Microbiological Profile and Infection Potential of Different Cryopreserved Skull Flaps After Decompressive Hemicraniectomy. Is Cryopreservation at -80°C Better?

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

Abstract Objective:Patterns of cryopreservation of explanted skull bone flaps have long been a matter of debate, in particular the appropriate temperature of storage. To the best of our knowledge no study to date has compared the microbiological profile and the infection potential of skull bone flaps cryostored at the same institution at disparate degrees for neurosurgical purposes. In the context of our clinical trial DRKS00023283, we performed a bacterial culture of explanted skull bone flaps, which were cryoasserved lege artis at a temperature of either -23°C or -80°C after a decompressive hemicraniectomy. In a further step, we contaminated the bone fragments in a suspension with specific pathogens (S.aureus, S.epidermidis and C.acnes, CFU 103/ml) over 24 hours and conducted a second culture.Results: A total of 17 cryopreserved skull flaps (8: -23°C; 9: -80°C) explanted during decompressive hemicraniectomies performed between 2019 and 2020 as well as 2 computer-aided-designed skulls (1 vancomycin-soaked) were analyzed. Median duration of cryopreservation was 10.5 months (2 to 17 months). No microorganisms were detected at the normal bacterial culture. After active contamination of our skull flaps, all samples showed similar bacterial growth of above-mentioned pathogens; thus, our study did not reveal an influence of the storage temperature upon infectious dynamic of the skulls.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00