An age-related nomogram for antral follicle count: an observational study of 3821 women
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This observational study developed an age-related nomogram for antral follicle count using data from 3821 women.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Research questionWhat is the relationship between antral follicle count (AFC) and chronological age, and what are the expected values for AFC?DesignThis was a retrospective cohort study at a specialist gynaecological ultrasound centre in London, UK. Women presenting to a gynaecology diagnostic unit for investigation of symptoms or routine check-up, and undergoing transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) examinations, between 1 January 2017 and 22 September 2022 were included in this study.ResultsIn total, 8821 TVUS records from 7573 patients were analysed. The relationship between AFC and age was estimated to develop an AFC nomogram independent of the stage in the menstrual cycle. AFC corresponding to the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th centiles for each patient and age group were calculated. Both nomogram and condition-specific populations displayed a Gaussian relationship between AFC and age. For the nomogram population (scans n = 4256, patients n = 3821), a peak median AFC of 30 was observed between 21-23 years of age. The AFC distribution of the group with previous ovarian cystectomy (scans n = 534, patients n = 443) was found to be significantly different compared with the nomogram population (P < 0.0001). However, the same did not hold true for those on hormonal contraception (scans n = 566, patients n = 534) (P = 0.43).ConclusionsAn AFC nomogram reporting median and interquartile values for AFC by chronological age across the reproductive years was developed. This is a useful tool for providing counselling for those undergoing ovarian reserve assessments, and can be taken any time in the menstrual cycle, including in women on hormonal contraceptives or who have undergone previous ovarian cystectomy.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (21)
- W1989858901 via openalex
- W1996105896 via openalex
- W2005527513 via openalex
- W2009589648 via openalex
- W2019420112 via openalex
- W2030781538 via openalex
- W2038989132 via openalex
- W2044459523 via openalex
- W2053547026 via openalex
- W2086631680 via openalex
- W2105290217 via openalex
- W2117212359 via openalex
- W2119690462 via openalex
- W2154523344 via openalex
- W2155153702 via openalex
- W2160557830 via openalex
- W2345861234 via openalex
- W2521922460 via openalex
- W2766792788 via openalex
- W3166378047 via openalex
- W4248728823 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK