Phenotyping avian bill sizes; combining the collection of standardized still images with software to obtain observer-independent measures of avian bill shapes

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Avian bill size is a morphological trait with evolutionary and ecological importance. Obtaining large-scale observer-independent measures of bill length and bill depth has proven to be challenging. We developed a device, the Bill Phenotyping Box, that allows taking standardized still images from wild small passerine birds in the field. We combine this with dedicated software that, based on a single human action, determines both bill length (tip to nostril) and depth (at 2/3 of the distance from the tip). We tested for consistency of observations by correlated measurements from two independently taken still images, which was high (r=0.85). We showed that the measurement depends on the angle of the bill position relative to the camera of the device but this error is relatively small compared to the between-observer variation in hand-based measures. We show that these hand-based measures are strongly observer-dependent and that calibrating observers to each other may take at least 50 measurements, which is not feasible in field studies with dozens of observers. We thus have developed a new method that allows large scale observer-independent bill morphological measurement on wild passerines. Both the specifications of the device and of the software is openly available
Full text 2,068 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Avian bill size is a morphological trait with evolutionary and ecological importance. Obtaining large-scale observer-independent measures of bill length and bill depth has proven to be challenging. We developed a device, the Bill Phenotyping Box, that allows taking standardized still images from wild small passerine birds in the field. We combine this with dedicated software that, based on a single human action, determines both bill length (tip to nostril) and depth (at 2/3 of the distance from the tip). We tested for consistency of observations by correlated measurements from two independently taken still images, which was high (r=0.85). We showed that the measurement depends on the angle of the bill position relative to the camera of the device but this error is relatively small compared to the between-observer variation in hand-based measures. We show that these hand-based measures are strongly observer-dependent and that calibrating observers to each other may take at least 50 measurements, which is not feasible in field studies with dozens of observers. We thus have developed a new method that allows large scale observer-independent bill morphological measurement on wild passerines. Both the specifications of the device and of the software is openly available https://doi.org/10.32942/X23076 Animal Sciences, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Life Sciences, Research Methods in Life Sciences Bill size, Passerine, Parus major, software, phenotyping, passerine, Parus major, Software, Phenotyping Published: 2026-01-01 23:22 Last Updated: 2026-01-01 23:22 CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00