Reply of the Authors: Endometriosis and pregnancy loss: the importance of mitigating sources of bias

Amalie Dyhrberg Boje, Pia Egerup, David Westergaard, Marie-Louise Mathilde Friis Bertelsen, Mette Nyegaard, Dorthe Hartwell, Øjvind Lidegaard, Henriette Svarre Nielsen
Fertility and sterility · 2023 · vol. 120(2) , pp. 393–394 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.003 · PMID:37169324
other OA: bronze public-domain-us
🔓 Open OA copy View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

The authors emphasize the critical need to address and mitigate sources of bias when investigating the relationship between endometriosis and pregnancy loss.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Abortion, Induced Abortion, Induced Abortion, Induced Abortion, Induced Abortion, Spontaneous Abortion, Spontaneous Abortion, Spontaneous Abortion, Spontaneous Abortion, Spontaneous Abortion, Spontaneous Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Female

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-17T00:33:41.425141+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine