Localized cervical pain: advantages and limits of ultrasound evaluation
article
OA: bronze
CC0
Abstract
PurposeCervical pain is very frequent in the general population. In clinical practice, plain X-ray and, in selected cases, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, are performed. However, the feasibility and utility of ultrasound examination have been poorly investigated. Aim of the present study was to evaluate whether ultrasound could be useful in the diagnosis of localized cervical pain.MethodsSubjects suffering from posterior cervical pain without irradiation to surrounding tissues were enrolled. After clinical and functional evaluation (demographic and anthropometric data, VAS at rest and during neck movements, symptoms duration, and characteristics of pain onset [atraumatic or traumatic]), an ultrasound exam of the cervical spine was performed according to standard protocols.ResultsThe anatomic structures of the neck district were visualized in 124/127 enrolled patients and pathological features were observed in 58. Significant ultrasound differences were registered between the patients with traumatic and atraumatic onset of neck pain. In the first group, articular effusion, capsular bulging, disalignment and avulsion of the articular apex were observed, whereas in the latter cortical irregularities, osteophytosis, and articular ankylosis were prevalent.ConclusionsUltrasound examination can be used as diagnostic tool in the evaluation of selected patients suffering from localized cervical pain, particularly in cases of pain due to traumatic injuries.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
References (25)
- doi:10.1007/s00256-012-1434-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181c9b075 via openalex
- doi:10.11152/mu.2013.2066.151.jo1ugc2 via openalex
- doi:10.1055/s-0034-1375568 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2014.07.007 via openalex
- doi:10.1186/s13075-015-0643-0 via openalex
- W128012473 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01170.x via openalex
- doi:10.1186/1471-2474-5-15 via openalex
- doi:10.36076/ppj.2007/10/229 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.011 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00007632-199501000-00004 via openalex
- doi:10.7863/ultra.32.11.1885 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00276-010-0621-9 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000090836.50508.f7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.berh.2011.01.019 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/bto.0b013e318289737e via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/ard.2010.140541 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s1047-9651(03)00039-1 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00586-013-2916-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/jcu.20876 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2007.01.006 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/aap.0b013e31823f3c80 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T05:55:38.273849+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK