Laparoscopy and robotic-assisted surgery for endometriosis: how intestinal and ovarian involvement impact operative time

Surgical duration for endometriosis treatment varies based on the anatomical complexity of the disease and the surgical technique applied. However, the independent effects of each of these factors remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that intestinal involvement and the presence of endometrioma, whether isolated or combined, significantly increase operative time, regardless of the surgical technique. This study aimed to assess how endometriosis phenotype and surgical approach influence operative time. This retrospective observational study included 263 patients who underwent either conventional laparoscopy (n = 113) or robotic-assisted surgery (n = 150) between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients were stratified into four groups: (1) isolated deep infiltrating endometriosis, (2) endometrioma without intestinal involvement, (3) intestinal endometriosis without endometrioma, and (4) combined presentation (endometrioma with intestinal involvement). Univariate analyses and multiple linear regression models were used to examine the effects of disease phenotype and surgical approach on operative time. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The presence of endometrioma and intestinal involvement were both significant predictors of increased operative time, with a cumulative effect in combined cases. Compared to isolated DIE, there was an average increase of 63.4 min for isolated endometrioma cases (p < 0.001), 40.9 min for isolated intestinal endometriosis (p = 0.004), and 103.8 min for combined presentation (p < 0.001). The robotic approach added an average of 34.0 min to operative time (p < 0.001), with the effect most pronounced in patients with endometrioma. Age was also a significant factor, contributing an additional 1.5 min per year (p = 0.035). The estimated mean docking time for robotic cases was approximately 12 min. When stratified by disease subtype, only the isolated endometrioma group showed a statistically significant difference between surgical techniques, with robotic-assisted surgery adding 55 min (p = 0.007). In the other groups, including those with intestinal involvement, no significant differences were observed between approaches, although there was a numerical trend towards longer operative times with the robotic technique. Operative time is primarily influenced by the clinical presentation of endometriosis, with endometrioma, especially when combined with intestinal involvement, having the greatest impact. Although robotic-assisted surgery was associated with longer operative times overall, it was more frequently used in complex cases, suggesting a positive selection bias. The additional time likely reflects both the technical intricacy of robotic procedures and the docking process. Nevertheless, this technology may offer advantages for complex dissections. These findings underscore the importance of individualized surgical planning based on the anatomical characteristics of the disease rather than solely on the choice of surgical platform. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Estes SJ, Soliman AM, Epstein AJ et al (2019) National trends in inpatient endometriosis admissions: patients, procedures and outcomes, 2006–2015. PLoS ONE 14:e0222889 Song Z, Li S, Luo M et al (2023) Assessing the role of robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery in patients with a diagnosis of endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 102:e33104 Rocha AM, de Albuquerque MM, Schmidt EM et al (2018) Late impact of the laparoscopic treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with segmental colorectal resection. Arq Bras Cir Dig 31:e1406 Limberger LF, Jacobsen L, Koshimizu RT et al (2018) Surgery for deep endometriosis: standardization of the operating technique. J Surg Oper Care. https://doi.org/10.15744/2455-7617.3.202 Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat C (2013) Nezhat’s video-assisted and robotic-assisted laparoscopy and hysteroscopy with DVD. Cambridge University Press, Boca Raton Oliveira MAP, Crispi CP, Oliveira FM et al (2014) Double circular stapler technique for bowel resection in rectosigmoid endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:136–141 Massimello F, Di Spiezio SA, Bifulco G et al (2023) New technologies in the surgical management of endometriosis. AboutOpen 10:50–54 Kang J-H, Kim T-J (2020) The role of robotic surgery for endometriosis. Gyne Robot Surg 1:36–49 Nezhat FR, Sirota I (2014) Perioperative outcomes of robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00094 Nezhat C, Hajhosseini B, King LP (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic treatment of bowel, bladder, and ureteral endometriosis. JSLS 15:387–392 Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X et al (2017) Laparoscopy vs. robotic surgery for endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 107:996-1002.e3 Pavone M, Baroni A, Campolo F et al (2024) Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence. J Robot Surg 18:212 Araujo SEA, Seid VE, Marques RM, Gomes MTV (2016) Advantages of the robotic approach to deep infiltrating rectal endometriosis: because less is more. J Robot Surg 10:165–169 Csirzó Á, Kovács DP, Szabó A et al (2024) Robot-assisted laparoscopy does not have demonstrable advantages over conventional laparoscopy in endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 38:529–539 Ferrari FA, Youssef Y, Naem A et al (2024) Robotic surgery for deep-infiltrating endometriosis: is it time to take a step forward? Front Med (Lausanne) 11:1387036 Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188:2S-15S Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki MA, Kim JY, Milad MP (2015) Longer operative time during benign laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy is associated with increased 30-day perioperative complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(6):S81 Leborne P, Huberlant S, Masia F, de Tayrac R, Letouzey V, Allegre L (2022) Clinical outcomes following surgical management of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Sci Rep 12:21800 Funding The authors have not disclosed any funding. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions All authors contributed equally. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Osaki, A.J.D., de Oliveira, M.A.P. Laparoscopy and robotic-assisted surgery for endometriosis: how intestinal and ovarian involvement impact operative time. J Robotic Surg 19, 417 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02588-8 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02588-8