Comparison of Femoral Offset Measurement Accuracy between Three-Dimensional-CT and X-ray in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Patients and Normal People

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Background: Femoral offset (FO) is essential for the guidance of prosthesis choice in the Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). In current clinical practice, X-ray is the primary method to measure FO. However, the X-ray measurement of FO has low accuracy, especially for DDH. In this study, three-dimensional (3D)-CT was conducted to provide more accurate measurements. Methods: 3D-CT and X-ray measurements of FO from 55 DDH patients and 60 normal volunteers were conducted twice by two osteoarticular surgeons. The inter- and intra-observer reproducibility was analyzed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The FO values measured by 3D-CT and X-ray were compared and the absolute value of the difference was recorded as the error value of X-ray. These values were analyzed by paired-sample t-test, independent-sample t-test and Dunnett's t-tests, p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: Significant differences were founded between 3D-CT and X-ray in the FO measurements, the absolute values of these differences were 5.42 ± 4.66 mm in DDH patients and 3.74 ± 2.80 mm in normal people, which was regarded as the X-ray error values. According to 3D-CT measurement, the FO value of DDH patients (including Hartofilakidis-I, II, III) was lower than that of normal people. The FO value of Hartofilakidis-II DDH patients was lower than that of Hartofilakidis-I patients. Conclusion: 3D-CT is more precise than X-ray in the measurement of FO in DDH patients and normal people. The 3D-CT method should be recommended to measure FO for the choice of prosthesis in DDH patients before THA.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00