TAUS: Target-Age Unified Survival. Survival analysis without assuming proportional hazards or parameterising the survival function

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

ABSTRACT Standard survival analysis methods often rely on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) or parameterisations of the survival function that might not be appropriate for wild populations. To enable survival analysis without these modelling constraints, we developed an approach that combines the Kaplan-Meier estimator with conditional probability theory to compute age-specific probabilities of survival up to some target age of choice τ . Marginalising this probability over the age distribution of the population yields O τ , the probability that a randomly sampled individual of unknown age will outlive the target age τ . Notably, the value for τ is set by the analyst for each group independently, which allows accounting for differences in pace of life across populations. We tested its application using a simulation study and two real-world datasets, and compared its performance against that of Cox PH and parametric survival models. The PH assumption was violated in the three examples, rendering the Cox PH models inappropriate. Parametric models offered a better alternative, but the best parametric fit missed at least some key survival patterns in all examples. The TAUS model provided a valid description of survival patterns in all cases. Its richer output also allowed finer analysis of survival differences between populations. The TAUS model is also available as an R package ( https://github.com/casasgomezuribarri/TAUS ). This new approach to survival analysis without PH or parametric assumptions allows the comparison of survival probabilities across populations with different age structures and rates of pace of life. This makes it suitable for a wide range of ecological applications, including in population viability analysis, epidemiology, or life-history theory
Full text 1,876 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
ABSTRACT Standard survival analysis methods often rely on the assumption of proportional hazards (PH) or parameterisations of the survival function that might not be appropriate for wild populations. To enable survival analysis without these modelling constraints, we developed an approach that combines the Kaplan-Meier estimator with conditional probability theory to compute age-specific probabilities of survival up to some target age of choice τ. Marginalising this probability over the age distribution of the population yields Oτ, the probability that a randomly sampled individual of unknown age will outlive the target age τ. Notably, the value for τ is set by the analyst for each group independently, which allows accounting for differences in pace of life across populations. We tested its application using a simulation study and two real-world datasets, and compared its performance against that of Cox PH and parametric survival models. The PH assumption was violated in the three examples, rendering the Cox PH models inappropriate. Parametric models offered a better alternative, but the best parametric fit missed at least some key survival patterns in all examples. The TAUS model provided a valid description of survival patterns in all cases. Its richer output also allowed finer analysis of survival differences between populations. The TAUS model is also available as an R package (https://github.com/casasgomezuribarri/TAUS). This new approach to survival analysis without PH or parametric assumptions allows the comparison of survival probabilities across populations with different age structures and rates of pace of life. This makes it suitable for a wide range of ecological applications, including in population viability analysis, epidemiology, or life-history theory Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00