest between the authors. Comment 7: «I suggest that the authors standardize bibliographic references. There are some non-standard ones.» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now tried to upload the bibliographic references standardized to the best. Dear Prof. Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, We would like to thank you for allowing us to revise the manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to improve our work further. We have responded to all the comments. Please find our replies below. Comment 1: «I suggest stating in the title of Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement.» Thank you for the suggestion. The heading of Figure 1 has been changed. Comment 2: «In the “Methods - Study design” section, I suggest maintaining what is described about the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement in relation to the protocol design, however adding that the study will be a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now added that our study is a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. Comment 3: «I suggest adding the acronym SPIRIT to the end of the title of Table 1» Thank you for this suggestion. The acronym SPIRIT has been added to the end of the title of Table 1, as you suggested. Comment 4: «In the primary outcome assessment item, add the commercial references of the ultrasound equipment that will be used to analyze the movement of the diaphragm. These details are important to allow other researchers to reproduce the study.» Thank you for your comment. As you suggested, the commercial references to the ultrasound equipment were added to the main text. Comment 5: «I suggest improving the description of the statistical analysis, adding more details about the analyses. In this same item, please add the commercial description of the software to be used» Following your suggestion, we have improved the subsection on statistical analysis as requested. As you suggested, we have uploaded details about both the analyses and the commercial description of the software to be used. Comment 6: «The study does not mention whether there are conflicts of interest between the authors. It would be interesting to mention if there is any conflict.» Thank you for pointing out. Here and in the main text, we would like to disclose no conflicts of interest between the authors. Comment 7: «I suggest that the authors standardize bibliographic references. There are some non-standard ones.» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now tried to upload the bibliographic references standardized to the best. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern Respond or Comment COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT Author Response 28 Nov 2023 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 28 Nov 2023 Author Response Dear Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, I extend my sincere thanks for your meticulous evaluation of our study protocol and for providing valuable feedback that helped us improve our work's ... Continue reading Dear Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, I extend my sincere thanks for your meticulous evaluation of our study protocol and for providing valuable feedback that helped us improve our work's quality. Please be reassured that we will address all the issues mentioned and further improve the manuscript. We are excited to share our findings with the broader research community and hope they interest readers. The publication of our study will provide new insights and stimulate further research in this area. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Dear Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, I extend my sincere thanks for your meticulous evaluation of our study protocol and for providing valuable feedback that helped us improve our work's quality. Please be reassured that we will address all the issues mentioned and further improve the manuscript. We are excited to share our findings with the broader research community and hope they interest readers. The publication of our study will provide new insights and stimulate further research in this area. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece Competing Interests: There are no competing interests. Close Report a concern Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS , Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece 13 Apr 2024 Author Response Dear Prof. Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, We would like to thank you for allowing us to revise the manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this ... Continue reading Dear Prof. Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, We would like to thank you for allowing us to revise the manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to improve our work further. We have responded to all the comments. Please find our replies below. Comment 1: «I suggest stating in the title of Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement.» Thank you for the suggestion. The heading of Figure 1 has been changed. Comment 2: «In the “Methods - Study design” section, I suggest maintaining what is described about the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement in relation to the protocol design, however adding that the study will be a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now added that our study is a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. Comment 3: «I suggest adding the acronym SPIRIT to the end of the title of Table 1» Thank you for this suggestion. The acronym SPIRIT has been added to the end of the title of Table 1, as you suggested. Comment 4: «In the primary outcome assessment item, add the commercial references of the ultrasound equipment that will be used to analyze the movement of the diaphragm. These details are important to allow other researchers to reproduce the study.» Thank you for your comment. As you suggested, the commercial references to the ultrasound equipment were added to the main text. Comment 5: «I suggest improving the description of the statistical analysis, adding more details about the analyses. In this same item, please add the commercial description of the software to be used» Following your suggestion, we have improved the subsection on statistical analysis as requested. As you suggested, we have uploaded details about both the analyses and the commercial description of the software to be used. Comment 6: «The study does not mention whether there are conflicts of interest between the authors. It would be interesting to mention if there is any conflict.» Thank you for pointing out. Here and in the main text, we would like to disclose no conflicts of interest between the authors. Comment 7: «I suggest that the authors standardize bibliographic references. There are some non-standard ones.» