Clinical applied value of different hysterectomy
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study compared total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with classic inferior supercervical hysterectomy (CISH) and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH), finding CISH and LAVH to be effective, less damaging, and leading to quicker recovery than TAH.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Objective: To approach clinical applied value of different hysterectomy among total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), classic inferior supercervical hysterectomy (CISH) and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH). Methods: One hundred and two patients with uterus benign diseases, 72 cases were leiomyomas, 30 cases were adenomyosis,102 cases were divided to three groups, there were 32 cases in CISH group, 30 cases in LAVH group and 40 cases in TAH group, compared with operational time, bleeding condition duriug operation and condition after operation. Results: The operation time of LAVH and CISH groups were longer than TAH group obviously, but operational bleeding were less than TAH group, the time to apply antibiotic after operation, out-of-bed activity time, passage of gas by anus time, average length of stay were shorter than TAH group obviously (P0.05). Conclusion: Compare to TAH, CISH and LAVH are effective hystrerectomia modality. Less damage and recover quickly are their features.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK