Robust Control of Autonomous Remotely Operated Vehicles for Fish Pen Inspections with a Sliding-Mode Compensator

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Autonomous remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) have emerged as a promising solution for fish pen inspections, replacing labor-intensive manual inspections and enhancing operational efficiency. However, deploying ROVs in these environments presents significant challenges, including unreliable localization, system uncertainties, and dynamic environmental disturbances. To address these issues, we propose a fully autonomous ROV system designed specifically for fish pen inspection in this paper. The system integrates a vision-aided approach for underwater localization and an effective path-planning algorithm to ensure safe navigation during inspections. To improve the system’s robustness against uncertainties and disturbances, we introduce a robust control scheme that combines two components: a nominal feedback controller that stabilizes the partially known nominal model of the ROV dynamics, and a sliding-mode compensator (SMC) that mitigates the effects of unknown dynamics and external disturbances. This robust control scheme, referred to as RC-SMC, minimizes the need for extensive parameter tuning while ensuring precise path-tracking underwater. Comprehensive experiments have been conducted in both laboratory and field environments to validate the efficacy and robustness of the proposed system. The results demonstrate that our ROV system can effectively perform autonomous inspections while maintaining improved stability and tracking precision compared to existing algorithms in the presence of various uncertainties and disturbances.
Full text 2,639 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Autonomous remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) have emerged as a promising solution for fish pen inspections, replacing labor-intensive manual inspections and enhancing operational efficiency. However, deploying ROVs in these environments presents significant challenges, including unreliable localization, system uncertainties, and dynamic environmental disturbances. To address these issues, we propose a fully autonomous ROV system designed specifically for fish pen inspection in this paper. The system integrates a vision-aided approach for underwater localization and an effective path-planning algorithm to ensure safe navigation during inspections. To improve the system’s robustness against uncertainties and disturbances, we introduce a robust control scheme that combines two components: a nominal feedback controller that stabilizes the partially known nominal model of the ROV dynamics, and a sliding-mode compensator (SMC) that mitigates the effects of unknown dynamics and external disturbances. This robust control scheme, referred to as RC-SMC, minimizes the need for extensive parameter tuning while ensuring precise path-tracking underwater. Comprehensive experiments have been conducted in both laboratory and field environments to validate the efficacy and robustness of the proposed system. The results demonstrate that our ROV system can effectively perform autonomous inspections while maintaining improved stability and tracking precision compared to existing algorithms in the presence of various uncertainties and disturbances. Supplementary Material File (jfr-smc-20250310.pdf) - Download - 25.85 MB Information & Authors Information Version history Copyright This work is licensed under a Non Exclusive No Reuse License.

Keywords

Authors Metrics & Citations Metrics Article Usage 296views 241downloads Citations Download citation Zhikang Ge, Peng Wei, Wenwu Lu, et al. Robust Control of Autonomous Remotely Operated Vehicles for Fish Pen Inspections with a Sliding-Mode Compensator. Authorea. 13 March 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174188943.39299911/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.174188943.39299911/v1 If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download. For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2025) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00