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now tried to upload the bibliographic references standardized to the best. Dear Prof. Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, We would like to thank you for allowing us to revise the manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to improve our work further. We have responded to all the comments. Please find our replies below. Comment 1: «I suggest stating in the title of Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement.» Thank you for the suggestion. The heading of Figure 1 has been changed. Comment 2: «In the “Methods - Study design” section, I suggest maintaining what is described about the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement in relation to the protocol design, however adding that the study will be a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now added that our study is a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. Comment 3: «I suggest adding the acronym SPIRIT to the end of the title of Table 1» Thank you for this suggestion. The acronym SPIRIT has been added to the end of the title of Table 1, as you suggested. Comment 4: «In the primary outcome assessment item, add the commercial references of the ultrasound equipment that will be used to analyze the movement of the diaphragm. These details are important to allow other researchers to reproduce the study.» Thank you for your comment. As you suggested, the commercial references to the ultrasound equipment were added to the main text. Comment 5: «I suggest improving the description of the statistical analysis, adding more details about the analyses. In this same item, please add the commercial description of the software to be used» Following your suggestion, we have improved the subsection on statistical analysis as requested. As you suggested, we have uploaded details about both the analyses and the commercial description of the software to be used. Comment 6: «The study does not mention whether there are conflicts of interest between the authors. It would be interesting to mention if there is any conflict.» Thank you for pointing out. Here and in the main text, we would like to disclose no conflicts of interest between the authors. Comment 7: «I suggest that the authors standardize bibliographic references. There are some non-standard ones.» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now tried to upload the bibliographic references standardized to the best. Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Close Report a concern COMMENT ON THIS REPORT Comments on this article Comments (0) Version 2 VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 18 Oct 2023 ADD YOUR COMMENT Comment keyboard_arrow_left keyboard_arrow_right Open Peer Review Reviewer Status info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Reviewer Reports Invited Reviewers 1 2 Version 2 (revision) 19 Mar 24 read read Version 1 18 Oct 23 read read Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira , Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Brazil Ragab K. Elnaggar , College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Saudi Arabia; Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt Comments on this article All Comments (0) Add a comment Sign up for content alerts Sign Up You are now signed up to receive this alert Browse by related subjects keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Elnaggar R. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 25 Apr 2024 | for Version 2 Ragab K. Elnaggar , Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia; Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt 0 Views copyright © 2024 Elnaggar R. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I appreciate the authors' thorough efforts in addressing the concerns raised in the previous review round. Their revisions have significantly improved the manuscript. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Physical Therapy I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Elnaggar RK. Peer Review Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257334) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2#referee-response-257334 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Oliveira L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 04 Apr 2024 | for Version 2 Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira , Human Movement and Rehabilitation Post Graduation Program, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil 0 Views copyright © 2024 Oliveira L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (0) Approved info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions I am satisfied with the changes made by the authors. All suggestions were accepted. I declare that I have no conflict of interest with the manuscript or the authors. Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise PhD in Health Sciences, specialist in Respiratory Physiotherapy and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Cardiorespiratory Sleep Disorders. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. reply Respond to this report Responses (0) Oliveira LVF. Peer Review Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.163150.r257335) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2#referee-response-257335 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2024 Elnaggar R. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 20 Feb 2024 | for Version 1 Ragab K. Elnaggar , Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al Kharj, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia; Department of Physical Therapy for Pediatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt 0 Views copyright © 2024 Elnaggar R. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (2) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This protocol for a prospective, randomized clinical trial will assess the effect of manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma. While, based on a brief search of the database, previous evidence on the effect of this intervention is likely scarce, there is, therefore, a need for more well-controlled trials, employing adequate methodology, to conclusively evaluate the role of MDRT for patients with asthma. I partially disagree with the assertion that “The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma”. There is a previous publication on the role of MRDT in pediatric patients with asthma (1). Asthma encompasses heterogeneous phenotypes that vary widely in terms of their underlying causes, triggers, clinical manifestations, and response to treatment. Furthermore, the severity of asthma can range from mild and intermittent symptoms to severe and persistent symptoms that require frequent medical intervention. Understanding the heterogeneity of asthma is important because it helps healthcare professionals tailor treatment approaches to individual patients. It is unclear in this protocol which type/severity of asthma would be considered. While reading the introduction section, I noticed that it lacks a comprehensive background on patients with asthma, their diaphragmatic function, and the potential benefits of MDRT in addressing this issue. I believe that including these key elements would greatly enhance the clarity and contextual understanding of the intended study. Providing a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function, respiratory muscle strength, or altered breathing patterns, and emphasizing the potential of MDRT as a therapeutic intervention would help readers grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. I encourage the authors to consider revising the introduction accordingly to provide a more comprehensive background and set a firm foundation for the remainder of the study. The significance of the study is not clear. Authors may need to justify the importance of their work, highlight the impact it has on the research field, and define its contribution to new knowledge. More importantly, they need to pinpoint the research gap (in light of the related literature) and make it clear what drove them to conduct the study. Again, the statement “As for asthma, there is no data for the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for one pilot study” is not true and should be revised in light of the aforementioned publication. I have a concern regarding the study power. A sample size of 24 is a considerably small sample. The authors conducted an a priori power analysis to determine the minimum sample size necessary for detecting clinically significant results. They employed a substantial effect size (d = 1.36) and the minimum acceptable power level (80%) in their analysis. However, this approach may present challenges in detecting moderate or small changes in the outcome variable, potentially resulting in inconclusive findings and limiting the interpretability of the study conclusions. The authors aim to recruit a minimum of 24 participants, encompassing a broad age range from 8 to 60 years. However, it is recommended that the authors consider prioritizing either pediatric or adult patients for a more focused investigation. It is crucial to incorporate a thorough and detailed description of the pulmonary rehabilitation program within this protocol, as its current absence hinders the comprehensive understanding of the intervention being studied. The data analysis plan is appropriate. The utilization of 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment will be used to examine the interaction between intervention offer advantages for allowing for the examination of within-subject changes across multiple conditions or time points and accounting for the correlated nature of data within subjects. In summary, the implementation of the study as outlined in this protocol has the potential to offer supplementary or corroborating evidence concerning the efficacy of MDRT in individuals diagnosed with asthma. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Partly Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Partly Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Partly Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable References 1. Elnaggar RK, Shendy MA, Mahmoud MZ: Prospective Effects of Manual Diaphragmatic Release and Thoracic Lymphatic Pumping in Childhood Asthma. Respir Care . 2019; 64 (11): 1422-1432 PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise Physical Therapy I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (2) Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS, Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece Dear Ragab Elnaggar, Thank you for your thorough review and insightful feedback on our study protocol. Your contributions have significantly enhanced the quality of our work. We will meticulously address all the concerns raised and further refine our manuscript. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS, Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece Dear Prof. Ragab Elnaggar, We would like to thank you for reviewing our manuscript and giving us the opportunity to revise it. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to further improve our work. Before presenting our responses to your comments, we deemed it important to clarify that our study will only focus on adults with mild to moderate severity of asthma. Unfortunately, we found a typographical error in the inclusion criteria of our study, where "18" was mistakenly written as "8." We acknowledge that this significantly affected your assessment. Given the above, we here by provide our responses in the same order as you presented your comments. Please find our replies below: Comment 1: « I partially disagree with the assertion that “The proposed protocol is the first to examine the effectiveness of MRDT on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma”. There is a previous publication on the role of MRDT in pediatric patients with asthma (1).» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was a bit overstated. Following your suggestion, we decided to delete the sentence to improve the clarity of this section. Comment 2: « While reading the introduction section, I noticed that it lacks a comprehensive background on patients with asthma, their diaphragmatic function, and the potential benefits of MDRT in addressing this issue. I believe including these key elements would greatly enhance the clarity and contextual understanding of the intended study. Providing a brief overview of the impact of asthma on diaphragmatic function, respiratory muscle strength, or altered breathing patterns and emphasizing the potential of MDRT as a therapeutic intervention would help readers grasp the significance of the study and its potential implications for asthma management. I encourage the authors to consider revising the introduction accordingly to provide a more comprehensive background and set a firm foundation for the remainder of the study.» Thank you for this comment. We agree that this part of the manuscript was inadequate. Following your suggestion, we have modified the introduction, providing a more comprehensive background. We have added the text as follows: « It's also important to note that the mechanical disadvantage of the diaphragm in asthma can result in an increased workload for all inspiratory muscles, particularly during exercise, where dynamic hyperinflation may occur, leading to heightened dyspnea 15 ,16 » « Finally, although specific diaphragm MT techniques have not been documented yet, recent studies have reported evidence for their positive effect on pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). 25 In particular, the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) aims to directly stretch the muscle fibers of the diaphragm, as detailed in Rochas’ research. 18 The study showed an improvement in diaphragm’s mobility, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and exercise capacity (EC) in people suffering from COPD. 18 We deem it pertinent to mention that previous studies have demonstrated that even a single MT session can have a positive effect on chest wall mechanics, dyspnea, and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in individuals with COPD. 26, 27 Therefore, dyspnea, being one of the primary symptoms of asthma, can adversely affect both exercise capacity (EC) levels and overall quality of life (QoL). 28-31 According to a study 26 a single MT session of soft tissue and joint mobilization immediately improved dyspnea (Borg Scale 0-10, pre: 2.3 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.5). The authors reported that the mechanism underlying this improvement could be the increase in respiratory muscle length and thoracic cage flexibility induced by MT, consequently reducing breathing effort and the development of dyspnea in individuals with COPD. 32 As for asthma, there is currently no data regarding the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for the pilot study conducted by Macias and colleagues 24 , and the study by Elnaggar and colleagues 33 , which investigated the efficacy of MDRT in children. Considering the growing clinical interest in asthma and the recent publications in the field, we believe that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting intervention on the zone of apposition of the diaphragm using the MDRT in adults with asthma for outcomes assessment is warranted. .» Comment 3: « The significance of the study is not clear. Authors may need to justify the importance of their work, highlight the impact it has on the research field, and define its contribution to new knowledge.» Comment 4: « More importantly, they need to pinpoint the research gap (in light of the related literature) and make it clear what drove them to conduct the study.» Thank you for your suggestions. As requested, we highlighted the impact on the research field and the research gap at the discussion session. The text has been correspondingly modified as follows: “Although several studies assessing the efficacy of MT in obstructive lung diseases (OLD) have been conducted, drawing definitive conclusions is challenging due to their conflicting results. 45 A recent systematic review (SR) of the existing literature aimed to identify indications that may underscore the need for differentiated manual therapy (MT) approaches targeting the zone of apposition (ZOA) of the diaphragm in individuals with OLD suffering from pathological adaptations of their chest wall or from respiratory symptoms. 76 This SR outlined a model illustrating how MT delays the onset of fatigue in respiratory muscles. Additionally, it demonstrated that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of MT on the diaphragm for treating individuals (adults) with asthma. 76 It is noteworthy that two previous studies have examined how MT on the ZOA of the diaphragm hampers the diaphragm's function and pulmonary function in childhood asthma (RCT) 33 and in adults with asthma 24 (pilot study) accordingly. Up to this point, no RCT has comprehensively examined the impact of MDRT, in particular, on the ZOA of the diaphragm by MDRT in adults suffering from asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The primary objective of this RCT is to address the existing literature gap concerning the impact of MDRT on enhancing the functional parameters of individuals with asthma, thereby indicating the need for further research in this domain. Additionally, considering the prevalent pathological changes in the diaphragm muscle among individuals with asthma, it is crucial to determine which anatomical regions and hands-on therapy techniques are most effective for increasing diaphragm excursion in adults with asthma. The protocol of this study is designed in accordance with accepted practices concerning randomization, concealed allocation, blinding of examiners, and appropriate sample size calculation. This rigorous approach ensures the reliability and robustness of the study's findings. What sets this study apart is its original investigation into the mechanism of the MDRT on the ZOA of the diaphragm in individuals living with asthma. Finally, several significant constraints must be considered. The study sample is drawn exclusively from a single hospital, potentially limiting the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, the extended experimental period and the substantial number of sessions may lead to participant dropouts. ” Comment 5: «Again, the statement “As for asthma, there is no data for the efficacy of diaphragm MT methods, except for one pilot study” is not true and should be revised in light of the aforementioned publication.» We believe that this comment has been addressed based on our previous replies. After clarifying that there was confusion due to the typographical error, we believe that this statement is now correct. Please do not hesitate to reach out for any further clarification. Comment 6: « I have a concern regarding the study power. A sample size of 24 is a considerably small sample. The authors conducted an a priori power analysis to determine the minimum sample size necessary for detecting clinically significant results. They employed a substantial effect size (d = 1.36) and the minimum acceptable power level (80%) in their analysis. However, this approach may present challenges in detecting moderate or small changes in the outcome variable, potentially resulting in inconclusive findings and limiting the interpretability of the study conclusions.» Thank you for your comment. We understand your concerns about the sample study calculation, and we would like to explain the rationale behind the participant number determined by our power analysis. In 2023, we conducted a systematic review ( Is manual therapy of the diaphragm effective for people with Obstructive Lung Diseases? A Systematic Review, Respir Med Res. 2023 Jun:83:101002. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101002. Epub 2023 Feb 15.) investigating the effects of specialized mobilization techniques applied to the zone of apposition of the diaphragm in patients with obstructive respiratory diseases, including asthma and COPD. The results of this study revealed a literature gap indicating that the applied techniques on the ZOA of the diaphragm have not been applied in people with asthma beyond, of course, your study (in the pediatric population) and that of Macias et al. 2018 ( Effects of manual therapy on the diaphragm in asthmatic patients: A randomized pilot studyhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.07.006 ). The two studies included in our research represented the closest in design to our own protocol (participants, manual therapy techniques of the diaphragm, diaphragm excursion measured by the US), thus necessitating the power analysis calculation based on them. For your convenience, we hereby provide the two studies in our research, which served as the basis for our study power. Rocha T, Souza H, Brandão DC, et al.: The Manual Diaphragm Release Technique improves diaphragmatic mobility, inspiratory capacity and exercise capacity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised trial. J. Physiother. 2015;61(4):182–189. 26386894 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.08.009 Nair A, Alaparthi GK, Krishnan S, et al.: Comparison of Diaphragmatic Stretch Technique and Manual Diaphragm Release Technique on Diaphragmatic Excursion in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Crossover Trial. Pulm. Med. 2019;2019:1–7. 30719351 10.1155/2019/6364376 PMC6335861 These studies closely aligned with the design of our protocol and thus informed our power analysis calculation. The sample size calculation was based on an alpha (α) level of 0.01, a power (β) of 0.85, and a large effect size, Cohen's d, of 1.86 for a two-tailed independent t-test. This effect size was calculated based on the results reported by Rocha et al. (2015), specifically from the mean (SD) values of the control and experimental groups following six manual therapy intervention sessions. Furthermore, the calculation accounted for an anticipated attrition rate of approximately 15%, foreseeing the potential for participant dropout or exclusion. This comprehensive approach to sample size calculation ensures the robustness and reliability of the study's findings, enabling precise detection of the large effect size with high statistical confidence. This resulted in a total sample size of 24 people (12 per group), considering a withdrawal rate of 15%. Comment 7: « The authors aim to recruit a minimum of 24 participants, encompassing a broad age range from 8 to 60 years. However, it is recommended that the authors consider prioritizing either pediatric or adult patients for a more focused investigation.» We agree that this is a mistake. Thank you for pointing this out. We have modified the text according to your comment. Comment 8: « It is crucial to incorporate a thorough and detailed description of the pulmonary rehabilitation program within this protocol, as its current absence hinders the comprehensive understanding of the intervention being studied.» Thank you for prompting us to share the treatment regimen with our readers. It was an oversight, not to mention it in detail. The following paragraphs and Table 1. (Key parameters of the rehabilitation program) have been added to the manuscript (Interventions Section): “Regarding respiratory volumes, patients will be instructed to breathe progressively deeper from set to set, aiming for maximal diaphragmatic excursion and stretch. It is essential to ensure that the therapist's grip on the lower thoracic aperture is maintained throughout.” “The phases of BRE will consist of i) identification of the abnormal breathing pattern, ii) diaphragmatic breathing, ii) nose breathing, iii) slow breathing with controlled breath-holding at the end of exhalation, iv) adaptation of the new breathing pattern in everyday life activities and various positions (supine, semi-sitting, sitting), and v) breathing control in speech. The repetitions and sets of BRE are indicative, given that our priority was progression and individualization during the sessions. For instance, the first session may only include recognition of the abnormal breathing pattern exercise and practice diaphragmatic and nose breathing retraining exercise. At the beginning of every session, each participant will be assessed for their compliance concerning the exercises (use of a calendar or via questions about their exercise). If a patient has not comprehended or cannot perform the exercises correctly, the previous session will have to be repeated. Once they have fully understood the instructions and execution, they will proceed to the subsequent BRE.” Comment 9: « The data analysis plan is appropriate. The utilization of 2x3 repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment will be used to examine the interaction between intervention offer advantages for allowing for the examination of within-subject changes across multiple conditions or time points and accounting for the correlated nature of data within subjects.» Thank you for reviewing and confirming that our statistical approach is appropriate. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Elnaggar RK. Peer Review Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r223569) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v1#referee-response-223569 keyboard_arrow_left Back to all reports Reviewer Report 0 Views copyright © 2023 Oliveira L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 25 Oct 2023 | for Version 1 Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira , Human Movement and Rehabilitation Post Graduation Program, Evangelical University of Goiás, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil 0 Views copyright © 2023 Oliveira L. This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. format_quote Cite this report speaker_notes Responses (2) Approved With Reservations info_outline Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved The paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved Fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions This RCT will be innovative as it will, for the first time, provide evidence of the effect of the manual diaphragm release technique on diaphragm function in people with asthma. Manual Therapy is a low-cost alternative and supplementary therapy to standard treatment procedures that might improve the biomechanics of breathing in pulmonary rehabilitation. Studies aimed at investigating intervention strategies that seek to improve the functioning of the main muscle of our breathing (diaphragm) are extremely important around the world. The authors propose a low-cost intervention strategy without any risk to patients. I believe that the results of this study protocol will make important contributions to Pulmonology and Respiratory Physiotherapy around the world. Below I describe some suggestions to improve the presentation of the study protocol. The title of the study complies with the PICOS strategy, characterizing the proposal well. It is noteworthy that the study protocol