How to promote more nuanced construct theories: An interdisciplinary perspective with pragmatic recommendations

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-17

This paper presents an interdisciplinary framework using predictive validity, invariance testing, and distributional properties to enhance construct validity beyond mere statistical model fit in psychology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Psychology's reliance on statistical model fit often misinterprets statistical coherence asconstruct validity. Constructs may exhibit strong model fit but lack theoretical clarity. Thispaper argues that model fit should be one of several criteria for construct validity. We presentan interdisciplinary framework that combines psychometric and philosophical insights andencourages approaches beyond structural analyses. By emphasizing predictive validity,testing (in)variance across constructs, and examining distributional properties, we proposemethods that yield theoretically robust constructs. Our aim is to move from statistical fit to anuanced understanding of construct validity, enabling models that better represent realpsychological phenomena.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00