How different AI models understand cells differently

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

AI single-cell foundation models (scFMs) are believed to be able to learn essential relations in cell transcriptomics with the attention modules in Transformer, but there is no method to reveal what they actually learned. We observed that different models may grasp different aspects of relations. To unravel the mystery, we propose scGeneLens, a framework for dissecting how scFMs perceive cells. We employed a sparse block attention to replace the original attention mechanism to concentrate attentions into a few dominant gene–gene relations, used attention propagation to trace how the relations propagate across Transformer layers, and used integrated gradients to disentangle the relative contributions of gene identity and expression in cell representations. We applied it to scFoundation and scGPT and show that they exhibit pluralistic perceptions of cells: scFoundation emphasizes relations among cell-type marker genes, resulting in stronger cell-type separability, whereas scGPT focuses more on genes involved in shared cellular pathways and core biological activities, leading to representations that generalize across conditions. The framework provides a unified lens for probing what scFMs learn about cells and offers actionable insights for the design of future cellular foundation models. Our code can be seen in https://anonymous.4open.science/r/scGeneLens-B771/ .
Full text 1,469 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract AI single-cell foundation models (scFMs) are believed to be able to learn essential relations in cell transcriptomics with the attention modules in Transformer, but there is no method to reveal what they actually learned. We observed that different models may grasp different aspects of relations. To unravel the mystery, we propose scGeneLens, a framework for dissecting how scFMs perceive cells. We employed a sparse block attention to replace the original attention mechanism to concentrate attentions into a few dominant gene–gene relations, used attention propagation to trace how the relations propagate across Transformer layers, and used integrated gradients to disentangle the relative contributions of gene identity and expression in cell representations. We applied it to scFoundation and scGPT and show that they exhibit pluralistic perceptions of cells: scFoundation emphasizes relations among cell-type marker genes, resulting in stronger cell-type separability, whereas scGPT focuses more on genes involved in shared cellular pathways and core biological activities, leading to representations that generalize across conditions. The framework provides a unified lens for probing what scFMs learn about cells and offers actionable insights for the design of future cellular foundation models. Our code can be seen in https://anonymous.4open.science/r/scGeneLens-B771/. Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00