is already registered at Clinical Trials.gov (ID: NCT05709054). The manuscript contains all sessions necessary for a study protocol. The abstract of the manuscript is well written and well designed, summarizing the study proposal very well. I suggest stating in the title of Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement. In the “Methods - Study design” section I suggest maintaining what is described about the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement, in relation to the protocol design, however adding that the study will be a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. I suggest adding the acronym SPIRIT to the end of the title of Table 1. In the primary outcome assessment item, add the commercial references of the ultrasound equipment that will be used to analyze the movement of the diaphragm. These details are important to allow other researchers to reproduce the study. I suggest improving the description of the statistical analysis, adding more details about the analyses. In this same item, please add the commercial description of the software to be used. The study does not mention whether there are conflicts of interest between the authors. It would be interesting to mention if there is any type of conflict. I suggest that the authors standardize bibliographic references. There are some non-standard ones. I would also like to congratulate the authors for the brilliant proposal. Is the rationale for, and objectives of, the study clearly described? Yes Is the study design appropriate for the research question? Yes Are sufficient details of the methods provided to allow replication by others? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Not applicable Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. Reviewer Expertise PhD in Health Sciences, specialist in Respiratory Physiotherapy and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Cardiorespiratory Sleep Disorders. I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above. reply Respond to this report Responses (2) Author Response 28 Nov 2023 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS, Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece Dear Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, I extend my sincere thanks for your meticulous evaluation of our study protocol and for providing valuable feedback that helped us improve our work's quality. Please be reassured that we will address all the issues mentioned and further improve the manuscript. We are excited to share our findings with the broader research community and hope they interest readers. The publication of our study will provide new insights and stimulate further research in this area. Yours sincerely, Mr Dimitrios Tsimouris -- PhD candidate Department of Physiotherapy University of West Attica Athens, Greece View more View less Competing Interests There are no competing interests. reply Respond Report a concern Author Response 13 Apr 2024 DIMITRIOS TSIMOURIS, Physiotherapy Department, ,, Egaleo, 12243, Greece Dear Prof. Luis Vicente Franco Oliveira, We would like to thank you for allowing us to revise the manuscript. We appreciate the time and effort you put into this to improve our work further. We have responded to all the comments. Please find our replies below. Comment 1: «I suggest stating in the title of Figure 1. Design of the trial that the flowchart was prepared in accordance with the SPIRIT statement.» Thank you for the suggestion. The heading of Figure 1 has been changed. Comment 2: «In the “Methods - Study design” section, I suggest maintaining what is described about the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement in relation to the protocol design, however adding that the study will be a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now added that our study is a randomized controlled study conducted in accordance with the CONSORT statement. Comment 3: «I suggest adding the acronym SPIRIT to the end of the title of Table 1» Thank you for this suggestion. The acronym SPIRIT has been added to the end of the title of Table 1, as you suggested. Comment 4: «In the primary outcome assessment item, add the commercial references of the ultrasound equipment that will be used to analyze the movement of the diaphragm. These details are important to allow other researchers to reproduce the study.» Thank you for your comment. As you suggested, the commercial references to the ultrasound equipment were added to the main text. Comment 5: «I suggest improving the description of the statistical analysis, adding more details about the analyses. In this same item, please add the commercial description of the software to be used» Following your suggestion, we have improved the subsection on statistical analysis as requested. As you suggested, we have uploaded details about both the analyses and the commercial description of the software to be used. Comment 6: «The study does not mention whether there are conflicts of interest between the authors. It would be interesting to mention if there is any conflict.» Thank you for pointing out. Here and in the main text, we would like to disclose no conflicts of interest between the authors. Comment 7: «I suggest that the authors standardize bibliographic references. There are some non-standard ones.» Thank you for your comment. We apologize for the mistake you pointed out. We have now tried to upload the bibliographic references standardized to the best. View more View less Competing Interests No competing interests were disclosed. reply Respond Report a concern Oliveira LVF. Peer Review Report For: The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults with asthma: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] . F1000Research 2024, 12 :1361 ( https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.154901.r216768) NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in this citation. The direct URL for this report is: https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v1#referee-response-216768 Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article: Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit. Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions Adjust parameters to alter display View on desktop for interactive features Includes Interactive Elements View on desktop for interactive features Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Stay Updated Sign up for content alerts and receive a weekly or monthly email with all newly published articles Register with F1000Research Already registered? Sign in Not now, thanks close PLEASE NOTE If you are an AUTHOR of this article, please check that you signed in with the account associated with this article otherwise we cannot automatically identify your role as an author and your comment will be labelled as a “User Comment”. If you are a REVIEWER of this article, please check that you have signed in with the account associated with this article and then go to your account to submit your report, please do not post your review here. If you do not have access to your original account, please contact us . All commenters must hold a formal affiliation as per our Policies . The information that you give us will be displayed next to your comment. User comments must be in English, comprehensible and relevant to the article under discussion. We reserve the right to remove any comments that we consider to be inappropriate, offensive or otherwise in breach of the User Comment Terms and Conditions . Commenters must not use a comment for personal attacks. When criticisms of the article are based on unpublished data, the data should be made available. I accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions Please confirm that you accept the User Comment Terms and Conditions. Affiliation ✕ refresh Please enter your institution. Note: To add your institution or organisation, start typing the name and then select the correct name from the list. Where applicable, the name will appear in both the original language and in English. Do not paste in the name. If the name does not appear in the drop-down list, we will display the information you have entered. ✕ refresh Country/Region * USA UK Canada China France Germany Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory British Virgin Islands Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Democratic Republic of the Congo Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Federated States of Micronesia Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and Mcdonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Kosovo (Serbia and Montenegro) Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Minor Outlying Islands of the United States Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island North Korea North Macedonia Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestinian Territory Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Is South Korea South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand The Gambia The Netherlands Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu UK USA Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United States Virgin Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Vietnam Wallis and Futuna West Bank and Gaza Strip Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Please select your country/region. You must enter a comment. Competing Interests Please disclose any competing interests that might be construed to influence your judgment of the article's or peer review report's validity or importance. Competing Interests Policy Provide sufficient details of any financial or non-financial competing interests to enable users to assess whether your comments might lead a reasonable person to question your impartiality. Consider the following examples, but note that this is not an exhaustive list: Examples of 'Non-Financial Competing Interests' Within the past 4 years, you have held joint grants, published or collaborated with any of the authors of the selected paper. You have a close personal relationship (e.g. parent, spouse, sibling, or domestic partner) with any of the authors. You are a close professional associate of any of the authors (e.g. scientific mentor, recent student). You work at the same institute as any of the authors. You hope/expect to benefit (e.g. favour or employment) as a result of your submission. You are an Editor for the journal in which the article is published. Examples of 'Financial Competing Interests' You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, any of the following from any commercial organisation that may gain financially from your submission: a salary, fees, funding, reimbursements. You expect to receive, or in the past 4 years have received, shared grant support or other funding with any of the authors. You hold, or are currently applying for, any patents or significant stocks/shares relating to the subject matter of the paper you are commenting on. Please state your competing interests The comment has been saved. An error has occurred. Please try again. Cancel Post var lTitle = "The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm...".replace("'", ''); var linkedInUrl = "http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle) + "&summary=" + encodeURIComponent('Read the article by '); var deliciousUrl = "https://del.icio.us/post?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); var redditUrl = "http://reddit.com/submit?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2" + "&title=" + encodeURIComponent(lTitle); linkedInUrl += encodeURIComponent('Tsimouris D et al.'); var offsetTop = /chrome/i.test( navigator.userAgent ) ? 4 : -10; var addthis_config = { ui_offset_top: offsetTop, services_compact : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_expanded : "facebook,twitter,www.linkedin.com,www.mendeley.com,reddit.com", services_custom : [ { name: "LinkedIn", url: linkedInUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_linkedin.svg" }, { name: "Mendeley", url: "http://www.mendeley.com/import/?url=https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2/mendeley", icon:"/img/icon/at_mendeley.svg" }, { name: "Reddit", url: redditUrl, icon:"/img/icon/at_reddit.svg" }, ] }; var addthis_share = { url: "https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361", templates : { twitter : "The effect of manual therapy on diaphragm function in adults.... Tsimouris D et al., published by " + "@F1000Research" + ", https://f1000research.com/articles/12-1361/v2" } }; if (typeof(addthis) != "undefined"){ addthis.addEventListener('addthis.ready', checkCount); addthis.addEventListener('addthis.menu.share', checkCount); } $(".f1r-shares-twitter").attr("href", "https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=" + addthis_share.templates.twitter); $(".f1r-shares-facebook").attr("href", "https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=" + addthis_share.url); $(".f1r-shares-linkedin").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[0].url); $(".f1r-shares-reddit").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[2].url); $(".f1r-shares-mendelay").attr("href", addthis_config.services_custom[1].url); function checkCount(){ setTimeout(function(){ $(".addthis_button_expanded").each(function(){ var count = $(this).text(); if (count !== "" && count != "0") $(this).removeClass("is-hidden"); else $(this).addClass("is-hidden"); }); }, 1000); } close How to cite this report {{reportCitation}} Cancel Copy Citation Details $(function(){R.ui.buttonDropdowns('.dropdown-for-downloads');}); $(function(){R.ui.toolbarDropdowns('.toolbar-dropdown-for-downloads');}); $.get("/articles/acj/141455/163150") new F1000.Clipboard(); new F1000.ThesaurusTermsDisplay("articles", "article", "163150"); $(document).ready(function() { $( "#frame1" ).on('load', function() { var mydiv = $(this).contents().find("div"); var h = mydiv.height(); console.log(h) }); var tooltipLivingFigure = jQuery(".interactive-living-figure-label .icon-more-info"), titleLivingFigure = tooltipLivingFigure.attr("title"); tooltipLivingFigure.simpletip({ fixed: true, position: ["-115", "30"], baseClass: 'small-tooltip', content:titleLivingFigure + " " }); tooltipLivingFigure.removeAttr("title"); $("body").on("click", ".cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); var ref = $(this).attr("data-ref"); $(this).closest(".living-figure-list-container").find("#" + ref).fadeIn(200); }); $("body").on("click", ".close-cite-living-figure", function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).closest(".popup-window-wrapper").fadeOut(200); }); $(document).on("mouseup", function(e) { var metricsContainer = $(".article-metrics-popover-wrapper"); if (!metricsContainer.is(e.target) && metricsContainer.has(e.target).length === 0) { $(".article-metrics-close-button").click(); } }); var articleId = $('#articleId').val(); if($("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics) { $("#main-article-count-box").attachArticleMetrics(articleId, { articleMetricsView: true }); } }); var figshareWidget = $(".new_figshare_widget"); if (figshareWidget.length > 0) { window.figshare.load("f1000", function(Widget) { // Select a tag/tags defined in your page. In this tag we will place the widget. _.map(figshareWidget, function(el){ var widget = new Widget({ articleId: $(el).attr("figshare_articleId") //height:300 // this is the height of the viewer part. [Default: 550] }); widget.initialize(); // initialize the widget widget.mount(el); // mount it in a tag that's on your page // this will save the widget on the global scope for later use from // your JS scripts. This line is optional. //window.widget = widget; }); }); } close Error Close Add Reset F1000.MICROSERVICES.AFFILIATION = ''; $(document).ready(function () { $('.js-affiliations-form').each((index, form) => { new AffiliationForm({ formId: form.id, institutionErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-institution', departmentErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-department', placeSelector: '.js-add-comment-place', stateSelector: '.js-add-comment-state', zipCodeSelector: '.js-add-comment-zipcode', countrySelector: '.js-add-comment-country', countryErrorSelector: '.comment-enter-country', }); }); }); $(document).ready(function () { var reportIds = { "216770": 0, "216769": 0, "216768": 40, "223563": 0, "223562": 0, "223561": 0, "223560": 0, "223567": 0, "223566": 0, "223565": 0, "223564": 0, "223569": 35, "223568": 0, "265383": 0, "265390": 0, "265385": 0, "265387": 0, "265396": 0, "265398": 0, "265392": 0, "257335": 18, "257334": 5, "265394": 0, "216767": 0, "265400": 0, "216766": 0, "265402": 0, }; $(".referee-response-container,.js-referee-report").each(function(index, el) { var reportId = $(el).attr("data-reportid"), reportCount = reportIds[reportId] || 0; $(el).find(".comments-count-container,.js-referee-report-views").html(reportCount); }); var uuidInput = $("#article_uuid"), oldUUId = uuidInput.val(), newUUId = "dd1de14a-4ec2-42b0-a9fe-35e7e34f09eb"; uuidInput.val(newUUId); $("a[href*='article_uuid=']").each(function(index, el) { var newHref = $(el).attr("href").replace(oldUUId, newUUId); $(el).attr("href", newHref); }); }); An innovative open access publishing platform offering rapid publication and open peer review, whilst supporting data deposition and sharing. Browse Gateways Collections How it Works Contact For Developers Cookie Notice Privacy Notice RSS Submit Your Research Follow us © 2012-2026 F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402 | Legal | Partner of Research4Life • CrossRef • ORCID • FAIRSharing R.templateTests.simpleTemplate = R.template(' $text $text $text $text $text '); R.templateTests.runTests(); var F1000platform = new F1000.Platform({ name: "f1000research", displayName: "F1000Research", hostName: "f1000research.com", id: "1", editorialEmail: "[email protected]", infoEmail: "[email protected]", usePmcStats: true }); $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-authors, .dropdown-for-about, .dropdown-for-myresearch');}); // $(function(){R.ui.dropdowns('.dropdown-for-referees');}); $(document).ready(function () { if ($(".cookie-warning").is(":visible")) { $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "35px"); $(".devices").addClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); } $(".cookie-warning .close-button").click(function (e) { $(".devices").removeClass("devices-and-cookie-warning"); $(".sticky").css("margin-bottom", "0"); }); $("#tweeter-feed .tweet-message").each(function (i, message) { var self = $(message); self.html(linkify(self.html())); }); $(".partner").on("mouseenter mouseleave", function() { $(this).find(".gray-scale, .colour").toggleClass("is-hidden"); }); }); Sign In Remember me Forgotten your password? Sign In Cancel Email or password not correct. Please try again Please wait... $(function(){ // Note: All the setup needs to run against a name attribute and *not* the id due the clonish // nature of facebox... $("a[id=googleSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("GOOGLE"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=facebookSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("FACEBOOK"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); $("a[id=orcidSignInButton]").click(function(event){ event.preventDefault(); $("input[id=oAuthSystem]").val("ORCID"); $("form[id=oAuthForm]").submit(); }); }); If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password. The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000. Email address not valid, please try again You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here . You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password. To sign in, please click here . If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here . Code not correct, please try again Reset password Cancel Email us for further assistance. Server error, please try again. If your email address is registered with us, we will email you instructions to reset your password. If you think you should have received this email but it has not arrived, please check your spam filters and/or contact for further assistance. Please wait... Register $(document).ready(function () { signIn.createSignInAsRow($("#sign-in-form-gfb-popup")); $(".target-field").each(function () { var uris = $(this).val().split("/"); if (uris.pop() === "login") { $(this).val(uris.toString().replace(",","/")); } }); });