Mutagenesis Sensitivity Mapping of Human Enhancers In Vivo

preprint OA: closed
📄 Open PDF Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Distant-acting enhancers are central to human development. However, our limited understanding of their functional sequence features prevents the interpretation of enhancer mutations in disease. Here, we determined the functional sensitivity to mutagenesis of human developmental enhancers in vivo. Focusing on seven enhancers active in the developing brain, heart, limb and face, we created over 1700 transgenic mice for over 260 mutagenized enhancer alleles. Systematic mutation of 12-basepair blocks collectively altered each sequence feature in each enhancer at least once. We show that 69% of all blocks are required for normal in vivo activity, with mutations more commonly resulting in loss (60%) than in gain (9%) of function. Using predictive modeling, we annotated critical nucleotides at base-pair resolution. The vast majority of motifs predicted by these machine learning models (88%) coincided with changes to in vivo function, and the models showed considerable sensitivity, identifying 59% of all functional blocks. Taken together, our results reveal that human enhancers contain a high density of sequence features required for their normal in vivo function and provide a rich resource for further exploration of human enhancer logic.
Full text 1,550 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Abstract Distant-acting enhancers are central to human development. However, our limited understanding of their functional sequence features prevents the interpretation of enhancer mutations in disease. Here, we determined the functional sensitivity to mutagenesis of human developmental enhancers in vivo. Focusing on seven enhancers active in the developing brain, heart, limb and face, we created over 1700 transgenic mice for over 260 mutagenized enhancer alleles. Systematic mutation of 12-basepair blocks collectively altered each sequence feature in each enhancer at least once. We show that 69% of all blocks are required for normal in vivo activity, with mutations more commonly resulting in loss (60%) than in gain (9%) of function. Using predictive modeling, we annotated critical nucleotides at base-pair resolution. The vast majority of motifs predicted by these machine learning models (88%) coincided with changes to in vivo function, and the models showed considerable sensitivity, identifying 59% of all functional blocks. Taken together, our results reveal that human enhancers contain a high density of sequence features required for their normal in vivo function and provide a rich resource for further exploration of human enhancer logic. Competing Interest Statement A.K. is on the scientific advisory board of SerImmune, AINovo, TensorBio and OpenTargets. A.K. was a scientific co-founder of RavelBio, a paid consultant with Illumina, was on the SAB of PatchBio and owns shares in DeepGenomics, Immunai, Freenome, and Illumina.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00