High Data Quality Enhances Microplastic Toxicity Prediction

preprint OA: closed
Full text JSON View at publisher

Abstract

Unlike chemicals, microplastics (MPs) lack standardized identifiers, limiting the applicability of traditional predictive ecotoxicology methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. This study aimed to predict MP toxicity using MP properties, MP concentration, organismal traits, endpoints, and experimental design, and to evaluate how data pre-processing, dataset size, and quality influence model performance. We applied the Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) machine learning algorithm to four datasets derived from the Toxicity of Microplastics Explorer database (ToMEx 2.0): (i) imputed missing values, (ii) complete-case (missing values removed), (iii) high-quality data, and (iv) low-quality data. The high-quality dataset yielded the best final predictions for both random cross-validation (AUC = 0.93) and blocked cross-validation by particle identifier (AUC = 0.87). Explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) analyses showed that predictive performance was primarily determined by endpoints and concentration, with MP properties contributing despite limited reporting. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of machine learning to predict and identify key drivers of MP toxicity, highlighting that high-quality data improves predictive performance while reducing data mining and computational costs. Standardized experiments, detailed MP characterization, and high reporting standards would better support risk assessment frameworks and inform the design of safer materials.
Full text 2,415 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. You must log in to post a comment. There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint. Add a Comment You must log in to post a comment. Comments There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article. Unlike chemicals, microplastics (MPs) lack standardized identifiers, limiting the applicability of traditional predictive ecotoxicology methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. This study aimed to predict MP toxicity using MP properties, MP concentration, organismal traits, endpoints, and experimental design, and to evaluate how data pre-processing, dataset size, and quality influence model performance. We applied the Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) machine learning algorithm to four datasets derived from the Toxicity of Microplastics Explorer database (ToMEx 2.0): (i) imputed missing values, (ii) complete-case (missing values removed), (iii) high-quality data, and (iv) low-quality data. The high-quality dataset yielded the best final predictions for both random cross-validation (AUC = 0.93) and blocked cross-validation by particle identifier (AUC = 0.87). Explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) analyses showed that predictive performance was primarily determined by endpoints and concentration, with MP properties contributing despite limited reporting. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of machine learning to predict and identify key drivers of MP toxicity, highlighting that high-quality data improves predictive performance while reducing data mining and computational costs. Standardized experiments, detailed MP characterization, and high reporting standards would better support risk assessment frameworks and inform the design of safer materials. https://doi.org/10.32942/X2C96D Life Sciences ecotoxicology, explainable artificial intelligence, predictive modeling, microplastic properties, risk assessment Published: 2026-03-23 11:06 Last Updated: 2026-03-23 11:06 CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Data and Code Availability Statement: All data and code will be made publicly available upon publication. Language: English

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-05-20T01:45:00.602351+00:00