Open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver Type B2 fractures - A retrospective single-center experience with a minimum follow-up of 6 months

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Periprosthetic femoral fractures are an increasingly common complication following hip arthroplasty, particularly in elderly patients, and are associated with high mortality rates. Vancouver Type B2 fractures, involving a loose femoral stem with adequate bone stock, are traditionally managed with revision arthroplasty. However, in frail patients with high perioperative risk, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) represents a viable and less complex alternative due to reduced operative time, blood loss, and perioperative morbidity, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This retrospective single-center study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) treated with ORIF without femoral stem revision over a ten-year period, with a minimum follow-up of six months. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-center study was conducted at an urban Level I trauma center. Between 2014 and 2023, patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) without femoral stem revision and a minimum follow up of 6 months were included. Surgical fixation was performed via a lateral approach using 4.5 LCP Plates. Radiographic assessments included evaluation of stem subsidence, implant loosening, plate working length, and implant failure, based on imaging obtained postoperatively and at final follow-up. Results A total of 64 patients with Vancouver Type B2 fractures treated with ORIF were included. Anatomic fracture reduction was achieved in 81.3% of cases. Stem subsidence occurred in 60.9% of patients and was significantly associated with radiological signs of loosening. However, stem subsidence was not predictive of postoperative ambulation. Four patients (6.3%) required revision surgery. No correlation was found between postoperative weight-bearing protocol and achieved mobility. One-year survival was 66.2% on average. Conclusion ORIF appears to be a viable treatment option for selected patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, particularly in elderly individuals with high surgical risk. Compared to data reported in literature, it offers shorter operative times, reduced transfusion requirements than revision surgery. It also indicates acceptable mid-term outcomes, with few complications requiring revision surgery.
Full text 14,277 characters · extracted from preprint-html · click to expand
Open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver Type B2 fractures - A retrospective single-center experience with a minimum follow-up of 6 months | Research Square window.SnipcartSettings = { analytics: { enabled: false } }; (function() { var accessVector = localStorage.getItem('access_vector') || ''; window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; if (accessVector) { window.dataLayer.push({ user: { profile: { profileInfo: { snid: accessVector } } } }); } })(); (function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-K279D39R'); Browse Preprints In Review Journals COVID-19 Preprints AJE Video Bytes Research Tools Research Promotion AJE Professional Editing AJE Rubriq About Preprint Platform In Review Editorial Policies Our Team Advisory Board Help Center Sign In Submit a Preprint Cite Share Download PDF Research Article Open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver Type B2 fractures - A retrospective single-center experience with a minimum follow-up of 6 months Valerie Ladstätter, M Luger, M Hofbauer, T Tiefenböck, J Erdös, and 3 more This is a preprint; it has not been peer reviewed by a journal. https://doi.org/ 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7288551/v1 This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Abstract Introduction Periprosthetic femoral fractures are an increasingly common complication following hip arthroplasty, particularly in elderly patients, and are associated with high mortality rates. Vancouver Type B2 fractures, involving a loose femoral stem with adequate bone stock, are traditionally managed with revision arthroplasty. However, in frail patients with high perioperative risk, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) represents a viable and less complex alternative due to reduced operative time, blood loss, and perioperative morbidity, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This retrospective single-center study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) treated with ORIF without femoral stem revision over a ten-year period, with a minimum follow-up of six months. Materials and Methods This retrospective single-center study was conducted at an urban Level I trauma center. Between 2014 and 2023, patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) without femoral stem revision and a minimum follow up of 6 months were included. Surgical fixation was performed via a lateral approach using 4.5 LCP Plates. Radiographic assessments included evaluation of stem subsidence, implant loosening, plate working length, and implant failure, based on imaging obtained postoperatively and at final follow-up. Results A total of 64 patients with Vancouver Type B2 fractures treated with ORIF were included. Anatomic fracture reduction was achieved in 81.3% of cases. Stem subsidence occurred in 60.9% of patients and was significantly associated with radiological signs of loosening. However, stem subsidence was not predictive of postoperative ambulation. Four patients (6.3%) required revision surgery. No correlation was found between postoperative weight-bearing protocol and achieved mobility. One-year survival was 66.2% on average. Conclusion ORIF appears to be a viable treatment option for selected patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, particularly in elderly individuals with high surgical risk. Compared to data reported in literature, it offers shorter operative times, reduced transfusion requirements than revision surgery. It also indicates acceptable mid-term outcomes, with few complications requiring revision surgery. Full Text Additional Declarations No competing interests reported. Cite Share Download PDF Status: Posted Version 1 posted You are reading this latest preprint version Research Square lets you share your work early, gain feedback from the community, and start making changes to your manuscript prior to peer review in a journal. As a division of Research Square Company, we’re committed to making research communication faster, fairer, and more useful. We do this by developing innovative software and high quality services for the global research community. Our growing team is made up of researchers and industry professionals working together to solve the most critical problems facing scientific publishing. Also discoverable on Platform About Our Team In Review Editorial Policies Advisory Board Help Center Resources Author Services Accessibility API Access RSS feed Manage Cookie Preferences © Research Square 2026 | ISSN 2693-5015 (online) Privacy Policy Terms of Service Do Not Sell My Personal Information {"props":{"pageProps":{"initialData":{"identity":"rs-7288551","acceptedTermsAndConditions":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"archivedVersions":[],"articleType":"Research Article","associatedPublications":[],"authors":[{"id":508694107,"identity":"1531275b-58d3-4f49-8910-bc079af7d708","order_by":0,"name":"Valerie Ladstätter","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":true,"prefix":"","firstName":"Valerie","middleName":"","lastName":"Ladstätter","suffix":""},{"id":508694108,"identity":"5d500f6e-78d5-4b99-9d86-0630c504feab","order_by":1,"name":"M Luger","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"M","middleName":"","lastName":"Luger","suffix":""},{"id":508694110,"identity":"7420d950-7998-46d8-b403-d4ce5cdb4d6c","order_by":2,"name":"M Hofbauer","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"M","middleName":"","lastName":"Hofbauer","suffix":""},{"id":508694111,"identity":"6fcd366f-764b-425f-b249-f2795329edf1","order_by":3,"name":"T Tiefenböck","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"T","middleName":"","lastName":"Tiefenböck","suffix":""},{"id":508694112,"identity":"3941577c-e54f-45c1-98a3-08332f89dbcc","order_by":4,"name":"J Erdös","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"J","middleName":"","lastName":"Erdös","suffix":""},{"id":508694114,"identity":"d2ced3f2-5644-4da0-8fda-3fdd41bb9515","order_by":5,"name":"S Frenzel","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"S","middleName":"","lastName":"Frenzel","suffix":""},{"id":508694118,"identity":"ee82cd70-cb13-4fdf-86ae-b40923579631","order_by":6,"name":"T Haider","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"T","middleName":"","lastName":"Haider","suffix":""},{"id":508694119,"identity":"9d183768-2e3c-41dc-8e98-4d2d06428b72","order_by":7,"name":"S Hajdu","email":"","orcid":"","institution":"Medical University of Vienna","correspondingAuthor":false,"prefix":"","firstName":"S","middleName":"","lastName":"Hajdu","suffix":""}],"badges":[],"createdAt":"2025-08-04 08:08:32","currentVersionCode":1,"declarations":"","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7288551/v1","doiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7288551/v1","draftVersion":[],"editorialEvents":[],"editorialNote":"","failedWorkflow":false,"files":[{"id":91567323,"identity":"7cb19210-5aa7-43ea-ad82-50885ed1d63d","added_by":"auto","created_at":"2025-09-17 20:01:32","extension":"pdf","order_by":1,"title":"","display":"","copyAsset":false,"role":"manuscript-pdf","size":692060,"visible":true,"origin":"","legend":"","description":"","filename":"ManuskriptEJost2.pdf","url":"https://assets-eu.researchsquare.com/files/rs-7288551/v1_covered_41aca02f-d835-48ac-ac9b-98b488b5fa76.pdf"}],"financialInterests":"No competing interests reported.","formattedTitle":"Open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver Type B2 fractures - A retrospective single-center experience with a minimum follow-up of 6 months","fulltext":[],"fulltextSource":"","fullText":"","funders":[],"hasAdminPriorityOnWorkflow":false,"hasManuscriptDocX":false,"hasOptedInToPreprint":true,"hasPassedJournalQc":"","hasAnyPriority":false,"hideJournal":true,"highlight":"","institution":"","isAcceptedByJournal":false,"isAuthorSuppliedPdf":true,"isDeskRejected":"","isHiddenFromSearch":false,"isInQc":false,"isInWorkflow":false,"isPdf":true,"isPdfUpToDate":true,"isWithdrawnOrRetracted":false,"journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true},"keywords":"","lastPublishedDoi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7288551/v1","lastPublishedDoiUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7288551/v1","license":{"name":"CC BY 4.0","url":"https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"},"manuscriptAbstract":"\u003cp\u003eIntroduction Periprosthetic femoral fractures are an increasingly common complication following hip arthroplasty, particularly in elderly patients, and are associated with high mortality rates. Vancouver Type B2 fractures, involving a loose femoral stem with adequate bone stock, are traditionally managed with revision arthroplasty. However, in frail patients with high perioperative risk, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) represents a viable and less complex alternative due to reduced operative time, blood loss, and perioperative morbidity, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This retrospective single-center study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) treated with ORIF without femoral stem revision over a ten-year period, with a minimum follow-up of six months. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eMaterials and Methods This retrospective single-center study was conducted at an urban Level I trauma center. Between 2014 and 2023, patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) without femoral stem revision and a minimum follow up of 6 months were included. Surgical fixation was performed via a lateral approach using 4.5 LCP Plates. Radiographic assessments included evaluation of stem subsidence, implant loosening, plate working length, and implant failure, based on imaging obtained postoperatively and at final follow-up. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eResults A total of 64 patients with Vancouver Type B2 fractures treated with ORIF were included. Anatomic fracture reduction was achieved in 81.3% of cases. Stem subsidence occurred in 60.9% of patients and was significantly associated with radiological signs of loosening. However, stem subsidence was not predictive of postoperative ambulation. Four patients (6.3%) required revision surgery. No correlation was found between postoperative weight-bearing protocol and achieved mobility. One-year survival was 66.2% on average. \u0026nbsp;\u0026nbsp;\u003c/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eConclusion ORIF appears to be a viable treatment option for selected patients with Vancouver Type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, particularly in elderly individuals with high surgical risk. Compared to data reported in literature, it offers shorter operative times, reduced transfusion requirements than revision surgery. It also indicates acceptable mid-term outcomes, with few complications requiring revision surgery.\u003c/p\u003e","manuscriptTitle":"Open reduction and internal fixation in Vancouver Type B2 fractures - A retrospective single-center experience with a minimum follow-up of 6 months","msid":"","msnumber":"","nonDraftVersions":[{"code":1,"date":"2025-09-03 02:55:30","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7288551/v1","editorialEvents":[{"type":"communityComments","content":0}],"status":"published","journal":{"display":true,"email":"[email protected]","identity":"researchsquare","isNatureJournal":false,"hasQc":true,"allowDirectSubmit":true,"externalIdentity":"","sideBox":"","snPcode":"","submissionUrl":"/submission","title":"Research Square","twitterHandle":"researchsquare","acdcEnabled":true,"dfaEnabled":false,"editorialSystem":"","reportingPortfolio":"","inReviewEnabled":false,"inReviewRevisionsEnabled":true}}],"origin":"","ownerIdentity":"71d5f240-c9f6-4a37-9444-844fbe8fd807","owner":[],"postedDate":"September 3rd, 2025","published":true,"recentEditorialEvents":[],"rejectedJournal":[],"revision":"","amendment":"","status":"posted","subjectAreas":[],"tags":[],"updatedAt":"2026-05-12T08:11:26+00:00","versionOfRecord":[],"versionCreatedAt":"2025-09-03 02:55:30","video":"","vorDoi":"","vorDoiUrl":"","workflowStages":[]},"version":"v1","identity":"rs-7288551","journalConfig":"researchsquare"},"__N_SSP":true},"page":"/article/[identity]/[[...version]]","query":{"redirect":"/article/rs-7288551","identity":"rs-7288551","version":["v1"]},"buildId":"8U1c8b4HqxoKbykW_rLl7","isFallback":false,"isExperimentalCompile":false,"dynamicIds":[84888],"gssp":true,"scriptLoader":[]}

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: preprint-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00