Alternative miRNAs: Human sequences misidentified as plant miRNAs in plant studies and in human plasma

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF View at publisher

Abstract

A recent study reported that “Plant miRNAs found in human circulating system provide evidences of cross kingdom RNAi” 1 . Analysis of two human blood plasma sequencing datasets was said to provide evidence for uptake of plant miRNAs into human plasma. The results were also purportedly inconsistent with contamination 1 . However, a review of these data suggests that they do not support dietary xenomiR uptake, but instead confirm previous findings that detection of rare plant miRNAs in mammalian sequencing datasets is artifactual. Only one putative plant miRNA (“peu-MIR2910) in this study mapped consistently above background, and this sequence is found in a human rRNA. Several other rarer but consistently mapped plant miRNAs also have 100% or near 100% matches to human transcripts or genomic sequences, and some do not map to plant genomes at all. These misidentified “alternative miRNAs”—including MIR2910 and MIR2911—emphasize the need for rigorous filtering strategies when assessing possible xenomiRNAs.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00