Feasibility and clinical significance of endoluminal assessment by transvaginal salpingoscopy during transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in infertile women
other
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
Transvaginal salpingoscopy during transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy was feasible in 41% of attempts, with success correlating to patent and normal-appearing tubes, though not past Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and clinical usefulness of transvaginal salpingoscopy (TS) during transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL) in infertile women.
DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: Jichi Medical School, Tochigi, Japan.
PATIENTS: One hundred thirty infertile women, aged 22 to 43 years, who underwent THL.
INTERVENTIONS: Transvaginal salpingoscopy findings in comparison with THL findings.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Transvaginal salpingoscopy could be performed in 41.0% of the attempted tubes. In comparing rates of successful TS in relation to tubal patency, tubal morphology, and past Chlamydia trachomatis infection, patent tubes and normal-appearing tubes classified with normal morphology had a significantly higher TS success rate. However, past C. trachomatis infection did not affect the success of TS. There was a significant correlation between salpingoscopic and laparoscopic findings; however, there were no significant correlations between salpingoscopic findings and C. trachomatis antibody titers.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that TS can be performed simultaneously in some infertile women undergoing THL especially those with patent tubes or with normal-appearing tubes. Further studies are required to show the usefulness of intratubal exploration in assessing tubal infertility.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:29.922408+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine