The role of laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in chronic pelvic pain
review
OA: closed
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
Laparoscopy is frequently used for chronic pelvic pain, diagnosing conditions like endometriosis and adhesions in over 65% of cases, though conscious pain mapping may improve accuracy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
More than 40% of laparoscopies are performed for the diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Although laparoscopic evaluation is sometimes considered a routine part of the evaluation, ideally the decision to perform a laparoscopy should be based on the patient's history, physical examination and findings of non-invasive tests. About 65% of women with CPP have at least one diagnosis detectable by laparoscopy and it is common to attribute causality to this diagnosis. Endometriosis is diagnosed in one-third of laparoscopies for CPP. Endometriosis requires histological confirmation to assure an accurate diagnosis. Adhesions are diagnosed in about one-quarter of laparoscopies. Ovarian cysts, hernias, pelvic congestion syndrome, ovarian remnant syndrome, ovarian retention syndrome, post-operative peritoneal cysts and endosalpingiosis are other diagnoses that can be made laparoscopically in some cases. Laparoscopic conscious pain mapping has the potential to improve the accuracy of laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool in CPP.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-05T06:14:40.014199+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:36.046895+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine