The Excluded Ordinary? A Theory of Populist Radical Right Voters’ Position in Society – Preprint

preprint OA: closed
View at publisher

Abstract

While some research describes Populist Radical Right (PRR) voters as marginalized, other evidence suggests they are central members of society: PRR parties receive support from a broad demographic spectrum and particularly from historically powerful groups. Moreover, PRR voters see themselves as ordinary people. I argue that the conundrum of the marginalized vs. ordinary PRR voter arises because social inclusion is often insufficiently understood as just belonging to the group. I apply Optimal Distinctiveness Theory to posit that an individual’s inclusion experience relies on two needs: First, individuals need to experience belonging to the larger group. Second, they simultaneously need to feel recognized as members of unique subgroups within that larger group. Amid a liberalization of values and a reduction of historical injustices, majority members may feel excluded despite belonging to society because they feel their unique subgroup background is unrecognized. I showcase this argument using semi-structured interviews with German PRR voters. The study explores the general suitability of the theory for majority members’ inclusion experience. I close by raising avenues for quantitative tests of the theory and a significant implication: future progress on minority rights will inevitably drive polarization unless majority members’ need for uniqueness is accounted for.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-19T01:45:01.086888+00:00